Obama Wire Tapped Trump

7,904 Views | 71 Replies | Last: 7 yr ago by bubbadog
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

So, did Obama wire tap Trumps phones as he angrily said? Still waiting. Oh, just another lie from POTUS. Sad but true.
The FBI did indeed "wiretap" the former head of Trump's campaign, Paul Manafort, both before and after Trump was elected. If Trump officials or Trump himself communicated with Manafort during the wiretaps, they would have been recorded, too.

There were also wiretaps on then-Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) in 2011 under Obama. The same happened under President George W. Bush to former Congresswoman Jane Harman (D-Calif.).
Journalists have been targeted, too. This internal email, exposed by WikiLeaks, should give everyone chills. It did me.

Dated Sept. 21, 2010, the "global intelligence" firm Stratfor wrote:
Quote:

[John] Brennan [then an Obama Homeland Security adviser] is behind the witch hunts of investigative journalists learning information from inside the beltway sources.
Note -- There is specific tasker from the WH to go after anyone printing materials negative to the Obama agenda (oh my.) Even the FBI is shocked. The Wonder Boys must be in meltdown mode...
The government subsequently got caught monitoring journalists at Fox News, The Associated Press, and, as I allege in a federal lawsuit, my computers while I worked as an investigative correspondent at CBS News. On Aug. 7, 2013, CBS News publicly announced:
Quote:

correspondent Sharyl Attkisson's computer was hacked by 'an unauthorized, external, unknown party on multiple occasions,' confirming Attkisson's previous revelation of the hacking.
Johnny Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Doc Holliday said:

It is maddening to see people create this new definition of spying on someone, then claiming that your claims are utterly devoid of facts according to the new definition you literally just created.

The government was actively and intentionally collecting intel on the Trump campaign. They weren't just watching the news or looking at records they have access to. They weren't simply receiving the information from people who came to them, such as reporting a crime or something.

They were paying a guy a LOT of money to gather this information under false pretenses and report it back. They were wiretapping. This was occuring before the date they've given for their pretense of the current investigation, which itself was driven off of a foreign intel package that was paid for by oppo research. They were doing this to gather oppo research to use to lessen the likelihood of Trump winning, and also to set the stage for harrassing his administration and anyone from his campaign crew, to send a message to our supposedly democratic nation that you don't run for office without their blessing.

This is vastly bigger than Watergate. Vastly. Objectively bigger. The principle is identical, but the scope of what was done is hundreds if not thousands of times bigger.

And keep in mind, this is just what we know about. Exclusively stuff they have vehemently denied in the past. Most likely we do not know the half of it.

Imagine if Trump was caught doing this crap to an opposition party candidate. Would they just go "oh geez that wasn't really spying. Trump was trying to help!"
So true. It's become more and more apparent over the last year that Obama and his Justice Department worked to sabotage Trump's presidency. This is very much in keeping with Obama's violation of the WARN Act and his flagrant abuse of the IRS for political purposes, but it surpasses anything he did before--let alone what Nixon did.
Compared to either Obama or (especially) the Clinton Crime Syndicate, Nixon was a saint.
Johnny Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Johnny Bear said:

PartyBear said:

Trump is cornered criminal. He is lashing out as they all do with all sorts of lies.
And what "crime" is there ACTUAL EVIDENCE of that he committed as either a candidate or a sitting POTUS? Please reveal the ACTUAL EVIDENCE. Talking points and what you hope happened don't count, by the way.
As anticipated, no response because there is no actual evidence. Just a lot of wholly unsubstantiated accusations and name calling from hate filled people. It's shameful.
cinque
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

bubbadog said:

Doc Holliday said:

That FISA warrant was based on the Steele Dossier...which Clinton/DNC paid for and was and still is UNVERIFIED. Comey called the dossier unverified, salacious...yet they used it to get the warrant.

The IG is investigating this and will rain down on your parade.

Comey said there was also information other than the dossier that was used in the FISA application to spy on Carter Page because they provided "probable cause" that Page was a foreign agent. Carter Page was only briefly a foreign-policy adviser during the Trump campaign.

I don't buy the "there was other information too" argument.

It seems to me that this dossier was a key part of the FISA warrant application.

If there was strong other information, it should have been able to stand on its own.

If Comey really believed Carter Page to be a Russian "spy" wouldn't Comey have thought it more important to brief Trump on that? instead of making a Memo telling him about pee pee stuff?

Carter Page has never been indicted on anything. Page is long-known to have business ties with Russia (also not illegal). The narrative is - as far as I can tell - that Page was a middleman in quid pro quo - Trump would lift the sanctions in exchange for Russia ensuring he wins.

This makes zero sense because had Hillary Clinton taken her ex-President husband's advice and campaigned just a little harder in the Rust Belt states (or even set foot in Wisconsin) - she would have won. That she didn't was HER choice.
There are at least two falsehoods in your very first sentence. Cleaning out the Augean stables is a job for Hercules. I've got other priorities.
Comey testified under oath on 1/6/17 that portions of the dossier were salacious and unverified.

The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence report shows that the FBI and the Department of Justice under President Obama secured a FISA warrant targeting Carter Page, including how they relied on the discredited "dossier" paid for by Hillary Clinton's campaign to be president and the Democratic National Committee, but failed to tell the court this when making the request

You can read it right here: https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/democrat_memo_charge_and_response.pdf


You need some help arguing your positions.
riflebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Great parody acct to follow.

HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Speaking of Trumps caught in wiretaps...
KOKQB70
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ha, you guys don't get it, but will soon.
Henry Gondorff
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yes, in its attempt to undermine Trump, the Obama administration opened a public investigation of Clinton, not once, but twice, while keeping the Trump Russia investigation secret so as not to be seen as politically favoring Clinton.

But, on a separate note, I LOVE to Dear Supreme Leader coin minted by the Trump WH commemorating the NK summit. That he was for...before he was against... before.... Hilarious. And, thank goodness he saved ZTE. He's saving Chinese jobs!

And, you suckers are buying this guy....
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Johnny Bear said:

PartyBear said:

Trump is cornered criminal. He is lashing out as they all do with all sorts of lies.
And what "crime" is there ACTUAL EVIDENCE of that he committed as either a candidate or a sitting POTUS? Please reveal the ACTUAL EVIDENCE. Talking points and what you hope happened don't count, by the way.
There is an investigation. DT jr sets up meeting with Russians. He claims nothing came of it. I should believe him because ?????
cinque
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Roger Stone and Carter Page are in trouble.
bubbadog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Henry Gondorff said:


And, you suckers are buying this guy....
Who can begrudge them for being suckers when they so enjoy the sucking?
"Free your ass and your mind will follow." -- George Clinton
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

bubbadog said:

Doc Holliday said:

It is maddening to see people create this new definition of spying on someone, then claiming that your claims...
Well, there it went. My Florida Mike-grade Iron-o-Meter just sputtered and went dead. Fastest I've ever seen it go from zero to ten on this site.

Will talk to the R&D people at Acme Iron-o-Meters tomorrow.
I don't really care what your make believe meter says, you're on the losing team and you know it.

Team America?
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KOK QB 70 said:

Ha, you guys don't get it, but will soon.

He said for tbe umpteenth time. More acorns?
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

J.R. said:

So, did Obama wire tap Trumps phones as he angrily said? Still waiting. Oh, just another lie from POTUS. Sad but true.
The FBI did indeed "wiretap" the former head of Trump's campaign, Paul Manafort, both before and after Trump was elected. If Trump officials or Trump himself communicated with Manafort during the wiretaps, they would have been recorded, too.

There were also wiretaps on then-Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) in 2011 under Obama. The same happened under President George W. Bush to former Congresswoman Jane Harman (D-Calif.).
Journalists have been targeted, too. This internal email, exposed by WikiLeaks, should give everyone chills. It did me.

Dated Sept. 21, 2010, the "global intelligence" firm Stratfor wrote:
Quote:

[John] Brennan [then an Obama Homeland Security adviser] is behind the witch hunts of investigative journalists learning information from inside the beltway sources.
Note -- There is specific tasker from the WH to go after anyone printing materials negative to the Obama agenda (oh my.) Even the FBI is shocked. The Wonder Boys must be in meltdown mode...
The government subsequently got caught monitoring journalists at Fox News, The Associated Press, and, as I allege in a federal lawsuit, my computers while I worked as an investigative correspondent at CBS News. On Aug. 7, 2013, CBS News publicly announced:
Quote:

correspondent Sharyl Attkisson's computer was hacked by 'an unauthorized, external, unknown party on multiple occasions,' confirming Attkisson's previous revelation of the hacking.


The question that provoked this cut and paste response was "So, did Obama wire tap Trumps phones as he angrily said?"

You didn't answer that. It is a claim you have made on many occasions.
riflebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Simple questions for you hardcore liberal conspiracy theorists.

If the FBI/CIA was so worried about the Russians messing w/ our elections...

a. Why did they go to the DNC about hacking and not look into their servers? The DNC refused access, but they briefed the Hilary campaign. Why didn't the DNC want them to investigate? People conveniently forget the bomb shell info that was in the leaks from Podesta and others.

b. Why didn't they also put spies or 'human intelligence' inside the Clinton campaign since the Russians were going after our elections?

c. If they were so worried about the Russians why didn't they warn the Trump campaign and tell them to watch out for Russians trying to plant themselves or use Trump officials to mess w/ the elections?

d. Liberals are yelling 'Russia' because of the Poppodopolous meeting in Europe. The Australian who set that meeting up then called the FBI after he met w/ him actually donated $20M+ to the Clinton foundation - coincidence?

e. Liberals are using Trump Jr meeting w/ Russian lawyer in Trump tower as smoking gun. Coincidence that Obama's State dept gave her a special Visa to get into the US just before the meeting?

f. Also, is it a coincidence that the Russian 'lawyer' who desperately wanted the meeting w/ Trump Jr at Trump Tower met w/ Fusion GPS President BEFORE and AFTER the meeting? The same President who has employees married to FBI/DOJ officials and took money from the DNC to write a fake dossier that started all this mess in the first place

One of these above might be fishy, but when you put them all together (and there is A LOT more) you have to be a moron to not know what was going on and who they were really after. Why do you think the IG report is so damaging and you have 3 FBI officials begging to meet w/ Congress in June to expose more lies from the FBI.

It might be a slow drip and we all know taking down the swamp is almost impossible but it's happening. You don't have 10+ people from the DOJ/FBI fired or demoted over nothing?
riflebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Henry Gondorff said:

And, thank goodness he saved ZTE. He's saving Chinese jobs!


You might want to realize what was actually going on w/ ZTE before believing CNN or MSNBC. I swear you guys will learn a lot more if you stop watching those channels. You are literally missing out on 99% of what's actually happening in the world.

DaveyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why didnt Obama have FBI surveillance in the Hillary campaign since the investigation was not ABOUT TRUMP?
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

KOK QB 70 said:

Ha, you guys don't get it, but will soon.

He said for tbe umpteenth time. More acorns?
Acorns or unicorns?
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

quash said:

KOK QB 70 said:

Ha, you guys don't get it, but will soon.

He said for tbe umpteenth time. More acorns?
Acorns or unicorns?

Acorns, Henny Penny reference.
cinque
How long do you want to ignore this user?
riflebear said:

Henry Gondorff said:

And, thank goodness he saved ZTE. He's saving Chinese jobs!


You might want to realize what was actually going on w/ ZTE before believing CNN or MSNBC. I swear you guys will learn a lot more if you stop watching those channels. You are literally missing out on 99% of what's actually happening in the world.


Trump is lying as usual:

In a lengthy speech on the Senate Floor on Wednesday, Rubio put the issue of trade negotiations with China in more dire terms, saying that the U.S. had to crack down on Beijing's trade practices as a way to preserve democracy.
"Democracies are morally superior to dictatorships, and if we allow China to cheat and steal their way into dominance, there will be more dictatorships and less democracies on this planet, and we will all pay a price," he said.
Rubio cast doubt over the Trump administration's proposed deal with ZTE, calling it a "terrible" short-term fix for a long-term problem that could usher in the "beginning of the end of America's place in the world as its most influential nation."
"Most of us here do not want to live in a world [where] in 10 or 15 years ... some other country dominates the world ... because when they were displacing us, your policymakers were too busy arguing with each other and playing dumb, ridiculous games," he said.
ZTE announced earlier this month that it would cease major operations after the U.S. banned American companies from supplying the telecom giant. The ban came after the U.S. accused ZTE of violating sanctions against Iran and North Korea.
President Trump said in a tweet earlier this month that ZTE's failure had cost too many jobs in China, and pledged to work with Chinese President Xi Jinping to help the company recover.
The tweet was a surprise departure from Trump's "America first" rhetoric and insistence that Beijing's unfair trade
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Waco1947 said:

quash said:

KOK QB 70 said:

Ha, you guys don't get it, but will soon.

He said for tbe umpteenth time. More acorns?
Acorns or unicorns?

Acorns, Henny Penny reference.

Oh! The sky is failing! I get it.
You right too. These guys live in a hysterical, scary world.
PS How is the coup going?
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Henry Gondorff said:

Yes, in its attempt to undermine Trump, the Obama administration opened a public investigation of Clinton, not once, but twice, while keeping the Trump Russia investigation secret so as not to be seen as politically favoring Clinton.

But, on a separate note, I LOVE to Dear Supreme Leader coin minted by the Trump WH commemorating the NK summit. That he was for...before he was against... before.... Hilarious. And, thank goodness he saved ZTE. He's saving Chinese jobs!

And, you suckers are buying this guy....
Comey already admitted that they opened the investigation into Clinton because of new evidence and they didn't want a president elect under investigation. All because he was 100% certain Clinton would win.

So yeah, it was to clear her.
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

Henry Gondorff said:

Yes, in its attempt to undermine Trump, the Obama administration opened a public investigation of Clinton, not once, but twice, while keeping the Trump Russia investigation secret so as not to be seen as politically favoring Clinton.

But, on a separate note, I LOVE to Dear Supreme Leader coin minted by the Trump WH commemorating the NK summit. That he was for...before he was against... before.... Hilarious. And, thank goodness he saved ZTE. He's saving Chinese jobs!

And, you suckers are buying this guy....
Comey already admitted that they opened the investigation into Clinton because of new evidence and they didn't want a president elect under investigation. All because he was 100% certain Clinton would win.

So yeah, it was to clear her.

Unless you have paranoid delusions that makes no sense. Comey sunk Clinton, he did not clear her. And, had she won, she would have been a president-elect under investigation.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Doc Holliday said:

Henry Gondorff said:

Yes, in its attempt to undermine Trump, the Obama administration opened a public investigation of Clinton, not once, but twice, while keeping the Trump Russia investigation secret so as not to be seen as politically favoring Clinton.

But, on a separate note, I LOVE to Dear Supreme Leader coin minted by the Trump WH commemorating the NK summit. That he was for...before he was against... before.... Hilarious. And, thank goodness he saved ZTE. He's saving Chinese jobs!

And, you suckers are buying this guy....
Comey already admitted that they opened the investigation into Clinton because of new evidence and they didn't want a president elect under investigation. All because he was 100% certain Clinton would win.

So yeah, it was to clear her.

Unless you have paranoid delusions that makes no sense. Comey sunk Clinton, he did not clear her. And, had she won, she would have been a president-elect under investigation.
Its straight out of Comey's book.

Comey writes: "Assuming, as nearly everyone did, that Hillary Clinton would be elected president of the United States in less than two weeks, what would happen to the FBI, the justice department or her own presidency if it later was revealed, after the fact, that she still was the subject of an FBI investigation?"

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/apr/13/james-comey-book-hillary-clinton-email-investigation

quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

quash said:

Doc Holliday said:

Henry Gondorff said:

Yes, in its attempt to undermine Trump, the Obama administration opened a public investigation of Clinton, not once, but twice, while keeping the Trump Russia investigation secret so as not to be seen as politically favoring Clinton.

But, on a separate note, I LOVE to Dear Supreme Leader coin minted by the Trump WH commemorating the NK summit. That he was for...before he was against... before.... Hilarious. And, thank goodness he saved ZTE. He's saving Chinese jobs!

And, you suckers are buying this guy....
Comey already admitted that they opened the investigation into Clinton because of new evidence and they didn't want a president elect under investigation. All because he was 100% certain Clinton would win.

So yeah, it was to clear her.

Unless you have paranoid delusions that makes no sense. Comey sunk Clinton, he did not clear her. And, had she won, she would have been a president-elect under investigation.
Its straight out of Comey's book.

Comey writes: "Assuming, as nearly everyone did, that Hillary Clinton would be elected president of the United States in less than two weeks, what would happen to the FBI, the justice department or her own presidency if it later was revealed, after the fact, that she still was the subject of an FBI investigation?"

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/apr/13/james-comey-book-hillary-clinton-email-investigation



Yes. Cool question. And how did he answer it.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Doc Holliday said:

quash said:

Doc Holliday said:

Henry Gondorff said:

Yes, in its attempt to undermine Trump, the Obama administration opened a public investigation of Clinton, not once, but twice, while keeping the Trump Russia investigation secret so as not to be seen as politically favoring Clinton.

But, on a separate note, I LOVE to Dear Supreme Leader coin minted by the Trump WH commemorating the NK summit. That he was for...before he was against... before.... Hilarious. And, thank goodness he saved ZTE. He's saving Chinese jobs!

And, you suckers are buying this guy....
Comey already admitted that they opened the investigation into Clinton because of new evidence and they didn't want a president elect under investigation. All because he was 100% certain Clinton would win.

So yeah, it was to clear her.

Unless you have paranoid delusions that makes no sense. Comey sunk Clinton, he did not clear her. And, had she won, she would have been a president-elect under investigation.
Its straight out of Comey's book.

Comey writes: "Assuming, as nearly everyone did, that Hillary Clinton would be elected president of the United States in less than two weeks, what would happen to the FBI, the justice department or her own presidency if it later was revealed, after the fact, that she still was the subject of an FBI investigation?"

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/apr/13/james-comey-book-hillary-clinton-email-investigation



Yes. Cool question. And how did he answer it.
He tried to get her investigation over with before she won. Keep up.

Do you actually believe the guy that leaked against and spied against Trump tried to sink Clinton on purpose?!
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

quash said:

Doc Holliday said:

quash said:

Doc Holliday said:

Henry Gondorff said:

Yes, in its attempt to undermine Trump, the Obama administration opened a public investigation of Clinton, not once, but twice, while keeping the Trump Russia investigation secret so as not to be seen as politically favoring Clinton.

But, on a separate note, I LOVE to Dear Supreme Leader coin minted by the Trump WH commemorating the NK summit. That he was for...before he was against... before.... Hilarious. And, thank goodness he saved ZTE. He's saving Chinese jobs!

And, you suckers are buying this guy....
Comey already admitted that they opened the investigation into Clinton because of new evidence and they didn't want a president elect under investigation. All because he was 100% certain Clinton would win.

So yeah, it was to clear her.

Unless you have paranoid delusions that makes no sense. Comey sunk Clinton, he did not clear her. And, had she won, she would have been a president-elect under investigation.
Its straight out of Comey's book.

Comey writes: "Assuming, as nearly everyone did, that Hillary Clinton would be elected president of the United States in less than two weeks, what would happen to the FBI, the justice department or her own presidency if it later was revealed, after the fact, that she still was the subject of an FBI investigation?"

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/apr/13/james-comey-book-hillary-clinton-email-investigation



Yes. Cool question. And how did he answer it.
He tried to get her investigation over with before she won. Keep up.

Do you actually believe the guy that leaked against and spied against Trump tried to sink Clinton on purpose?!

He did no such thing. He torpedoed the Clinton campaign and knew the investigation would not wrap up in a few days, ie. voting day. Trump should be thanking Comey.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Doc Holliday said:

quash said:

Doc Holliday said:

quash said:

Doc Holliday said:

Henry Gondorff said:

Yes, in its attempt to undermine Trump, the Obama administration opened a public investigation of Clinton, not once, but twice, while keeping the Trump Russia investigation secret so as not to be seen as politically favoring Clinton.

But, on a separate note, I LOVE to Dear Supreme Leader coin minted by the Trump WH commemorating the NK summit. That he was for...before he was against... before.... Hilarious. And, thank goodness he saved ZTE. He's saving Chinese jobs!

And, you suckers are buying this guy....
Comey already admitted that they opened the investigation into Clinton because of new evidence and they didn't want a president elect under investigation. All because he was 100% certain Clinton would win.

So yeah, it was to clear her.

Unless you have paranoid delusions that makes no sense. Comey sunk Clinton, he did not clear her. And, had she won, she would have been a president-elect under investigation.
Its straight out of Comey's book.

Comey writes: "Assuming, as nearly everyone did, that Hillary Clinton would be elected president of the United States in less than two weeks, what would happen to the FBI, the justice department or her own presidency if it later was revealed, after the fact, that she still was the subject of an FBI investigation?"

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/apr/13/james-comey-book-hillary-clinton-email-investigation



Yes. Cool question. And how did he answer it.
He tried to get her investigation over with before she won. Keep up.

Do you actually believe the guy that leaked against and spied against Trump tried to sink Clinton on purpose?!

He did no such thing. He torpedoed the Clinton campaign and knew the investigation would not wrap up in a few days, ie. voting day. Trump should be thanking Comey.
The investigation wrapped up 9 days after they reopened it and 2 days before the election...

And yes he did leak against Trump. The Justice Department Inspector General "is conducting an investigation into classification issues related to the Comey memos that he leaked.
cBUrurenthusism
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He drafted an exoneration letter prior to interviewing 17 key witnesses including Hillary herself

Allowed McCabe to change the wording from 'gross negligence' - which is a criminal act in and of itself when handling classified information to 'extremely careless'. Gross negligence is an automatic DQ for HIllary's Presidency

The only reason he was forced to reopen the email probe was that McCabe sat on the discovery of her emails on Huma/Weiner laptop for a month...NYPD was threatening to go public with what was found on the laptop and the the FBI was trying to bury it

The IG report on the email investigation is supposed to be released this week so all these questions will be answered
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

quash said:

Doc Holliday said:

quash said:

Doc Holliday said:

quash said:

Doc Holliday said:

Henry Gondorff said:

Yes, in its attempt to undermine Trump, the Obama administration opened a public investigation of Clinton, not once, but twice, while keeping the Trump Russia investigation secret so as not to be seen as politically favoring Clinton.

But, on a separate note, I LOVE to Dear Supreme Leader coin minted by the Trump WH commemorating the NK summit. That he was for...before he was against... before.... Hilarious. And, thank goodness he saved ZTE. He's saving Chinese jobs!

And, you suckers are buying this guy....
Comey already admitted that they opened the investigation into Clinton because of new evidence and they didn't want a president elect under investigation. All because he was 100% certain Clinton would win.

So yeah, it was to clear her.

Unless you have paranoid delusions that makes no sense. Comey sunk Clinton, he did not clear her. And, had she won, she would have been a president-elect under investigation.
Its straight out of Comey's book.

Comey writes: "Assuming, as nearly everyone did, that Hillary Clinton would be elected president of the United States in less than two weeks, what would happen to the FBI, the justice department or her own presidency if it later was revealed, after the fact, that she still was the subject of an FBI investigation?"

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/apr/13/james-comey-book-hillary-clinton-email-investigation



Yes. Cool question. And how did he answer it.
He tried to get her investigation over with before she won. Keep up.

Do you actually believe the guy that leaked against and spied against Trump tried to sink Clinton on purpose?!

He did no such thing. He torpedoed the Clinton campaign and knew the investigation would not wrap up in a few days, ie. voting day. Trump should be thanking Comey.
The investigation wrapped up 9 days after they reopened it and 2 days before the election...

And yes he did leak against Trump. The Justice Department Inspector General "is conducting an investigation into classification issues related to the Comey memos that he leaked.

You are correct, I had 11 and 9 out of order. Good catch.

Still think McCabe is the bad guy on this one, not Comey, based on what we know.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cBUrurenthusism said:

He drafted an exoneration letter prior to interviewing 17 key witnesses including Hillary herself

Allowed McCabe to change the wording from 'gross negligence' - which is a criminal act in and of itself when handling classified information to 'extremely careless'. Gross negligence is an automatic DQ for HIllary's Presidency

The only reason he was forced to reopen the email probe was that McCabe sat on the discovery of her emails on Huma/Weiner laptop for a month...NYPD was threatening to go public with what was found on the laptop and the the FBI was trying to bury it

The IG report on the email investigation is supposed to be released this week so all these questions will be answered
I wonder what's on that laptop besides creepy Weiner pedo sexting?

Hillary emails? I think yes.

Can't wait for the IG, maybe Friday?
cBUrurenthusism
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

cBUrurenthusism said:

He drafted an exoneration letter prior to interviewing 17 key witnesses including Hillary herself

Allowed McCabe to change the wording from 'gross negligence' - which is a criminal act in and of itself when handling classified information to 'extremely careless'. Gross negligence is an automatic DQ for HIllary's Presidency

The only reason he was forced to reopen the email probe was that McCabe sat on the discovery of her emails on Huma/Weiner laptop for a month...NYPD was threatening to go public with what was found on the laptop and the the FBI was trying to bury it

The IG report on the email investigation is supposed to be released this week so all these questions will be answered
I wonder what's on that laptop besides creepy Weiner pedo sexting?

Hillary emails? I think yes.

Can't wait for the IG, maybe Friday?
Everything was on Huma's laptop

Thank God NYPD got their hands on it due to a criminal investigation otherwise it would have ended up in the Hudson River or at the business end of a hammer

Comey's FBI was apparently pretty confused about how to handle technology based evidence....like never even looking at the 'hacked' DNC server or hiding what was on the Huma laptop
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cBUrurenthusism said:

Doc Holliday said:

cBUrurenthusism said:

He drafted an exoneration letter prior to interviewing 17 key witnesses including Hillary herself

Allowed McCabe to change the wording from 'gross negligence' - which is a criminal act in and of itself when handling classified information to 'extremely careless'. Gross negligence is an automatic DQ for HIllary's Presidency

The only reason he was forced to reopen the email probe was that McCabe sat on the discovery of her emails on Huma/Weiner laptop for a month...NYPD was threatening to go public with what was found on the laptop and the the FBI was trying to bury it

The IG report on the email investigation is supposed to be released this week so all these questions will be answered
I wonder what's on that laptop besides creepy Weiner pedo sexting?

Hillary emails? I think yes.

Can't wait for the IG, maybe Friday?
Everything was on Huma's laptop

Thank God NYPD got their hands on it due to a criminal investigation otherwise it would have ended up in the Hudson River or at the business end of a hammer

Comey's FBI was apparently pretty confused about how to handle technology based evidence....like never even looking at the 'hacked' DNC server or hiding what was on the Huma laptop
Yes.

They have lied about the hacking of the DNC. It's devoid of any actual proof or evidence that they were hacked at all, much less by Russian intelligence agents. They just brought in their own hired gun (CrowdStrike) and refused to let the FBI or officials investigate.

Lawsuits are going to destroy the DNC.

When you start digging into it, it becomes clear that they are more corrupt than I ever expected. Also, really stupid. They're not smart people.
riflebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Only the liberals and the media could spin this story like they are and think they can get away w/ it. Got to give credit to the hardcore liberals though, when they lie - they double down and hold firm no matter how obvious it is.



riflebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nothing to see here. Carry on...

Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.