Redbrickbear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Being homosexual doesn't send you to hell, being heterosexual doesn't send you to heaven

---

True.

It's also true that one is natural form of sexuality encouraged by Christian doctrine and practice.

And the other is a unnatural fundamentally disordered form of sexuality rightfully condemned by Christian doctrine and practice.

---

Are oral sex and anal sex ok in a heterosexual marriage? How about outside of marriage? Or are they deviant or natural forms of behavior in Christian doctrine and practice?

---

yes oral, no anal, no sex outside of marriage..

As your science shows, hormones create a connection during sexual experience in two ways, the first one is the thrill dopamine, the second is oxytocin

Instead of strengthening bonds between a husband and wife, people are jumping from person to person in short relationships or one night stands when the dopamine thrill is gone and the oxytocin bond didnt form.

Science proves Gods design of one woman and one man forever

---

Why do you think oral is ok and anal is not?

According to lore, the god of Abraham approves of multiple wives and concubines for Jews, Muslims, and some Christians. Heavenly Father gave permission to the Mormons. God gave multiple indigenous religions permission for multiple wives. *** But not multiple husbands so much. That really irks him.

I'm not familiar with any scientific research the proves your preposterous claim. For one thing there has to be a god to make that assertion, a forever, and premise that can be the subject of a scientific study.

---

anal sex poses serious medical risks, including bacterial and viral infections of the vagina, *****, rectum, and anus. Also, rectal tissue is more delicate and vulnerable to tearing and abrasion than vaginal tissue.

Science is why I am against it. Years in the healthcare field is why I am against it.

The God that I pray to believes in one man and one woman forever. The rest of your post is whataboutism that isnt applicable.

the correlation between the increase in premarital sex / sex for fun only and the increase in mental health issues isnt a coincidence.

---

..Vaginal intercourse has multiple health risks associated with it including the risk of pregnancy.

---

That is not a "health risk"

That is the literally purpose of sex

---

4th and Inches said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Being homosexual doesn't send you to hell, being heterosexual doesn't send you to heaven

---

True.

It's also true that one is natural form of sexuality encouraged by Christian doctrine and practice.

And the other is a unnatural fundamentally disordered form of sexuality rightfully condemned by Christian doctrine and practice.

---

Are oral sex and anal sex ok in a heterosexual marriage? How about outside of marriage? Or are they deviant or natural forms of behavior in Christian doctrine and practice?

---

yes oral, no anal, no sex outside of marriage..

As your science shows, hormones create a connection during sexual experience in two ways, the first one is the thrill dopamine, the second is oxytocin

Instead of strengthening bonds between a husband and wife, people are jumping from person to person in short relationships or one night stands when the dopamine thrill is gone and the oxytocin bond didnt form.

Science proves Gods design of one woman and one man forever

---

Why do you think oral is ok and anal is not?

According to lore, the god of Abraham approves of multiple wives and concubines for Jews, Muslims, and some Christians. Heavenly Father gave permission to the Mormons. God gave multiple indigenous religions permission for multiple wives. *** But not multiple husbands so much. That really irks him.

I'm not familiar with any scientific research the proves your preposterous claim. For one thing there has to be a god to make that assertion, a forever, and premise that can be the subject of a scientific study.

---

anal sex poses serious medical risks, including bacterial and viral infections of the vagina, *****, rectum, and anus. Also, rectal tissue is more delicate and vulnerable to tearing and abrasion than vaginal tissue.

Science is why I am against it. Years in the healthcare field is why I am against it.

The God that I pray to believes in one man and one woman forever. The rest of your post is whataboutism that isnt applicable.

the correlation between the increase in premarital sex / sex for fun only and the increase in mental health issues isnt a coincidence.

---

Ok, your argument has some validity depending upon the methods used I would think. Similar arguments can be made about vaginal intercourse also. Vaginal intercourse has multiple health risks associated with it including the risk of pregnancy. Oral sex has a host of associated health risks. You're not against either of those, presumably because you enjoy those two activities.

How do you know your god believes that? If it's the god of the Bible, that simply is not true. Granted the Bible is full of contradictory and conflicting primitive lore, but that god allows for multiple wives and concubines.

Please give me empirical objective scientific evidence that supports your claim that premarital sex, or sex for fun is the causation of an increase in mental health issues.

---

2018 study published in Psychological Science revealed that sexual intimacy heightens feelings of attachment and commitment, regardless of the relationship's longevity. When this bond is broken, feelings of rejection, inadequacy, and loss often follow.


This isnt a new thing..

Dr. Armand Nicholi, Jr., clinical professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, describes a study he helped to carry out in the 1960s:
"Not long after the sexual revolution was underway, clinicians observed that the new sexual freedom was creating a psychological disaster. We began to study Harvard students who complained of emptiness and despondency.

"There was a gap between their social conscience and the morality they were practicing in their personal lives. The new sexual permissiveness was leading to empty relationships and feelings of self-contempt. Many of these students were preoccupied with the passing of time and with death. They yearned for meaning, for a moral framework.

"When some of them moved away from moral relativism to a system of clear values typically embracing a drug-free lifestyle and a strict sexual code they reported that their relationships with the opposite sex improved, as did relations with peers in general, relationships with their parents, and their academic performance."

---

• The 2020 Meta-Analysis: A comprehensive review of 71 quantitative articles found that, while individuals often evaluate casual sexual experiences (CSREs) more positively than negatively, there can be short-term declines in emotional health (such as self-esteem or depression) depending on personal attitudes.
• Sexual Well-being Review: A scoping review of over 60 studies consistently found that positive sexual health indicators (regardless of marital status) are associated with lower anxiety, higher quality of life, and greater life satisfaction. [1, 2, 3]

• Longitudinal Evidence: Data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health) shows that early sexual behavior (before age 16) is a predictor for depressive symptoms in the short term for girls, but these effects often do not persist into young adulthood.
• Causal Inference Studies: Researchers using "propensity score methods" (to better isolate cause and effect) found that early sexual initiation did not predict long-term depressive symptoms once other life factors were controlled for. [1, 2, 3]

• Autonomous vs. Non-autonomous: Studies in the Archives of Sexual Behavior (e.g., Vrangalova, 2014) highlight that sex for autonomous reasons (personal desire, fun) is linked to higher self-esteem. In contrast, sex for non-autonomous reasons (peer pressure, seeking validation) is linked to higher depression and anxiety.
• Validation Seeking: Research suggests that when casual sex is used to "cope" with loneliness or misery, it is significantly more likely to lead to negative emotional outcomes. [1, 2, 3]

• The Sexual Double Standard: Evidence suggests that women often experience more regret and social shaming following casual encounters due to societal stigmas, which contributes to higher rates of psychological distress compared to men.
• Value Conflicts: A scoping review found that individuals with high religiosity or those who value "bodily purity" are more likely to experience negative mental health outcomes (like shame or guilt) if they engage in premarital sex because it conflicts with their internal values. [1, 2, 3, 4]

• Anderson et al. (2020). "Emotional Outcomes of Casual Sexual Relationships and Experiences: A Systematic Review." Journal of Sex Research.
• Wesche et al. (2017). "Early sexual initiation and mental health." Journal of Adolescent Health.
• Vasilenko & Lefkowitz (2023). "Sexual Behavior and Health from Adolescence to Adulthood." Advances in Life Course Research.
• Vrangalova (2014). "Does Casual Sex Harm College Students' Well-Being? A Longitudinal Investigation of Self-Determination Theory." Archives of Sexual Behavior.
• Abdullahi & Umar (2013). "Factors associated with premarital sex: A scoping review." Journal of Health Research. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Being homosexual doesn't send you to hell, being heterosexual doesn't send you to heaven

---

True.

It's also true that one is natural form of sexuality encouraged by Christian doctrine and practice.

And the other is a unnatural fundamentally disordered form of sexuality rightfully condemned by Christian doctrine and practice.

---

Are oral sex and anal sex ok in a heterosexual marriage? How about outside of marriage? Or are they deviant or natural forms of behavior in Christian doctrine and practice?

---

yes oral, no anal, no sex outside of marriage..

As your science shows, hormones create a connection during sexual experience in two ways, the first one is the thrill dopamine, the second is oxytocin

Instead of strengthening bonds between a husband and wife, people are jumping from person to person in short relationships or one night stands when the dopamine thrill is gone and the oxytocin bond didnt form.

Science proves Gods design of one woman and one man forever

---

Why do you think oral is ok and anal is not?

According to lore, the god of Abraham approves of multiple wives and concubines for Jews, Muslims, and some Christians. Heavenly Father gave permission to the Mormons. God gave multiple indigenous religions permission for multiple wives. *** But not multiple husbands so much. That really irks him.

I'm not familiar with any scientific research the proves your preposterous claim. For one thing there has to be a god to make that assertion, a forever, and premise that can be the subject of a scientific study.

---

Abraham didn't write scripture. He was just like you, a fallen individual with deceit in his heart.

I thought you knew this stuff prior to walking away from Christ. It seems you're either displaying your lack of knowledge or, you're purposefully misleading.

So did you walk away out of ignorance or, are you of satan?

---

Ancient elders wrote scripture over 500 years, and no God did not watch over every dot and tittle through those 500 years. That's an erroneous faith statement and unprovable. Unless, of course, you engage in circular reasoning where the person says.

---

Tell me about the book of Abraham to which you refer. I'd love to read it.

---

Zondervan: The Old Testament was written gradually over roughly 1,000 years, with composition beginning around 14001200 BC for the earliest parts of the Torah (first five books) and finishing around 400 BC. While oral traditions existed earlier, scholars generally believe formal writing began during this mid-second to mid-first millennium BC period.
Zondervan Academic +2

---

You probably missed the part where I asked you about Abraham Because I have no idea what you are talking about.

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Being homosexual doesn't send you to hell, being heterosexual doesn't send you to heaven

---

True.

It's also true that one is natural form of sexuality encouraged by Christian doctrine and practice.

And the other is a unnatural fundamentally disordered form of sexuality rightfully condemned by Christian doctrine and practice.

---

Are oral sex and anal sex ok in a heterosexual marriage? How about outside of marriage? Or are they deviant or natural forms of behavior in Christian doctrine and practice?

---

yes oral, no anal, no sex outside of marriage..

As your science shows, hormones create a connection during sexual experience in two ways, the first one is the thrill dopamine, the second is oxytocin

Instead of strengthening bonds between a husband and wife, people are jumping from person to person in short relationships or one night stands when the dopamine thrill is gone and the oxytocin bond didnt form.

Science proves Gods design of one woman and one man forever

---

Why do you think oral is ok and anal is not?

According to lore, the god of Abraham approves of multiple wives and concubines for Jews, Muslims, and some Christians. Heavenly Father gave permission to the Mormons. God gave multiple indigenous religions permission for multiple wives. *** But not multiple husbands so much. That really irks him.

I'm not familiar with any scientific research the proves your preposterous claim. For one thing there has to be a god to make that assertion, a forever, and premise that can be the subject of a scientific study.

---

anal sex poses serious medical risks, including bacterial and viral infections of the vagina, *****, rectum, and anus. Also, rectal tissue is more delicate and vulnerable to tearing and abrasion than vaginal tissue.

Science is why I am against it. Years in the healthcare field is why I am against it.

The God that I pray to believes in one man and one woman forever. The rest of your post is whataboutism that isnt applicable.

the correlation between the increase in premarital sex / sex for fun only and the increase in mental health issues isnt a coincidence.

---

..Vaginal intercourse has multiple health risks associated with it including the risk of pregnancy.

---

That is not a "health risk"

That is the literally purpose of sex

---

There is the risk of communicable disease. AIDs, syphilis etc. Maybe you should be screened if your not aware of that.

---

Yet still….Pregnancy is still not a "health risk"

It's not the same category (or planet) as AIDs or a sexual transmitted disease

---

• Maternal Age: Pregnancy under 17 or over 35 increases risks of complications.
• Pre-existing Conditions: High blood pressure, diabetes, autoimmune diseases (lupus), kidney diseases, or heart conditions.
• Pregnancy-Specific Complications: Gestational diabetes, preeclampsia (high blood pressure and protein in urine), placental conditions (placenta previa/abruption), and too much or too little amniotic fluid.
• Lifestyle & Health: Obesity, being underweight, or substance use (alcohol, tobacco, drugs).
• Prior Obstetric History: Previous preterm birth, multiple C-sections, or prior miscarriage.
• Multiple Gestation: Carrying more than one fetus increases the risk of preterm labor and other complications. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]

Redbrickbear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Being homosexual doesn't send you to hell, being heterosexual doesn't send you to heaven

---

True.

It's also true that one is natural form of sexuality encouraged by Christian doctrine and practice.

And the other is a unnatural fundamentally disordered form of sexuality rightfully condemned by Christian doctrine and practice.

---

Are oral sex and anal sex ok in a heterosexual marriage? How about outside of marriage? Or are they deviant or natural forms of behavior in Christian doctrine and practice?

---

yes oral, no anal, no sex outside of marriage..

As your science shows, hormones create a connection during sexual experience in two ways, the first one is the thrill dopamine, the second is oxytocin

Instead of strengthening bonds between a husband and wife, people are jumping from person to person in short relationships or one night stands when the dopamine thrill is gone and the oxytocin bond didnt form.

Science proves Gods design of one woman and one man forever

---

Why do you think oral is ok and anal is not?

According to lore, the god of Abraham approves of multiple wives and concubines for Jews, Muslims, and some Christians. Heavenly Father gave permission to the Mormons. God gave multiple indigenous religions permission for multiple wives. *** But not multiple husbands so much. That really irks him.

I'm not familiar with any scientific research the proves your preposterous claim. For one thing there has to be a god to make that assertion, a forever, and premise that can be the subject of a scientific study.

---

anal sex poses serious medical risks, including bacterial and viral infections of the vagina, *****, rectum, and anus. Also, rectal tissue is more delicate and vulnerable to tearing and abrasion than vaginal tissue.

Science is why I am against it. Years in the healthcare field is why I am against it.

The God that I pray to believes in one man and one woman forever. The rest of your post is whataboutism that isnt applicable.

the correlation between the increase in premarital sex / sex for fun only and the increase in mental health issues isnt a coincidence.

---

..Vaginal intercourse has multiple health risks associated with it including the risk of pregnancy.

---

That is not a "health risk"

That is the literally purpose of sex

---

There is the risk of communicable disease. AIDs, syphilis etc. Maybe you should be screened if your not aware of that.

---

Yet still….Pregnancy is still not a "health risk"

It's not the same category (or planet) as AIDs or a sexual transmitted disease

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Being homosexual doesn't send you to hell, being heterosexual doesn't send you to heaven

---

True.

It's also true that one is natural form of sexuality encouraged by Christian doctrine and practice.

And the other is a unnatural fundamentally disordered form of sexuality rightfully condemned by Christian doctrine and practice.

---

Are oral sex and anal sex ok in a heterosexual marriage? How about outside of marriage? Or are they deviant or natural forms of behavior in Christian doctrine and practice?

---

yes oral, no anal, no sex outside of marriage..

As your science shows, hormones create a connection during sexual experience in two ways, the first one is the thrill dopamine, the second is oxytocin

Instead of strengthening bonds between a husband and wife, people are jumping from person to person in short relationships or one night stands when the dopamine thrill is gone and the oxytocin bond didnt form.

Science proves Gods design of one woman and one man forever

---

Why do you think oral is ok and anal is not?

According to lore, the god of Abraham approves of multiple wives and concubines for Jews, Muslims, and some Christians. Heavenly Father gave permission to the Mormons. God gave multiple indigenous religions permission for multiple wives. *** But not multiple husbands so much. That really irks him.

I'm not familiar with any scientific research the proves your preposterous claim. For one thing there has to be a god to make that assertion, a forever, and premise that can be the subject of a scientific study.

---

anal sex poses serious medical risks, including bacterial and viral infections of the vagina, *****, rectum, and anus. Also, rectal tissue is more delicate and vulnerable to tearing and abrasion than vaginal tissue.

Science is why I am against it. Years in the healthcare field is why I am against it.

The God that I pray to believes in one man and one woman forever. The rest of your post is whataboutism that isnt applicable.

the correlation between the increase in premarital sex / sex for fun only and the increase in mental health issues isnt a coincidence.

---

..Vaginal intercourse has multiple health risks associated with it including the risk of pregnancy.

---

That is not a "health risk"

That is the literally purpose of sex

---

There is the risk of communicable disease. AIDs, syphilis etc. Maybe you should be screened if your not aware of that.

---

Yet still….Pregnancy is still not a "health risk"

It's not the same category (or planet) as AIDs or a sexual transmitted disease

---

Tell that to women who have serious complications, and who have died with pregnancies ...

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Being homosexual doesn't send you to hell, being heterosexual doesn't send you to heaven

---

True.

It's also true that one is natural form of sexuality encouraged by Christian doctrine and practice.

And the other is a unnatural fundamentally disordered form of sexuality rightfully condemned by Christian doctrine and practice.

---

Are oral sex and anal sex ok in a heterosexual marriage? How about outside of marriage? Or are they deviant or natural forms of behavior in Christian doctrine and practice?

---

yes oral, no anal, no sex outside of marriage..

As your science shows, hormones create a connection during sexual experience in two ways, the first one is the thrill dopamine, the second is oxytocin

Instead of strengthening bonds between a husband and wife, people are jumping from person to person in short relationships or one night stands when the dopamine thrill is gone and the oxytocin bond didnt form.

Science proves Gods design of one woman and one man forever

---

Why do you think oral is ok and anal is not?

According to lore, the god of Abraham approves of multiple wives and concubines for Jews, Muslims, and some Christians. Heavenly Father gave permission to the Mormons. God gave multiple indigenous religions permission for multiple wives. *** But not multiple husbands so much. That really irks him.

I'm not familiar with any scientific research the proves your preposterous claim. For one thing there has to be a god to make that assertion, a forever, and premise that can be the subject of a scientific study.

---

anal sex poses serious medical risks, including bacterial and viral infections of the vagina, *****, rectum, and anus. Also, rectal tissue is more delicate and vulnerable to tearing and abrasion than vaginal tissue.

Science is why I am against it. Years in the healthcare field is why I am against it.

The God that I pray to believes in one man and one woman forever. The rest of your post is whataboutism that isnt applicable.

the correlation between the increase in premarital sex / sex for fun only and the increase in mental health issues isnt a coincidence.

---

..Vaginal intercourse has multiple health risks associated with it including the risk of pregnancy.

---

That is not a "health risk"

That is the literally purpose of sex

---

There is the risk of communicable disease. AIDs, syphilis etc. Maybe you should be screened if your not aware of that.

---

Yet still….Pregnancy is still not a "health risk"

It's not the same category (or planet) as AIDs or a sexual transmitted disease

---

Tell that to women who have serious complications, and who have died with pregnancies ...

---

Let's ask the medical community if they define human pregnancy as a "health risk"


[Physiologically, pregnancy is typically defined as a normal, healthy biological state rather than a "health risk" in itself.]

Eating, swallowing, Walking or using the bathroom are normal human biological functions

They are not defined as "health risks" inherently. Though in the course of these acts… accidents or health complications can occur.

But swallowing, eating, or human pregnancy are not defined as "health risks"

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Tell me you have no idea what medical school is for, much less any of the material they study.

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Being homosexual doesn't send you to hell, being heterosexual doesn't send you to heaven

---

True.

It's also true that one is natural form of sexuality encouraged by Christian doctrine and practice.

And the other is a unnatural fundamentally disordered form of sexuality rightfully condemned by Christian doctrine and practice.

---

Are oral sex and anal sex ok in a heterosexual marriage? How about outside of marriage? Or are they deviant or natural forms of behavior in Christian doctrine and practice?

---

yes oral, no anal, no sex outside of marriage..

As your science shows, hormones create a connection during sexual experience in two ways, the first one is the thrill dopamine, the second is oxytocin

Instead of strengthening bonds between a husband and wife, people are jumping from person to person in short relationships or one night stands when the dopamine thrill is gone and the oxytocin bond didnt form.

Science proves Gods design of one woman and one man forever

---

Why do you think oral is ok and anal is not?

According to lore, the god of Abraham approves of multiple wives and concubines for Jews, Muslims, and some Christians. Heavenly Father gave permission to the Mormons. God gave multiple indigenous religions permission for multiple wives. *** But not multiple husbands so much. That really irks him.

I'm not familiar with any scientific research the proves your preposterous claim. For one thing there has to be a god to make that assertion, a forever, and premise that can be the subject of a scientific study.

---

anal sex poses serious medical risks, including bacterial and viral infections of the vagina, *****, rectum, and anus. Also, rectal tissue is more delicate and vulnerable to tearing and abrasion than vaginal tissue.

Science is why I am against it. Years in the healthcare field is why I am against it.

The God that I pray to believes in one man and one woman forever. The rest of your post is whataboutism that isnt applicable.

the correlation between the increase in premarital sex / sex for fun only and the increase in mental health issues isnt a coincidence.

---

..Vaginal intercourse has multiple health risks associated with it including the risk of pregnancy.

---

That is not a "health risk"

That is the literally purpose of sex

---

There is the risk of communicable disease. AIDs, syphilis etc. Maybe you should be screened if your not aware of that.

---

Yet still….Pregnancy is still not a "health risk"

It's not the same category (or planet) as AIDs or a sexual transmitted disease

---

Tell that to women who have serious complications, and who have died with pregnancies ...

---

That like saying oxygen can be dangerous . You know too much oxygen can lead to oxygen toxicity and potentially kill you.

---

TexasScientist said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Being homosexual doesn't send you to hell, being heterosexual doesn't send you to heaven

---

True.

It's also true that one is natural form of sexuality encouraged by Christian doctrine and practice.

And the other is a unnatural fundamentally disordered form of sexuality rightfully condemned by Christian doctrine and practice.

---

Are oral sex and anal sex ok in a heterosexual marriage? How about outside of marriage? Or are they deviant or natural forms of behavior in Christian doctrine and practice?

---

yes oral, no anal, no sex outside of marriage..

As your science shows, hormones create a connection during sexual experience in two ways, the first one is the thrill dopamine, the second is oxytocin

Instead of strengthening bonds between a husband and wife, people are jumping from person to person in short relationships or one night stands when the dopamine thrill is gone and the oxytocin bond didnt form.

Science proves Gods design of one woman and one man forever

---

Why do you think oral is ok and anal is not?

According to lore, the god of Abraham approves of multiple wives and concubines for Jews, Muslims, and some Christians. Heavenly Father gave permission to the Mormons. God gave multiple indigenous religions permission for multiple wives. *** But not multiple husbands so much. That really irks him.

I'm not familiar with any scientific research the proves your preposterous claim. For one thing there has to be a god to make that assertion, a forever, and premise that can be the subject of a scientific study.

---

anal sex poses serious medical risks, including bacterial and viral infections of the vagina, *****, rectum, and anus. Also, rectal tissue is more delicate and vulnerable to tearing and abrasion than vaginal tissue.

Science is why I am against it. Years in the healthcare field is why I am against it.

The God that I pray to believes in one man and one woman forever. The rest of your post is whataboutism that isnt applicable.

the correlation between the increase in premarital sex / sex for fun only and the increase in mental health issues isnt a coincidence.

---

..Vaginal intercourse has multiple health risks associated with it including the risk of pregnancy.

---

That is not a "health risk"

That is the literally purpose of sex

---

There is the risk of communicable disease. AIDs, syphilis etc. Maybe you should be screened if your not aware of that.

---

Yet still….Pregnancy is still not a "health risk"

It's not the same category (or planet) as AIDs or a sexual transmitted disease

---

Tell that to women who have serious complications, and who have died with pregnancies ...

---

That like saying oxygen can be dangerous . You know too much oxygen can lead to oxygen toxicity and potentially kill you.

---

Correct. Too much pure oxygen is a risk.

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Tell me you have no idea what medical school is for, much less any of the material they study.

---

No, I'd rather continue to educate you. You need the help.

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Being homosexual doesn't send you to hell, being heterosexual doesn't send you to heaven

---

True.

It's also true that one is natural form of sexuality encouraged by Christian doctrine and practice.

And the other is a unnatural fundamentally disordered form of sexuality rightfully condemned by Christian doctrine and practice.

---

Are oral sex and anal sex ok in a heterosexual marriage? How about outside of marriage? Or are they deviant or natural forms of behavior in Christian doctrine and practice?

---

yes oral, no anal, no sex outside of marriage..

As your science shows, hormones create a connection during sexual experience in two ways, the first one is the thrill dopamine, the second is oxytocin

Instead of strengthening bonds between a husband and wife, people are jumping from person to person in short relationships or one night stands when the dopamine thrill is gone and the oxytocin bond didnt form.

Science proves Gods design of one woman and one man forever

---

Why do you think oral is ok and anal is not?

According to lore, the god of Abraham approves of multiple wives and concubines for Jews, Muslims, and some Christians. Heavenly Father gave permission to the Mormons. God gave multiple indigenous religions permission for multiple wives. *** But not multiple husbands so much. That really irks him.

I'm not familiar with any scientific research the proves your preposterous claim. For one thing there has to be a god to make that assertion, a forever, and premise that can be the subject of a scientific study.

---

anal sex poses serious medical risks, including bacterial and viral infections of the vagina, *****, rectum, and anus. Also, rectal tissue is more delicate and vulnerable to tearing and abrasion than vaginal tissue.

Science is why I am against it. Years in the healthcare field is why I am against it.

The God that I pray to believes in one man and one woman forever. The rest of your post is whataboutism that isnt applicable.

the correlation between the increase in premarital sex / sex for fun only and the increase in mental health issues isnt a coincidence.

---

..Vaginal intercourse has multiple health risks associated with it including the risk of pregnancy.

---

That is not a "health risk"

That is the literally purpose of sex

---

There is the risk of communicable disease. AIDs, syphilis etc. Maybe you should be screened if your not aware of that.

---

Yet still….Pregnancy is still not a "health risk"

It's not the same category (or planet) as AIDs or a sexual transmitted disease

---

Tell that to women who have serious complications, and who have died with pregnancies ...

---

Let's ask the medical community if they define human pregnancy as a "health risk"


[Physiologically, pregnancy is typically defined as a normal, healthy biological state rather than a "health risk" in itself.]

Eating, swallowing, Walking or using the bathroom are normal human biological functions

They are not defined as "health risks" inherently. Though in the course of these acts… accidents or health complications can occur.

But swallowing, eating, or human pregnancy are not defined as "health risks"

---

Pregnancy has health risks associated with it, for the mother and the featus. It may not be high risk or most individuals, but there is a risk.

---

Bill Maher: “[Yale] wanted to study themselves; why the trust in higher education is so in the toilet, which it is… unfair admissions standards, certainly Asian people have sued about that… but mostly it is indoctrination… At Yale, it’s 36-1, the number of Democrats to… pic.twitter.com/yQb4h6EhvD

— RedWave Press (@RedWavePress) May 2, 2026

Every year at graduation time it's the same scandal .... At top colleges and universities, virtually all the commencement and baccalaureate speakers and honorary degree recipients are liberals and Democrats. It's way past time to end the ideological bias in the selection process. https://t.co/ytryNa8e7W

— Robert P. George (@McCormickProf) May 3, 2026

Harvey Mansfield seems to be enjoying retirement:

“The Harvard faculty is stunned right now. It doesn’t know what happened to it. Looking back, they can’t see anything they did that they would regard as being wrong.” pic.twitter.com/yNQLuEOmew

— Steve McGuire (@sfmcguire79) May 4, 2026

4th and Inches said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Tell me you have no idea what medical school is for, much less any of the material they study.

---

No, I'd rather continue to educate you. You need the help.

---

so far you have not said anything educational. Keep trying, we are willing to listen

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Tell me you have no idea what medical school is for, much less any of the material they study.

---

No, I'd rather continue to educate you. You need the help.

---

In English, that post translates to you depending on propaganda because you are averse to facts.

I guess you missed the part where the Greek started with 'first, do no harm'.

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Being homosexual doesn't send you to hell, being heterosexual doesn't send you to heaven

---

True.

It's also true that one is natural form of sexuality encouraged by Christian doctrine and practice.

And the other is a unnatural fundamentally disordered form of sexuality rightfully condemned by Christian doctrine and practice.

---

Are oral sex and anal sex ok in a heterosexual marriage? How about outside of marriage? Or are they deviant or natural forms of behavior in Christian doctrine and practice?

---

yes oral, no anal, no sex outside of marriage..

As your science shows, hormones create a connection during sexual experience in two ways, the first one is the thrill dopamine, the second is oxytocin

Instead of strengthening bonds between a husband and wife, people are jumping from person to person in short relationships or one night stands when the dopamine thrill is gone and the oxytocin bond didnt form.

Science proves Gods design of one woman and one man forever

---

Why do you think oral is ok and anal is not?

According to lore, the god of Abraham approves of multiple wives and concubines for Jews, Muslims, and some Christians. Heavenly Father gave permission to the Mormons. God gave multiple indigenous religions permission for multiple wives. *** But not multiple husbands so much. That really irks him.

I'm not familiar with any scientific research the proves your preposterous claim. For one thing there has to be a god to make that assertion, a forever, and premise that can be the subject of a scientific study.

---

anal sex poses serious medical risks, including bacterial and viral infections of the vagina, *****, rectum, and anus. Also, rectal tissue is more delicate and vulnerable to tearing and abrasion than vaginal tissue.

Science is why I am against it. Years in the healthcare field is why I am against it.

The God that I pray to believes in one man and one woman forever. The rest of your post is whataboutism that isnt applicable.

the correlation between the increase in premarital sex / sex for fun only and the increase in mental health issues isnt a coincidence.

---

..Vaginal intercourse has multiple health risks associated with it including the risk of pregnancy.

---

That is not a "health risk"

That is the literally purpose of sex

---

There is the risk of communicable disease. AIDs, syphilis etc. Maybe you should be screened if your not aware of that.

---

Yet still….Pregnancy is still not a "health risk"

It's not the same category (or planet) as AIDs or a sexual transmitted disease

---

Tell that to women who have serious complications, and who have died with pregnancies ...

---

Let's ask the medical community if they define human pregnancy as a "health risk"


[Physiologically, pregnancy is typically defined as a normal, healthy biological state rather than a "health risk" in itself.]

Eating, swallowing, Walking or using the bathroom are normal human biological functions

They are not defined as "health risks" inherently. Though in the course of these acts… accidents or health complications can occur.

But swallowing, eating, or human pregnancy are not defined as "health risks"

---

Pregnancy has health risks associated with it, for the mother and the featus. It may not be high risk or most individuals, but there is a risk.

---

Pregnancy itself is NOT defined as an inherent health risk for humans and not categorized as such by the medical community.

Just as eating food is not defined as a health risk for humans by medical community.

It is concerning for your credibility that you won't just moved on from your wrong & inaccurate statement and just accept the loss.

You made a mistake in using the term "health risk" and associating it with human pregnancy.

It's ok..we all make mistakes….own up to it and move on

---