September 11, 2001

15,953 Views | 208 Replies | Last: 20 hrs ago by BUDOS
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Muslims are evil because of their actions. It goes far beyond rejecting Jesus Christ as the Son of God, although that alone condemns them to hell. It also includes lying, stealing, and killing in the name of their demonic death cult. The entire cult is based upon wars of conquest for 1,400 years along with mass slaughters (currently taking place in Nigeria) and the most vile barbarism and brutality. It is Muslims who are responsible gif the vast majority of terrorist attacks over the past 50+ years including 9-11 and October 7, 2023.

On top of all that, they fall under God's curse that was part of His covenant with Abraham.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Such as unfortunate name

Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:



One of the worst ideas ever. We did not need to invade. Should have just done some bombing missions with special forces missions to get OBL and get out.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Easier said than done. Remember how long it took to find and get Obama bin Laden? Remember the pathetic excuse we had for a Commander in Chief.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Easier said than done. Remember how long it took to find and get Obama bin Laden? Remember the pathetic excuse we had for a Commander in Chief.


It's as if they expected Osama to have a regular routine and address.
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Easier said than done. Remember how long it took to find and get Obama bin Laden? Remember the pathetic excuse we had for a Commander in Chief.

There are multiple sources over the years that have said we had chances to get him but always waited too long, didn't send enough forces, relied to much on the local Afghans (we saw over the course of almost 20 years how reliable they were, especially after we pulled out), or leaders were reluctant to move in without 100% confirmation. So it more than likely could have been done.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe. But that's speculation. "Reliable sources" often turn out to be totally unreliable, especially on anything the least bit political
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Maybe. But that's speculation. "Reliable sources" often turn out to be totally unreliable, especially on anything the least bit political


Several of them are military commenting on the military aspect of it.
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
By all means, let's go defend them per their request. . Eff that and Eff you MBS, you effing killer!
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BUDOS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
September 11th and January 6th are two dates in recent history which woke some of us up to reality.
One in an effort to start a war from an enemy from the outside and one from the inside. At least one is still active.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BUDOS said:

September 11th and January 6th are two dates in recent history which woke some of us up to reality.
One in an effort to start a war from an enemy from the outside and one from the inside. At least one is still active.

Not at all the same.

September 11th is in the same class as December 7th, while January 6th is in the same class as March 25th (look it up).
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BUDOS said:

September 11th and January 6th are two dates in recent history which woke some of us up to reality.
One in an effort to start a war from an enemy from the outside and one from the inside. At least one is still active.

Really? Are you really comparing grandmas walking through the capital to the death of 2,799 people and 3.3 trillion dollars in damages?

What is wrong with you?
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

BUDOS said:

September 11th and January 6th are two dates in recent history which woke some of us up to reality.
One in an effort to start a war from an enemy from the outside and one from the inside. At least one is still active.

Really? Are you really comparing grandmas walking through the capital to the death of 2,799 people and 3.3 trillion dollars in damages?

What is wrong with you?


Where are the grandmas?


Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

GrowlTowel said:

BUDOS said:

September 11th and January 6th are two dates in recent history which woke some of us up to reality.
One in an effort to start a war from an enemy from the outside and one from the inside. At least one is still active.

Really? Are you really comparing grandmas walking through the capital to the death of 2,799 people and 3.3 trillion dollars in damages?

What is wrong with you?


Where are the grandmas?




Inside. Cute selection of photos from you, pal.
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BUDOS said:

September 11th and January 6th are two dates in recent history which woke some of us up to reality.
One in an effort to start a war from an enemy from the outside and one from the inside. At least one is still active.

Seriously????

One killed thousands. One did not. One was clearly an attack on our nation, freedoms and ideals by a terrorist group.

One was an unarmed group of people with a FEW that acted violently but most just followed the crowd. IF a group of UNARMED people is a true threat to our democracy that is sad that we can be overthrown that easily.
BUDOS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

BUDOS said:

September 11th and January 6th are two dates in recent history which woke some of us up to reality.
One in an effort to start a war from an enemy from the outside and one from the inside. At least one is still active.

Not at all the same.

September 11th is in the same class as December 7th, while January 6th is in the same class as March 25th (look it up).

Are you referring to the RNC statement? The one that apparently did not watch the event all day long on live television, even Fox, until it started reducing coverage, and apparently forgot what their own Republican leaders said the days immediately following?

As you know from the past posts, I struggle with how you rationalize that event, although I recognize the difficulty of someone, anyone changing a belief which directly relates to a core belief (including me).

Now, having said all that, I think I recognize the point you are attempting to make and I don't totally disagree.
BUDOS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

BUDOS said:

September 11th and January 6th are two dates in recent history which woke some of us up to reality.
One in an effort to start a war from an enemy from the outside and one from the inside. At least one is still active.

Seriously????

One killed thousands. One did not. One was clearly an attack on our nation, freedoms and ideals by a terrorist group.

One was an unarmed group of people with a FEW that acted violently but most just followed the crowd. IF a group of UNARMED people is a true threat to our democracy that is sad that we can be overthrown that easily.

Your point is valid. I regret wording that statement the way I did and I apologize to everyone.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BUDOS said:

Oldbear83 said:

BUDOS said:

September 11th and January 6th are two dates in recent history which woke some of us up to reality.
One in an effort to start a war from an enemy from the outside and one from the inside. At least one is still active.

Not at all the same.

September 11th is in the same class as December 7th, while January 6th is in the same class as March 25th (look it up).

Are you referring to the RNC statement? The one that apparently did not watch the event all day long on live television, even Fox, until it started reducing coverage, and apparently forgot what their own Republican leaders said the days immediately following?

As you know from the past posts, I struggle with how you rationalize that event, although I recognize the difficulty of someone, anyone changing a belief which directly relates to a core belief (including me).

Now, having said all that, I think I recognize the point you are attempting to make and I don't totally disagree.

No, I am not referring to the RNC statement, but a famous protest with consequences which took place on March 25th, and which historically is consistent with the January 6 protests.

BUDOS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
My first thought was the one you had in mind. Interesting. So you were referring to Lady Day?"
Admittedly I am confused.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BUDOS said:

My first thought was the one you had in mind. Interesting. So you were referring to Lady Day?"
Admittedly I am confused.

Does the word 'Selma' ring a bell?

BUDOS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm aware of Selma, but we are not on the same page.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BUDOS said:

I'm aware of Selma, but we are not on the same page.

Catch up on your History, and you'll catch on.

BUDOS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.