Nothing about the article is leftist. Obvious to anyone who read it.Oldbear83 said:So much spluttering, quash needs a lifeguard I believe.quash said:Right about what? You plainly didn't read the ;linked article.Oldbear83 said:Yes, but I'm right, too.quash said:Oldbear83 said:You spew, I clarify.quash said:There he goes again.Oldbear83 said:Translation - quash hates having to hire legalsquash said:
We are getting less wall for more money than was promised, and to no real benefit. https://www.cato.org/blog/cost-border-wall-keeps-climbing-its-becoming-less-wall
It's what we do, q.
You're boring.
And "quash hates having to hire legals" is unsupported by anything. You know: a lie. And you are so proud of your honesty. Laffable.
Yes I read the article. Waste of time, that, in the context of this discussion, as it does not help your point..
But the gist of it is you are looking for excuses to prop up a leftist point of view, and I'm not having it.
So yes, since you act like a school child I am treating you as one. A simple rebuke in response to your petulant whine.
You lied about reading it.
But feel free to go read it now, claim that you did yesterday, and quote the leftist portion. I dare you on your integrity.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat