And they will frame it as women's rights while ignoring the fact that it's purely murder.ScottS said:
Cinque, Jinx, and 1947 will celebrate too
xiledinok said:
Different strokes for different folks. The Republicans use it as a political weapon in elections but they don't have to even bother with returns.
Obama trade that smart protectionist oil embargo for abortion rights and pork in Republican districts.
Ain't nothing happening on these political issues.
I won't pretend to know the ins and outs of the bill, so while that may be true, the cheering seems a little misplaced.fadskier said:
After reading about it, is doesn't seem as bad as portrayed. Although I am against abortion, it only approves abortion in the third trimester, IF the mother's life is in danger OR the fetus is not viable.
Having said that I have a question for those who support both abortion and gun control. How are you FOR restrictions on the rights of people who can possess a gun (which is specifically stated in the constitution) but against restrictions on someone who wants an abortion (which, by the way, IS NOT specifically stated in the constitution?) I am genuinely asking as I have friends who, when posed this questions, cannot answer.
They will allow abortions after 24 weeks if it "protects the patients life or health" when you read further it says the qualifications for abortions after 24 weeks which are as follows "all factors physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman's age"fadskier said:
After reading about it, is doesn't seem as bad as portrayed. Although I am against abortion, it only approves abortion in the third trimester, IF the mother's life is in danger OR the fetus is not viable.
Having said that I have a question for those who support both abortion and gun control. How are you FOR restrictions on the rights of people who can possess a gun (which is specifically stated in the constitution) but against restrictions on someone who wants an abortion (which, by the way, IS NOT specifically stated in the constitution?) I am genuinely asking as I have friends who, when posed this questions, cannot answer.
Doc Holliday said:They will allow abortions after 24 weeks if it "protects the patients life or health" when you read further it says the qualifications for abortions after 24 weeks which are as follows "all factors physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman's age"fadskier said:
After reading about it, is doesn't seem as bad as portrayed. Although I am against abortion, it only approves abortion in the third trimester, IF the mother's life is in danger OR the fetus is not viable.
Having said that I have a question for those who support both abortion and gun control. How are you FOR restrictions on the rights of people who can possess a gun (which is specifically stated in the constitution) but against restrictions on someone who wants an abortion (which, by the way, IS NOT specifically stated in the constitution?) I am genuinely asking as I have friends who, when posed this questions, cannot answer.
Exactly.Forest Bueller said:Doc Holliday said:They will allow abortions after 24 weeks if it "protects the patients life or health" when you read further it says the qualifications for abortions after 24 weeks which are as follows "all factors physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman's age"fadskier said:
After reading about it, is doesn't seem as bad as portrayed. Although I am against abortion, it only approves abortion in the third trimester, IF the mother's life is in danger OR the fetus is not viable.
Having said that I have a question for those who support both abortion and gun control. How are you FOR restrictions on the rights of people who can possess a gun (which is specifically stated in the constitution) but against restrictions on someone who wants an abortion (which, by the way, IS NOT specifically stated in the constitution?) I am genuinely asking as I have friends who, when posed this questions, cannot answer.
So this covers every reason you could conceive of.
emotional and familial leabed lots of room for interpretationDoc Holliday said:They will allow abortions after 24 weeks if it "protects the patients life or health" when you read further it says the qualifications for abortions after 24 weeks which are as follows "all factors physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman's age"fadskier said:
After reading about it, is doesn't seem as bad as portrayed. Although I am against abortion, it only approves abortion in the third trimester, IF the mother's life is in danger OR the fetus is not viable.
Having said that I have a question for those who support both abortion and gun control. How are you FOR restrictions on the rights of people who can possess a gun (which is specifically stated in the constitution) but against restrictions on someone who wants an abortion (which, by the way, IS NOT specifically stated in the constitution?) I am genuinely asking as I have friends who, when posed this questions, cannot answer.
beat me to it. This is nextCanada2017 said:
New York Dems are merely giving their constituents what they want.
Next to be sanctioned will be the murder of the old.
Canada2017 said:
New York Dems are merely giving their constituents what they want.
Next to be sanctioned will be the murder of the old.
ScottS said:Canada2017 said:
New York Dems are merely giving their constituents what they want.
Next to be sanctioned will be the murder of the old.
I was reading an article on Belgium and they have assisted suicide and euthanasia. 1/4 of the deaths there fall into the 2 categories.
From the Buffalo News:ScottS said:
Notice no lefties have checked in here. They know what this is.
cinque said:From the Buffalo News:ScottS said:
Notice no lefties have checked in here. They know what this is.
" The bill maintains abortions as legal within 24 weeks of the start of a pregnancy "or at any time when necessary to protect a woman's life or health.'' Late-term abortions had previously been authorized under state law if they meant saving the life of a woman."
This is hardly "up until. Why do you cons do this?
Everyone hates you.cinque said:From the Buffalo News:ScottS said:
Notice no lefties have checked in here. They know what this is.
" The bill maintains abortions as legal within 24 weeks of the start of a pregnancy "or at any time when necessary to protect a woman's life or health.'' Late-term abortions had previously been authorized under state law if they meant saving the life of a woman."
This is hardly "up until. Why do you cons do this?
Now, read the bill honestly without twisting it. Afterwards, go wash the blood off your hands!cinque said:From the Buffalo News:ScottS said:
Notice no lefties have checked in here. They know what this is.
" The bill maintains abortions as legal within 24 weeks of the start of a pregnancy "or at any time when necessary to protect a woman's life or health.'' Late-term abortions had previously been authorized under state law if they meant saving the life of a woman."
This is hardly "up until. Why do you cons do this?
Did you not read the law or you just being your normal obtuse self.cinque said:From the Buffalo News:ScottS said:
Notice no lefties have checked in here. They know what this is.
" The bill maintains abortions as legal within 24 weeks of the start of a pregnancy "or at any time when necessary to protect a woman's life or health.'' Late-term abortions had previously been authorized under state law if they meant saving the life of a woman."
This is hardly "up until. Why do you cons do this?
IT's just another platitude used by liberals to stroke the emotional and intellectual infancy of 90% of America. "Did you see what the news/paper said!!!??" Knowing full well the news and the paper will shill for the autocrats because the ignorant masses are too impatient to read for 10 minutesForest Bueller said:Did you not read the law or you just being your normal obtuse self.cinque said:From the Buffalo News:ScottS said:
Notice no lefties have checked in here. They know what this is.
" The bill maintains abortions as legal within 24 weeks of the start of a pregnancy "or at any time when necessary to protect a woman's life or health.'' Late-term abortions had previously been authorized under state law if they meant saving the life of a woman."
This is hardly "up until. Why do you cons do this?
Those Health and Life reasons included anything that occurs in life. Anything. Ignore reality you are good at it.
I suppose you are trying to clink to any falsehood to justify it.
Your first sentence sounds fair to me. Here is the relevant text:LIB,MR BEARS said:Now, read the bill honestly without twisting it. Afterwards, go wash the blood off your hands!cinque said:From the Buffalo News:ScottS said:
Notice no lefties have checked in here. They know what this is.
" The bill maintains abortions as legal within 24 weeks of the start of a pregnancy "or at any time when necessary to protect a woman's life or health.'' Late-term abortions had previously been authorized under state law if they meant saving the life of a woman."
This is hardly "up until. Why do you cons do this?
