Who is voting for Bo French?

12,573 Views | 346 Replies | Last: 1 min ago by Mitch Blood Green
303Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

303Bear said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

303Bear said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

303Bear said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

303Bear said:

historian said:

More misstatements and deception.

I never said "immigrants cause crime". I said illegal aliens are criminals, an obvious fact by definition, and that they often commit more crimes.

Crime did increase significantly under Biden. The Democrat crime wave was real. As I mentioned before, the Dems and "their defund the police" obsession along with Dem DA's who refused to prosecute contributed dramatically to the increase.

You talk mostly in generalities while repeating Leftist propaganda. I cited specific issues. Crime victims are not about "feelings", they are real people who suffered horribly an unnecessarily because the fascists are pro-crime.

You cited literally nothing and your assertion that there was a crime waive under Biden is not supported by facts. Crime rates nation wide have dropped steadily since 2020.

The crime wave of illegal immigration, fentanyl deaths, and drugs certainly increased under Biden. We don't even have to look up the stats to know it. It's basic economics. We also know that blue cities don't report immigration status in most of their crime stats for obvious reasons - because the globalists don't want citizens to know how much crime is committed by immigrants - legal or not.

You're just not good at this, you lap up what the TV sells you. Here's reality - illegal immigration is a crime. Illegal immigrant communities report less crime as well. Mass immigration displaces lower income people (citizens and non-citizens) in the labor force and grows an environment where crime will more readily occur. It's not a question of "if" - it is basic economics and the laws of incentives. People are predictable as a group.

You're likely one of the clowns who was arguing to defund the police. You're likely one of the idiots who was saying "walls don't work" when every piece of evidence indicates that they do.

You seem like a smart guy who can't do any bit of critical thinking and just regurgitates lib talking points.



Please point out a "lib talking point" I have made. Please point out anywhere I have advocated to defund the police. I have been very open about the closure of the southern border being the only notable accomplishment of Trump's second term thus far, and a scathing indictment of every administration (of both parties) over the last 40 years that said it could not be done effectively. This has also clearly had a direct role in the reduction in deaths from fentanyl (though the total number still remains higher in the US than any other country on earth), ironically, several border states are among the handful where deaths from fentanyl increased in 2025.

You're moving the goal posts even though you will claim you aren't. Saying "illegals are criminals" is perfectly true, it also is not what was originally being discussed. The assertion that " Crime did increase significantly under Biden" is not supported by statistics, regardless of who the perpetrators are. Your post is effectively your admission there are no statistics to back up the assertion, but it definitely happened despite that because of reasons.

Making up supposed positions I take based on 0 evidence (other than i disagree with you on a singular point, therefore I must also hold every other opinion you disagree with) is intellectually lazy and a laughable strawman to build up in a post where you accuse me of lacking critical thinking skills.



As stated - The crime wave of illegal immigration, fentanyl deaths, and drugs certainly increased under Biden. That's a fact jack.

A declaratory statement about a single type of crime, a trend in substance abuse and a general statement of "drugs" does not contradict the statement that there was not a general crime waive perpetrated by immigrants as some in this thread have stated / implied (and I note that in several instances there was no attempt to differentiate between legal and illegal immigrants). Well done ignoring everything in my post that contradicts your over-simple conclusion of convenience so that you are still "right".

Fentanyl deaths peaked in 2023 and then feel sharply in 2024 back to near pre-Covid levels. Is that also due to Biden?

As stated - The crime wave of illegal immigration, human trafficking, sexual assault, fentanyl deaths, and drugs certainly increased under Biden.

overall stats - we have no way of knowing how greatly immigrants impacted crime, because the largest crime areas do not report that info. We do know mass immigration impacts the citizenry and reduces wages and employment opportunities - especially when combined with the incentives of a nanny state like the US. What we also know - the crime that is directly attributable to immigrants went up, way up.



Said differently, there are no stats to back up my position, but I am sure of it. Also immigrants may have impacted other people and caused them to commit crimes (a position for which there is no support I have been able to find, but alas) so even non-immigrant crime is immigrants fault. That is certainly a position you can take, I guess.

So we should flood the country with another 20 million unvetted illegals and crime will go down?

Brilliant analysis 303.


Quite literally not at all what I said or what follows from anything I said, but if clinging to logical fallacies is necessary for you to feel good, you do you.
303Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

And maybe elect a Nazi representative! Graham Platner might be out but this does not mean the Left won't try again.


You're babbling.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

303Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

303Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

303Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

303Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

303Bear said:

historian said:

It's a fact backed by statistics and the headlines almost daily.


Which statistics? The ones that say illegals are incarcerated at materially lower per capita rates than native born Americans?

https://www.cato.org/briefing-paper/illegal-immigrant-incarceration-rates-2010-2024-demographics-american-imprisonment



I think we should keep in mind that Cato is a group that is always pro-migration (legal and illegal)

But when viewing these data points we need to keep some facts in mind.

1. America does have a very high crime rate underclass. We all know this and we can all debate its origin and how to fix it. But its existence skews the data with comparing it to new arrivals.

2. The data does remind us that legal immigrants (the ones we want) have a far less crime rate than illegal immigrants.

Which is kind of the point....

[Legal immigrants have the lowest incarceration rate, at 303 per 100,000 legal immigrants in 2024. Illegal immigrants have an incarceration rate of 674 per 100,000 illegal immigrants...]

Illegals are literally more than double the incarceration rate of legal immigrants. And that is probably an undercount since its so hard to find, locate, and prosecute illegals in the country without authorization and paperwork.

This feels like you are purposefully missing/leaving out the broader point, regardless of legal immigration status, the incarceration rate is materially lower than native born Americans. Therefore, the assertion that the waive of new illegal immigrants under Biden led to a crime waive is unsupported by facts (and your point 1 further points this out, even if unintentionally).


I agree that since the USA already has a violent crime rate higher than other developed nations... that this is not more than the native rate but its not necessarily a great rate in and of itself.

That does not mean its low....something to take into consideration.

Lets compare Illegal immigrant incarceration rate (674 per 100,000) to other developed nations.

"Japan's incarceration rate is approximately 33 per 100,000 of the national population"

"Denmark's incarceration rate is 70 per 100,000 residents"

"Ireland's current prison population rate is approximately 100 per 100,000 of the national population"

That illegal immigrant rate is not great.....

Ok, fair. Also a completely different conversation that also gets unhappily into many policy issues well beyond immigration.


Its not entirely a different conversation...it touches on this topic and others.

1. We can admit that crime rates from immigrants are less than the rate of Americans.

2. While admitting that America already has a very high crime rate and its actually a extreme rate among developed countries that are our peers.

3. And that immigrant rates are therefore not that great...they are still many times higher than average rates in developed countries.

It would be like saying the average American is $100,000 in debt. While the average illegal immigrant is only $60,000 in debt. While the average Japanese is only $30,000....

Better than the average is not necessary great.



A discussion of crime and incarceration rates nation wide is vastly different than a discussion of whether or not there was a crime waive due to immigrants, which was the proposition set forth in this thread.


We yes we can be more specific.

The crime waive was not due primarily due to immigrants.

But in a place like Maine: "Maine has an overall incarceration rate of 272 per 100,000 residents"...we see that CATO data shows that both legal and illegal immigrants have rates higher than that.....

[Legal immigrants have the lowest incarceration rate, at 303 per 100,000 legal immigrants in 2024. Illegal immigrants have an incarceration rate of 674 per 100,000 illegal immigrants...]


Maine has one of, if not the lowest crime rate in the country. You are comparing that against the nation wide rate. I cannot find a reliable number on crime rate in Maine specific to immigrants, but I do note that through July 2026, ICE had arrested / detained just under 500 immigrants in Maine. Of those, 95-98% had not criminal record and I can only find one confirmed violent offender arrested.


So do we think immigrants do more or less crime based on the State they are in?

Relatively speaking, yes.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

The_barBEARian said:

muddybrazos said:

The_barBEARian said:



I know this is a meme but Indians getting hit by trains is a very real thing. My brother has been living in the UK for a few years and he told me they have had to stop his train on more than one occasion bc an Indian or Pakistani person was just on the tracks in the way of a train.



The best memes or stereotypes are always grounded in truth.

The best Christians laugh at the tragedy others suffer.


Here is what the best Hindus laugh at:

Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

Frank Galvin said:

The_barBEARian said:

muddybrazos said:

The_barBEARian said:



I know this is a meme but Indians getting hit by trains is a very real thing. My brother has been living in the UK for a few years and he told me they have had to stop his train on more than one occasion bc an Indian or Pakistani person was just on the tracks in the way of a train.



The best memes or stereotypes are always grounded in truth.

The best Christians laugh at the tragedy others suffer.


Here is what the best Hindus laugh at:




There are awful people in every group. I guess you are proud to be ours.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bo is saying the quiet part out loud. (Read all three posts).

Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
303Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

303Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

303Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

303Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

303Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

303Bear said:

historian said:

It's a fact backed by statistics and the headlines almost daily.


Which statistics? The ones that say illegals are incarcerated at materially lower per capita rates than native born Americans?

https://www.cato.org/briefing-paper/illegal-immigrant-incarceration-rates-2010-2024-demographics-american-imprisonment



I think we should keep in mind that Cato is a group that is always pro-migration (legal and illegal)

But when viewing these data points we need to keep some facts in mind.

1. America does have a very high crime rate underclass. We all know this and we can all debate its origin and how to fix it. But its existence skews the data with comparing it to new arrivals.

2. The data does remind us that legal immigrants (the ones we want) have a far less crime rate than illegal immigrants.

Which is kind of the point....

[Legal immigrants have the lowest incarceration rate, at 303 per 100,000 legal immigrants in 2024. Illegal immigrants have an incarceration rate of 674 per 100,000 illegal immigrants...]

Illegals are literally more than double the incarceration rate of legal immigrants. And that is probably an undercount since its so hard to find, locate, and prosecute illegals in the country without authorization and paperwork.

This feels like you are purposefully missing/leaving out the broader point, regardless of legal immigration status, the incarceration rate is materially lower than native born Americans. Therefore, the assertion that the waive of new illegal immigrants under Biden led to a crime waive is unsupported by facts (and your point 1 further points this out, even if unintentionally).


I agree that since the USA already has a violent crime rate higher than other developed nations... that this is not more than the native rate but its not necessarily a great rate in and of itself.

That does not mean its low....something to take into consideration.

Lets compare Illegal immigrant incarceration rate (674 per 100,000) to other developed nations.

"Japan's incarceration rate is approximately 33 per 100,000 of the national population"

"Denmark's incarceration rate is 70 per 100,000 residents"

"Ireland's current prison population rate is approximately 100 per 100,000 of the national population"

That illegal immigrant rate is not great.....

Ok, fair. Also a completely different conversation that also gets unhappily into many policy issues well beyond immigration.


Its not entirely a different conversation...it touches on this topic and others.

1. We can admit that crime rates from immigrants are less than the rate of Americans.

2. While admitting that America already has a very high crime rate and its actually a extreme rate among developed countries that are our peers.

3. And that immigrant rates are therefore not that great...they are still many times higher than average rates in developed countries.

It would be like saying the average American is $100,000 in debt. While the average illegal immigrant is only $60,000 in debt. While the average Japanese is only $30,000....

Better than the average is not necessary great.



A discussion of crime and incarceration rates nation wide is vastly different than a discussion of whether or not there was a crime waive due to immigrants, which was the proposition set forth in this thread.


We yes we can be more specific.

The crime waive was not due primarily due to immigrants.

But in a place like Maine: "Maine has an overall incarceration rate of 272 per 100,000 residents"...we see that CATO data shows that both legal and illegal immigrants have rates higher than that.....

[Legal immigrants have the lowest incarceration rate, at 303 per 100,000 legal immigrants in 2024. Illegal immigrants have an incarceration rate of 674 per 100,000 illegal immigrants...]


Maine has one of, if not the lowest crime rate in the country. You are comparing that against the nation wide rate. I cannot find a reliable number on crime rate in Maine specific to immigrants, but I do note that through July 2026, ICE had arrested / detained just under 500 immigrants in Maine. Of those, 95-98% had not criminal record and I can only find one confirmed violent offender arrested.


So do we think immigrants do more or less crime based on the State they are in?

What we do know is the rate of many US States is actually very low...and in a few its very very high...skewing the numbers for the USA as a whole.

While we know immigrants are in the 303 per 100k to 674 per 100k range. (legal and illegal)

That is higher than the rate of many American States....

[According to the latest comprehensive state-by-state data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), 23 states have a incarceration rate lower than 303 per 100,000 residents. These include states like Massachusetts, Maine, Rhode Island, Vermont, New Jersey, New Hampshire, Minnesota, Hawaii, New York, Washington....]

You're literally just mixing metrics at this point still trying to prove you are "right". Show evidence of a state where immigrants commit more crimes than native born Americans...


I am giving you the figures that exist to provide data points.

Most States unfortunately don't track the individual data on illegal or legal immigrants and crime

Would be nice if they did so we had more specific info.

[Because the vast majority of U.S. states do not systematically track the legal immigration status of individuals at the time of arrest or conviction, precise comparisons are limited]

Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yep

He sees reality
303Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

303Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

303Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

303Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

303Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

303Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

303Bear said:

historian said:

It's a fact backed by statistics and the headlines almost daily.


Which statistics? The ones that say illegals are incarcerated at materially lower per capita rates than native born Americans?

https://www.cato.org/briefing-paper/illegal-immigrant-incarceration-rates-2010-2024-demographics-american-imprisonment



I think we should keep in mind that Cato is a group that is always pro-migration (legal and illegal)

But when viewing these data points we need to keep some facts in mind.

1. America does have a very high crime rate underclass. We all know this and we can all debate its origin and how to fix it. But its existence skews the data with comparing it to new arrivals.

2. The data does remind us that legal immigrants (the ones we want) have a far less crime rate than illegal immigrants.

Which is kind of the point....

[Legal immigrants have the lowest incarceration rate, at 303 per 100,000 legal immigrants in 2024. Illegal immigrants have an incarceration rate of 674 per 100,000 illegal immigrants...]

Illegals are literally more than double the incarceration rate of legal immigrants. And that is probably an undercount since its so hard to find, locate, and prosecute illegals in the country without authorization and paperwork.

This feels like you are purposefully missing/leaving out the broader point, regardless of legal immigration status, the incarceration rate is materially lower than native born Americans. Therefore, the assertion that the waive of new illegal immigrants under Biden led to a crime waive is unsupported by facts (and your point 1 further points this out, even if unintentionally).


I agree that since the USA already has a violent crime rate higher than other developed nations... that this is not more than the native rate but its not necessarily a great rate in and of itself.

That does not mean its low....something to take into consideration.

Lets compare Illegal immigrant incarceration rate (674 per 100,000) to other developed nations.

"Japan's incarceration rate is approximately 33 per 100,000 of the national population"

"Denmark's incarceration rate is 70 per 100,000 residents"

"Ireland's current prison population rate is approximately 100 per 100,000 of the national population"

That illegal immigrant rate is not great.....

Ok, fair. Also a completely different conversation that also gets unhappily into many policy issues well beyond immigration.


Its not entirely a different conversation...it touches on this topic and others.

1. We can admit that crime rates from immigrants are less than the rate of Americans.

2. While admitting that America already has a very high crime rate and its actually a extreme rate among developed countries that are our peers.

3. And that immigrant rates are therefore not that great...they are still many times higher than average rates in developed countries.

It would be like saying the average American is $100,000 in debt. While the average illegal immigrant is only $60,000 in debt. While the average Japanese is only $30,000....

Better than the average is not necessary great.



A discussion of crime and incarceration rates nation wide is vastly different than a discussion of whether or not there was a crime waive due to immigrants, which was the proposition set forth in this thread.


We yes we can be more specific.

The crime waive was not due primarily due to immigrants.

But in a place like Maine: "Maine has an overall incarceration rate of 272 per 100,000 residents"...we see that CATO data shows that both legal and illegal immigrants have rates higher than that.....

[Legal immigrants have the lowest incarceration rate, at 303 per 100,000 legal immigrants in 2024. Illegal immigrants have an incarceration rate of 674 per 100,000 illegal immigrants...]


Maine has one of, if not the lowest crime rate in the country. You are comparing that against the nation wide rate. I cannot find a reliable number on crime rate in Maine specific to immigrants, but I do note that through July 2026, ICE had arrested / detained just under 500 immigrants in Maine. Of those, 95-98% had not criminal record and I can only find one confirmed violent offender arrested.


So do we think immigrants do more or less crime based on the State they are in?

What we do know is the rate of many US States is actually very low...and in a few its very very high...skewing the numbers for the USA as a whole.

While we know immigrants are in the 303 per 100k to 674 per 100k range. (legal and illegal)

That is higher than the rate of many American States....

[According to the latest comprehensive state-by-state data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), 23 states have a incarceration rate lower than 303 per 100,000 residents. These include states like Massachusetts, Maine, Rhode Island, Vermont, New Jersey, New Hampshire, Minnesota, Hawaii, New York, Washington....]

You're literally just mixing metrics at this point still trying to prove you are "right". Show evidence of a state where immigrants commit more crimes than native born Americans...


I am giving you the figures that exist to provide data points.

Most States unfortunately don't track the individual data on illegal or legal immigrants and crime

Would be nice if they did so we had more specific info.

[Because the vast majority of U.S. states do not systematically track the legal immigration status of individuals at the time of arrest or conviction, precise comparisons are limited]



So said differently, you cannot support your position with any objective evidence, but remain committed to that position regardless.

At least you are being honest now.

This still gets back to my (almost) original point, that there is not a strong factual basis to claim (as many have in this thread) that "immigrants" are the cause of any recent crime spikes. You still have not addressed, or attempted to address, the nation wide reduction in crime and incarceration rates since 2020, which drop pre-dates the influx of illegal immigrants under the Biden admin. You still havent offered any evidence that immigrants (legal or illegal) commit crimes at a higher rate than native born Americans (and I fully realize I am setting aside the crime of being in this country illegally, which is a fair position to take when talking "crime" but regarding policy to address, the current regime is not proper imo).

As to the actual (I think, maybe, IDK at this point) point of the thread:

Bo French is not a good candidate for TRRC commissioner and should not have been the nominee. The TRRC is effectively a big oil rubber stamp and Texan's should expect better.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
303Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

303Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

303Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

303Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

303Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

303Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

303Bear said:

historian said:

It's a fact backed by statistics and the headlines almost daily.


Which statistics? The ones that say illegals are incarcerated at materially lower per capita rates than native born Americans?

https://www.cato.org/briefing-paper/illegal-immigrant-incarceration-rates-2010-2024-demographics-american-imprisonment



I think we should keep in mind that Cato is a group that is always pro-migration (legal and illegal)

But when viewing these data points we need to keep some facts in mind.

1. America does have a very high crime rate underclass. We all know this and we can all debate its origin and how to fix it. But its existence skews the data with comparing it to new arrivals.

2. The data does remind us that legal immigrants (the ones we want) have a far less crime rate than illegal immigrants.

Which is kind of the point....

[Legal immigrants have the lowest incarceration rate, at 303 per 100,000 legal immigrants in 2024. Illegal immigrants have an incarceration rate of 674 per 100,000 illegal immigrants...]

Illegals are literally more than double the incarceration rate of legal immigrants. And that is probably an undercount since its so hard to find, locate, and prosecute illegals in the country without authorization and paperwork.

This feels like you are purposefully missing/leaving out the broader point, regardless of legal immigration status, the incarceration rate is materially lower than native born Americans. Therefore, the assertion that the waive of new illegal immigrants under Biden led to a crime waive is unsupported by facts (and your point 1 further points this out, even if unintentionally).


I agree that since the USA already has a violent crime rate higher than other developed nations... that this is not more than the native rate but its not necessarily a great rate in and of itself.

That does not mean its low....something to take into consideration.

Lets compare Illegal immigrant incarceration rate (674 per 100,000) to other developed nations.

"Japan's incarceration rate is approximately 33 per 100,000 of the national population"

"Denmark's incarceration rate is 70 per 100,000 residents"

"Ireland's current prison population rate is approximately 100 per 100,000 of the national population"

That illegal immigrant rate is not great.....

Ok, fair. Also a completely different conversation that also gets unhappily into many policy issues well beyond immigration.


Its not entirely a different conversation...it touches on this topic and others.

1. We can admit that crime rates from immigrants are less than the rate of Americans.

2. While admitting that America already has a very high crime rate and its actually a extreme rate among developed countries that are our peers.

3. And that immigrant rates are therefore not that great...they are still many times higher than average rates in developed countries.

It would be like saying the average American is $100,000 in debt. While the average illegal immigrant is only $60,000 in debt. While the average Japanese is only $30,000....

Better than the average is not necessary great.



A discussion of crime and incarceration rates nation wide is vastly different than a discussion of whether or not there was a crime waive due to immigrants, which was the proposition set forth in this thread.


We yes we can be more specific.

The crime waive was not due primarily due to immigrants.

But in a place like Maine: "Maine has an overall incarceration rate of 272 per 100,000 residents"...we see that CATO data shows that both legal and illegal immigrants have rates higher than that.....

[Legal immigrants have the lowest incarceration rate, at 303 per 100,000 legal immigrants in 2024. Illegal immigrants have an incarceration rate of 674 per 100,000 illegal immigrants...]


Maine has one of, if not the lowest crime rate in the country. You are comparing that against the nation wide rate. I cannot find a reliable number on crime rate in Maine specific to immigrants, but I do note that through July 2026, ICE had arrested / detained just under 500 immigrants in Maine. Of those, 95-98% had not criminal record and I can only find one confirmed violent offender arrested.


So do we think immigrants do more or less crime based on the State they are in?

What we do know is the rate of many US States is actually very low...and in a few its very very high...skewing the numbers for the USA as a whole.

While we know immigrants are in the 303 per 100k to 674 per 100k range. (legal and illegal)

That is higher than the rate of many American States....

[According to the latest comprehensive state-by-state data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), 23 states have a incarceration rate lower than 303 per 100,000 residents. These include states like Massachusetts, Maine, Rhode Island, Vermont, New Jersey, New Hampshire, Minnesota, Hawaii, New York, Washington....]

You're literally just mixing metrics at this point still trying to prove you are "right". Show evidence of a state where immigrants commit more crimes than native born Americans...


I am giving you the figures that exist to provide data points.

Most States unfortunately don't track the individual data on illegal or legal immigrants and crime

Would be nice if they did so we had more specific info.

[Because the vast majority of U.S. states do not systematically track the legal immigration status of individuals at the time of arrest or conviction, precise comparisons are limited]



So said differently, you cannot support your position with any objective evidence, but remain committed to that position regardless.

At least you are being honest now.





I made no claim that "immigrants" were necessarily the cause of crime.

My personal default guess would be that legal vetted immigrants (selected for job skills and education) most likely have less criminal behaviors than most groups.

You seem to not be reading what I have posted or the data.

I simply posted the very data from CATO that you relied on with State average incarceration rates. (And CATO data has its own issues that we can discuss)

Along with posting the factual statement that America already has a generally higher crime rate than peer developed Nations

And shown the data from places like Japan and Denmark showing their rates.

Along with various U.S. States like Maine

P.S.

To prove your contention that migrants (legal or illegal) are far less prone to criminal behavior than native born citizens… you would need to show national certified data and then all states and their local data to prove this claim

And you can't do that…for understandable reasons…it does not currently exist in those forms

"The Cato Institute is transparent about the data limitations…Because there is no unified national database tracking the immigration status of criminals"

"48 states do not track legal status at arrest"
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

The_barBEARian said:

Frank Galvin said:

The_barBEARian said:

muddybrazos said:

The_barBEARian said:



I know this is a meme but Indians getting hit by trains is a very real thing. My brother has been living in the UK for a few years and he told me they have had to stop his train on more than one occasion bc an Indian or Pakistani person was just on the tracks in the way of a train.



The best memes or stereotypes are always grounded in truth.

The best Christians laugh at the tragedy others suffer.


Here is what the best Hindus laugh at:




There are awful people in every group. I guess you are proud to be ours.


Being meek and pathetic doesnt make you a good person.
Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

Frank Galvin said:

The_barBEARian said:

Frank Galvin said:

The_barBEARian said:

muddybrazos said:

The_barBEARian said:



I know this is a meme but Indians getting hit by trains is a very real thing. My brother has been living in the UK for a few years and he told me they have had to stop his train on more than one occasion bc an Indian or Pakistani person was just on the tracks in the way of a train.



The best memes or stereotypes are always grounded in truth.

The best Christians laugh at the tragedy others suffer.


Here is what the best Hindus laugh at:




There are awful people in every group. I guess you are proud to be ours.


Being meek and pathetic doesnt make you a good person.


Being an obnoxious boor doesn't either. And who was the guy who said "meek" was a good quality? Oh yes, it was Jesus.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

The_barBEARian said:

Frank Galvin said:

The_barBEARian said:

Frank Galvin said:

The_barBEARian said:

muddybrazos said:

The_barBEARian said:



I know this is a meme but Indians getting hit by trains is a very real thing. My brother has been living in the UK for a few years and he told me they have had to stop his train on more than one occasion bc an Indian or Pakistani person was just on the tracks in the way of a train.



The best memes or stereotypes are always grounded in truth.

The best Christians laugh at the tragedy others suffer.


Here is what the best Hindus laugh at:




There are awful people in every group. I guess you are proud to be ours.


Being meek and pathetic doesnt make you a good person.


Being an obnoxious boor doesn't either. And who was the guy who said "meek" was a good quality? Oh yes, it was Jesus.


Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The more we learn about US migration policies the stranger it gets

We are often a serious outlier in how other counties operate…


The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

The more we learn about US migration policies the stranger it gets

We are often a serious outlier in how other counties operate…





Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the US and Canada are the only "developed" countries w/ birthright citizenship... granted here in the US they literally had to kill off half the country's population to pass it.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

Redbrickbear said:

The more we learn about US migration policies the stranger it gets

We are often a serious outlier in how other counties operate…




Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the US and Canada are the only "developed" countries w/ birthright citizenship... granted here in the US they literally had to kill off half the country's population to pass it.


Most countries in the Western Hemisphere do offer birth right citizenship…but the majority of counties on Earth do not

It seems to be a "new world" style concept that was embraced by new nations in a development phase needing new settlers and immigrants to build up their societies



The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

The_barBEARian said:

Redbrickbear said:

The more we learn about US migration policies the stranger it gets

We are often a serious outlier in how other counties operate…




Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the US and Canada are the only "developed" countries w/ birthright citizenship... granted here in the US they literally had to kill off half the country's population to pass it.


Most countries in the Western Hemisphere do offer birth right citizenship…but the majority of counties on Earth do not

It seems to be a "new world" style concept that was embraced by new nations in a development phase needing new settlers and immigrants to build up their societies





Based Colombia.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Bo is saying the quiet part out loud. (Read all three posts).




A lot of truth here. There are maybe a handful of boomers in my congregation, maybe 15% Gen X, maybe 35% Millenial, and the rest Gen Z and the kids of those last two groups.

If you go to a Boomer majority - or even a Gen X majority church - you have no idea what is coming because the future isn't walking through your doors on Sunday.

You could say the same thing about most organs of the GOP. About the only thing keeping the DSA from a large electoral victory is the pro-illegal, pro-immigration stance it has inherited from the establishment democrats. If they flip the script from international socialism to national socialism it is game over.

(And yeah, don't bother digging up the historic association of that with Germany. This is strictly discussing it as an economic policy...and no, I do not support it.)
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

whiterock said:

Bo is saying the quiet part out loud. (Read all three posts).




A lot of truth here. There are maybe a handful of boomers in my congregation, maybe 15% Gen X, maybe 35% Millenial, and the rest Gen Z and the kids of those last two groups.

If you go to a Boomer majority - or even a Gen X majority church - you have no idea what is coming.

There's zero truth whatsoever. I have it on good authority from SicEm R&P (including Whiterock) that the prospect of right-wing pogroms is a figment of my liberal imagination.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

whiterock said:

Bo is saying the quiet part out loud. (Read all three posts).



You could say the same thing about most organs of the GOP. About the only thing keeping the DSA from a large electoral victory is the pro-illegal, pro-immigration stance it has inherited from the establishment democrats. If they flip the script from international socialism to national socialism it is game over.

(And yeah, don't bother digging up the historic association of that with Germany. This is strictly discussing it as an economic policy...and no, I do not support it.)

From the link: "I've said this in probably a hundred other comments on here, but I've talked to younger guys that would pogrom foreigners and the people that brought them here if someone gave them the green light."

But sure...they're "strictly discussing economic policy."
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Realitybites said:

whiterock said:

Bo is saying the quiet part out loud. (Read all three posts).




A lot of truth here. There are maybe a handful of boomers in my congregation, maybe 15% Gen X, maybe 35% Millenial, and the rest Gen Z and the kids of those last two groups.

If you go to a Boomer majority - or even a Gen X majority church - you have no idea what is coming.

There's zero truth whatsoever. I have it on good authority from SicEm R&P (including Whiterock) that the prospect of right-wing pogroms is a figment of my liberal imagination.


This is the wrong takeaway. What is coming isn't the result of any love for the right wing or left wing. It is merely the natural result of problems being ignored by elected representatives getting worse and the populace seeking out ever more radical solutions in order to stop them from getting worse.

Look, I'm in a bit of a unique situation as a brown immigrant. My life is in the fourth quarter. My adopted son is white. His is in the second quarter. My grandson is white. His game just kicked off. I worry greatly about their futures.

So can we please shut off the immigration tap and please have more - and more respect for - actual legacy Americans and policies that work for them?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
303Bear said:

historian said:

And maybe elect a Nazi representative! Graham Platner might be out but this does not mean the Left won't try again.


You're babbling.

You need to look in the mirror. Your projection is great.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

Redbrickbear said:

The more we learn about US migration policies the stranger it gets

We are often a serious outlier in how other counties operate…





Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the US and Canada are the only "developed" countries w/ birthright citizenship... granted here in the US they literally had to kill off half the country's population to pass it.

At time in US history was "literally" half the population killed off by anyone or anything. That is absurd and ignorant. As high as the death toll of the Civil War was, it was a small fraction of the overall population.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

Frank Galvin said:

The_barBEARian said:

Frank Galvin said:

The_barBEARian said:

Frank Galvin said:

The_barBEARian said:

muddybrazos said:

The_barBEARian said:



I know this is a meme but Indians getting hit by trains is a very real thing. My brother has been living in the UK for a few years and he told me they have had to stop his train on more than one occasion bc an Indian or Pakistani person was just on the tracks in the way of a train.



The best memes or stereotypes are always grounded in truth.

The best Christians laugh at the tragedy others suffer.


Here is what the best Hindus laugh at:




There are awful people in every group. I guess you are proud to be ours.


Being meek and pathetic doesnt make you a good person.


Being an obnoxious boor doesn't either. And who was the guy who said "meek" was a good quality? Oh yes, it was Jesus.




BTW, none of that applies to you. In case you were wondering
Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Seems relevant to this thread:

The G.O.P. Has Gone Off the Deep End

By Jamelle Bouie
Opinion Columnist

The Republican Party has a neo-Nazi problem. This is not slander or pejorative or innuendo; it is the plain truth of the matter, a conclusion drawn from simple observation. And the problem has been getting worse.

Consider a few of the people staffing the Trump administration. There is Paul Ingrassia, acting general counsel of the General Services Administration, who withdrew his nomination to serve as special counsel of the United States after Politico published a trove of offensive remarks from his social media and group chats. "I do have a Nazi streak in me from time to time, I will admit it," Ingrassia, who is 31, wrote in a text in 2024. "We need competent white men in positions of leadership," he wrote in another message. "The founding fathers were wrong that all men are created equal … We need to reject that part of our heritage."

There is Nate Hochman, a young Republican operative who was fired from Gov. Ron DeSantis's 2024 presidential campaign after promoting a pro-DeSantis video that used a Nazi symbol. He now works as speechwriter for Secretary of State Marco Rubio. (In 2022, Hochman wrote a feature for this newspaper's Opinion section.)

And there are the young staffers responsible for the Trump administration's social media presence, who use their large and influential platform to share Nazi-inspired rhetoric and post Nazi-inspired memes. In January of this year, for instance, the Department of Labor posted a video with the caption "One Homeland. One People. One Heritage. Remember who you are, American," a line that echoes the Nazi slogan of "Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fhrer": "One people, one realm, one leader."

Social media accounts for the Department of Homeland Security show a steady stream of memes and images drawn from neo-Nazi and white supremacist agitprop. One post, a recruitment ad for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, read "WE'LL HAVE OUR HOME AGAIN," the title of a song written by the Pine Tree Riots, an a cappella group associated with an explicitly white nationalist group. The song is popular with online neo-Nazis and white supremacists. It is unlikely to have been an accident. Another post, also an ICE recruitment ad, was captioned "Which way, American man?," a direct reference to "Which Way Western Man?," a virulently racist and antisemitic book published in 1978 and later sold and publicized by the National Alliance, a neo-Nazi group.

Keep in mind that these are not staffers' private accounts; these posts are reaching the public through the official organs of the U.S. government. If this weren't disturbing enough, consider some of the people working for Republican candidates and running for office under the Republican standard.

In Georgia, the Republican Senate nominee Mike Collins has had to answer for a former staffer who posted Nazi images online as well as a photo of himself in full Ku Klux Klan regalia. And Collins's son-in-law, David Alan Scheer II, is a white nationalist and online influencer with a history of posting Nazi imagery. Senator Jon Husted, an Ohio Republican running to retain the seat to which he was appointed after Vice President JD Vance left for the White House, recently fired his 25-year-old political director after learning that he had used a photograph of Nazi soldiers as a social media profile picture.

You'll notice that most of these people are in their 20s and 30s. That is no coincidence; it is clear that among the young staffer and operative class of the Republican Party are people with neo-Nazi sympathies and white supremacist views. Last year, for example, leaked messages from a group chat of Young Republicans from chapters across the country who ranged in age from 18 to 40 included racial slurs, support for Nazi ideas and a declaration of admiration for the leader of the Third Reich, all framed as jokes. "I love Hitler," wrote Peter Giunta, then the chief of staff to a New York State assemblyman. Asked if he was watching an N.B.A. playoff game, Giunta, who was also the chairman of the New York State Young Republicans at the time, replied, "I'd go to the zoo if I wanted to watch monkey play ball." If these were jokes, they revealed a taste for both cruelty and casual bigotry.

The University of Florida's College Republicans chapter was disbanded after two members were seen performing a Nazi salute on social media. Elsewhere in the state, 34-year-old Marshall Rawson is set to take a seat in Florida's House of Representatives nearly 10 years after marching alongside neo-Nazis at the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Va.

In March, 30-year-old Brandon Herrera won the Republican primary for Texas' 23rd Congressional District. A far-right YouTube personality, Herrera has published videos that feature Nazi imagery and Nazi military anthems, joke about the Holocaust and showcase Nazi weapons. He can even be seen goose-stepping. And one of the most prominent neo-Nazis in the country is 28-year-old Nick Fuentes, a far-right provocateur and political commentator whose supporters are known as "Groypers." Fuentes dined with President Trump between his two terms and in the past year sat for a friendly interview with Tucker Carlson, still arguably the most important figure in the right-wing media ecosystem.

As the historian David Austin Walsh makes clear in "Taking America Back: The Conservative Movement and the Far Right," there is a degree of self-flattery in the old conventional wisdom that traditional conservatives successfully policed the borders of their movement in the past. Despite his influence, a figure like William F. Buckley Jr. could not actually expel people from the conservative movement or define "conservatism" to fully exclude people and groups that occupied the dark margins of American politics. "American conservatism," Walsh writes, "resembled the fragmentation of the Protestant churches, with various factions and sects vying among themselves over who was 'truly' conservative."

The upshot of this dynamic is that there have always been points of political, social and ideological overlap between the far right and more mainstream conservatives. At National Review, the spiritual and institutional home of movement conservatism through much of the late 20th century, writers like Joe Sobran "flirted with the avowedly racist right," Walsh writes. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the neo-Nazi leader David Duke would make his home in the Louisiana Republican Party and win nearly 40 percent of the vote in the 1991 governor's race. The next year, in the Republican presidential primary, Pat Buchanan would launch a spirited challenge to George H.W. Bush even after Buchanan was condemned for trafficking in Holocaust denialism.

For a time, the institutional Republican Party was strong enough to keep these views, and the underlying forces that fueled them, away from its center of gravity. It is with the total collapse of the traditional Republican "establishment" and the extent to which it was supplanted, over the course of the 2000s and the 2010s, by conservative media and assorted billionaire donors that the party lost any ability it had to police its boundaries. The apotheosis of this phenomenon is Donald Trump, who fully bypassed conservative and Republican gatekeepers on the strength of his celebrity and media savvy, and whose victory in the 2024 presidential election opened the floodgates of the party to the far right.

But where even Trump once had to create the sense of distance between himself and the alt-right, now it is hard to think of it as "alternative" at all. Now it is simply the Republican right. There is every reason to think, in fact, that the Republican Party's neo-Nazi problem is spreading.Just look at the way that House Speaker Mike Johnson defended Herrera after being confronted with evidence of his abhorrent views, treating him as just another Republican candidate with an outsize online persona. "Brandon Herrera has been out running a very effective campaign," Johnson said.

Or look to last week's Republican midterm gathering in Dallas, where the vice president echoed far-right tropes about the alleged crime and disorder produced by immigrants. "We were tired of being called racists," Vance said to the cheers and approving nods of the audience, "for noticing that our country was becoming dirtier and poorer and less safe and less prosperous."The vice president is nothing if not shrewd and opportunistic. He sees where his fellow young conservatives are headed. He does not plan to be left behind.

Perhaps there will be some seismic shift that derails the far-right capture of the Republican Party. But this feels like wishful thinking. If the past decade is any guide, then the fever, if that is what we want to call it, is only going to get worse.
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LMAO

You are an idiot
Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Danielsjackson114 said:

LMAO

You are an idiot

WTH is wrong with you that your only argument is name-calling?
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why argue with absolute brain dead posts?
Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
To the rest of the forum--

While Daniel is probably best described as a troll, he is also the exact person Bo French appeals to and who the article describes as gaining more influence in the G.O.P. He and his groyper friends are just as dangerous to America as Antifa and communists.

It is dispiriting that he has any association with Baylor University (if that is true).

I am turning ignore on and I suggest you do the same.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

The next year, in the Republican presidential primary, Pat Buchanan would launch a spirited challenge to George H.W. Bush even after Buchanan was condemned for trafficking in Holocaust denialism.


This, by the way, was an absolutely slanderous lie used by the National Review crowd to target the man and his campaign after he used Goldman Sachs as an example of what was going wrong with the financialization of the economy. Sad to still see it still being brought up to attack a great patriot.
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

Frank Galvin said:

Redbrickbear said:

Frank Galvin said:

If you argue against UT spots going to actual foreigners who are not going to stay in America, fine, I probably agree with you. State resources should not go to something that will not benefit the state.

But most of you are arguing that Americans should not be at UT because of their ethnicity, regardless of their intellectual merit.

God is ashamed of you. Your argument is racist and sickening. Period, end of story.




No...they are arguing that American citizenship should not be so easily sold that the demographics of entire States can't switch in a breathtaking short term. Not even a single lifetime.



PS

Westerners are the least racist people on earth....the most welcoming and the least ethno-nationalist

I mean you don't see Africans, East Asians, Israelis, Arabs, or Indians letting in millions of other peoples into their nations do you?

Blaming Texans or Americans for not wanting to be demographically replaced in a single lifetime...while not holding the rest of the world to this same standard is utter and horrible hypocrisy.

What a racist trope. First, you have no idea whether those specific kids are from India, Asia, or Lorena. Second, the more general idea that we are being swamped by Asians or Muslims has zero statistical support. While Asians are Texas's fastest-growing demographic, they comprise about 6% of the state's population, growing at an annual rate of 5-6% compared with an overall growth rate of about 1.5%. In other words, they constitute a small percentage of the population and will remain a minority. Third, America has always been about immigration. The same complaints you are making now were leveled against the Irish, the Italians, Eastern Europeans, and previous generations of Asians.

What really upsets you is not that they won't "assimilate," because they do assimilate. Going crazy at a college football game proves that point.

You and French are upset that so many of them are in the picture because they earned their way into a selective public school. If America is one thing, it is supposed to be a meritocracy.


Shut up silly woman... families who have contributed tens of millions of dollars to the state of Texas in taxation and business development deserve the right to cut the line and receive preferential treatment and go to the public school of their choice that they are paying for with their tax dollars... if you dont like it too bad




Isn't the demographics shift partly based on the idea that test scores alone should determine college acceptance?
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frank Galvin said:

To the rest of the forum--

While Daniel is probably best described as a troll, he is also the exact person Bo French appeals to and who the article describes as gaining more influence in the G.O.P. He and his groyper friends are just as dangerous to America as Antifa and communists.

It is dispiriting that he has any association with Baylor University (if that is true).

I am turning ignore on and I suggest you do the same.


F that dude.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.