Robert Wilson said:Dealpfffdeal said:
Baylor allows this BS but can't serve a damn beer at a football game? Embarrassing
Lmao
Hey, look on the bright side. You can eat some Halal chicken while you watch us go 6-6.
TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:Robert Wilson said:Dealpfffdeal said:
Baylor allows this BS but can't serve a damn beer at a football game? Embarrassing
Lmao
Hey, look on the bright side. You can eat some Halal chicken while you watch us go 6-6.
6-6, wow, you're quite the optimist
ATL Bear said:Redbrickbear said:ATL Bear said:Redbrickbear said:ATL Bear said:Danielsjackson114 said:
No one wants that bull*****
If I went to a Muslim country, I would be forced to eat what they serve
I've eaten pork and drunk plenty of bourbon in some of the most conservative Muslim countries. Many restaurants have non-halal sections of their menus.
That is true and of course raises another question of Baylor's endless woke-social signaling
How many of Baylor's 290 Muslim background students are even interested in halal or following its rather tedious Islamic ritualism & dead legalism.
My gut feeling is most are more secular & academic than serious about their parents old world Islamism..most are probably 2nd gen kids from Muslim immigrant households born and raised in the USA
So Baylor is paying for this…putting cash in the halal industry's pocket….but how many of the MB (Muslim background) students are even interested in partaking?
As someone else mentioned, it would be about economics as far as a decision in my opinion. If there's limited demand, it's unnecessary. If there's a demand, what are the costs of facilitating relative to the options available.
My gut feeling is there is essentially no demand
Maybe a handful of our MB students would even be interested in this option…far less in actual paying for it themselves
Baylor jumped into offering it for its own social and political reasons "look at us and how welcoming, tolerant, & progressive we are"…and less from a place of actual meeting the desires of MB students
After all…we have a vast array of diversity commissars on campus…and their job is to come up with action items like this to meet various diversity mandates
If it was done to check a box on the diversity tolerance spectrum, shame on them. If it's an intentional move to attract more Muslim students, then it could be an economic choice.
Frank Galvin said:
Is there something about being nice to people that hurts right wing Christians?
Robert Wilson said:TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:Robert Wilson said:Dealpfffdeal said:
Baylor allows this BS but can't serve a damn beer at a football game? Embarrassing
Lmao
Hey, look on the bright side. You can eat some Halal chicken while you watch us go 6-6.
6-6, wow, you're quite the optimist
This year, I'd take the under. But we're basically 6-6 over the last century plus.
Mitch Blood Green said:TexasScientist said:Mitch Blood Green said:Danielsjackson114 said:
Still can't tell me that Aranda is purely DEI
I've come around to your thinking. Not only should we never have a minority coach, we should field an all white team.
The right kind of whites!
The team should only come from Christian schools.
Christian is too broad, is too loosely defined, and too much heresy. An all white Baptist team is what's needed. You know, with Baptist values.
You're right. Don't want no "Talarico" Christians or God forbid, Catholics on the team.
I believe that Roger Staubach is one of them there Catholics. Yuk!
TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:ATL Bear said:Redbrickbear said:ATL Bear said:Redbrickbear said:ATL Bear said:Danielsjackson114 said:
No one wants that bull*****
If I went to a Muslim country, I would be forced to eat what they serve
I've eaten pork and drunk plenty of bourbon in some of the most conservative Muslim countries. Many restaurants have non-halal sections of their menus.
That is true and of course raises another question of Baylor's endless woke-social signaling
How many of Baylor's 290 Muslim background students are even interested in halal or following its rather tedious Islamic ritualism & dead legalism.
My gut feeling is most are more secular & academic than serious about their parents old world Islamism..most are probably 2nd gen kids from Muslim immigrant households born and raised in the USA
So Baylor is paying for this…putting cash in the halal industry's pocket….but how many of the MB (Muslim background) students are even interested in partaking?
As someone else mentioned, it would be about economics as far as a decision in my opinion. If there's limited demand, it's unnecessary. If there's a demand, what are the costs of facilitating relative to the options available.
My gut feeling is there is essentially no demand
Maybe a handful of our MB students would even be interested in this option…far less in actual paying for it themselves
Baylor jumped into offering it for its own social and political reasons "look at us and how welcoming, tolerant, & progressive we are"…and less from a place of actual meeting the desires of MB students
After all…we have a vast array of diversity commissars on campus…and their job is to come up with action items like this to meet various diversity mandates
If it was done to check a box on the diversity tolerance spectrum, shame on them. If it's an intentional move to attract more Muslim students, then it could be an economic choice.
It can be both,
You know progressives - they can't explain why they love muslims, they just know that they do. The left-wing media programming has them completely brainwashed into cheering and defending muslims, despite the fact that muslims think liberals are complete trash and vermin - they just look at libs as weak minded tools to use to slowly take control of their communities.
Libs are brainwashed dolts.
That is how Rabbi Priest , Kosher , veal calfs. It is sacred , and has been done for centuries : Well before this country was founded.SipEmBears said:
Funny how PETA doesn't really go after the process of halal hard. Hanging a live animal up and slashing its neck while alive and allowing the blood to drain. Very inhumane and very painful.
SipEmBears said:
Funny how PETA doesn't really go after the process of halal hard. Hanging a live animal up and slashing its neck while alive and allowing the blood to drain. Very inhumane and very painful.
TexasScientist said:SipEmBears said:
Funny how PETA doesn't really go after the process of halal hard. Hanging a live animal up and slashing its neck while alive and allowing the blood to drain. Very inhumane and very painful.
It's plain and simple animal abuse - another absurd primitive religious belief.
Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:SipEmBears said:
Funny how PETA doesn't really go after the process of halal hard. Hanging a live animal up and slashing its neck while alive and allowing the blood to drain. Very inhumane and very painful.
It's plain and simple animal abuse - another absurd primitive religious belief.
Halal and kosher practices were purposefully humane when instituted and are still relatively humane when done properly. Another case of religion guiding the development of moral sensibility.
TexasScientist said:Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:SipEmBears said:
Funny how PETA doesn't really go after the process of halal hard. Hanging a live animal up and slashing its neck while alive and allowing the blood to drain. Very inhumane and very painful.
It's plain and simple animal abuse - another absurd primitive religious belief.
Halal and kosher practices were purposefully humane when instituted and are still relatively humane when done properly. Another case of religion guiding the development of moral sensibility.
They may have been purposefully humane (maybe). Relatively is the operative word. Relative to what? Today there are far better options, in terms of pain and suffering, but they're still inhumane. It remains an inhumane practice.
We used to beat confessions out of people, some methods possibly more humane than others, but are inhumane.
Another case of religious perpetuation of inhumane practice guised under a cloak of moral sensibility.
Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:SipEmBears said:
Funny how PETA doesn't really go after the process of halal hard. Hanging a live animal up and slashing its neck while alive and allowing the blood to drain. Very inhumane and very painful.
It's plain and simple animal abuse - another absurd primitive religious belief.
Halal and kosher practices were purposefully humane when instituted and are still relatively humane when done properly. Another case of religion guiding the development of moral sensibility.
They may have been purposefully humane (maybe). Relatively is the operative word. Relative to what? Today there are far better options, in terms of pain and suffering, but they're still inhumane. It remains an inhumane practice.
We used to beat confessions out of people, some methods possibly more humane than others, but are inhumane.
Another case of religious perpetuation of inhumane practice guised under a cloak of moral sensibility.
Relative to vegetarianism. Otherwise there's no reason to avoid halal meat. At least in the United States, the animals are almost always stunned before killing, so they don't suffer.
TexasScientist said:Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:SipEmBears said:
Funny how PETA doesn't really go after the process of halal hard. Hanging a live animal up and slashing its neck while alive and allowing the blood to drain. Very inhumane and very painful.
It's plain and simple animal abuse - another absurd primitive religious belief.
Halal and kosher practices were purposefully humane when instituted and are still relatively humane when done properly. Another case of religion guiding the development of moral sensibility.
They may have been purposefully humane (maybe). Relatively is the operative word. Relative to what? Today there are far better options, in terms of pain and suffering, but they're still inhumane. It remains an inhumane practice.
We used to beat confessions out of people, some methods possibly more humane than others, but are inhumane.
Another case of religious perpetuation of inhumane practice guised under a cloak of moral sensibility.
Relative to vegetarianism. Otherwise there's no reason to avoid halal meat. At least in the United States, the animals are almost always stunned before killing, so they don't suffer.
Relative to vegetarianism = inhumane.
Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:SipEmBears said:
Funny how PETA doesn't really go after the process of halal hard. Hanging a live animal up and slashing its neck while alive and allowing the blood to drain. Very inhumane and very painful.
It's plain and simple animal abuse - another absurd primitive religious belief.
Halal and kosher practices were purposefully humane when instituted and are still relatively humane when done properly. Another case of religion guiding the development of moral sensibility.
They may have been purposefully humane (maybe). Relatively is the operative word. Relative to what? Today there are far better options, in terms of pain and suffering, but they're still inhumane. It remains an inhumane practice.
We used to beat confessions out of people, some methods possibly more humane than others, but are inhumane.
Another case of religious perpetuation of inhumane practice guised under a cloak of moral sensibility.
Relative to vegetarianism. Otherwise there's no reason to avoid halal meat. At least in the United States, the animals are almost always stunned before killing, so they don't suffer.
Relative to vegetarianism = inhumane.
Then your issue isn't really with religion.
TexasScientist said:Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:SipEmBears said:
Funny how PETA doesn't really go after the process of halal hard. Hanging a live animal up and slashing its neck while alive and allowing the blood to drain. Very inhumane and very painful.
It's plain and simple animal abuse - another absurd primitive religious belief.
Halal and kosher practices were purposefully humane when instituted and are still relatively humane when done properly. Another case of religion guiding the development of moral sensibility.
They may have been purposefully humane (maybe). Relatively is the operative word. Relative to what? Today there are far better options, in terms of pain and suffering, but they're still inhumane. It remains an inhumane practice.
We used to beat confessions out of people, some methods possibly more humane than others, but are inhumane.
Another case of religious perpetuation of inhumane practice guised under a cloak of moral sensibility.
Relative to vegetarianism. Otherwise there's no reason to avoid halal meat. At least in the United States, the animals are almost always stunned before killing, so they don't suffer.
Relative to vegetarianism = inhumane.
Then your issue isn't really with religion.
Religion = inhumane.
Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:SipEmBears said:
Funny how PETA doesn't really go after the process of halal hard. Hanging a live animal up and slashing its neck while alive and allowing the blood to drain. Very inhumane and very painful.
It's plain and simple animal abuse - another absurd primitive religious belief.
Halal and kosher practices were purposefully humane when instituted and are still relatively humane when done properly. Another case of religion guiding the development of moral sensibility.
They may have been purposefully humane (maybe). Relatively is the operative word. Relative to what? Today there are far better options, in terms of pain and suffering, but they're still inhumane. It remains an inhumane practice.
We used to beat confessions out of people, some methods possibly more humane than others, but are inhumane.
Another case of religious perpetuation of inhumane practice guised under a cloak of moral sensibility.
Relative to vegetarianism. Otherwise there's no reason to avoid halal meat. At least in the United States, the animals are almost always stunned before killing, so they don't suffer.
Relative to vegetarianism = inhumane.
Then your issue isn't really with religion.
Religion = inhumane.
Meat is a $300 billion per year industry in the US, of which halal meat is less than 10 percent. Why not say the free market is absurd and inhumane, perhaps a product of primitive liberal democracy?
So we have to do it at Baylor? Both methods are sick.J.J.Crockett said:That is how Rabbi Priest , Kosher , veal calfs. It is sacred , and has been done for centuries : Well before this country was founded.SipEmBears said:
Funny how PETA doesn't really go after the process of halal hard. Hanging a live animal up and slashing its neck while alive and allowing the blood to drain. Very inhumane and very painful.
Can animals be humane? Are we not animals ourselves? Or are we divine beings?TexasScientist said:Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:SipEmBears said:
Funny how PETA doesn't really go after the process of halal hard. Hanging a live animal up and slashing its neck while alive and allowing the blood to drain. Very inhumane and very painful.
It's plain and simple animal abuse - another absurd primitive religious belief.
Halal and kosher practices were purposefully humane when instituted and are still relatively humane when done properly. Another case of religion guiding the development of moral sensibility.
They may have been purposefully humane (maybe). Relatively is the operative word. Relative to what? Today there are far better options, in terms of pain and suffering, but they're still inhumane. It remains an inhumane practice.
We used to beat confessions out of people, some methods possibly more humane than others, but are inhumane.
Another case of religious perpetuation of inhumane practice guised under a cloak of moral sensibility.
Relative to vegetarianism. Otherwise there's no reason to avoid halal meat. At least in the United States, the animals are almost always stunned before killing, so they don't suffer.
Relative to vegetarianism = inhumane.
Then your issue isn't really with religion.
Religion = inhumane.
Meat is a $300 billion per year industry in the US, of which halal meat is less than 10 percent. Why not say the free market is absurd and inhumane, perhaps a product of primitive liberal democracy?
Inhumanity is a product of mankind/culture. As such, inhumanity tends to worm its way into man's religious and cultural beliefs/laws for justification. Unrelated except to the extent inhumanity is traded in the free market. Free market doesn't cause it, but mankind sure does.
SipEmBears said:J.J.Crockett said:SipEmBears said:
Funny how PETA doesn't really go after the process of halal hard. Hanging a live animal up and slashing its neck while alive and allowing the blood to drain. Very inhumane and very painful.
That is how Rabbi Priest , Kosher , veal calfs. It is sacred , and has been done for centuries : Well before this country was founded.
So we have to do it at Baylor? Both methods are sick.
no I am not and yes I have.J.R. said:SipEmBears said:J.J.Crockett said:SipEmBears said:
Funny how PETA doesn't really go after the process of halal hard. Hanging a live animal up and slashing its neck while alive and allowing the blood to drain. Very inhumane and very painful.
That is how Rabbi Priest , Kosher , veal calfs. It is sacred , and has been done for centuries : Well before this country was founded.
So we have to do it at Baylor? Both methods are sick.
So you are a vegetarian? If you not and you have obviously never been to a cattle processing plant.
SipEmBears said:J.R. said:SipEmBears said:J.J.Crockett said:SipEmBears said:
Funny how PETA doesn't really go after the process of halal hard. Hanging a live animal up and slashing its neck while alive and allowing the blood to drain. Very inhumane and very painful.
That is how Rabbi Priest , Kosher , veal calfs. It is sacred , and has been done for centuries : Well before this country was founded.
So we have to do it at Baylor? Both methods are sick.
So you are a vegetarian? If you not and you have obviously never been to a cattle processing plant.
no I am not and yes I have.
Sam Lowry said:SipEmBears said:J.R. said:SipEmBears said:J.J.Crockett said:SipEmBears said:
Funny how PETA doesn't really go after the process of halal hard. Hanging a live animal up and slashing its neck while alive and allowing the blood to drain. Very inhumane and very painful.
That is how Rabbi Priest , Kosher , veal calfs. It is sacred , and has been done for centuries : Well before this country was founded.
So we have to do it at Baylor? Both methods are sick.
So you are a vegetarian? If you not and you have obviously never been to a cattle processing plant.
no I am not and yes I have.
So what were people supposed to do before industrial meat processing existed?
Wangchung said:TexasScientist said:Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:SipEmBears said:
Funny how PETA doesn't really go after the process of halal hard. Hanging a live animal up and slashing its neck while alive and allowing the blood to drain. Very inhumane and very painful.
It's plain and simple animal abuse - another absurd primitive religious belief.
Halal and kosher practices were purposefully humane when instituted and are still relatively humane when done properly. Another case of religion guiding the development of moral sensibility.
They may have been purposefully humane (maybe). Relatively is the operative word. Relative to what? Today there are far better options, in terms of pain and suffering, but they're still inhumane. It remains an inhumane practice.
We used to beat confessions out of people, some methods possibly more humane than others, but are inhumane.
Another case of religious perpetuation of inhumane practice guised under a cloak of moral sensibility.
Relative to vegetarianism. Otherwise there's no reason to avoid halal meat. At least in the United States, the animals are almost always stunned before killing, so they don't suffer.
Relative to vegetarianism = inhumane.
Then your issue isn't really with religion.
Religion = inhumane.
Meat is a $300 billion per year industry in the US, of which halal meat is less than 10 percent. Why not say the free market is absurd and inhumane, perhaps a product of primitive liberal democracy?
Inhumanity is a product of mankind/culture. As such, inhumanity tends to worm its way into man's religious and cultural beliefs/laws for justification. Unrelated except to the extent inhumanity is traded in the free market. Free market doesn't cause it, but mankind sure does.
Can animals be humane? Are we not animals ourselves? Or are we divine beings?
J.R. said:Sam Lowry said:SipEmBears said:J.R. said:SipEmBears said:J.J.Crockett said:SipEmBears said:
Funny how PETA doesn't really go after the process of halal hard. Hanging a live animal up and slashing its neck while alive and allowing the blood to drain. Very inhumane and very painful.
That is how Rabbi Priest , Kosher , veal calfs. It is sacred , and has been done for centuries : Well before this country was founded.
So we have to do it at Baylor? Both methods are sick.
So you are a vegetarian? If you not and you have obviously never been to a cattle processing plant.
no I am not and yes I have.
So what were people supposed to do before industrial meat processing existed?
farm to table. Not possible these days. Love how Trump sold out "his farmers". His farmers are stupid to believe Trump. All about fat boy, not farmers.
So it's an animal concept conceived by one species of animal on earth. Why would being humane be better than being the same as literally every other animal on earth?TexasScientist said:Wangchung said:TexasScientist said:Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:SipEmBears said:
Funny how PETA doesn't really go after the process of halal hard. Hanging a live animal up and slashing its neck while alive and allowing the blood to drain. Very inhumane and very painful.
It's plain and simple animal abuse - another absurd primitive religious belief.
Halal and kosher practices were purposefully humane when instituted and are still relatively humane when done properly. Another case of religion guiding the development of moral sensibility.
They may have been purposefully humane (maybe). Relatively is the operative word. Relative to what? Today there are far better options, in terms of pain and suffering, but they're still inhumane. It remains an inhumane practice.
We used to beat confessions out of people, some methods possibly more humane than others, but are inhumane.
Another case of religious perpetuation of inhumane practice guised under a cloak of moral sensibility.
Relative to vegetarianism. Otherwise there's no reason to avoid halal meat. At least in the United States, the animals are almost always stunned before killing, so they don't suffer.
Relative to vegetarianism = inhumane.
Then your issue isn't really with religion.
Religion = inhumane.
Meat is a $300 billion per year industry in the US, of which halal meat is less than 10 percent. Why not say the free market is absurd and inhumane, perhaps a product of primitive liberal democracy?
Inhumanity is a product of mankind/culture. As such, inhumanity tends to worm its way into man's religious and cultural beliefs/laws for justification. Unrelated except to the extent inhumanity is traded in the free market. Free market doesn't cause it, but mankind sure does.
Can animals be humane? Are we not animals ourselves? Or are we divine beings?
We can be humane or inhumane, it's a human concept. There's no evidence for divine beings.
Wangchung said:TexasScientist said:Wangchung said:TexasScientist said:Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:Sam Lowry said:TexasScientist said:SipEmBears said:
Funny how PETA doesn't really go after the process of halal hard. Hanging a live animal up and slashing its neck while alive and allowing the blood to drain. Very inhumane and very painful.
It's plain and simple animal abuse - another absurd primitive religious belief.
Halal and kosher practices were purposefully humane when instituted and are still relatively humane when done properly. Another case of religion guiding the development of moral sensibility.
They may have been purposefully humane (maybe). Relatively is the operative word. Relative to what? Today there are far better options, in terms of pain and suffering, but they're still inhumane. It remains an inhumane practice.
We used to beat confessions out of people, some methods possibly more humane than others, but are inhumane.
Another case of religious perpetuation of inhumane practice guised under a cloak of moral sensibility.
Relative to vegetarianism. Otherwise there's no reason to avoid halal meat. At least in the United States, the animals are almost always stunned before killing, so they don't suffer.
Relative to vegetarianism = inhumane.
Then your issue isn't really with religion.
Religion = inhumane.
Meat is a $300 billion per year industry in the US, of which halal meat is less than 10 percent. Why not say the free market is absurd and inhumane, perhaps a product of primitive liberal democracy?
Inhumanity is a product of mankind/culture. As such, inhumanity tends to worm its way into man's religious and cultural beliefs/laws for justification. Unrelated except to the extent inhumanity is traded in the free market. Free market doesn't cause it, but mankind sure does.
Can animals be humane? Are we not animals ourselves? Or are we divine beings?
We can be humane or inhumane, it's a human concept. There's no evidence for divine beings.
So it's an animal concept conceived by one species of animal on earth. Why would being humane be better than being the same as literally every other animal on earth?
SipEmBears said:J.R. said:Sam Lowry said:SipEmBears said:J.R. said:SipEmBears said:J.J.Crockett said:SipEmBears said:
Funny how PETA doesn't really go after the process of halal hard. Hanging a live animal up and slashing its neck while alive and allowing the blood to drain. Very inhumane and very painful.
That is how Rabbi Priest , Kosher , veal calfs. It is sacred , and has been done for centuries : Well before this country was founded.
So we have to do it at Baylor? Both methods are sick.
So you are a vegetarian? If you not and you have obviously never been to a cattle processing plant.
no I am not and yes I have.
So what were people supposed to do before industrial meat processing existed?
farm to table. Not possible these days. Love how Trump sold out "his farmers". His farmers are stupid to believe Trump. All about fat boy, not farmers.
Farm-to-table isn't dead. You're just shopping at Whole Foods and calling it analysis.
Tariffs punched some export markets. That's not a secret. Then came $12 billion in bridge payments, higher reference prices, more base acres, and China back on the hook for 25 million tons of soybeans a year plus extra ag buys. USDA says the ag trade deficit is down about 40% from when he took office. You can hate the method. Pretending he "sold out his farmers" while writing checks and reopening China is just fan fiction.
Calling farmers stupid because they don't share your politics is the whole post. They'll keep planting. You'll keep posting.
