T Mobile opened a new tech hub in India. They then laid off Americans, spent $81.5M on H-1B Visa salaries and got a new Indian CEO
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) April 6, 2026
The even sent Americans over to India to train the new Indian workers to replace them
“T-Mobile USA could have easily opened up this technology hub… pic.twitter.com/Nb96Cwotfp
Texas White Flight?
16,993 Views |
228 Replies |
Last: 14 hrs ago by canoso
Mitch Blood Green said:curtpenn said:Mitch Blood Green said:The_barBEARian said:
Free exercise of religion is an absolute American assimilation. I don't see how that's any different than churches that do live venomous snake handling in their service.
Neither is for me. Both are constitutionally protected.
Islam delenda est. It's not just a religion.
It is. It's also odd to me that the Indians in North Texas get associated with Muslims. Some may be Muslim but most of these people are not.
Again, not my jam but if we want Christianity forced into the public square, others forms of worship come with it.
It's not.
Republic Day marks the date India officially became a constitutional republic.
— Greg Abbott (@GregAbbott_TX) January 26, 2024
It's an honor to be in New Delhi to celebrate America's largest democratic ally.
India will always have a friend in Texas. pic.twitter.com/9glpu8HvP4
Mitch Blood Green said:curtpenn said:Mitch Blood Green said:The_barBEARian said:
Free exercise of religion is an absolute American assimilation. I don't see how that's any different than churches that do live venomous snake handling in their service.
Neither is for me. Both are constitutionally protected.
Islam delenda est. It's not just a religion.
Again, not my jam but if we want Christianity forced into the public square, others forms of worship come with it.
So we have to force religion out of the public square and into the closet..
And let radical secular liberalism dominate the public sphere and all manner of educational & public-shared institutions.
Funny…I don't remember reading that in the Declaration of independence, the Constitution of the United States, or any of our founding documents or State Constitutions
Redbrickbear said:Mitch Blood Green said:curtpenn said:Mitch Blood Green said:The_barBEARian said:
Free exercise of religion is an absolute American assimilation. I don't see how that's any different than churches that do live venomous snake handling in their service.
Neither is for me. Both are constitutionally protected.
Islam delenda est. It's not just a religion.
Again, not my jam but if we want Christianity forced into the public square, others forms of worship come with it.
So we have to force religion out of the public square and into the closet..
And let radical secular liberalism dominate the public sphere and all manner of educational & public-shared institutions.
Funny…I don't remember reading that in the Declaration of independence, the Constitution of the United States, or any of our founding documents or State Constitutions
No. You have to accept that all religions are treated equally under the law. We can't prioritize one over the other.
Mitch Blood Green said:Redbrickbear said:Mitch Blood Green said:curtpenn said:Mitch Blood Green said:The_barBEARian said:
Free exercise of religion is an absolute American assimilation. I don't see how that's any different than churches that do live venomous snake handling in their service.
Neither is for me. Both are constitutionally protected.
Islam delenda est. It's not just a religion.
Again, not my jam but if we want Christianity forced into the public square, others forms of worship come with it.
So we have to force religion out of the public square and into the closet..
And let radical secular liberalism dominate the public sphere and all manner of educational & public-shared institutions.
Funny…I don't remember reading that in the Declaration of independence, the Constitution of the United States, or any of our founding documents or State Constitutions
No. You have to accept that all religions are treated equally under the law. We can't prioritize one over the other.
Then you have to accept that people don't lose their right to practice their faith at the school house door or in the public square
Despite what you might think there is no Constitutional right to force religion into the closet…or a requirement to force secular liberalism on immigrants or natives
Redbrickbear said:Mitch Blood Green said:Redbrickbear said:Mitch Blood Green said:curtpenn said:Mitch Blood Green said:The_barBEARian said:
Free exercise of religion is an absolute American assimilation. I don't see how that's any different than churches that do live venomous snake handling in their service.
Neither is for me. Both are constitutionally protected.
Islam delenda est. It's not just a religion.
Again, not my jam but if we want Christianity forced into the public square, others forms of worship come with it.
So we have to force religion out of the public square and into the closet..
And let radical secular liberalism dominate the public sphere and all manner of educational & public-shared institutions.
Funny…I don't remember reading that in the Declaration of independence, the Constitution of the United States, or any of our founding documents or State Constitutions
No. You have to accept that all religions are treated equally under the law. We can't prioritize one over the other.
Then you have to accept that people don't lose their right to practice their faith at the school house door or in the public square
Despite what you might think there is no Constitutional right to force religion into the closet…or a requirement to force secular liberalism on immigrants or natives
It doesn't matter to me. I remember it always being that way. As a kid, the Jewish kids were Jewish, and the Jehovah's Witnesses were Jehovah's Witnesses. We didn't have the state put the Ten Commandments in each classroom. It was ok.
🚨 FRISCO, TEXAS 🚨An Indian resident says the U.S. is “stolen land” and defends the influx of Hindu Indians through the H-1B visa program. She also argues that America is an economic zone. Why is a Republican county allowing this demographic collapse? pic.twitter.com/KX8W3JN5Gk
— Carlos Turcios (@Carlos__Turcios) April 8, 2026
DAC said:Mitch Blood Green said:curtpenn said:Mitch Blood Green said:The_barBEARian said:
Free exercise of religion is an absolute American assimilation. I don't see how that's any different than churches that do live venomous snake handling in their service.
Neither is for me. Both are constitutionally protected.
Islam delenda est. It's not just a religion.
It is. It's also odd to me that the Indians in North Texas get associated with Muslims. Some may be Muslim but most of these people are not.
They look the same and sound the same
Hello, racism. AKA blacks all look alike. It's not that people actually look the sameit's that when you haven't had meaningful exposure or attention to individuals from another group, your brain gets less practiced at distinguishing faces in that group. Over time, that can turn into a harmful generalization as you did here..
Waco1947
Mitch Blood Green said:Redbrickbear said:Mitch Blood Green said:Redbrickbear said:Mitch Blood Green said:curtpenn said:Mitch Blood Green said:The_barBEARian said:
Free exercise of religion is an absolute American assimilation. I don't see how that's any different than churches that do live venomous snake handling in their service.
Neither is for me. Both are constitutionally protected.
Islam delenda est. It's not just a religion.
Again, not my jam but if we want Christianity forced into the public square, others forms of worship come with it.
So we have to force religion out of the public square and into the closet..
And let radical secular liberalism dominate the public sphere and all manner of educational & public-shared institutions.
Funny…I don't remember reading that in the Declaration of independence, the Constitution of the United States, or any of our founding documents or State Constitutions
No. You have to accept that all religions are treated equally under the law. We can't prioritize one over the other.
Then you have to accept that people don't lose their right to practice their faith at the school house door or in the public square
Despite what you might think there is no Constitutional right to force religion into the closet…or a requirement to force secular liberalism on immigrants or natives
It doesn't matter to me. I remember it always being that way. As a kid, the Jewish kids were Jewish, and the Jehovah's Witnesses were Jehovah's Witnesses. We didn't have the state put the Ten Commandments in each classroom. It was ok.
You have every right to critique government involvement in the schools (but they are public government run after all)
But we threw out religion from the public institutions in the 1960s (without democratic consent by the way)
And replaced it with a new religion (or moral-faith system)
We don't have blank slate institutions and we never will
“Liberalism is a species of post-Christian religion, yet a religion incapable of recognising its true nature: arrogance masquerading as altruism and dogmatic certainty disguised as open-mindedness.”
— Mark W. (@DurhamWASP) April 7, 2026
Maurice Cowling pic.twitter.com/uOjmPGPE7j
Redbrickbear said:Mitch Blood Green said:Redbrickbear said:Mitch Blood Green said:Redbrickbear said:Mitch Blood Green said:curtpenn said:Mitch Blood Green said:The_barBEARian said:
ion on every
Free exercise of religion is an absolute American assimilation. I don't see how that's any different than churches that do live venomous snake handling in their service.
Neither is for me. Both are constitutionally protected.
Islam delenda est. It's not just a religion.
Again, not my jam but if we want Christianity forced into the public square, others forms of worship come with it.
So we have to force religion out of the public square and into the closet..
And let radical secular liberalism dominate the public sphere and all manner of educational & public-shared institutions.
Funny…I don't remember reading that in the Declaration of independence, the Constitution of the United States, or any of our founding documents or State Constitutions
No. You have to accept that all religions are treated equally under the law. We can't prioritize one over the other.
Then you have to accept that people don't lose their right to practice their faith at the school house door or in the public square
Despite what you might think there is no Constitutional right to force religion into the closet…or a requirement to force secular liberalism on immigrants or natives
It doesn't matter to me. I remember it always being that way. As a kid, the Jewish kids were Jewish, and the Jehovah's Witnesses were Jehovah's Witnesses. We didn't have the state put the Ten Commandments in each classroom. It was ok.
You have every right to critique government involvement in the schools (but they are public governments run after all)
But we threw out religion from the public institutions in the 1960s (without democratic concent by the way)
And replaced it with a new religion (or moral-faith system)
We don't have blank slate institutions and we never will“Liberalism is a species of post-Christian religion, yet a religion incapable of recognising its true nature: arrogance masquerading as altruism and dogmatic certainty disguised as open-mindedness.”
— Mark W. (@DurhamWASP) April 7, 2026
Maurice Cowling pic.twitter.com/uOjmPGPE7j
We didn't throw religion out of schools. We stopped authorities from forcing their version of religion onto the rest of us.
I was once on a plane from Dallas to Pittsburgh, sitting next to a Jehovah's Witness. For three hours, he Watch Towered the hell out of me. (Full Flight), ignoring my multiple requests to leave me alone. How is that fair in a school setting?
Imagine I'm your son's Muslim Football coach. Would you think it's ok if I Allah'd him to death for playing time?
Mitch Blood Green said:Redbrickbear said:Mitch Blood Green said:Redbrickbear said:Mitch Blood Green said:Redbrickbear said:Mitch Blood Green said:curtpenn said:Mitch Blood Green said:The_barBEARian said:
ion on every
Free exercise of religion is an absolute American assimilation. I don't see how that's any different than churches that do live venomous snake handling in their service.
Neither is for me. Both are constitutionally protected.
Islam delenda est. It's not just a religion.
Again, not my jam but if we want Christianity forced into the public square, others forms of worship come with it.
So we have to force religion out of the public square and into the closet..
And let radical secular liberalism dominate the public sphere and all manner of educational & public-shared institutions.
Funny…I don't remember reading that in the Declaration of independence, the Constitution of the United States, or any of our founding documents or State Constitutions
No. You have to accept that all religions are treated equally under the law. We can't prioritize one over the other.
Then you have to accept that people don't lose their right to practice their faith at the school house door or in the public square
Despite what you might think there is no Constitutional right to force religion into the closet…or a requirement to force secular liberalism on immigrants or natives
It doesn't matter to me. I remember it always being that way. As a kid, the Jewish kids were Jewish, and the Jehovah's Witnesses were Jehovah's Witnesses. We didn't have the state put the Ten Commandments in each classroom. It was ok.
You have every right to critique government involvement in the schools (but they are public governments run after all)
But we threw out religion from the public institutions in the 1960s (without democratic concent by the way)
And replaced it with a new religion (or moral-faith system)
We don't have blank slate institutions and we never will“Liberalism is a species of post-Christian religion, yet a religion incapable of recognising its true nature: arrogance masquerading as altruism and dogmatic certainty disguised as open-mindedness.”
— Mark W. (@DurhamWASP) April 7, 2026
Maurice Cowling pic.twitter.com/uOjmPGPE7j
We didn't throw religion out of schools. We stopped authorities from forcing their version of religion onto the rest of us.
And thus forcing a form of liberal secular belief system on everyone.
You don't see they replaced one religious system with another...
Also, important to note did it without democratic consent and via judicial legislating from the bench. Nuking local citizens decisions about what their tax payer supported public schools could teach.
"Until 1963, a unifying form of religion was taught in schools, giving all American children a common cultural and moral framework....nonsectarianism...teaching from the Bible as a moral guide...the US Supreme Court essentially banned nonsectarianism in 1963" pic.twitter.com/Fc5YtRc6ux
— Rob Henderson (@robkhenderson) February 9, 2026
And thus "forcing" a form of liberal secular belief system on everyone.
No forcing at all
No forcing at all
Waco1947
Waco1947 said:
And thus "forcing" a form of liberal secular belief system on everyone.
No forcing at all
It is the nature of k-12 education, whatever the topic. Yes, absolutely forcing.
Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free.
Waco1947
Waco1947 said:
Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free.
And liberal free.
Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
And DEI free
Waco1947 said:
Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free.
A secularism that has the traits of religious dogma.
This is happening in Princeton, Texas. Your lakes are being polluted. Why is this being allowed in Texas??? pic.twitter.com/IVHIJFGG5P
— Carlos Turcios (@Carlos__Turcios) April 11, 2026
schools aren't teaching secularismD. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:
Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free.
A secularism that has the traits of religious dogma.
Waco1947
Waco1947 said:schools aren't teaching secularismD. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:
Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free.
A secularism that has the traits of religious dogma.
When was the last time you were in a school?
Remember. I made Texas one of only two states to halt state agencies and universities from using H1B visas.
— Greg Abbott (@GregAbbott_TX) April 11, 2026
We are thoroughly investigating abuses and potential fraud in the program.
Remember also that it’s the feds not the states that authorize them. We need the feds to stop…
D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:
Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free.
A secularism that has the traits of religious dogma.
schools aren't teaching secularism
When was the last time you were in a school?
I talk to teachers. They laugh at that silliness. They are simply to control a classroom and move them forward in the basics for education. You still have not defined secularism What is it and how do you teach?
Waco1947
Waco1947 said:schools aren't teaching secularismD. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:
Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free.
A secularism that has the traits of religious dogma.
You two statements above, "Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free."
and…
"schools aren't teaching secularism."
are really not compatible with each other.
🚨H.E.B. = H-1B SCANDAL: NO HALAL IN TEXAS
— Dust & Hustle (@dust_hustle) April 13, 2026
Texas-based H-E-B filed 47 H-1B Labor Condition Applications in FY2025 (and 17 more already in 2026), sponsoring foreign workers for corporate roles while American graduates and veterans are passed over.
At the same time, their new… pic.twitter.com/NpUUt7kiM3
D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:
Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free.
A secularism that has the traits of religious dogma.
schools aren't teaching secularism
You two statements above, "Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free."
and…
"schools aren't teaching secularism."
are really not compatible with each other.
You did not answer the question what are the specifics of securalism tthat teachers teach?
Waco1947
Waco1947 said:D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:
Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free.
A secularism that has the traits of religious dogma.
schools aren't teaching secularism
You two statements above, "Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free."
and…
"schools aren't teaching secularism."
are really not compatible with each other.
You did not answer the question what are the specifics of securalism tthat teachers teach?
Since you said that schools are secular and not religious, maybe you should answer your own question. It does not seem to be a point of disagreement.
#NotSatire
— National Conservative (@NatCon2022) April 14, 2026
A Pakistani woman, Shabana Mahmood, has stripped a native British man of his British citizenship. First time in British history.
Mark Bullen lives in St. Petersburg with his Russian wife and works for FC Zenit Saint Petersburg. He was a British cop for 11 years. pic.twitter.com/ivVlquJkd1
stay focused. It's your assertionD. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:
Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free.
A secularism that has the traits of religious dogma.
schools aren't teaching secularism
You two statements above, "Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free."
and…
"schools aren't teaching secularism."
are really not compatible with each other.
You did not answer the question what are the specifics of securalism tthat teachers teach?
Since you said that schools are secular and not religious, maybe you should answer your own question. It does not seem to be a point of disagreement.
Waco1947
AMERICA HAS BEEN HIJACKED.
— Neon White Rabbit (@RedPillRabbit) April 17, 2026
Indian CEOs are state actors for India, working to DESTROY the US while STEALING our jobs and companies for their people in INDIA.
This is a NATIONAL SECURITY ISSUE. pic.twitter.com/RsAIqUvJjx
I think this is really simple. No religion in public schools, period. If you would like a religious school for your kids, it is available to you. Christian, Yeshiva, Muslim, ect.
J.R. said:
I think this is really simple. No religion in public schools, period. If you would like a religious school for your kids, it is available to you. Christian, Yeshiva, Muslim, ect.
Based on the law of the instrument, it would make sense that you would think that it is "really simple."
Waco1947 said:stay focused. It's your assertionD. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:
Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free.
A secularism that has the traits of religious dogma.
schools aren't teaching secularism
You two statements above, "Of course, it's secular because schools should be religion-free."
and…
"schools aren't teaching secularism."
are really not compatible with each other.
You did not answer the question what are the specifics of securalism tthat teachers teach?
Since you said that schools are secular and not religious, maybe you should answer your own question. It does not seem to be a point of disagreement.
You said schools are secular.
That's your assessment.
Texas A&M University (@TAMU) just hired an H-1B "Operations Research and Reporting Analyst"
— Chris Brunet (@chrisbrunet) April 18, 2026
Salary: $57,262
The TAMU employee in charge of facilitating this hire was Sahar Zubairy, Senior Immigration Coordinator pic.twitter.com/ETQYISDmsc