I would not characterize teachers and waiters as losers. A terrible attempt at making rich people reading this feel better about demonizing Democrats.

These people with postgraduate education, working 30k-60k jobs, are probably saddled with lifetime student loan debt, didnt get the jobs their universities seemed to indicate were plentiful, are looking at a job landscape full of AI in its future... What do Republicans respond to this with? Doing nothing about the rising costs of education the government encouraged, restarting student loan payments with very little relief, policy that increases inflation and daily costs, and pushing legislation that makes regulating or taxing AI very difficult.

Only 1 party is even trying to get these people's votes, and thats why they are voting that way. What the Democrats offer is total disaster, if ever realized, but the Republicans are offering nothing at all.

Consider that regardless of what party started these issues, Republicans are bent on continuing the problems. Why would those afflicted want to vote for that?

Mothra said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

I would not characterize teachers and waiters as losers. A terrible attempt at making rich people reading this feel better about demonizing Democrats.

These people with postgraduate education, working 30k-60k jobs, are probably saddled with lifetime student loan debt, didnt get the jobs their universities seemed to indicate were plentiful, are looking at a job landscape full of AI in its future... What do Republicans respond to this with? Doing nothing about the rising costs of education the government encouraged, restarting student loan payments with very little relief, policy that increases inflation and daily costs, and pushing legislation that makes regulating or taxing AI very difficult.

Only 1 party is even trying to get these people's votes, and thats why they are voting that way. What the Democrats offer is total disaster, if ever realized, but the Republicans are offering nothing at all.

Consider that regardless of what party started these issues, Republicans are bent on continuing the problems. Why would those afflicted want to vote for that?

---

Why should the govt. be responsible for subsidizing higher education? How about let the market run these grifters out of business?

College has become a racket. And it fooled a lot of people into believing that perpetual education would somehow increase their lot.

Baylor is a perfect example. Around $80k a year when you account for housing. That's insane for a teacher's certificate - or really any degree for that matter.

---

Do you want to tell the simpleton what is driving up the cost of higher education and who is responsible for it?

it's amazing how he unintentionally proves the point of over-educated morons vote Democrat.

Yep

Fk, I hate liberals

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

I would not characterize teachers and waiters as losers. A terrible attempt at making rich people reading this feel better about demonizing Democrats.

These people with postgraduate education, working 30k-60k jobs, are probably saddled with lifetime student loan debt, didnt get the jobs their universities seemed to indicate were plentiful, are looking at a job landscape full of AI in its future... What do Republicans respond to this with? Doing nothing about the rising costs of education the government encouraged, restarting student loan payments with very little relief, policy that increases inflation and daily costs, and pushing legislation that makes regulating or taxing AI very difficult.

Only 1 party is even trying to get these people's votes, and thats why they are voting that way. What the Democrats offer is total disaster, if ever realized, but the Republicans are offering nothing at all.

Consider that regardless of what party started these issues, Republicans are bent on continuing the problems. Why would those afflicted want to vote for that?

---

Why should the govt. be responsible for subsidizing higher education? How about let the market run these grifters out of business?

College has become a racket. And it fooled a lot of people into believing that perpetual education would somehow increase their lot.

Baylor is a perfect example. Around $80k a year when you account for housing. That's insane for a teacher's certificate - or really any degree for that matter.

---

Do you want to tell the simpleton what is driving up the cost of higher education and who is responsible for it?

it's amazing how he unintentionally proves the point of over-educated morons vote Democrat.

---

You are so dumb. Just read what I wrote again. Im so many steps ahead of you, you need to buy a bike.

Porteroso said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

I would not characterize teachers and waiters as losers. A terrible attempt at making rich people reading this feel better about demonizing Democrats.

These people with postgraduate education, working 30k-60k jobs, are probably saddled with lifetime student loan debt, didnt get the jobs their universities seemed to indicate were plentiful, are looking at a job landscape full of AI in its future... What do Republicans respond to this with? Doing nothing about the rising costs of education the government encouraged, restarting student loan payments with very little relief, policy that increases inflation and daily costs, and pushing legislation that makes regulating or taxing AI very difficult.

Only 1 party is even trying to get these people's votes, and thats why they are voting that way. What the Democrats offer is total disaster, if ever realized, but the Republicans are offering nothing at all.

Consider that regardless of what party started these issues, Republicans are bent on continuing the problems. Why would those afflicted want to vote for that?

---

Why should the govt. be responsible for subsidizing higher education? How about let the market run these grifters out of business?

College has become a racket. And it fooled a lot of people into believing that perpetual education would somehow increase their lot.

Baylor is a perfect example. Around $80k a year when you account for housing. That's insane for a teacher's certificate - or really any degree for that matter.

---

Do you want to tell the simpleton what is driving up the cost of higher education and who is responsible for it?

it's amazing how he unintentionally proves the point of over-educated morons vote Democrat.

---

You are so dumb. Just read what I wrote again. Im so many steps ahead of you, you need to buy a bike.

---

You do not even know what dumb means you idiot. I could explain it to you, but I cannot understand it for you. As usual, you bring emotion to an intellectual problem. You do not understand economics, which is why you cannot contemplate a solution or the problem and revert to making emotional claims because you think they're arguments.

Just for fun so you can demonstrate your stupidity, what party is responsible for the high cost of higher education?

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

I would not characterize teachers and waiters as losers. A terrible attempt at making rich people reading this feel better about demonizing Democrats.

These people with postgraduate education, working 30k-60k jobs, are probably saddled with lifetime student loan debt, didnt get the jobs their universities seemed to indicate were plentiful, are looking at a job landscape full of AI in its future... What do Republicans respond to this with? Doing nothing about the rising costs of education the government encouraged, restarting student loan payments with very little relief, policy that increases inflation and daily costs, and pushing legislation that makes regulating or taxing AI very difficult.

Only 1 party is even trying to get these people's votes, and thats why they are voting that way. What the Democrats offer is total disaster, if ever realized, but the Republicans are offering nothing at all.

Consider that regardless of what party started these issues, Republicans are bent on continuing the problems. Why would those afflicted want to vote for that?

---

Why should the govt. be responsible for subsidizing higher education? How about let the market run these grifters out of business?

College has become a racket. And it fooled a lot of people into believing that perpetual education would somehow increase their lot.

Baylor is a perfect example. Around $80k a year when you account for housing. That's insane for a teacher's certificate - or really any degree for that matter.

---

Do you want to tell the simpleton what is driving up the cost of higher education and who is responsible for it?

it's amazing how he unintentionally proves the point of over-educated morons vote Democrat.

---

You are so dumb. Just read what I wrote again. Im so many steps ahead of you, you need to buy a bike.

---

You do not even know what dumb means you idiot. I could explain it to you, but I cannot understand it for you. As usual, you bring emotion to an intellectual problem. You do not understand economics, which is why you cannot contemplate a solution or the problem and revert to making emotional claims because you think they're arguments.

Just for fun so you can demonstrate your stupidity, what party is responsible for the high cost of higher education?

---

If you could read and comprehend you would know i alluded to the answer in my previous post. Reading and comprehending is clearly not necessary to use the forum but it sure is nice when we all make the attempt.

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Nate Sliver confirms what any of us that tries to engage with a Democrat already knew: it's the party of losers. While they claim Democrats are more highly educated than Republicans, the part they leave out is the highly educated losers party. The party is dominated by college-educated workers at Casey's.

Based on this grid, what is the most Democratic voting group in America? It's voters with postgraduate degrees but lower-to-middle household incomes of $30K to $60K per year.

This is very much also the sweet spot for the DSA. In the group's most recent member survey in 2021, 80 percent of members aged 25 or older had bachelor's degrees, but 45 percent had household incomes below $60,000 per year.

This is unusual, because education and income are usually substantially positively correlated. In the composite CES data, only 19 percent of Americans with bachelor's degrees or higher had household incomes of $60K or below. The DSA rate is around twice that.4 These voters aren't necessarily "blue collar" in the sense of working with their hands. But that doesn't mean they're privileged. Common occupations among DSA members include teachers, non-profit workers, social workers, and public sector employees.

All kidding aside, this explains a lot. Didn't Earn It, Karenification, focus on "social justice," etc., has reduced to academic rigor of so many universities in favor of "activism." Practically this means more stupid people are admitted, rewarded, and graduated, but outside of the safety of the Didn't Earn It academic bubble, they cannot succeed. Since their perceived success was solely based on blaming others, it is natural this would extend to post-graduate life and perpetuate professional victimhood.

---

Little to no work ethic always equates to laziness/shiftlessness, which is what underlies everything the young freeloaders complain about. Yeah, I know. just too honest.

Porteroso said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

I would not characterize teachers and waiters as losers. A terrible attempt at making rich people reading this feel better about demonizing Democrats.

These people with postgraduate education, working 30k-60k jobs, are probably saddled with lifetime student loan debt, didnt get the jobs their universities seemed to indicate were plentiful, are looking at a job landscape full of AI in its future... What do Republicans respond to this with? Doing nothing about the rising costs of education the government encouraged, restarting student loan payments with very little relief, policy that increases inflation and daily costs, and pushing legislation that makes regulating or taxing AI very difficult.

Only 1 party is even trying to get these people's votes, and thats why they are voting that way. What the Democrats offer is total disaster, if ever realized, but the Republicans are offering nothing at all.

Consider that regardless of what party started these issues, Republicans are bent on continuing the problems. Why would those afflicted want to vote for that?

---

Why should the govt. be responsible for subsidizing higher education? How about let the market run these grifters out of business?

College has become a racket. And it fooled a lot of people into believing that perpetual education would somehow increase their lot.

Baylor is a perfect example. Around $80k a year when you account for housing. That's insane for a teacher's certificate - or really any degree for that matter.

---

Do you want to tell the simpleton what is driving up the cost of higher education and who is responsible for it?

it's amazing how he unintentionally proves the point of over-educated morons vote Democrat.

---

You are so dumb. Just read what I wrote again. Im so many steps ahead of you, you need to buy a bike.

---

You do not even know what dumb means you idiot. I could explain it to you, but I cannot understand it for you. As usual, you bring emotion to an intellectual problem. You do not understand economics, which is why you cannot contemplate a solution or the problem and revert to making emotional claims because you think they're arguments.

Just for fun so you can demonstrate your stupidity, what party is responsible for the high cost of higher education?

---

If you could read and comprehend you would know i alluded to the answer in my previous post. Reading and comprehending is clearly not necessary to use the forum but it sure is nice when we all make the attempt.

---

Again, you just keep making ad hominem attacks ... rich coming from a guy that does not know what "dumb" means.

Just for fun so you can demonstrate your stupidity, what party is responsible for the high cost of higher education? (Hint: the maybe one public university run by a conservative has not raised tuition in maybe a decade)

Do you support GOP efforts to remove Didn't Earn It programs and grievance studies majors from state universities?

Do you support cancelling the federal student loan program?

(These are specifics so we know you're about to bolt the conversation)

canoso said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Nate Sliver confirms what any of us that tries to engage with a Democrat already knew: it's the party of losers. While they claim Democrats are more highly educated than Republicans, the part they leave out is the highly educated losers party. The party is dominated by college-educated workers at Casey's.

Based on this grid, what is the most Democratic voting group in America? It's voters with postgraduate degrees but lower-to-middle household incomes of $30K to $60K per year.

This is very much also the sweet spot for the DSA. In the group's most recent member survey in 2021, 80 percent of members aged 25 or older had bachelor's degrees, but 45 percent had household incomes below $60,000 per year.

This is unusual, because education and income are usually substantially positively correlated. In the composite CES data, only 19 percent of Americans with bachelor's degrees or higher had household incomes of $60K or below. The DSA rate is around twice that.4 These voters aren't necessarily "blue collar" in the sense of working with their hands. But that doesn't mean they're privileged. Common occupations among DSA members include teachers, non-profit workers, social workers, and public sector employees.

All kidding aside, this explains a lot. Didn't Earn It, Karenification, focus on "social justice," etc., has reduced to academic rigor of so many universities in favor of "activism." Practically this means more stupid people are admitted, rewarded, and graduated, but outside of the safety of the Didn't Earn It academic bubble, they cannot succeed. Since their perceived success was solely based on blaming others, it is natural this would extend to post-graduate life and perpetuate professional victimhood.

---

Little to no work ethic always equates to laziness/shiftlessness, which is what underlies everything the young freeloaders complain about. Yeah, I know. just too honest.

---

Pretty much ... there is a reason the stupid ones - particular the Didn't Earn Its - are attracted to the authoritarians that will babysit them for life while the smart ones are too busy being happy to complain.