President Trump announces military strikes on Iran: Operation Epic Fury

255,014 Views | 4665 Replies | Last: 10 hrs ago by Realitybites
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:09p, 4/4/26
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:09p, 4/4/26
Reply Quote
D. C. Bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FLBear5630 • 1:29p, 4/4/26
FLBear5630 said:
whiterock said:
boognish_bear said:

the only failure in his post is himself. He's already been removed from the equation, so no risk of doubling down at all.

Many agree with him.


Joe Kent is a crazy as an outhouse rat. Right down the "Charlie Kirk was killed by Jews" rabbit hole. How can I trust his Iran analysis when he comes up with this crap?
Reply Quote
The_barBEARian
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to D. C. Bear • 1:36p, 4/4/26
D. C. Bear said:
FLBear5630 said:
whiterock said:
boognish_bear said:

the only failure in his post is himself. He's already been removed from the equation, so no risk of doubling down at all.

Many agree with him.


Joe Kent is a crazy as an outhouse rat. Right down the "Charlie Kirk was killed by Jews" rabbit hole. How can I trust his Iran analysis when he comes up with this crap?


Jesus Christ... you are such a Boomer.
Reply Quote
D. C. Bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to The_barBEARian • 1:38p, 4/4/26
The_barBEARian said:
D. C. Bear said:
FLBear5630 said:
whiterock said:
boognish_bear said:

the only failure in his post is himself. He's already been removed from the equation, so no risk of doubling down at all.

Many agree with him.


Joe Kent is a crazy as an outhouse rat. Right down the "Charlie Kirk was killed by Jews" rabbit hole. How can I trust his Iran analysis when he comes up with this crap?


Jesus Christ... you are such a Boomer.


I'm not Jesus Christ, and I am not a Boomer, but even if I had been born between 1946 and 1964, Joe Kent would still be as crazy as an outhouse rat.
Reply Quote
1 edit
BellCountyBear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to The_barBEARian • 2:08p, 4/4/26
The_barBEARian said:
D. C. Bear said:
FLBear5630 said:
whiterock said:
boognish_bear said:

the only failure in his post is himself. He's already been removed from the equation, so no risk of doubling down at all.

Many agree with him.


Joe Kent is a crazy as an outhouse rat. Right down the "Charlie Kirk was killed by Jews" rabbit hole. How can I trust his Iran analysis when he comes up with this crap?


Jesus Christ... you are such a Boomer.

Mohammed, you are such an idiot.
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:09p, 4/4/26
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:55p, 4/4/26
Reply Quote
FLBear5630
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to D. C. Bear • 4:10p, 4/4/26
D. C. Bear said:
FLBear5630 said:
whiterock said:
boognish_bear said:

the only failure in his post is himself. He's already been removed from the equation, so no risk of doubling down at all.

Many agree with him.


Joe Kent is a crazy as an outhouse rat. Right down the "Charlie Kirk was killed by Jews" rabbit hole. How can I trust his Iran analysis when he comes up with this crap?

I have no idea about the Kirk stuff.

I do know he served 11 combat tours over there and knows security. He also had access to intel we don't. He is more knowledgeable than anyone on this Board and what he says is consistent with what our position has been for 50 years.

The outlier here is not Kent, it is the Trump decision and Hegseth desire to do this. All of a sudden this can't wait? After 50 years and 25 of them trying to build a bomb? After we obliterated their nuclear operation.

Kent is not the one that should be questioned, why now? Bibi?????
Reply Quote
D. C. Bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FLBear5630 • 4:34p, 4/4/26
FLBear5630 said:
D. C. Bear said:
FLBear5630 said:
whiterock said:
boognish_bear said:

the only failure in his post is himself. He's already been removed from the equation, so no risk of doubling down at all.

Many agree with him.


Joe Kent is a crazy as an outhouse rat. Right down the "Charlie Kirk was killed by Jews" rabbit hole. How can I trust his Iran analysis when he comes up with this crap?

I have no idea about the Kirk stuff.

I do know he served 11 combat tours over there and knows security. He also had access to intel we don't. He is more knowledgeable than anyone on this Board and what he says is consistent with what our position has been for 50 years.

The outlier here is not Kent, it is the Trump decision and Hegseth desire to do this. All of a sudden this can't wait? After 50 years and 25 of them trying to build a bomb? After we obliterated their nuclear operation.

Kent is not the one that should be questioned, why now? Bibi?????


Neither does Kent.

Makes me wonder about all of his "analysis."

Kind of like of someone seems to be making sense and then they say that Jeb Bush was behind 9/11.
Reply Quote
FLBear5630
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to D. C. Bear • 4:36p, 4/4/26
D. C. Bear said:
FLBear5630 said:
D. C. Bear said:
FLBear5630 said:
whiterock said:
boognish_bear said:

the only failure in his post is himself. He's already been removed from the equation, so no risk of doubling down at all.

Many agree with him.


Joe Kent is a crazy as an outhouse rat. Right down the "Charlie Kirk was killed by Jews" rabbit hole. How can I trust his Iran analysis when he comes up with this crap?

I have no idea about the Kirk stuff.

I do know he served 11 combat tours over there and knows security. He also had access to intel we don't. He is more knowledgeable than anyone on this Board and what he says is consistent with what our position has been for 50 years.

The outlier here is not Kent, it is the Trump decision and Hegseth desire to do this. All of a sudden this can't wait? After 50 years and 25 of them trying to build a bomb? After we obliterated their nuclear operation.

Kent is not the one that should be questioned, why now? Bibi?????


Neither does Kent.

Makes me wonder about all of his "analysis."

Kind of like of someone seems to be making sense and then they say that Jeb Bush was behind 9/11.

I didn't know who Kirk was until he was killed. Wrong person on that front!
Reply Quote
Realitybites
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FLBear5630 • 4:40p, 4/4/26
FLBear5630 said:
D. C. Bear said:
FLBear5630 said:
whiterock said:
boognish_bear said:

the only failure in his post is himself. He's already been removed from the equation, so no risk of doubling down at all.

Many agree with him.


Joe Kent is a crazy as an outhouse rat. Right down the "Charlie Kirk was killed by Jews" rabbit hole. How can I trust his Iran analysis when he comes up with this crap?

I have no idea about the Kirk stuff.

I do know he served 11 combat tours over there and knows security. He also had access to intel we don't. He is more knowledgeable than anyone on this Board and what he says is consistent with what our position has been for 50 years.

The outlier here is not Kent, it is the Trump decision and Hegseth desire to do this. All of a sudden this can't wait? After 50 years and 25 of them trying to build a bomb? After we obliterated their nuclear operation.

Kent is not the one that should be questioned, why now? Bibi?????


I'm pretty sure about two things.

(1) Charlie Kirk's assassin wasn't some random ****** that decided to kill him and acted without outside assistance/ties.

(2) The "text message" sequence released by the FBI without timestamps. There's not a person under 70 who is going to communicate with others using that bit of AI generated grammar, much less on text messages.

Was the Mossad pulling his strings? Maybe. Was it Antifa? Maybe. The Feds? Also possible. But *someone* was.
Reply Quote
1 edit
FLBear5630
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Realitybites • 4:49p, 4/4/26
Realitybites said:
FLBear5630 said:
D. C. Bear said:
FLBear5630 said:
whiterock said:
boognish_bear said:

the only failure in his post is himself. He's already been removed from the equation, so no risk of doubling down at all.

Many agree with him.


Joe Kent is a crazy as an outhouse rat. Right down the "Charlie Kirk was killed by Jews" rabbit hole. How can I trust his Iran analysis when he comes up with this crap?

I have no idea about the Kirk stuff.

I do know he served 11 combat tours over there and knows security. He also had access to intel we don't. He is more knowledgeable than anyone on this Board and what he says is consistent with what our position has been for 50 years.

The outlier here is not Kent, it is the Trump decision and Hegseth desire to do this. All of a sudden this can't wait? After 50 years and 25 of them trying to build a bomb? After we obliterated their nuclear operation.

Kent is not the one that should be questioned, why now? Bibi?????


I'm pretty sure about two things.

(1) Charlie Kirk's assassin wasn't some random ****** that decided to kill him and acted without outside assistance/ties.

(2) The "text message" sequence released by the FBI without timestamps. There's not a person under 70 who is going to communicate with others using that bit of AI generated grammar, much less on text messages.

Was the Mossad pulling his strings? Maybe. Was it Antifa? Maybe. The Feds? Also possible. But *someone* was.

Well, there is a bunch of Israel stuff last few years. Maybe Kent is not so crazy?
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:08p, 4/4/26
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:17p, 4/4/26
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:29p, 4/4/26
Reply Quote
Oldbear83
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FLBear5630 • 5:36p, 4/4/26
You had a pretty good post, right up to when you decided to blame da joooos
Reply Quote
FLBear5630
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Oldbear83 • 5:47p, 4/4/26
Oldbear83 said:
You had a pretty good post, right up to when you decided to blame da joooos

No, not the Jews. Bibi. There is a difference. Why else are we in Iran?
Reply Quote
Oldbear83
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FLBear5630 • 5:50p, 4/4/26
FLBear5630 said:
Oldbear83 said:
You had a pretty good post, right up to when you decided to blame da joooos

No, not the Jews. Bibi. There is a difference. Why else are we in Iran?

Talk to your doctor about your meds. You seem to be conflating anti-semitic conspiracies with actual events.

Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:29p, 4/4/26
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:55p, 4/4/26
This has got to be a new record for how many times a war has been won. I think we have won this war at least once a week since it started.

Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:01p, 4/4/26
Sure as hell hope this report is true

Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:07p, 4/4/26
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:36p, 4/4/26




Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:36p, 4/4/26
Reply Quote
Porteroso
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to whiterock • 8:09p, 4/4/26
whiterock said:
Porteroso said:
whiterock said:
ATL Bear said:
whiterock said:
ATL Bear said:
Oldbear83 said:
ATL Bear said:
Air Superiority was never in question even before the conflict started. Its relevance to victory completely depends upon how you define it (victory). Welcome to asymmetric war.

We certainly see how some here hang on every rumor, hoping they can crow about American losses.

My son is in the process of becoming a Marine officer, so you can **** right off with that sentiment you miserable sycophant.

My daughter is an Air Force officer directly involved in the airlift for this operation, so why don't you lighten up, Francis.

Why do you want Americans to die?

I want the mullah regime to die and am not in the least bit amused with those who are trying to undermine the effort to make that happen by romancing discontent of actions they do not even care to try to understand. I participated in the quiet part of the front-end of our 47-yr long war that Iran has waged against us, against both Iran and Hizballah. I now have an offspring invested in the hot end that war, comfortably within range of Iranian missiles. She's going to get to be there when it finishes, like I was with the Cold War. So....lighten up, Francis. This thing is going to take a minute to resolve. We are the side engaging in asymmetrical warfare, dictating virtually every aspect of the battle and denouement approaches. Iran's "Seoul Hostage Problem" is over. They are not going to be able to use conventional deterrence to shield their pursuit of nukes. Sit down, shut up, watch & learn.


What if we leave while they are still enriching uranium? Will you sit down and shut up?

Silly false dilemma. They are not currently enriching uranium. Their equipment has been destroyed. Will take them years to get back to where they were a year ago.

They don't have the equipment to enrich at any of their backup sites? I've never read that.
Reply Quote
FLBear5630
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Oldbear83 • 8:27p, 4/4/26
Oldbear83 said:
FLBear5630 said:
Oldbear83 said:
You had a pretty good post, right up to when you decided to blame da joooos

No, not the Jews. Bibi. There is a difference. Why else are we in Iran?

Talk to your doctor about your meds. You seem to be conflating anti-semitic conspiracies with actual events.



Yawn, you can do better than that.

Specifically said not Jews, but BiBi.
Reply Quote
Oldbear83
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Porteroso • 8:29p, 4/4/26
Porteroso said:
whiterock said:
Porteroso said:
whiterock said:
ATL Bear said:
whiterock said:
ATL Bear said:
Oldbear83 said:
ATL Bear said:
Air Superiority was never in question even before the conflict started. Its relevance to victory completely depends upon how you define it (victory). Welcome to asymmetric war.

We certainly see how some here hang on every rumor, hoping they can crow about American losses.

My son is in the process of becoming a Marine officer, so you can **** right off with that sentiment you miserable sycophant.

My daughter is an Air Force officer directly involved in the airlift for this operation, so why don't you lighten up, Francis.

Why do you want Americans to die?

I want the mullah regime to die and am not in the least bit amused with those who are trying to undermine the effort to make that happen by romancing discontent of actions they do not even care to try to understand. I participated in the quiet part of the front-end of our 47-yr long war that Iran has waged against us, against both Iran and Hizballah. I now have an offspring invested in the hot end that war, comfortably within range of Iranian missiles. She's going to get to be there when it finishes, like I was with the Cold War. So....lighten up, Francis. This thing is going to take a minute to resolve. We are the side engaging in asymmetrical warfare, dictating virtually every aspect of the battle and denouement approaches. Iran's "Seoul Hostage Problem" is over. They are not going to be able to use conventional deterrence to shield their pursuit of nukes. Sit down, shut up, watch & learn.


What if we leave while they are still enriching uranium? Will you sit down and shut up?

Silly false dilemma. They are not currently enriching uranium. Their equipment has been destroyed. Will take them years to get back to where they were a year ago.

They don't have the equipment to enrich at any of their backup sites? I've never read that.

Well, first of all the US hit three major nuclear sites last year, not just Natanz. Iran does not exactly have a lot of facilities to work on uranium enrichment just now.

Also, a friend of mine with DOE experience was laughing when I asked about Iran's enrichment levels.

'Did you notice how they always say they are at 60% enrichment just days after they get hit?'

I asked what he meant, and he explained that's a standard public statement the Iranians want to sell, because 60% enrichment is the level needed to make a crude bomb. Iran very badly wants everyone to believe they can at least make a little nuke, something in the 50kt range at least.

'Actually building a viable nuclear weapon, that's a big ask.' he explained.

'Everyone will know if you reach the 92+% enrichment level needed to make a high-yield weapon, because there are signs. 60% they can claim because it's not so clear.

'No, I won't tell you what they are, but one thing the Iranians would do if they got to that point, is to have a test, because they know damn well the Americans, the Russians and China, everyone would know they could make one.

'Iran has other problems besides enrichment. Everyone focuses on enrichment, because Iran wants a big bomb, and if we prevent enrichment there is no bomb.

'But there are other things needed, and between the US and Israel, those things have been destroyed.

'Iran wants to be seen as credible, and wants to damage US credibility in being able to prevent uranium enrichment.'

Note: Discussion paraphrased, no names are provided, nor are means/methods discussed, for obvious reasons.

Reply Quote
1 edit
Oldbear83
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FLBear5630 • 8:31p, 4/4/26
FLBear5630 said:
Oldbear83 said:
FLBear5630 said:
Oldbear83 said:
You had a pretty good post, right up to when you decided to blame da joooos

No, not the Jews. Bibi. There is a difference. Why else are we in Iran?

Talk to your doctor about your meds. You seem to be conflating anti-semitic conspiracies with actual events.



Yawn, you can do better than that.

Specifically said not Jews, but BiBi.

Show me proof we did all this because 'Bibi'.

And if you are yawning, it sounds like your brain is not working full speed.
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:38p, 4/4/26
Reply Quote
303Bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to boognish_bear • 8:51p, 4/4/26
boognish_bear said:


So when is this internal uprising of disaffected and oppressed Iranian going to rise up and take back the country?

At this point we have killed the top [insert number here] officials multiple times per reports. Realizing there are multi-layer succession plans in place, this much shuffling must still have a destabilizing effect that could be exploited if there were actually an opposition ready to exploit it.
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:51p, 4/4/26
OK… I think the rescue is legit

Reply Quote
LIB,MR BEARS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:19a, 4/5/26
Legit

Reply Quote
william
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:11a, 4/5/26
glad he is out......

- UF

... good team work US Mil. dudes.

{ sipping covfefe }

{ eating donut }

D!

pro ecclesia, pro javelina
Reply Quote
1 edit
whiterock
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:16a, 4/5/26
Best report I've seen.

Reply Quote
First Page Last Page
Page 91 of 134 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.