"Democrat" double standard seen with Ilhan Omar

5,671 Views | 108 Replies | Last: 8 days ago by Oldbear83
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BEHOLD: Democrats who said "no one is above the law" are very upset that the DOJ is investigating a Democrat

https://notthebee.com/article/behold-democrats-who-said-no-one-is-above-the-law-are-very-upset-that-the-doj-is-investigating-a-democrat

They loved to say "No one is above the law" when they used law fare against Trump in fake charges and no evidence but not so much when one of them apparently is guilty of very serious crimes.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

BEHOLD: Democrats who said "no one is above the law" are very upset that the DOJ is investigating a Democrat

https://notthebee.com/article/behold-democrats-who-said-no-one-is-above-the-law-are-very-upset-that-the-doj-is-investigating-a-democrat

They loved to say "No one is above the law" when they used law fare against Trump in fake charges and no evidence but not so much when one of them apparently is guilty of very serious crimes.

I realize this will make absolutely no difference to "conservatives," but the accusations against Trump were in fact very real.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
on trumped up charges with no evidence

All charges were dropped for obvious reasons, except the kangaroo court in New York which was blatantly unconstitutional and violated his rights as a defendant. But the fascists don't care about such things. And each of those prosecution teams have their own scandals. Jack Smith probably belongs in jail. Arguably, Leticia James does as well.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

on trumped up charges with no evidence

All charges were dropped for obvious reasons, except the kangaroo court in New York which was blatantly unconstitutional and violated his rights as a defendant. But the fascists don't care about such things. And each of those prosecution teams have their own scandals. Jack Smith probably belongs in jail. Arguably, Leticia James does as well.

For those who don't remember, here are several stacks of "no evidence."


Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

on trumped up charges with no evidence

All charges were dropped for obvious reasons, except the kangaroo court in New York which was blatantly unconstitutional and violated his rights as a defendant. But the fascists don't care about such things. And each of those prosecution teams have their own scandals. Jack Smith probably belongs in jail. Arguably, Leticia James does as well.

For those who don't remember, here are several stacks of "no evidence."



Debunked
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lunatic left hypocrisy/virtue signaling knows no bounds
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's nothing more than carefully orchestrated props proving nothing related to the accusations. Not so clever propaganda.

The raid on Mar-a-Lago was blatantly unconstitutional and unjustified. Jack Smith lying to Congress about that and other things is why he belongs in jail. Perjury is a felony.

Nobody is above the law.

Debunked
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
fubar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

on trumped up charges with no evidence

All charges were dropped for obvious reasons, except the kangaroo court in New York which was blatantly unconstitutional and violated his rights as a defendant. But the fascists don't care about such things. And each of those prosecution teams have their own scandals. Jack Smith probably belongs in jail. Arguably, Leticia James does as well.

You call yourself "historian" and yet present these absurdities?

Hay-SOOS!
fubar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

It's nothing more than carefully orchestrated props proving nothing related to the accusations. Not so clever propaganda.

The raid on Mar-a-Lago was blatantly unconstitutional and unjustified. Jack Smith lying to Congress about that and other things is why he belongs in jail. Perjury is a felony.

Nobody is above the law.

Debunked

This might be your stupidest post ever, and that's saying something.

You literally have zero idea of what you're talking about.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Apparently a lot more than you.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fubar said:

historian said:

on trumped up charges with no evidence

All charges were dropped for obvious reasons, except the kangaroo court in New York which was blatantly unconstitutional and violated his rights as a defendant. But the fascists don't care about such things. And each of those prosecution teams have their own scandals. Jack Smith probably belongs in jail. Arguably, Leticia James does as well.

You call yourself "historian" and yet present these absurdities?

Hay-SOOS!

his history books have a lot of pictures, obviously.
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

BEHOLD: Democrats who said "no one is above the law" are very upset that the DOJ is investigating a Democrat

https://notthebee.com/article/behold-democrats-who-said-no-one-is-above-the-law-are-very-upset-that-the-doj-is-investigating-a-democrat

They loved to say "No one is above the law" when they used law fare against Trump in fake charges and no evidence but not so much when one of them apparently is guilty of very serious crimes.

I realize this will make absolutely no difference to "conservatives," but the accusations against Trump were in fact very real.


Not only real, Trump had every opportunity to cure before it went to warrant. He is willing to burn down the country.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

It's nothing more than carefully orchestrated props proving nothing related to the accusations. Not so clever propaganda.

The raid on Mar-a-Lago was blatantly unconstitutional and unjustified. Jack Smith lying to Congress about that and other things is why he belongs in jail. Perjury is a felony.

Nobody is above the law.

Debunked

What lie did Jack Smith tell, specifically?
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

It's nothing more than carefully orchestrated props proving nothing related to the accusations. Not so clever propaganda.

The raid on Mar-a-Lago was blatantly unconstitutional and unjustified. Jack Smith lying to Congress about that and other things is why he belongs in jail. Perjury is a felony.

Nobody is above the law.

Debunked

What lie did Jack Smith tell, specifically?


I thought you, as a shill for Putin, would like Trump better after the diesel deal.
That said, whatever is presented as a lie/falsehood/half truth with vital missing info, would just be all truth for you, the half truth king regarding the ministry of truth attempt by the same admin that appointed Smith.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

It's nothing more than carefully orchestrated props proving nothing related to the accusations. Not so clever propaganda.

The raid on Mar-a-Lago was blatantly unconstitutional and unjustified. Jack Smith lying to Congress about that and other things is why he belongs in jail. Perjury is a felony.

Nobody is above the law.

Debunked

What lie did Jack Smith tell, specifically?


I thought you, as a shill for Putin, would like Trump better after the diesel deal.
That said, whatever is presented as a lie/falsehood/half truth with vital missing info, would just be all truth for you, the half truth king regarding the ministry of truth attempt by the same admin that appointed Smith.


Again, I had no opinion on the disinformation board. I recognized the dangers and was open to arguments that it was unconstitutional, but no one responded to that question either.

What did Jack Smith lie about?
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

It's nothing more than carefully orchestrated props proving nothing related to the accusations. Not so clever propaganda.

The raid on Mar-a-Lago was blatantly unconstitutional and unjustified. Jack Smith lying to Congress about that and other things is why he belongs in jail. Perjury is a felony.

Nobody is above the law.

Debunked

What lie did Jack Smith tell, specifically?


I thought you, as a shill for Putin, would like Trump better after the diesel deal.
That said, whatever is presented as a lie/falsehood/half truth with vital missing info, would just be all truth for you, the half truth king regarding the ministry of truth attempt by the same admin that appointed Smith.


Again, I had no opinion on the disinformation board. I recognized the dangers and was open to arguments that it was unconstitutional, but no one responded to that question either.

What did Jack Smith lie about?


You typed an awful lot of argument about something you had "no opinion" about. And you were answered often, but chose to argue that it was constitutional and could be beneficial. Not a "no opinion" behavior.

Do you like this type of history rewriting as well? Did you help make this video?

Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

BEHOLD: Democrats who said "no one is above the law" are very upset that the DOJ is investigating a Democrat

https://notthebee.com/article/behold-democrats-who-said-no-one-is-above-the-law-are-very-upset-that-the-doj-is-investigating-a-democrat

They loved to say "No one is above the law" when they used law fare against Trump in fake charges and no evidence but not so much when one of them apparently is guilty of very serious crimes.

I realize this will make absolutely no difference to "conservatives," but the accusations against Trump were in fact very real.

Is that why state's had to pass laws specifically to charge him and even Democrats said "this has never been done before?"

BTW - have you Jew-haters figured out how a "genocide" leads to an increase in population?
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

It's nothing more than carefully orchestrated props proving nothing related to the accusations. Not so clever propaganda.

The raid on Mar-a-Lago was blatantly unconstitutional and unjustified. Jack Smith lying to Congress about that and other things is why he belongs in jail. Perjury is a felony.

Nobody is above the law.

Debunked

What lie did Jack Smith tell, specifically?


I thought you, as a shill for Putin, would like Trump better after the diesel deal.
That said, whatever is presented as a lie/falsehood/half truth with vital missing info, would just be all truth for you, the half truth king regarding the ministry of truth attempt by the same admin that appointed Smith.


Again, I had no opinion on the disinformation board. I recognized the dangers and was open to arguments that it was unconstitutional, but no one responded to that question either.

What did Jack Smith lie about?


You typed an awful lot of argument about something you had "no opinion" about. And you were answered often, but chose to argue that it was constitutional and could be beneficial. Not a "no opinion" behavior.

Do you like this type of history rewriting as well? Did you help make this video?



It's not my fault if what you read was different from what I wrote.

What did Jack Smith lie about?
fubar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

It's nothing more than carefully orchestrated props proving nothing related to the accusations. Not so clever propaganda.

The raid on Mar-a-Lago was blatantly unconstitutional and unjustified. Jack Smith lying to Congress about that and other things is why he belongs in jail. Perjury is a felony.

Nobody is above the law.

Debunked

What lie did Jack Smith tell, specifically?


I thought you, as a shill for Putin, would like Trump better after the diesel deal.
That said, whatever is presented as a lie/falsehood/half truth with vital missing info, would just be all truth for you, the half truth king regarding the ministry of truth attempt by the same admin that appointed Smith.


Again, I had no opinion on the disinformation board. I recognized the dangers and was open to arguments that it was unconstitutional, but no one responded to that question either.

What did Jack Smith lie about?


You typed an awful lot of argument about something you had "no opinion" about. And you were answered often, but chose to argue that it was constitutional and could be beneficial. Not a "no opinion" behavior.

Do you like this type of history rewriting as well? Did you help make this video?



It's not my fault if what you read was different from what I wrote.

What did Jack Smith lie about?

You'll never get a truthful answer.
fubar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

BEHOLD: Democrats who said "no one is above the law" are very upset that the DOJ is investigating a Democrat

https://notthebee.com/article/behold-democrats-who-said-no-one-is-above-the-law-are-very-upset-that-the-doj-is-investigating-a-democrat

They loved to say "No one is above the law" when they used law fare against Trump in fake charges and no evidence but not so much when one of them apparently is guilty of very serious crimes.

I realize this will make absolutely no difference to "conservatives," but the accusations against Trump were in fact very real.


Not only real, Trump had every opportunity to cure before it went to warrant. He is willing to burn down the country.

Yessir.
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fubar said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

BEHOLD: Democrats who said "no one is above the law" are very upset that the DOJ is investigating a Democrat

https://notthebee.com/article/behold-democrats-who-said-no-one-is-above-the-law-are-very-upset-that-the-doj-is-investigating-a-democrat

They loved to say "No one is above the law" when they used law fare against Trump in fake charges and no evidence but not so much when one of them apparently is guilty of very serious crimes.

I realize this will make absolutely no difference to "conservatives," but the accusations against Trump were in fact very real.


Not only real, Trump had every opportunity to cure before it went to warrant. He is willing to burn down the country.

Yessir.


If that were the full truth, then Biden would have been prosecuted well before Trump. Justice has not been blind for some time on the matter of classified documents. If it had, both men would have been charged, tried, and if found guilty then sentenced as hard as all the government grunts that have served time.
As it has stood for a long time, the executive big wigs and Congress members get a whole lot of leeway.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

fubar said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

BEHOLD: Democrats who said "no one is above the law" are very upset that the DOJ is investigating a Democrat

https://notthebee.com/article/behold-democrats-who-said-no-one-is-above-the-law-are-very-upset-that-the-doj-is-investigating-a-democrat

They loved to say "No one is above the law" when they used law fare against Trump in fake charges and no evidence but not so much when one of them apparently is guilty of very serious crimes.

I realize this will make absolutely no difference to "conservatives," but the accusations against Trump were in fact very real.


Not only real, Trump had every opportunity to cure before it went to warrant. He is willing to burn down the country.

Yessir.


If that were the full truth, then Biden would have been prosecuted well before Trump. Justice has not been blind for some time on the matter of classified documents. If it had, both men would have been charged, tried, and if found guilty then sentenced as hard as all the government grunts that have served time.
As it has stood for a long time, the executive big wigs and Congress members get a whole lot of leeway.

Biden cooperated and returned the documents. Trump had more than enough opportunity to do the same, but he refused. It's not that complicated.
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

fubar said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

BEHOLD: Democrats who said "no one is above the law" are very upset that the DOJ is investigating a Democrat

https://notthebee.com/article/behold-democrats-who-said-no-one-is-above-the-law-are-very-upset-that-the-doj-is-investigating-a-democrat

They loved to say "No one is above the law" when they used law fare against Trump in fake charges and no evidence but not so much when one of them apparently is guilty of very serious crimes.

I realize this will make absolutely no difference to "conservatives," but the accusations against Trump were in fact very real.


Not only real, Trump had every opportunity to cure before it went to warrant. He is willing to burn down the country.

Yessir.


If that were the full truth, then Biden would have been prosecuted well before Trump. Justice has not been blind for some time on the matter of classified documents. If it had, both men would have been charged, tried, and if found guilty then sentenced as hard as all the government grunts that have served time.
As it has stood for a long time, the executive big wigs and Congress members get a whole lot of leeway.

Biden cooperated and returned the documents. Trump had more than enough opportunity to do the same, but he refused. It's not that complicated.


Biden had not cooperated for many years before that, but was never raided or searched until Trump was targeted for documents. It was not a secret about Biden and documents, it just wasn't pursued until Trump. Even then the reasons not to pursue any further charges against Joe Biden are garbage. He was never going to be in any real trouble.
It has been as I stated above. DC rules have been ridiculously different for the elites. Trump became the exception for that.
Simplistic view you have there that is not what the document investigation into Biden concluded in its own documents.
fubar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

fubar said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

BEHOLD: Democrats who said "no one is above the law" are very upset that the DOJ is investigating a Democrat

https://notthebee.com/article/behold-democrats-who-said-no-one-is-above-the-law-are-very-upset-that-the-doj-is-investigating-a-democrat

They loved to say "No one is above the law" when they used law fare against Trump in fake charges and no evidence but not so much when one of them apparently is guilty of very serious crimes.

I realize this will make absolutely no difference to "conservatives," but the accusations against Trump were in fact very real.


Not only real, Trump had every opportunity to cure before it went to warrant. He is willing to burn down the country.

Yessir.


If that were the full truth, then Biden would have been prosecuted well before Trump. Justice has not been blind for some time on the matter of classified documents. If it had, both men would have been charged, tried, and if found guilty then sentenced as hard as all the government grunts that have served time.
As it has stood for a long time, the executive big wigs and Congress members get a whole lot of leeway.

Biden cooperated and returned the documents. Trump had more than enough opportunity to do the same, but he refused. It's not that complicated.

It takes a willing imbecile to not see the difference.

Welcome to the sicem365 R&P Board.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fubar said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

fubar said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

BEHOLD: Democrats who said "no one is above the law" are very upset that the DOJ is investigating a Democrat

https://notthebee.com/article/behold-democrats-who-said-no-one-is-above-the-law-are-very-upset-that-the-doj-is-investigating-a-democrat

They loved to say "No one is above the law" when they used law fare against Trump in fake charges and no evidence but not so much when one of them apparently is guilty of very serious crimes.

I realize this will make absolutely no difference to "conservatives," but the accusations against Trump were in fact very real.


Not only real, Trump had every opportunity to cure before it went to warrant. He is willing to burn down the country.

Yessir.


If that were the full truth, then Biden would have been prosecuted well before Trump. Justice has not been blind for some time on the matter of classified documents. If it had, both men would have been charged, tried, and if found guilty then sentenced as hard as all the government grunts that have served time.
As it has stood for a long time, the executive big wigs and Congress members get a whole lot of leeway.

Biden cooperated and returned the documents. Trump had more than enough opportunity to do the same, but he refused. It's not that complicated.

It takes a willing imbecile to not see the difference.

Welcome to the sicem365 R&P Board.


You're projecting. Only an imbecile would think Biden returned them - how were they recovered from his Chinese-funded "think tank" and his garage? It's not hard - facts don't care about your feelings.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fubar said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

It's nothing more than carefully orchestrated props proving nothing related to the accusations. Not so clever propaganda.

The raid on Mar-a-Lago was blatantly unconstitutional and unjustified. Jack Smith lying to Congress about that and other things is why he belongs in jail. Perjury is a felony.

Nobody is above the law.

Debunked

What lie did Jack Smith tell, specifically?


I thought you, as a shill for Putin, would like Trump better after the diesel deal.
That said, whatever is presented as a lie/falsehood/half truth with vital missing info, would just be all truth for you, the half truth king regarding the ministry of truth attempt by the same admin that appointed Smith.


Again, I had no opinion on the disinformation board. I recognized the dangers and was open to arguments that it was unconstitutional, but no one responded to that question either.

What did Jack Smith lie about?


You typed an awful lot of argument about something you had "no opinion" about. And you were answered often, but chose to argue that it was constitutional and could be beneficial. Not a "no opinion" behavior.

Do you like this type of history rewriting as well? Did you help make this video?



It's not my fault if what you read was different from what I wrote.

What did Jack Smith lie about?

You'll never get a truthful answer.

Doesn't look like it.

Anyone? Historian?
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

fubar said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

fubar said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

BEHOLD: Democrats who said "no one is above the law" are very upset that the DOJ is investigating a Democrat

https://notthebee.com/article/behold-democrats-who-said-no-one-is-above-the-law-are-very-upset-that-the-doj-is-investigating-a-democrat

They loved to say "No one is above the law" when they used law fare against Trump in fake charges and no evidence but not so much when one of them apparently is guilty of very serious crimes.

I realize this will make absolutely no difference to "conservatives," but the accusations against Trump were in fact very real.


Not only real, Trump had every opportunity to cure before it went to warrant. He is willing to burn down the country.

Yessir.


If that were the full truth, then Biden would have been prosecuted well before Trump. Justice has not been blind for some time on the matter of classified documents. If it had, both men would have been charged, tried, and if found guilty then sentenced as hard as all the government grunts that have served time.
As it has stood for a long time, the executive big wigs and Congress members get a whole lot of leeway.

Biden cooperated and returned the documents. Trump had more than enough opportunity to do the same, but he refused. It's not that complicated.

It takes a willing imbecile to not see the difference.

Welcome to the sicem365 R&P Board.


You're projecting. Only an imbecile would think Biden returned them - how were they recovered from his Chinese-funded "think tank" and his garage? It's not hard - facts don't care about your feelings.

While you could easily make the srgument the government should have raided Biden's garage, you cannot say they raided Trump's resort without reason. It boils down to yet another "b-b-b-buttt BIDENNN??????" argument that is only slightly more en vogue than "butttt OBAMA???"
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

fubar said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

fubar said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

BEHOLD: Democrats who said "no one is above the law" are very upset that the DOJ is investigating a Democrat

https://notthebee.com/article/behold-democrats-who-said-no-one-is-above-the-law-are-very-upset-that-the-doj-is-investigating-a-democrat

They loved to say "No one is above the law" when they used law fare against Trump in fake charges and no evidence but not so much when one of them apparently is guilty of very serious crimes.

I realize this will make absolutely no difference to "conservatives," but the accusations against Trump were in fact very real.


Not only real, Trump had every opportunity to cure before it went to warrant. He is willing to burn down the country.

Yessir.


If that were the full truth, then Biden would have been prosecuted well before Trump. Justice has not been blind for some time on the matter of classified documents. If it had, both men would have been charged, tried, and if found guilty then sentenced as hard as all the government grunts that have served time.
As it has stood for a long time, the executive big wigs and Congress members get a whole lot of leeway.

Biden cooperated and returned the documents. Trump had more than enough opportunity to do the same, but he refused. It's not that complicated.

It takes a willing imbecile to not see the difference.

Welcome to the sicem365 R&P Board.


You're projecting. Only an imbecile would think Biden returned them - how were they recovered from his Chinese-funded "think tank" and his garage? It's not hard - facts don't care about your feelings.

While you could easily make the srgument the government should have raided Biden's garage, you cannot say they raided Trump's resort without reason. It boils down to yet another "b-b-b-buttt BIDENNN??????" argument that is only slightly more en vogue than "butttt OBAMA???"

I think it is called more simply wanting a single standard of justice.

There was no reason to raid Trump's home - it was clearly a show by the Biden FBI to discourage a Trump campaign, If you cannot see that I cannot help you. Even the pictures have been disproven. Jack Smith as well is a known political hack. They don't tell you this on CNN or The View, but Smith has a long history or running lawfare against GOP candidates. Here is one example.

Obama, Biden, Clinton - probably Bush - all had documents. Only Trump was raided by the FBI. Just like the FBI was used by the Bidens to raid a journalist's home to recover his daughter's diary and Obama used the IRS to attack political opponents.

The left has no problem with such tactics as long as it is yielding the power. In fact the left singularly is built on corruption and lawfare.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

Sam Lowry said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

fubar said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

BEHOLD: Democrats who said "no one is above the law" are very upset that the DOJ is investigating a Democrat

https://notthebee.com/article/behold-democrats-who-said-no-one-is-above-the-law-are-very-upset-that-the-doj-is-investigating-a-democrat

They loved to say "No one is above the law" when they used law fare against Trump in fake charges and no evidence but not so much when one of them apparently is guilty of very serious crimes.

I realize this will make absolutely no difference to "conservatives," but the accusations against Trump were in fact very real.


Not only real, Trump had every opportunity to cure before it went to warrant. He is willing to burn down the country.

Yessir.


If that were the full truth, then Biden would have been prosecuted well before Trump. Justice has not been blind for some time on the matter of classified documents. If it had, both men would have been charged, tried, and if found guilty then sentenced as hard as all the government grunts that have served time.
As it has stood for a long time, the executive big wigs and Congress members get a whole lot of leeway.

Biden cooperated and returned the documents. Trump had more than enough opportunity to do the same, but he refused. It's not that complicated.


Biden had not cooperated for many years before that, but was never raided or searched until Trump was targeted for documents. It was not a secret about Biden and documents, it just wasn't pursued until Trump. Even then the reasons not to pursue any further charges against Joe Biden are garbage. He was never going to be in any real trouble.
It has been as I stated above. DC rules have been ridiculously different for the elites. Trump became the exception for that.
Simplistic view you have there that is not what the document investigation into Biden concluded in its own documents.

Not even close to the truth. The initial batch of Biden documents was discovered by his own lawyers and returned the next day. Biden cooperated with the DOJ to locate and return the rest of them as quickly as possible. The investigation concluded that the documents could plausibly have been kept by mistake and that prosecution was unwarranted because the evidence didn't establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

In contrast, the Trump documents were found missing by the National Archives. What followed was more than a year of haggling, obstruction, and defiance by Trump, during which time the documents were stored in a grossly unsecure manner and, in some instances, openly displayed to his guests. To this day it's still not clear whether all of them were recovered.
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
>>
Alan Dershowitz argues Rep. Ilhan Omar in 'deep, deep trouble' with investigation

(NewsNation) As the federal investigation into Minnesota Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar continues, prominent attorney and Harvard Law School professor Alan Dershowitz said he believes the congresswoman is in serious legal jeopardy.

The case involving the congresswoman centers on questions surrounding her citizenship and immigration records, including how she obtained legal status after immigrating to the United States from Somalia decades ago. Investigators are also looking at actions by her late father, who brought the family to the U.S. from a Kenyan refugee camp in 1995.

A.J. Kern, a former Minnesota congressional candidate who ran against Omar, raised this issue in 2019. Omar claims neither of those appears to be true and that she has documents to support it.

Ilhan Omar probe: Border czar says investigators have 'strong case'
NewsNation has confirmed federal prosecutors have issued more than 15 subpoenas, including to relatives of Omar, as part of an ongoing criminal investigation, according to a source familiar with the investigation.

'I hope she has to go to jail': Alan Dershowitz on Ilhan Omar

Dershowitz's vast experience in dealing with search warrants done against government officials means there's something very substantial in the case, he told "On Balance."

"This is not the normal case of a judge just signing off," Dershowitz said. "And so I suspect there's a lot more than we now know publicly."

While Omar hasn't been charged with any crime, Dershowitz hopes she ends up in prison.

Feds dumpster-dive for Rep. Ilhan Omar's DNA: Sources
"She's a horrible, horrible human being, a horrible member of Congress, a horrible anti-American, anti-Semite, anti-Israel," he stated. "And I hope she has to go to jail. The statute of limitations may be over on some of her criminal conduct, but not on her fraud in becoming a citizen."

Feds have to prove Omar lied on citizenship application: Alan Dershowitz
Omar has maintained that she has done nothing wrong. Dershowitz argued that public opinion could shift if federal investigators are able to prove she provided false information on her citizenship application or that someone else submitted false information on her behalf.

"If she continues to lie, if she continues to give her birth date wrongly, even though she did it in the past, and the past may be beyond the statute of limitations, this may constitute what's called a continuing crime," he said. "And so the statute of limitations may be satisfied."

Presidential historian: History favors Democrats in the midterms
"We don't know how deep the trouble is. But at the very least, if it turns out that she lied or that her citizenship was obtained through fraud, whether it's her fraud or her father's fraud, she has great vulnerability to being denaturalized."

Omar is seeking a fifth term in Congress.
pro ecclesia, pro javelina
Forest Bueller III
How long do you want to ignore this user?
william said:

>>
Alan Dershowitz argues Rep. Ilhan Omar in 'deep, deep trouble' with investigation

(NewsNation) As the federal investigation into Minnesota Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar continues, prominent attorney and Harvard Law School professor Alan Dershowitz said he believes the congresswoman is in serious legal jeopardy.

The case involving the congresswoman centers on questions surrounding her citizenship and immigration records, including how she obtained legal status after immigrating to the United States from Somalia decades ago. Investigators are also looking at actions by her late father, who brought the family to the U.S. from a Kenyan refugee camp in 1995.

A.J. Kern, a former Minnesota congressional candidate who ran against Omar, raised this issue in 2019. Omar claims neither of those appears to be true and that she has documents to support it.

Ilhan Omar probe: Border czar says investigators have 'strong case'
NewsNation has confirmed federal prosecutors have issued more than 15 subpoenas, including to relatives of Omar, as part of an ongoing criminal investigation, according to a source familiar with the investigation.

'I hope she has to go to jail': Alan Dershowitz on Ilhan Omar

Dershowitz's vast experience in dealing with search warrants done against government officials means there's something very substantial in the case, he told "On Balance."

"This is not the normal case of a judge just signing off," Dershowitz said. "And so I suspect there's a lot more than we now know publicly."

While Omar hasn't been charged with any crime, Dershowitz hopes she ends up in prison.

Feds dumpster-dive for Rep. Ilhan Omar's DNA: Sources
"She's a horrible, horrible human being, a horrible member of Congress, a horrible anti-American, anti-Semite, anti-Israel," he stated. "And I hope she has to go to jail. The statute of limitations may be over on some of her criminal conduct, but not on her fraud in becoming a citizen."

Feds have to prove Omar lied on citizenship application: Alan Dershowitz
Omar has maintained that she has done nothing wrong. Dershowitz argued that public opinion could shift if federal investigators are able to prove she provided false information on her citizenship application or that someone else submitted false information on her behalf.

"If she continues to lie, if she continues to give her birth date wrongly, even though she did it in the past, and the past may be beyond the statute of limitations, this may constitute what's called a continuing crime," he said. "And so the statute of limitations may be satisfied."

Presidential historian: History favors Democrats in the midterms
"We don't know how deep the trouble is. But at the very least, if it turns out that she lied or that her citizenship was obtained through fraud, whether it's her fraud or her father's fraud, she has great vulnerability to being denaturalized."

Omar is seeking a fifth term in Congress.

She will win again and is also an obvious crook. Not sure why people on the left are coming to her defense. Doing a deep dive into her activities the immigration status issue is really the least of our worries with her.

Not sure why voters and politically involved people on both sides of politics love their corrupt crooks.
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

on trumped up charges with no evidence

All charges were dropped for obvious reasons, except the kangaroo court in New York which was blatantly unconstitutional and violated his rights as a defendant. But the fascists don't care about such things. And each of those prosecution teams have their own scandals. Jack Smith probably belongs in jail. Arguably, Leticia James does as well.

For those who don't remember, here are several stacks of "no evidence."




Debunked.

Look I don't like Trump and most of his actions.

But a picture of boxes proves nothing. I have some of those same boxes with papers/books in my home. Is that "proof" of anything?

No.

If it was proof then there would have been a trial and a guilty verdict beyond the show trial we got.

But you did a great job of deflecting the topic of this thread from Omar to Trump as almost every post after this one is about him and not the possible laws broken by her or the investigation.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

on trumped up charges with no evidence

All charges were dropped for obvious reasons, except the kangaroo court in New York which was blatantly unconstitutional and violated his rights as a defendant. But the fascists don't care about such things. And each of those prosecution teams have their own scandals. Jack Smith probably belongs in jail. Arguably, Leticia James does as well.

For those who don't remember, here are several stacks of "no evidence."




Debunked.

Look I don't like Trump and most of his actions.

But a picture of boxes proves nothing. I have some of those same boxes with papers/books in my home. Is that "proof" of anything?

No.

If it was proof then there would have been a trial and a guilty verdict beyond the show trial we got.

But you did a great job of deflecting the topic of this thread from Omar to Trump as almost every post after this one is about him and not the possible laws broken by her or the investigation.


I don't think "debunked" means what you think it means.

And the original post was about Trump too.
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

cowboycwr said:

Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

on trumped up charges with no evidence

All charges were dropped for obvious reasons, except the kangaroo court in New York which was blatantly unconstitutional and violated his rights as a defendant. But the fascists don't care about such things. And each of those prosecution teams have their own scandals. Jack Smith probably belongs in jail. Arguably, Leticia James does as well.

For those who don't remember, here are several stacks of "no evidence."




Debunked.

Look I don't like Trump and most of his actions.

But a picture of boxes proves nothing. I have some of those same boxes with papers/books in my home. Is that "proof" of anything?

No.

If it was proof then there would have been a trial and a guilty verdict beyond the show trial we got.

But you did a great job of deflecting the topic of this thread from Omar to Trump as almost every post after this one is about him and not the possible laws broken by her or the investigation.


I don't think "debunked" means what you think it means.

And the original post was about Trump too.

I am using it the way you use it. It is your go to phrase anytime you don't like what someone posts and want to pretend it isn't true.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

Sam Lowry said:

cowboycwr said:

Sam Lowry said:

historian said:

on trumped up charges with no evidence

All charges were dropped for obvious reasons, except the kangaroo court in New York which was blatantly unconstitutional and violated his rights as a defendant. But the fascists don't care about such things. And each of those prosecution teams have their own scandals. Jack Smith probably belongs in jail. Arguably, Leticia James does as well.

For those who don't remember, here are several stacks of "no evidence."




Debunked.

Look I don't like Trump and most of his actions.

But a picture of boxes proves nothing. I have some of those same boxes with papers/books in my home. Is that "proof" of anything?

No.

If it was proof then there would have been a trial and a guilty verdict beyond the show trial we got.

But you did a great job of deflecting the topic of this thread from Omar to Trump as almost every post after this one is about him and not the possible laws broken by her or the investigation.


I don't think "debunked" means what you think it means.

And the original post was about Trump too.

I am using it the way you use it.
Not quite.
Last Page
Page 1 of 4 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.