The ruling wipes out four Democratic-leaning U.S. House seats in Virginia and means that Republicans will enter the midterms with a structural advantage from their moves to carve out newly red districts across the country.
Oldbear83 said:
Ending gerrymandering when it is based on race is "unfair", says Porteroso.
Porteroso said:
They deserve to gerrymander all they want, but they have to follow the rules. I am shocked that voters are going along with this. Tribalism is ruining this country. People dont care that their neighbor might be unfairly represented, they just care about winning. A total cancer.
BearFan33 said:
It was a 4-3 decision. Apparently unconstitutional on procedural grounds. Am I hearing right? It would seem procedural grounds should have been unanimous
Mitch Blood Green said:Oldbear83 said:
Ending gerrymandering when it is based on race is "unfair", says Porteroso.
Looking at the new Tennessee map, I've not seen a more unfair map. Memphis is what it is. If that's also a congressional district, no way that's unfair. To now take a city and divide it into four districts is not "more fair" than calling it black majority. It's black majority because the city boundaries are majority black. VRA rightfully ensured that the interests of urban communities not be diluted.
My hope is that Tennesseans overwhelmingly vote. Turnout lessens the impact of the map.
Oldbear83 said:BearFan33 said:
It was a 4-3 decision. Apparently unconstitutional on procedural grounds. Am I hearing right? It would seem procedural grounds should have been unanimous
Courts are not always unanimous even when every fact and concept is clear.
Osodecentx said:Porteroso said:
They deserve to gerrymander all they want, but they have to follow the rules. I am shocked that voters are going along with this. Tribalism is ruining this country. People dont care that their neighbor might be unfairly represented, they just care about winning. A total cancer.
The House member from that Memphis district has been a white male for the last decade
This dude just lost his seat. https://t.co/bNK8dyOAE2 pic.twitter.com/Yjbjvz5U2w
— Bonchie (@bonchieredstate) May 7, 2026
cowboycwr said:Mitch Blood Green said:Oldbear83 said:
Ending gerrymandering when it is based on race is "unfair", says Porteroso.
Looking at the new Tennessee map, I've not seen a more unfair map. Memphis is what it is. If that's also a congressional district, no way that's unfair. To now take a city and divide it into four districts is not "more fair" than calling it black majority. It's black majority because the city boundaries are majority black. VRA rightfully ensured that the interests of urban communities not be diluted.
My hope is that Tennesseans overwhelmingly vote. Turnout lessens the impact of the map.
Have you looked at the maps of the northeast? States with nearly half the population voting Republican but not a single red district?
Massachusetts is more red than Tennessee is blue.
— ALX πΊπΈ (@alx) May 7, 2026
Massachusetts has not had a Republican member of Congress in 30 years.
If Massachusetts has 0 red districts, Tennessee should have 0 blue districts.
Democrats are just mad that Republicans are finally doing the same thing they⦠pic.twitter.com/2ebAV2JyKO
cowboycwr said:Mitch Blood Green said:Oldbear83 said:
Ending gerrymandering when it is based on race is "unfair", says Porteroso.
Looking at the new Tennessee map, I've not seen a more unfair map. Memphis is what it is. If that's also a congressional district, no way that's unfair. To now take a city and divide it into four districts is not "more fair" than calling it black majority. It's black majority because the city boundaries are majority black. VRA rightfully ensured that the interests of urban communities not be diluted.
My hope is that Tennesseans overwhelmingly vote. Turnout lessens the impact of the map.
Have you looked at the maps of the northeast? States with nearly half the population voting Republican but not a single red district?
Osodecentx said:Porteroso said:
They deserve to gerrymander all they want, but they have to follow the rules. I am shocked that voters are going along with this. Tribalism is ruining this country. People dont care that their neighbor might be unfairly represented, they just care about winning. A total cancer.
The House member from that Memphis district has been a white male for the last decade
Porteroso said:Osodecentx said:Porteroso said:
They deserve to gerrymander all they want, but they have to follow the rules. I am shocked that voters are going along with this. Tribalism is ruining this country. People dont care that their neighbor might be unfairly represented, they just care about winning. A total cancer.
The House member from that Memphis district has been a white male for the last decade
Cohen has been there for 30 years at least. And should black Memphians not get to vote for a white guy, if they want? And are you saying that putting the whole city of Memphis into a district would be mapping based upon race?
I'd make the argument that splitting up Memphis is closer to mapping to dilute the black vote than having Memphis in a single district.
If splitting up a majority black district to get 3 majority white districts is not racial mapping, what would be, in your opinion?
Porteroso said:Osodecentx said:Porteroso said:
They deserve to gerrymander all they want, but they have to follow the rules. I am shocked that voters are going along with this. Tribalism is ruining this country. People dont care that their neighbor might be unfairly represented, they just care about winning. A total cancer.
The House member from that Memphis district has been a white male for the last decade
Cohen has been there for 30 years at least. And should black Memphians not get to vote for a white guy, if they want? And are you saying that putting the whole city of Memphis into a district would be mapping based upon race?
I'd make the argument that splitting up Memphis is closer to mapping to dilute the black vote than having Memphis in a single district.
If splitting up a majority black district to get 3 majority white districts is not racial mapping, what would be, in your opinion?
midgett said:Porteroso said:Osodecentx said:Porteroso said:
They deserve to gerrymander all they want, but they have to follow the rules. I am shocked that voters are going along with this. Tribalism is ruining this country. People dont care that their neighbor might be unfairly represented, they just care about winning. A total cancer.
The House member from that Memphis district has been a white male for the last decade
Cohen has been there for 30 years at least. And should black Memphians not get to vote for a white guy, if they want? And are you saying that putting the whole city of Memphis into a district would be mapping based upon race?
I'd make the argument that splitting up Memphis is closer to mapping to dilute the black vote than having Memphis in a single district.
If splitting up a majority black district to get 3 majority white districts is not racial mapping, what would be, in your opinion?
The white male Democrat who has long represented the majority black district ran against a black female Republican. Dems spent millions defeating the black woman. You know, racist gerrymandering.
Osodecentx said:Porteroso said:Osodecentx said:Porteroso said:
They deserve to gerrymander all they want, but they have to follow the rules. I am shocked that voters are going along with this. Tribalism is ruining this country. People dont care that their neighbor might be unfairly represented, they just care about winning. A total cancer.
The House member from that Memphis district has been a white male for the last decade
Cohen has been there for 30 years at least. And should black Memphians not get to vote for a white guy, if they want? And are you saying that putting the whole city of Memphis into a district would be mapping based upon race?
I'd make the argument that splitting up Memphis is closer to mapping to dilute the black vote than having Memphis in a single district.
If splitting up a majority black district to get 3 majority white districts is not racial mapping, what would be, in your opinion?
Steve Cohen is a Democratic U.S. Representative for Tennessee's 9th Congressional District, centered in Memphis, serving since 2007.
New 2026 House Ratings From Inside Elections
— OSZ (@OpenSourceZone) May 8, 2026
π΄ Republicans: 217
π΅ Democrats: 207
π‘ Tossup: 11 pic.twitter.com/0wvHb3MO8e
π¨ NOW: It's been revealed that Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger's team PANICKED when Democrats drew the now-struck down 10D-1R Congressional map
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) May 10, 2026
"Internally, there is now a LOT of ANGRY SNIPING within Democratic circles in Virginia."
"Don't do this, we don't think it's legal!"β¦ pic.twitter.com/dHFFGGx5fE
Assassin said:
Turns the Governor was told it was illegal. She still wasted 60 odd million of the DNC's money and they were already running low. There will be hell to pay for his. She may get the Clinton remedy....π¨ NOW: It's been revealed that Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger's team PANICKED when Democrats drew the now-struck down 10D-1R Congressional map
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) May 10, 2026
"Internally, there is now a LOT of ANGRY SNIPING within Democratic circles in Virginia."
"Don't do this, we don't think it's legal!"β¦ pic.twitter.com/dHFFGGx5fE
NEWS: According to the New York Times, some Democrats are proposing a plan to overturn the stateβs Supreme Court ruling that invalidated the referendum:
— Judicial Hub (@judicialhub) May 10, 2026
1) Invoke the circuit court ruling that invalidated the referendum due to county officials not posting notice of it atβ¦
To ensure that rules and norms are restored the Democrats are kicking around the idea of forcing Supreme Court Justices in Virginia to retire at 54 years old so they can appoint an entirely new slate of Justices who will rule the way they want
— Enguerrand VII de Coucy (@ingelramdecoucy) May 10, 2026
Much procedure, much Democracy https://t.co/cXodZMho5z pic.twitter.com/VIYeeZJG8Q
Redbrickbear said:NEWS: According to the New York Times, some Democrats are proposing a plan to overturn the stateβs Supreme Court ruling that invalidated the referendum:
— Judicial Hub (@judicialhub) May 10, 2026
1) Invoke the circuit court ruling that invalidated the referendum due to county officials not posting notice of it atβ¦To ensure that rules and norms are restored the Democrats are kicking around the idea of forcing Supreme Court Justices in Virginia to retire at 54 years old so they can appoint an entirely new slate of Justices who will rule the way they want
— Enguerrand VII de Coucy (@ingelramdecoucy) May 10, 2026
Much procedure, much Democracy https://t.co/cXodZMho5z pic.twitter.com/VIYeeZJG8Q
william said:
Assassin said:New 2026 House Ratings From Inside Elections
— OSZ (@OpenSourceZone) May 8, 2026
π΄ Republicans: 217
π΅ Democrats: 207
π‘ Tossup: 11 pic.twitter.com/0wvHb3MO8e
ABC BEAR said:Assassin said:New 2026 House Ratings From Inside Elections
— OSZ (@OpenSourceZone) May 8, 2026
π΄ Republicans: 217
π΅ Democrats: 207
π‘ Tossup: 11 pic.twitter.com/0wvHb3MO8e
Not sure why there is any shade of blue in Nevada outside of Clark County. The (bleeping) test range should be should be gray.
New Cook Political Report House Ratings Changes:
— OSZ (@OpenSourceZone) May 10, 2026
Virginia:
VA 1: π΅ Safe D -> π΄ Lean R
VA 2: π΅ Lean D -> π‘ Tossup
VA 5: π΅ Safe D -> π΄ Safe R
VA 6: π΅ Likely D -> π΄ Safe R
Tennessee:
TN 9: π΅ Safe D -> π΄ Safe R
Florida:
FL 9: π΅ Safe D -> π΄ Likely R
FL 14: π΅ Safe D ->β¦ pic.twitter.com/ZMrsOWV4mV
As expected, this is a crazy filing. Virginia makes two arguments in support of its request for an emergency stay.
— Ed Whelan (@EdWhelanEPPC) May 11, 2026
1. It contends that the state supreme court's interpretation of the Virginia constitution is "predicated ... on a grave misreading of federal law." But the court⦠https://t.co/5d2r8VLBLE