President Trump just won with tariffs.

16,266 Views | 172 Replies | Last: 6 yr ago by quash
cinque
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

America is winning.

Cinque is losing,

That is all.
Trump is losing to three Dems in Texas. I'm good.
Make Racism Wrong Again
contrario
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cinque said:

Oldbear83 said:

America is winning.

Cinque is losing,

That is all.
Trump is losing to three Dems in Texas. I'm good.
Which poll are you looking at? I only ask because the Quinnipiac poll that was recently released only has him behind Biden, within the margin of error. He leads all other D candidates in that poll.
BrooksBearLives
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

America is winning.

Cinque is losing,

That is all.


You're not even trying to debate. You're just declaring victory and moving on.
BrooksBearLives
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

BrooksBearLives said:

So, our President agreed to a deal where Mexico is sending "troops" from a National Guard that didn't exist before last Christmas, and you're claiming this as a win?

You deserve to be fooled.
They're arresting women and children traveling on foot. I don't think 30 months of Navy SEAL training is a prerequisite.


No one said it would take 30 months. But surely you realize it will take more than 6, right? It took over a year of planning for Nike to roll out our new uniform campaign.

You think creating an entire national guard infrastructure will go faster?

I mean, sure. Mexico is known for its efficient government and all...
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cinque said:

Oldbear83 said:

America is winning.

Cinque is losing,

That is all.
Trump is losing to three Dems in Texas. I'm good.
LOL! And Texas and Governor Greg Abbott are about to legalize crack cocaine.
"Stand with anyone when he is right; Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong." - Abraham Lincoln
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BrooksBearLives said:

Sam Lowry said:

BrooksBearLives said:

So, our President agreed to a deal where Mexico is sending "troops" from a National Guard that didn't exist before last Christmas, and you're claiming this as a win?

You deserve to be fooled.
They're arresting women and children traveling on foot. I don't think 30 months of Navy SEAL training is a prerequisite.


No one said it would take 30 months. But surely you realize it will take more than 6, right? It took over a year of planning for Nike to roll out our new uniform campaign.

You think creating an entire national guard infrastructure will go faster?

I mean, sure. Mexico is known for its efficient government and all...
Our national guard was founded in December of 1636 and was massacring Pequot Indians with marvelous efficiency the following May. It's really not that big a deal.
contrario
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BrooksBearLives said:

Sam Lowry said:

BrooksBearLives said:

So, our President agreed to a deal where Mexico is sending "troops" from a National Guard that didn't exist before last Christmas, and you're claiming this as a win?

You deserve to be fooled.
They're arresting women and children traveling on foot. I don't think 30 months of Navy SEAL training is a prerequisite.


No one said it would take 30 months. But surely you realize it will take more than 6, right? It took over a year of planning for Nike to roll out our new uniform campaign.

You think creating an entire national guard infrastructure will go faster?

I mean, sure. Mexico is known for its efficient government and all...
I would get your point if Mexico didn't have an army at all, but it's not like they were starting from ground zero. Even the Washington Post is saying Mexico is sending its "new national guard" to the southern border this week. Are you ready to concede that you were wrong about Mexico not having a national guard, or are you going to argue against the reporting of the Washington Post as well?
Golem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BrooksBearLives said:

Oldbear83 said:

America is winning.

Cinque is losing,

That is all.


You're not even trying to debate. You're just declaring victory and moving on.


That's generally how ignorant children are treated. You should be used to it by now.
Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BrooksBearLives said:

Oldbear83 said:

America is winning.

Cinque is losing,

That is all.


You're not even trying to debate. You're just declaring victory and moving on.


Because we're win win winning biglier(word?) than an Art Briles 1st Half 56-0 blowout!
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BrooksBearLives said:

Oldbear83 said:

America is winning.

Cinque is losing,

That is all.


You're not even trying to debate. You're just declaring victory and moving on.
I stopped worrying about your 'debate', BBL, when you abandoned reason and decorum in order to throw a TDS tantrum.

That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

BrooksBearLives said:

Oldbear83 said:

America is winning.

Cinque is losing,

That is all.


You're not even trying to debate. You're just declaring victory and moving on.
I stopped worrying about your 'debate', BBL, when you abandoned reason and decorum in order to throw a TDS tantrum.




BBL has proven to be a very very beta soy boy male in past

He sometimes simply picks up his toys and goes home when he's defeated once and for all
redfish961
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BrooksBearLives said:

riflebear said:


The Mexican National guard doesn't exist yet, LOL.

Every single thing in this "agreement" was already agreed to months ago.

This is an absolute joke. You're kidding with all this, right?

Trump got played again. And all of his supporters are just going along with it.
There is a difference between agreeing and doing.

If an agreement was there, but what was agreed upon was not happening, then at some point you have to do something to get it off of high center.

Perhaps that's the case here.
cinque
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump was waving around a one pager in front of reporters insisting that was his agreement with Mexico.

Something's wrong with him.
Make Racism Wrong Again
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cinque said:

Trump was waving around a one pager in front of reporters insisting that was his agreement with Mexico.

Something's wrong with him.
Yeah, what's wrong is Congress only cares about 'getting Trump', they don't care for the 300+ million Americans they hurt with their political games.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
cinque
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

cinque said:

Trump was waving around a one pager in front of reporters insisting that was his agreement with Mexico.

Something's wrong with him.
Yeah, what's wrong is Congress only cares about 'getting Trump', they don't care for the 300+ million Americans they hurt with their political games.
Did you see him waving his one pager?
Make Racism Wrong Again
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cinque said:

Oldbear83 said:

cinque said:

Trump was waving around a one pager in front of reporters insisting that was his agreement with Mexico.

Something's wrong with him.
Yeah, what's wrong is Congress only cares about 'getting Trump', they don't care for the 300+ million Americans they hurt with their political games.
Did you see him waving his one pager?
You really need a better hobby than obsessing on President Trump, cinque.

And there are many fine decaffeinated brands that are just as tasty as the real thing.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
robby44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cinque said:

Oldbear83 said:

cinque said:

Trump was waving around a one pager in front of reporters insisting that was his agreement with Mexico.

Something's wrong with him.
Yeah, what's wrong is Congress only cares about 'getting Trump', they don't care for the 300+ million Americans they hurt with their political games.
Did you see him waving his one pager?

A 1 page agreement with a sovereign nation. LOL
redfish961
How long do you want to ignore this user?
robby44 said:

cinque said:

Oldbear83 said:

cinque said:

Trump was waving around a one pager in front of reporters insisting that was his agreement with Mexico.

Something's wrong with him.
Yeah, what's wrong is Congress only cares about 'getting Trump', they don't care for the 300+ million Americans they hurt with their political games.
Did you see him waving his one pager?

A 1 page agreement with a sovereign nation. LOL

I'd have to believe that if it was a 1 page agreement, there would be no agreement.

Probably easier than trying to flap a 63 page agreement in the open.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
robby44 said:

cinque said:

Oldbear83 said:

cinque said:

Trump was waving around a one pager in front of reporters insisting that was his agreement with Mexico.

Something's wrong with him.
Yeah, what's wrong is Congress only cares about 'getting Trump', they don't care for the 300+ million Americans they hurt with their political games.
Did you see him waving his one pager?

A 1 page agreement with a sovereign nation. LOL

More likely he was waving the confirmation that Mexico signed the agreement.

Sorry if facts kill the buzz, son.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
robby44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

robby44 said:

cinque said:

Oldbear83 said:

cinque said:

Trump was waving around a one pager in front of reporters insisting that was his agreement with Mexico.

Something's wrong with him.
Yeah, what's wrong is Congress only cares about 'getting Trump', they don't care for the 300+ million Americans they hurt with their political games.
Did you see him waving his one pager?

A 1 page agreement with a sovereign nation. LOL

More likely he was waving the confirmation that Mexico signed the agreement.

Sorry if facts kill the buzz, son.

I'd bet the fast food lunch order for the Lady Bears visit to the White House was thicker than the one page
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
robby44 said:

Oldbear83 said:

robby44 said:

cinque said:

Oldbear83 said:

cinque said:

Trump was waving around a one pager in front of reporters insisting that was his agreement with Mexico.

Something's wrong with him.
Yeah, what's wrong is Congress only cares about 'getting Trump', they don't care for the 300+ million Americans they hurt with their political games.
Did you see him waving his one pager?

A 1 page agreement with a sovereign nation. LOL

More likely he was waving the confirmation that Mexico signed the agreement.

Sorry if facts kill the buzz, son.

I'd bet the fast food lunch order for the Lady Bears visit to the White House was thicker than the one page
Way to duck the point, daffy.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
robby44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

robby44 said:

Oldbear83 said:

robby44 said:

cinque said:

Oldbear83 said:

cinque said:

Trump was waving around a one pager in front of reporters insisting that was his agreement with Mexico.

Something's wrong with him.
Yeah, what's wrong is Congress only cares about 'getting Trump', they don't care for the 300+ million Americans they hurt with their political games.
Did you see him waving his one pager?

A 1 page agreement with a sovereign nation. LOL

More likely he was waving the confirmation that Mexico signed the agreement.

Sorry if facts kill the buzz, son.

I'd bet the fast food lunch order for the Lady Bears visit to the White House was thicker than the one page
Way to duck the point, daffy.

Yea I got it. It was the confirmation to the agreement
BrooksBearLives
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

BrooksBearLives said:

Sam Lowry said:

BrooksBearLives said:

So, our President agreed to a deal where Mexico is sending "troops" from a National Guard that didn't exist before last Christmas, and you're claiming this as a win?

You deserve to be fooled.
They're arresting women and children traveling on foot. I don't think 30 months of Navy SEAL training is a prerequisite.


No one said it would take 30 months. But surely you realize it will take more than 6, right? It took over a year of planning for Nike to roll out our new uniform campaign.

You think creating an entire national guard infrastructure will go faster?

I mean, sure. Mexico is known for its efficient government and all...
Our national guard was founded in December of 1636 and was massacring Pequot Indians with marvelous efficiency the following May. It's really not that big a deal.


Are you REALLY comparing those two? Really? The soldiers brought their own guns and never had uniforms?

Also, guarantee it took more than 6 months to muster.

This is a really bad take.
BrooksBearLives
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

BrooksBearLives said:

Oldbear83 said:

America is winning.

Cinque is losing,

That is all.


You're not even trying to debate. You're just declaring victory and moving on.
I stopped worrying about your 'debate', BBL, when you abandoned reason and decorum in order to throw a TDS tantrum.




You're a wimp.

Moaning about decorum while defending a President who has been accused by over a dozen women of sexual harassment.

Get out of here.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BrooksBearLives said:

Oldbear83 said:

BrooksBearLives said:

Oldbear83 said:

America is winning.

Cinque is losing,

That is all.


You're not even trying to debate. You're just declaring victory and moving on.
I stopped worrying about your 'debate', BBL, when you abandoned reason and decorum in order to throw a TDS tantrum.




You're a wimp.

Moaning about decorum while defending a President who has been accused by over a dozen women of sexual harassment.

Get out of here.
You have become a whiny brat throwing a tantrum because he finally starts to realize Trump will win a second term.

That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

BrooksBearLives said:

Oldbear83 said:

BrooksBearLives said:

Oldbear83 said:

America is winning.

Cinque is losing,

That is all.


You're not even trying to debate. You're just declaring victory and moving on.
I stopped worrying about your 'debate', BBL, when you abandoned reason and decorum in order to throw a TDS tantrum.




You're a wimp.

Moaning about decorum while defending a President who has been accused by over a dozen women of sexual harassment.

Get out of here.
You have become a whiny brat throwing a tantrum because he finally starts to realize Trump will win a second term.


TDS is an actual legit medical term. Not even kidding.
contrario
How long do you want to ignore this user?
contrario said:

BrooksBearLives said:

Sam Lowry said:

BrooksBearLives said:

So, our President agreed to a deal where Mexico is sending "troops" from a National Guard that didn't exist before last Christmas, and you're claiming this as a win?

You deserve to be fooled.
They're arresting women and children traveling on foot. I don't think 30 months of Navy SEAL training is a prerequisite.


No one said it would take 30 months. But surely you realize it will take more than 6, right? It took over a year of planning for Nike to roll out our new uniform campaign.

You think creating an entire national guard infrastructure will go faster?

I mean, sure. Mexico is known for its efficient government and all...
I would get your point if Mexico didn't have an army at all, but it's not like they were starting from ground zero. Even the Washington Post is saying Mexico is sending its "new national guard" to the southern border this week. Are you ready to concede that you were wrong about Mexico not having a national guard, or are you going to argue against the reporting of the Washington Post as well?
BBL?
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BrooksBearLives said:

Sam Lowry said:

BrooksBearLives said:

Sam Lowry said:

BrooksBearLives said:

So, our President agreed to a deal where Mexico is sending "troops" from a National Guard that didn't exist before last Christmas, and you're claiming this as a win?

You deserve to be fooled.
They're arresting women and children traveling on foot. I don't think 30 months of Navy SEAL training is a prerequisite.


No one said it would take 30 months. But surely you realize it will take more than 6, right? It took over a year of planning for Nike to roll out our new uniform campaign.

You think creating an entire national guard infrastructure will go faster?

I mean, sure. Mexico is known for its efficient government and all...
Our national guard was founded in December of 1636 and was massacring Pequot Indians with marvelous efficiency the following May. It's really not that big a deal.


Are you REALLY comparing those two? Really? The soldiers brought their own guns and never had uniforms?

Also, guarantee it took more than 6 months to muster.

This is a really bad take.
Four months to the first muster, which is commemorated each April. Five months to the first major battle. Believe me, Mexico is not promising the impossible.
BrooksBearLives
How long do you want to ignore this user?
contrario said:

contrario said:

BrooksBearLives said:

Sam Lowry said:

BrooksBearLives said:

So, our President agreed to a deal where Mexico is sending "troops" from a National Guard that didn't exist before last Christmas, and you're claiming this as a win?

You deserve to be fooled.
They're arresting women and children traveling on foot. I don't think 30 months of Navy SEAL training is a prerequisite.


No one said it would take 30 months. But surely you realize it will take more than 6, right? It took over a year of planning for Nike to roll out our new uniform campaign.

You think creating an entire national guard infrastructure will go faster?

I mean, sure. Mexico is known for its efficient government and all...
I would get your point if Mexico didn't have an army at all, but it's not like they were starting from ground zero. Even the Washington Post is saying Mexico is sending its "new national guard" to the southern border this week. Are you ready to concede that you were wrong about Mexico not having a national guard, or are you going to argue against the reporting of the Washington Post as well?
BBL?


I'm really not making this up. As it is, these troops don't really exist. They're scrambling to get them there. The "National guard" is about as real as the Space Force.

This is a joke.

The National Guard that Trump is bragging about us 6,000 troops that haven deployed yet and won't for months.
BrooksBearLives
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

BrooksBearLives said:

Sam Lowry said:

BrooksBearLives said:

Sam Lowry said:

BrooksBearLives said:

So, our President agreed to a deal where Mexico is sending "troops" from a National Guard that didn't exist before last Christmas, and you're claiming this as a win?

You deserve to be fooled.
They're arresting women and children traveling on foot. I don't think 30 months of Navy SEAL training is a prerequisite.


No one said it would take 30 months. But surely you realize it will take more than 6, right? It took over a year of planning for Nike to roll out our new uniform campaign.

You think creating an entire national guard infrastructure will go faster?

I mean, sure. Mexico is known for its efficient government and all...
Our national guard was founded in December of 1636 and was massacring Pequot Indians with marvelous efficiency the following May. It's really not that big a deal.


Are you REALLY comparing those two? Really? The soldiers brought their own guns and never had uniforms?

Also, guarantee it took more than 6 months to muster.

This is a really bad take.
Four months to the first muster, which is commemorated each April. Five months to the first major battle. Believe me, Mexico is not promising the impossible.


https://www.npr.org/2019/06/10/731385412/mexico-scrambles-to-establish-national-guard-after-promising-to-tighten-border

From an interview done yesterday.

CORNISH: Tell us more about the Mexican National Guard 'cause it was just announced a few weeks ago. What's going on there?

FREDRICK: So the National Guard is really the primary security policy of President Lopez Obrador, who is in his first year here. And basically he pitched the National Guard as a modern, sophisticated kind of hybrid military civilian force. This force would basically have police powers to arrest people. And then specifically talking about migration, it would be the only security force in Mexico that would have the authority on its own to arrest undocumented migrants. This is really all theoretical right now because President Lopez Obrador has talked a lot about it. But there is no active National Guard right now, and we're kind of waiting to see exactly when National Guard gets rolled out.

CORNISH: My next question was going to be whether these Guard members have been trained, but you're saying this force doesn't exist yet. So where are they going to come from?

FREDRICK: Well, so what we know so far is about 1,500 National Guard members are currently being trained. They're not fully trained yet. And this training question is really important because as President Lopez Obrador has pushed it, this is a modern force. It's going to be very respectful of human rights. He said Mexican police and army have had several scandals around human rights. And the feeling that they are trying to rush this out for migration enforcement really doesn't engender a lot of confidence that this is going to be the modern security force that can make Mexico safer.
Limited IQ Redneck in PU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

Oldbear83 said:

BrooksBearLives said:

Oldbear83 said:

BrooksBearLives said:

Oldbear83 said:

America is winning.

Cinque is losing,

That is all.


You're not even trying to debate. You're just declaring victory and moving on.
I stopped worrying about your 'debate', BBL, when you abandoned reason and decorum in order to throw a TDS tantrum.




You're a wimp.

Moaning about decorum while defending a President who has been accused by over a dozen women of sexual harassment.

Get out of here.
You have become a whiny brat throwing a tantrum because he finally starts to realize Trump will win a second term.


TDS is an actual legit medical term. Not even kidding.
I looked this up in my CHPD5 and couldnt find it. BS or do you really think that?
I have found theres only two ways to go:
Living fast or dying slow.
I dont want to live forever.
But I will live while I'm here.
Wichitabear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2 sometimes you have to be an ******* when they don't hear you the 1st time. Mexico knew we could not and would not be able to handle all the immigrants coming across our border. They knew this was a problem but they chose to have their head up their ass! Or did they???hmm
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BrooksBearLives said:

Sam Lowry said:

BrooksBearLives said:

Sam Lowry said:

BrooksBearLives said:

Sam Lowry said:

BrooksBearLives said:

So, our President agreed to a deal where Mexico is sending "troops" from a National Guard that didn't exist before last Christmas, and you're claiming this as a win?

You deserve to be fooled.
They're arresting women and children traveling on foot. I don't think 30 months of Navy SEAL training is a prerequisite.


No one said it would take 30 months. But surely you realize it will take more than 6, right? It took over a year of planning for Nike to roll out our new uniform campaign.

You think creating an entire national guard infrastructure will go faster?

I mean, sure. Mexico is known for its efficient government and all...
Our national guard was founded in December of 1636 and was massacring Pequot Indians with marvelous efficiency the following May. It's really not that big a deal.


Are you REALLY comparing those two? Really? The soldiers brought their own guns and never had uniforms?

Also, guarantee it took more than 6 months to muster.

This is a really bad take.
Four months to the first muster, which is commemorated each April. Five months to the first major battle. Believe me, Mexico is not promising the impossible.


https://www.npr.org/2019/06/10/731385412/mexico-scrambles-to-establish-national-guard-after-promising-to-tighten-border

From an interview done yesterday.

CORNISH: Tell us more about the Mexican National Guard 'cause it was just announced a few weeks ago. What's going on there?

FREDRICK: So the National Guard is really the primary security policy of President Lopez Obrador, who is in his first year here. And basically he pitched the National Guard as a modern, sophisticated kind of hybrid military civilian force. This force would basically have police powers to arrest people. And then specifically talking about migration, it would be the only security force in Mexico that would have the authority on its own to arrest undocumented migrants. This is really all theoretical right now because President Lopez Obrador has talked a lot about it. But there is no active National Guard right now, and we're kind of waiting to see exactly when National Guard gets rolled out.

CORNISH: My next question was going to be whether these Guard members have been trained, but you're saying this force doesn't exist yet. So where are they going to come from?

FREDRICK: Well, so what we know so far is about 1,500 National Guard members are currently being trained. They're not fully trained yet. And this training question is really important because as President Lopez Obrador has pushed it, this is a modern force. It's going to be very respectful of human rights. He said Mexican police and army have had several scandals around human rights. And the feeling that they are trying to rush this out for migration enforcement really doesn't engender a lot of confidence that this is going to be the modern security force that can make Mexico safer.
So they're currently in training, and NPR is wringing its hands about human rights violations that haven't happened yet. Which one of these things is a surprise?
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BBL "From an interview done yesterday.

CORNISH: Tell us more about the Mexican National Guard 'cause it was just announced a few weeks ago. What's going on there?

FREDRICK: So the National Guard is really the primary security policy of President Lopez Obrador, who is in his first year here. And basically he pitched the National Guard as a modern, sophisticated kind of hybrid military civilian force. This force would basically have police powers to arrest people. And then specifically talking about migration, it would be the only security force in Mexico that would have the authority on its own to arrest undocumented migrants. This is really all theoretical right now because President Lopez Obrador has talked a lot about it. But there is no active National Guard right now, and we're kind of waiting to see exactly when National Guard gets rolled out.

CORNISH: My next question was going to be whether these Guard members have been trained, but you're saying this force doesn't exist yet. So where are they going to come from?

FREDRICK: Well, so what we know so far is about 1,500 National Guard members are currently being trained. They're not fully trained yet. And this training question is really important because as President Lopez Obrador has pushed it, this is a modern force. It's going to be very respectful of human rights. He said Mexican police and army have had several scandals around human rights. And the feeling that they are trying to rush this out for migration enforcement really doesn't engender a lot of confidence that this is going to be the modern security force that can make Mexico safer."
Fact ^^^^^^^^^^^
Yes human rights are a concern not hand wringing but real potential.
Waco1947 ,la
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So are we worried that these brutes won't be deployed, or that they will be? I'm losing track.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.