Frank Galvin said:

---

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

historian said:

---

Or maybe he means American citizens who are part of our culture, including first or second generation immigrants who have assimilated. They are just as much Americans as those of us whose ancestors came in the 17th or 18th centuries or were already here to greet them. In other words, people with an American heritage.

---

So you are saying that a bunch of kids going crazy at an SEC football game doesn't want to assimilate? What do they need ot do to assimilate? How do they qualify as assimilated?

---

If this is considered "assimilating" what do you consider "not assimilating"?

Bringing this back to remind y’all that the Indian population in Texas is so huge that 70-foot-tall Indian temples can be found in the middle of Texas neighborhoods

And ranchers now rent out cows to Indian families who use them to “bless” their homes: pic.twitter.com/Va6favu9a2

— Savanah Hernandez (@Savsays) September 14, 2026

---

You are upset that they are building churches and doing business with local farmers?

No assimilating is not working, trying to change the structure of the government, committing crimes, etc.

You ask a good question, though. Does remaining a Hindu prevent an Indian from assimilating? Does living in a neighborhood with other Indians mean that an Indian has not assimilated? Does speaking English with an accent mean an Indian has not assimilated?

---

This monstrosity should be used as target practice by the artillery corps

90-F00T-TALL Hindu satanic monkey god, Hanuman, in Sugar Land, Texas.

Tallest statue in Texas used as an advertisement for Indian immigrants. pic.twitter.com/V5zHRCNHK2

— The General (@1776General_) April 14, 2025

---

If it is height that bothers you, I guess we blow up a bunch of crosses too,

---

If you love India so much why dont you move there?

I feel the same w/ historian and Israel.

You guys seem to love foreigners and foreign countries more than Americans and America but refuse to leave.

🚨 I Exposed Texas' Indian Invasion - Full Documentary

Like and share on X to support our work! pic.twitter.com/9bs3mvG8py

— Tyler Oliveira (@tyleraloevera) April 6, 2026

---

The whole point of America is to love ideals, not groups. I love America because people can immigrate here. You love America as long as it is white.

---

American is NOT just an ideal....its a physically place...a country and a homeland for its citizens

That country does have various ideals. And some are in fact very universal...and some that are particular to Americans. And the country is itself quite open and welcoming of new comers in general.

But people like Sir Roger Scruton have long explained that a country is a tangible living community bound by a specific landscape/homeland, shared language, customs, and inherited institutions, history, and values.

So its more than just "ideals". And it would be as strange to love America for only ethno reasons as it is for you to love it only because people can immigrate to it.


"Blood & Soil" vs "Ideals uber Alles"....these are both strange and seem very fanatical.

---

I keep asking the question and none of the racists can answer it. What "language, cusotms, and institutions" are the Asians and Indians hurting?

---

They may in fact not be hurting any...

I get the strong feeling you are not upset about the debate specifics themselves....you seem angry the debate is happening at all.

That anyone in the West daring to have a problem with mass migration seems to trigger you on a deep level. (Especially if its White people who have a problem with it.)

You view migration through a moral lens.....

---

mass migration does hurt communities and institutions though. It displaces citizens who'd normally fill these roles, it lowers wages, it impacts housing costs, and it burdens government institutions.

There is a place for controlled and limited immigration - Indians absolutely have a place in our work force and can be great people to work with. But it should not come at the expense of the citizenry.

---

You must have flunked economics. Bringing in productive people creates more opportunity; it doesn't displace anyone.

---

So you are making the case for slave labor as well.

I didn't flunk economics, I know it quite well. Better than you.

You want to pretend that bringing in millions of people has zero negative impact on the citizenry. You're wrong. The vast majority of "productive" immigrants coming here on work visas aren't anything special. They take advantage of the system, and the absolutely lower the wages for citizens. There's zero chance you've actually hired anywhere near technology. You'll believe whatever the TV tells you.

If you’re not from DFW, I don’t think you have an idea how significant the immigration issue is here. I don’t mean the mass of the problem, but rather how personal and widespread the frustration is among the residents regardless of political affiliations.

Even before my post,…

— Daniel Keene (@Djkeene1) September 14, 2026

continued:
Even before my post, it's been the topic at almost every dinner or party. If you're from here and anything less than the upper class, you have a deep resentment for the companies and politicians ushering in foreigners at the expense of your home. We've watched some of the most liberal progressive people we know pull their kids out of public schools because they're the only Americans left in their class. I don't know how these people will vote, but they are facing the reality of their progressivism.

A lot of these people are uncomfortable having the discussion in public given it touches a raw part regarding race. I get the sensitivity and there is a sense in which that's right. But if our politicians want the support of the people of Texas, they're going to have to recognize that however silent, there is a significant majority that feel disenfranchise, betrayed and a level of despair watching their home be transferred to newcomers.

These are not hateful, mean or racist people. They simply want to give their kids an upbringing that resembles the one they had. They want their kids to go to schools with other English speaking Americans, meet kids at the park they can be friends with and they don't want their kids to be minorities. This is normal and good.

If Bo's post was over the line for you then you've lost touch with every voter and are in for a rude awakening.







[url=https://x.com/chiweethedog][/url]

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

historian said:

---

Or maybe he means American citizens who are part of our culture, including first or second generation immigrants who have assimilated. They are just as much Americans as those of us whose ancestors came in the 17th or 18th centuries or were already here to greet them. In other words, people with an American heritage.

---

So you are saying that a bunch of kids going crazy at an SEC football game doesn't want to assimilate? What do they need ot do to assimilate? How do they qualify as assimilated?

---

If this is considered "assimilating" what do you consider "not assimilating"?

Bringing this back to remind y’all that the Indian population in Texas is so huge that 70-foot-tall Indian temples can be found in the middle of Texas neighborhoods

And ranchers now rent out cows to Indian families who use them to “bless” their homes: pic.twitter.com/Va6favu9a2

— Savanah Hernandez (@Savsays) September 14, 2026

---

You are upset that they are building churches and doing business with local farmers?

No assimilating is not working, trying to change the structure of the government, committing crimes, etc.

You ask a good question, though. Does remaining a Hindu prevent an Indian from assimilating? Does living in a neighborhood with other Indians mean that an Indian has not assimilated? Does speaking English with an accent mean an Indian has not assimilated?

---

This monstrosity should be used as target practice by the artillery corps

90-F00T-TALL Hindu satanic monkey god, Hanuman, in Sugar Land, Texas.

Tallest statue in Texas used as an advertisement for Indian immigrants. pic.twitter.com/V5zHRCNHK2

— The General (@1776General_) April 14, 2025

---

If it is height that bothers you, I guess we blow up a bunch of crosses too,

---

If you love India so much why dont you move there?

I feel the same w/ historian and Israel.

You guys seem to love foreigners and foreign countries more than Americans and America but refuse to leave.

🚨 I Exposed Texas' Indian Invasion - Full Documentary

Like and share on X to support our work! pic.twitter.com/9bs3mvG8py

— Tyler Oliveira (@tyleraloevera) April 6, 2026

---

The whole point of America is to love ideals, not groups. I love America because people can immigrate here. You love America as long as it is white.

---

American is NOT just an ideal....its a physically place...a country and a homeland for its citizens

That country does have various ideals. And some are in fact very universal...and some that are particular to Americans. And the country is itself quite open and welcoming of new comers in general.

But people like Sir Roger Scruton have long explained that a country is a tangible living community bound by a specific landscape/homeland, shared language, customs, and inherited institutions, history, and values.

So its more than just "ideals". And it would be as strange to love America for only ethno reasons as it is for you to love it only because people can immigrate to it.


"Blood & Soil" vs "Ideals uber Alles"....these are both strange and seem very fanatical.

---

I keep asking the question and none of the racists can answer it. What "language, cusotms, and institutions" are the Asians and Indians hurting?

---

They may in fact not be hurting any...

I get the strong feeling you are not upset about the debate specifics themselves....you seem angry the debate is happening at all.

That anyone in the West daring to have a problem with mass migration seems to trigger you on a deep level. (Especially if its White people who have a problem with it.)

You view migration through a moral lens.....

---

mass migration does hurt communities and institutions though. It displaces citizens who'd normally fill these roles, it lowers wages, it impacts housing costs, and it burdens government institutions.

There is a place for controlled and limited immigration - Indians absolutely have a place in our work force and can be great people to work with. But it should not come at the expense of the citizenry.

---

You must have flunked economics. Bringing in productive people creates more opportunity; it doesn't displace anyone.

---

So you are making the case for slave labor as well.

I didn't flunk economics, I know it quite well. Better than you.

You want to pretend that bringing in millions of people has zero negative impact on the citizenry. You're wrong. The vast majority of "productive" immigrants coming here on work visas aren't anything special. They take advantage of the system, and the absolutely lower the wages for citizens. There's zero chance you've actually hired anywhere near technology. You'll believe whatever the TV tells you.

---

Well slave labor was productive. But it was a human travesty and a mortal sin. So you can't really compare the two without being disingenious.

Of course immigration has an impact, nobody is pretending any different. Your understanding of the impact is just flat out wrong.

Osodecentx said:

---

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

https://www.texastribune.org/2026/09/14/bo-french-post-ut-ohio-football-game/

Definitely not voting for French. Thanks for starting this thread.

---

But you'll vote for a trans-affirming, pro kid-transitioning, zero traditional Christian values, makes up God in his own image, complete liar, and "non-racist" Talarico. OK good for you.

---

Nope

---

Stick to your principles and write-in John Cornyn for Railroad Commish

303Bear said:

---

Seems like we could save a lot of back and forth if we all just agreed that there is a group here who hates/thinks everyone who isn't a white male should not have any position or influence in America and another group that thinks that position is absurd/untenable and not supported by either history nor current reality.

These groups are not going to sway the other. Seems like I just saved us all a lot of time.

Edit: and to be clear, Bo French still sucks and you shouldn't vote for him (regardless of you position on his observations of Indian men at the UT game)

---

I dont even need to go pre-civil war to debunk this.

America had racial quotas on immigration until the Hart Cellar act and somehow we still managed to become the most powerful country on Earth... imagine that...

303Bear said:

---

Seems like we could save a lot of back and forth if we all just agreed that there is a group here who hates/thinks everyone who isn't a white male should not have any position or influence in America and another group that thinks that position is absurd/untenable and not supported by either history nor current reality.

These groups are not going to sway the other. Seems like I just saved us all a lot of time.

Edit: and to be clear, Bo French still sucks and you shouldn't vote for him (regardless of you position on his observations of Indian men at the UT game)

---

I think there are racists on both sides, but also people on both sides who just want to coexist and have their cultures respected. The ones pulling down statues and trying to deport 100 million people are the problem.

Sam Lowry said:

---

303Bear said:

---

Seems like we could save a lot of back and forth if we all just agreed that there is a group here who hates/thinks everyone who isn't a white male should not have any position or influence in America and another group that thinks that position is absurd/untenable and not supported by either history nor current reality.

These groups are not going to sway the other. Seems like I just saved us all a lot of time.

Edit: and to be clear, Bo French still sucks and you shouldn't vote for him (regardless of you position on his observations of Indian men at the UT game)

---

I think there are racists on both sides, but also people on both sides who just want to coexist and have their cultures respected. The ones pulling down statues and trying to deport 100 million people are the problem.

---

So are the ones who are pulling down statues and trying to import 100 million people.

Frank Galvin said:

---

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

historian said:

---

Or maybe he means American citizens who are part of our culture, including first or second generation immigrants who have assimilated. They are just as much Americans as those of us whose ancestors came in the 17th or 18th centuries or were already here to greet them. In other words, people with an American heritage.

---

So you are saying that a bunch of kids going crazy at an SEC football game doesn't want to assimilate? What do they need ot do to assimilate? How do they qualify as assimilated?

---

If this is considered "assimilating" what do you consider "not assimilating"?

Bringing this back to remind y’all that the Indian population in Texas is so huge that 70-foot-tall Indian temples can be found in the middle of Texas neighborhoods

And ranchers now rent out cows to Indian families who use them to “bless” their homes: pic.twitter.com/Va6favu9a2

— Savanah Hernandez (@Savsays) September 14, 2026

---

You are upset that they are building churches and doing business with local farmers?

No assimilating is not working, trying to change the structure of the government, committing crimes, etc.

You ask a good question, though. Does remaining a Hindu prevent an Indian from assimilating? Does living in a neighborhood with other Indians mean that an Indian has not assimilated? Does speaking English with an accent mean an Indian has not assimilated?

---

This monstrosity should be used as target practice by the artillery corps

90-F00T-TALL Hindu satanic monkey god, Hanuman, in Sugar Land, Texas.

Tallest statue in Texas used as an advertisement for Indian immigrants. pic.twitter.com/V5zHRCNHK2

— The General (@1776General_) April 14, 2025

---

If it is height that bothers you, I guess we blow up a bunch of crosses too,

---

If you love India so much why dont you move there?

I feel the same w/ historian and Israel.

You guys seem to love foreigners and foreign countries more than Americans and America but refuse to leave.

🚨 I Exposed Texas' Indian Invasion - Full Documentary

Like and share on X to support our work! pic.twitter.com/9bs3mvG8py

— Tyler Oliveira (@tyleraloevera) April 6, 2026

---

The whole point of America is to love ideals, not groups. I love America because people can immigrate here. You love America as long as it is white.

---

American is NOT just an ideal....its a physically place...a country and a homeland for its citizens

That country does have various ideals. And some are in fact very universal...and some that are particular to Americans. And the country is itself quite open and welcoming of new comers in general.

But people like Sir Roger Scruton have long explained that a country is a tangible living community bound by a specific landscape/homeland, shared language, customs, and inherited institutions, history, and values.

So its more than just "ideals". And it would be as strange to love America for only ethno reasons as it is for you to love it only because people can immigrate to it.


"Blood & Soil" vs "Ideals uber Alles"....these are both strange and seem very fanatical.

---

I keep asking the question and none of the racists can answer it. What "language, cusotms, and institutions" are the Asians and Indians hurting?

---

They may in fact not be hurting any...

I get the strong feeling you are not upset about the debate specifics themselves....you seem angry the debate is happening at all.

That anyone in the West daring to have a problem with mass migration seems to trigger you on a deep level. (Especially if its White people who have a problem with it.)

You view migration through a moral lens.....

---

mass migration does hurt communities and institutions though. It displaces citizens who'd normally fill these roles, it lowers wages, it impacts housing costs, and it burdens government institutions.

There is a place for controlled and limited immigration - Indians absolutely have a place in our work force and can be great people to work with. But it should not come at the expense of the citizenry.

---

You must have flunked economics. Bringing in productive people creates more opportunity; it doesn't displace anyone.

---

So you are making the case for slave labor as well.

I didn't flunk economics, I know it quite well. Better than you.

You want to pretend that bringing in millions of people has zero negative impact on the citizenry. You're wrong. The vast majority of "productive" immigrants coming here on work visas aren't anything special. They take advantage of the system, and the absolutely lower the wages for citizens. There's zero chance you've actually hired anywhere near technology. You'll believe whatever the TV tells you.

---

Well slave labor was productive. But it was a human travesty and a mortal sin. So you can't really compare the two without being disingenious.

Of course immigration has an impact, nobody is pretending any different. Your understanding of the impact is just flat out wrong.

---

no my understanding isn't wrong. Controlled and reasonable immigration has a positive impact. Mass practically uncontrolled immigration hurts the citizenry. It's not even a question.

Sam Lowry said:

---

muddybrazos said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

303Bear said:

---

Seems like we could save a lot of back and forth if we all just agreed that there is a group here who hates/thinks everyone who isn't a white male should not have any position or influence in America and another group that thinks that position is absurd/untenable and not supported by either history nor current reality.

These groups are not going to sway the other. Seems like I just saved us all a lot of time.

Edit: and to be clear, Bo French still sucks and you shouldn't vote for him (regardless of you position on his observations of Indian men at the UT game)

---

I think there are racists on both sides, but also people on both sides who just want to coexist and have their cultures respected. The ones pulling down statues and trying to deport 100 million people are the problem.

---

So are the ones who are pulling down statues and trying to import 100 million people.

---

No one is trying to do that. We're experiencing demographic change as a result of low birth rates and the demands of the market (and, to some extent, US policies that create chaos in our neighboring countries to the south).

---

So why do we need so many Indians? they arent to our south. I understand people coming here from hispanic countries but we dont need Indians coming here to work cheaper that our own people especially since AI will be doing all of the coding with in a very short time.

Sam Lowry said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

muddybrazos said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

303Bear said:

---

Seems like we could save a lot of back and forth if we all just agreed that there is a group here who hates/thinks everyone who isn't a white male should not have any position or influence in America and another group that thinks that position is absurd/untenable and not supported by either history nor current reality.

These groups are not going to sway the other. Seems like I just saved us all a lot of time.

Edit: and to be clear, Bo French still sucks and you shouldn't vote for him (regardless of you position on his observations of Indian men at the UT game)

---

I think there are racists on both sides, but also people on both sides who just want to coexist and have their cultures respected. The ones pulling down statues and trying to deport 100 million people are the problem.

---

So are the ones who are pulling down statues and trying to import 100 million people.

---

No one is trying to do that. We're experiencing demographic change as a result of low birth rates and the demands of the market (and, to some extent, US policies that create chaos in our neighboring countries to the south).

---

I think the oppressive policies created the low birth rates... native white birthrates were great before Hart Cellar

---

I'm not sure what the connection would be there. Griswold and Roe have always been the obvious culprits IMO.

---

It's pretty obvious actually... remove the immigration quotas, flood the country with 3rd worlders, and watch the 3rd worlders vote to bring in more 3rd worlders and create anti-white laws demonizing the native white population. Change the population demographics, culture, and traditions of the nation and demoralize heritage Americans into oblivion.