Waco1947 said:

---

Justice for women is not evil rather is legal and a right and maybe moral because she is an equal person as you and I.
But none of you has right to right to tell a woman what to do. You cannot force your belief on another.

---

Prohibition of murder isn't forcing a belief upon anyone unless you're satanic.

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Justice for women is not evil rather is legal and a right and maybe moral because she is an equal person as you and I.
But none of you has right to right to tell a woman what to do. You cannot force your belief on another.

---

The woman has no right to kill the person temporarily inside of her.

---

Do I have a right to take your gun?
Nope
You don't have a right to tell a woman "Carry to term."

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Justice for women is not evil rather is legal and a right and maybe moral because she is an equal person as you and I.
But none of you has right to right to tell a woman what to do. You cannot force your belief on another.

---

The woman has no right to kill the person temporarily inside of her.

---

Do I have a right to take your gun?
Nope
You don't have a right to tell a woman "Carry to term."

---

This discussion is idiotic but I think you could make the argument that if he was going to use his gun to kill someone then you would, in fact, have the right as well as the moral obligation to take it if you could.

quash said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

quash said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

trey3216 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

BAdvocating for justice for blacks, asking you t empathize
, getting an education in black history? That's a high horse?
Why?

---

You're nothing but an enabler for blacks

You help them to be helpless

You're handicapping them to try to make yourself feel better

That's what I wake up feeling about you

---

And you? What are you doing for justice? Any empathy or education or experience? So you just resort to silly slogans.

---

As opposed to preaching divisiveness in the name of Jesus. Well done cloth man

---

And you?

---

I dont preach, or preach divisiveness.

---

Pointing out injustice is not divisive. It's truth you can't handle the truth.

---

Killing the unborn is a great injustice, but you consider it a fundamental right. That's the truth, and you can't handle the truth.

Making women carry to term against their will is unjust. That's the truth. It is a civil right whether you like it or not. God made these women too and they are have rights like every human. "God made them male and female in God's image." You have no right to another person to say "I am in charge of your right to be pregnant." The woman is made in the image of God. That's the truth.

---

---

Learn to use the quote function properly.

Rights do not include the right to kill another person made in the image of God any more than they include the right to enslave another person. The unborn human is such a person, made in the image of God. That's the truth.

---

That's religious belief.

---

Then when exactly does the collection of cells become a person with rights according to your supposed objective truth/non-religious belief? Just curious what you think? Disclosure: I'm a "moment-of-conception" guy.

---

I'm good at 20-22 weeks, there is an element of consciousness that seems to appear then. I have backed that down from 26 weeks based on newer evidence.

---

Just curious, why would technology change whether that is a baby or not?

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Justice for women is not evil rather is legal and a right and maybe moral because she is an equal person as you and I.
But none of you has right to right to tell a woman what to do. You cannot force your belief on another.

---

The woman has no right to kill the person temporarily inside of her.

---

Do I have a right to take your gun?
Nope
You don't have a right to tell a woman "Carry to term."

---

Federal Law prevents most felons from owning a gun. So, yes, thank you for making the argument against abortion.

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Justice for women is not evil rather is legal and a right and maybe moral because she is an equal person as you and I.
But none of you has right to right to tell a woman what to do. You cannot force your belief on another.

---

The woman has no right to kill the person temporarily inside of her.

---

Do I have a right to take your gun?
Nope
You don't have a right to tell a woman "Carry to term."

---

If you can't tell the difference there's basically no hope for you. Lord, have mercy.

Waco1947 said:

---

Justice for women is not evil rather is legal and a right and maybe moral because she is an equal person as you and I.
But none of you has right to right to tell a woman what to do. You cannot force your belief on another.

---

"You cannot force your belief on another."

All governments do this all of the time, as do all groups of humans regardless of form. That's what it means to be part of a family, clan, tribe, FB group, etc. You really need help if you can't see this simple truth.

You misspelled "evidence".

The race card has lost its edge, so they're doubling down with outlandish claims about white supremacy. To understand how they can calculate a gain from this, one must understand the premise of critical race theory - slavery was America's "original sin."

So what we're seeing from Waco1947and these bigoted Democrat candidates is going to be followed up with a strong push from the press and media. NYT is launching of on a "1619 project" where they will do a Ken Burns-esque take on America's REAL founding as 1619, the year the first slaves arrived in this country, and make the case that every facet, every single facet, of American life today is derivative of slavery.

no joke.

It is a patent attempt to re-write history to fit post-modernist deconstruction of American Exceptionalism.

It is the best example yet of the failure of institutions.....press & media choosing sides & pushing narratives rather than just telling us what happened and doing a best effort to tell both sides of the story.

Those of you who subscribe to the NYT (tsk, tsk, tsk) can find a write up about the pending story in the NYT magazine. Here's a link from the Cato Institute about the "project."

https://www.cato.org/blog/1619-project-confronting-legacies-american-slavery

So creepy how 1947 embraces abortion.

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Justice for women is not evil rather is legal and a right and maybe moral because she is an equal person as you and I.
But none of you has right to right to tell a woman what to do. You cannot force your belief on another.

---

The woman has no right to kill the person temporarily inside of her.

---

Do I have a right to take your gun?
Nope
You don't have a right to tell a woman "Carry to term."

---

If you can't tell the difference there's basically no hope for you. Lord, have mercy.


I can tell the difference but you can not. You failed to answer. If I know a gun is going to kill a living human being by murder, suicide, accident then why sell to it to you. A gun has very harmful possibilities of killing people.

---

I'm not a radical pro lifer but I don't understand your position here. A gun might be used to kill someone so it shouldn't be sold. An abortion is definitely used to kill someone but that ok.

That's just a super odd juxtaposition to me.

nein51 said:

---

I'm not a radical pro lifer but I don't understand your position here. A gun might be used to kill someone so it shouldn't be sold. An aborti
on is definitely used to kill someone but that ok.

That's just a super odd juxtaposition to me.

The issue is about rights and logic - not per se guns and abortion.

But the tie in is: Pro life (false advertising) says ""Conception holds the potential for a human being; therefore, abortion is killing a human being."
My argument is: "If a gun holds the potential for killing a human being then why sell it? Stop the process early."

Both positions depend on "potential" for life or death. How far back does one push "potential for life" - vasectomies or tubal ligation because that person does not want children? Should those procedures be stopped because "potential humans" will never have a chance?

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Justice for women is not evil rather is legal and a right and maybe moral because she is an equal person as you and I.
But none of you has right to right to tell a woman what to do. You cannot force your belief on another.

---

The woman has no right to kill the person temporarily inside of her.

---

Do I have a right to take your gun?
Nope
You don't have a right to tell a woman "Carry to term."

---

If you can't tell the difference there's basically no hope for you. Lord, have mercy.


I can tell the difference but you can not. You failed to answer. If I know a gun is going to kill a living human being by murder, suicide, accident then why sell to it to you. A gun has very harmful possibilities of killing people.

---

---

So, now you're just making up rules based on "harmful possibilities"? And that's over against the certainty of murdering a baby every time you rip it from its mother's womb. SMH...

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Justice for women is not evil rather is legal and a right and maybe moral because she is an equal person as you and I.
But none of you has right to right to tell a woman what to do. You cannot force your belief on another.

---

The woman has no right to kill the person temporarily inside of her.

---

Do I have a right to take your gun?
Nope
You don't have a right to tell a woman "Carry to term."

---

If you can't tell the difference there's basically no hope for you. Lord, have mercy.


I can tell the difference but you can not. You failed to answer. If I know a gun is going to kill a living human being by murder, suicide, accident then why sell to it to you. A gun has very harmful possibilities of killing people.

---

---

So, now you're just making up rules based on "harmful possibilities"? And that's over against the certainty of murdering a baby every time you rip it from its mother's womb. SMH...

---

And that's why we should all pray for his Methodist congregants.

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Justice for women is not evil rather is legal and a right and maybe moral because she is an equal person as you and I.
But none of you has right to right to tell a woman what to do. You cannot force your belief on another.

---

The woman has no right to kill the person temporarily inside of her.

---

Do I have a right to take your gun?
Nope
You don't have a right to tell a woman "Carry to term."

---

If you can't tell the difference there's basically no hope for you. Lord, have mercy.


I can tell the difference but you can not. You failed to answer. If I know a gun is going to kill a living human being by murder, suicide, accident then why sell to it to you. A gun has very harmful possibilities of killing people.

---

---

You still are not using the quote function properly. Type in the white part at the bottom of the screen. The gray part is the quoted part.

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Justice for women is not evil rather is legal and a right and maybe moral because she is an equal person as you and I.
But none of you has right to right to tell a woman what to do. You cannot force your belief on another.

---

The woman has no right to kill the person temporarily inside of her.

---

Do I have a right to take your gun?
Nope
You don't have a right to tell a woman "Carry to term."

---

If you can't tell the difference there's basically no hope for you. Lord, have mercy.


I can tell the difference but you can not. You failed to answer. If I know a gun is going to kill a living human being by murder, suicide, accident then why sell to it to you. A gun has very harmful possibilities of killing people.

---

---

You still are not using the quote function properly. Type in the white part at the bottom of the screen. The gray part is the quoted part.

---

He can't do that. He's ashamed of the white part

Waco1947 said:

---

nein51 said:

---

I'm not a radical pro lifer but I don't understand your position here. A gun might be used to kill someone so it shouldn't be sold. An aborti
on is definitely used to kill someone but that ok.

That's just a super odd juxtaposition to me.

The issue is about rights and logic - not per se guns and abortion.

But the tie in is: Pro life (false advertising) says ""Conception holds the potential for a human being; therefore, abortion is killing a human being."
My argument is: "If a gun holds the potential for killing a human being then why sell it? Stop the process early."

Both positions depend on "potential" for life or death. How far back does one push "potential for life" - vasectomies or tubal ligation because that person does not want children? Should those procedures be stopped because "potential humans" will never have a chance?

---

---

How many times do you have to reveal that you have no idea how conception works?

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Justice for women is not evil rather is legal and a right and maybe moral because she is an equal person as you and I.
But none of you has right to right to tell a woman what to do. You cannot force your belief on another.

---

The woman has no right to kill the person temporarily inside of her.

---

Do I have a right to take your gun?
Nope
You don't have a right to tell a woman "Carry to term."

---

If you can't tell the difference there's basically no hope for you. Lord, have mercy.


I can tell the difference but you can not. You failed to answer. If I know a gun is going to kill a living human being by murder, suicide, accident then why sell to it to you. A gun has very harmful possibilities of killing people.

---

---

So, now you're just making up rules based on "harmful possibilities"? And that's over against the certainty of murdering a baby every time you rip it from its mother's womb. SMH...

---

Not "making up rules." Good Catholic theology
1. Contraceptive stops God!
2. - every zygote is human. Or potential.
3. It's about rights. Do you want your guns rights messed with?

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Justice for women is not evil rather is legal and a right and maybe moral because she is an equal person as you and I.
But none of you has right to right to tell a woman what to do. You cannot force your belief on another.

---

The woman has no right to kill the person temporarily inside of her.

---

Do I have a right to take your gun?
Nope
You don't have a right to tell a woman "Carry to term."

---

If you can't tell the difference there's basically no hope for you. Lord, have mercy.


I can tell the difference but you can not. You failed to answer. If I know a gun is going to kill a living human being by murder, suicide, accident then why sell to it to you. A gun has very harmful possibilities of killing people.

---

---

So, now you're just making up rules based on "harmful possibilities"? And that's over against the certainty of murdering a baby every time you rip it from its mother's womb. SMH...

---

Not "making up rules." Good Catholic theology
1. Contraceptive stops God!
2. - every zygote is human. Or potential.
3. It's about rights. Do you want your guns rights messed with?

---

I would like to take this moment to celebrate the correct use of the quote function.

Tell you what, I will support any form of gun control you wish if you will admit that the unborn offspring of two humans is, in fact, a human being and adjust your position accordingly.

Funny

So many have told him the same

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Justice for women is not evil rather is legal and a right and maybe moral because she is an equal person as you and I.
But none of you has right to right to tell a woman what to do. You cannot force your belief on another.

---

The woman has no right to kill the person temporarily inside of her.

---

Do I have a right to take your gun?
Nope
You don't have a right to tell a woman "Carry to term."

---

If you can't tell the difference there's basically no hope for you. Lord, have mercy.


I can tell the difference but you can not. You failed to answer. If I know a gun is going to kill a living human being by murder, suicide, accident then why sell to it to you. A gun has very harmful possibilities of killing people.

---

---

So, now you're just making up rules based on "harmful possibilities"? And that's over against the certainty of murdering a baby every time you rip it from its mother's womb. SMH...

---

Not "making up rules." Good Catholic theology
1. Contraceptive stops God!
2. - every zygote is human. Or potential.
3. It's about rights. Do you want your guns rights messed with?

---

I would like to take this moment to celebrate the correct use of the quote function.

Tell you what, I will support any form of gun control you wish if you will admit that the unborn offspring of two humans is, in fact, a human being and adjust your position accordingly.

---

That a fetus is a human being is questionable. Is an egg a chicken?
But in i my estimation the fetus is human but that does not give you right to control a woman's body.
It's her business not yours.
Rights has always been the issue. But binary world sees only one "right" or "absolute" side. One cannot reason an Absolutist. That is sad. One sees it in the LGBT arguments too or God is all powerful when physics says No.

Effin idiot

Then using that logic you have given pregnant women the right to commit murder.

I could understand being pro choice if you were taking the stance that a fetus is not a human. We can debate that on its merit because certainly it is the crux of the argument.

There is no plausible way to reconcile the concept that a fetus is a human being with the right to abort it. No amount of mental gymnastics would make that ok.

Waco1947 said:

---

But in i my estimation the fetus is human but that does not give you right to control a woman's body.
It's her business not yours.

---

So, I read this as, you are cool with killing humans even though there are clear commandments about murder in scripture. Did I misread your statement?

Edmond Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

But in i my estimation the fetus is human but that does not give you right to control a woman's body.
It's her business not yours.

---

So, I read this as, you are cool with killing humans even though there are clear commandments about murder in scripture. Did I misread your statement?

---

It seems quite clear that, in his opinion, the unborn human offspring is human, but his or her mother has a right to kill him or her and it is none of your business if she does.

Edmond Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

But in i my estimation the fetus is human but that does not give you right to control a woman's body.
It's her business not yours.

---

So, I read this as, you are cool with killing humans even though there are clear commandments about murder in scripture. Did I misread your statement?
No, not cool. Read again and respond with reason not silliness

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Edmond Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

But in i my estimation the fetus is human but that does not give you right to control a woman's body.

It's her business not yours.

---

So, I read this as, you are cool with killing humans even though there are clear commandments about murder in scripture. Did I misread your statement?

---

It seems quite clear that, in his opinion, the unborn human offspring is human, but his or her mother has a right to kill him or her and it is none of your business if she does.

No it not clear like you say. It is clear that you make things up and call them true. You raised a straw man not an argument.
Try again

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Edmond Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

But in i my estimation the fetus is human but that does not give you right to control a woman's body.

It's her business not yours.

---

So, I read this as, you are cool with killing humans even though there are clear commandments about murder in scripture. Did I misread your statement?

---

It seems quite clear that, in his opinion, the unborn human offspring is human, but his or her mother has a right to kill him or her and it is none of your business if she does.

No it not clear like you say. It is clear that you make things up and call them true. You raised a straw man not an argument.
Try again

---

---

1. Use the quote function properly.

2. Show me what is false about your opinion:

1. The unborn offspring is human
2. The mother has a right to kill the offspring.
3. Her choice to kill the offspring is none of my (or yours or anyone else's) business.

Which one of those three is "made up and called true?"
They are based in your direct quotes.:

1. "But in i my estimation the fetus is human"
2. "that does not give you right to control a woman's body."
3. "It's her business, not yours." (You have repeated this one more times than I care to count).

Maybe someone stole your login information.

Waco1947 said:

---

Edmond Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

But in i my estimation the fetus is human but that does not give you right to control a woman's body.
It's her business not yours.

---

So, I read this as, you are cool with killing humans even though there are clear commandments about murder in scripture. Did I misread your statement?
No, not cool. Read again and respond with reason not silliness

---

---

Here's my version:
1 - Learn to use the quote function. Type in the white space, not the gray space.

2 - You agree the fetus is human.

3 - You are cool with abortions which kills a human.

4 - Exodus 20:13 makes it perfectly clear that we are not to kill a human.

What did I miss?

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Edmond Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

But in i my estimation the fetus is human but that does not give you right to control a woman's body.

It's her business not yours.

---

So, I read this as, you are cool with killing humans even though there are clear commandments about murder in scripture. Did I misread your statement?

---

It seems quite clear that, in his opinion, the unborn human offspring is human, but his or her mother has a right to kill him or her and it is none of your business if she does.

No it not clear like you say. It is clear that you make things up and call them true. You raised a straw man not an argument.
Try again

---

---

1. Use the quote function properly.

2. Show me what is false about your opinion:

1. The unborn offspring is human. """""""""""No fetus. It's your opinion and push to extreme. It means no contraception or masturbation because each sperm and egg is a "potential" human""""""
2. The mother has a right to kill the offspring.
""""""""""""""Offspring? No fetus. Kill no. Health decision
3. Her choice to kill the offspring is none of my (or yours or anyone else's) business. """""""""">>>> Killing<<<<<< is your word not mine. """""""""

Which one of those three is "made up and called true?"
They are based in your direct quotes.:
"""""""""All of them made up using your straw man machine. Making up positions and attacking them. It's classic stupidity of of your arguments """"""
>>>>>>>I might attention if you used my actual words and not your bs<<<<<<<<<<<

1. "But in i my estimation the fetus is human" >>>>>>>> true. Not a straw man. It is why I am anti abortion but in context to the woman and her moral position it is immaterial and none of my business. It like saying "You are a stupid drunk and alcoholic and killing yourself but it's your damn business. "
2. "that does not give you right to control a woman's body." """"""Do you have the right? Is it reciprocal?""
3. "It's her business, not yours." (You have repeated this one more times than I care to count).
""""""""So I have said it countless times. You have no answer and you know it."""""
Maybe someone stole your login information.

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Edmond Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

But in i my estimation the fetus is human but that does not give you right to control a woman's body.

It's her business not yours.

---

So, I read this as, you are cool with killing humans even though there are clear commandments about murder in scripture. Did I misread your statement?

---

It seems quite clear that, in his opinion, the unborn human offspring is human, but his or her mother has a right to kill him or her and it is none of your business if she does.

No it not clear like you say. It is clear that you make things up and call them true. You raised a straw man not an argument.
Try again

---

---

1. Use the quote function properly.

2. Show me what is false about your opinion:

1. The unborn offspring is human. """""""""""No fetus. It's your opinion and push to extreme. It means no contraception or masturbation because each sperm and egg is a "potential" human""""""
2. The mother has a right to kill the offspring.
""""""""""""""Offspring? No fetus. Kill no. Health decision
3. Her choice to kill the offspring is none of my (or yours or anyone else's) business. """""""""">>>> Killing<<<<<< is your word not mine. """""""""

Which one of those three is "made up and called true?"
They are based in your direct quotes.:
"""""""""All of them made up using your straw man machine. Making up positions and attacking them. It's classic stupidity of of your arguments """"""
>>>>>>>I might attention if you used my actual words and not your bs<<<<<<<<<<<

1. "But in i my estimation the fetus is human" >>>>>>>> true. Not a straw man. It is why I am anti abortion but in context to the woman and her moral position it is immaterial and none of my business. It like saying "You are a stupid drunk and alcoholic and killing yourself but it's your damn business. "
2. "that does not give you right to control a woman's body." """"""Do you have the right? Is it reciprocal?""
3. "It's her business, not yours." (You have repeated this one more times than I care to count).
""""""""So I have said it countless times. You have no answer and you know it."""""
Maybe someone stole your login information.

---

---

None of the quotes I attribute to you are made up. All of them are directly taken, in proper context, from your own statements. They are directly quoted, word-for-word and their meaning is not distorted.

You say the fetus is human. "But in i my estimation the fetus is human." This is not an ambiguous statement. It is not a straw man and it is most certainly not made up. Quit insulting everyone's intelligence. We can all read what you wrote.

If you are correct and the unborn offspring (a fetus is, by definition, unborn offspring) is human, then it is not like saying, "You are a stupid drunk and alcoholic and killing yourself but it's your damn business." Rather, it is like saying, "You are a stupid drunk and alcoholic and abusing your wife and kids to the point of death and driving drunk every night of the week but it's your damn business!"

Killing isn't "my word," it is what a successful abortion does to the unborn offspring.

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Edmond Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

But in i my estimation the fetus is human but that does not give you right to control a woman's body.

It's her business not yours.

---

So, I read this as, you are cool with killing humans even though there are clear commandments about murder in scripture. Did I misread your statement?

---

It seems quite clear that, in his opinion, the unborn human offspring is human, but his or her mother has a right to kill him or her and it is none of your business if she does.

No it not clear like you say. It is clear that you make things up and call them true. You raised a straw man not an argument.
Try again

---

---

1. Use the quote function properly.

2. Show me what is false about your opinion:

1. The unborn offspring is human. """""""""""No fetus. It's your opinion and push to extreme. It means no contraception or masturbation because each sperm and egg is a "potential" human""""""
2. The mother has a right to kill the offspring.
""""""""""""""Offspring? No fetus. Kill no. Health decision
3. Her choice to kill the offspring is none of my (or yours or anyone else's) business. """""""""">>>> Killing<<<<<< is your word not mine. """""""""

Which one of those three is "made up and called true?"
They are based in your direct quotes.:
"""""""""All of them made up using your straw man machine. Making up positions and attacking them. It's classic stupidity of of your arguments """"""
>>>>>>>I might attention if you used my actual words and not your bs<<<<<<<<<<<

1. "But in i my estimation the fetus is human" >>>>>>>> true. Not a straw man. It is why I am anti abortion but in context to the woman and her moral position it is immaterial and none of my business. It like saying "You are a stupid drunk and alcoholic and killing yourself but it's your damn business. "
2. "that does not give you right to control a woman's body." """"""Do you have the right? Is it reciprocal?""
3. "It's her business, not yours." (You have repeated this one more times than I care to count).
""""""""So I have said it countless times. You have no answer and you know it."""""
Maybe someone stole your login information.

---

---

Waco, DC Bear is using the quote function properly which copies your exact words and places them in a quote.

You, on the other hand, struggle with the quote function.

Edmond Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Edmond Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

But in i my estimation the fetus is human but that does not give you right to control a woman's body.

It's her business not yours.

---

So, I read this as, you are cool with killing humans even though there are clear commandments about murder in scripture. Did I misread your statement?

---

It seems quite clear that, in his opinion, the unborn human offspring is human, but his or her mother has a right to kill him or her and it is none of your business if she does.

No it not clear like you say. It is clear that you make things up and call them true. You raised a straw man not an argument.
Try again

---

---

1. Use the quote function properly.

2. Show me what is false about your opinion:

1. The unborn offspring is human. """""""""""No fetus. It's your opinion and push to extreme. It means no contraception or masturbation because each sperm and egg is a "potential" human""""""
2. The mother has a right to kill the offspring.
""""""""""""""Offspring? No fetus. Kill no. Health decision
3. Her choice to kill the offspring is none of my (or yours or anyone else's) business. """""""""">>>> Killing<<<<<< is your word not mine. """""""""

Which one of those three is "made up and called true?"
They are based in your direct quotes.:
"""""""""All of them made up using your straw man machine. Making up positions and attacking them. It's classic stupidity of of your arguments """"""
>>>>>>>I might attention if you used my actual words and not your bs<<<<<<<<<<<

1. "But in i my estimation the fetus is human" >>>>>>>> true. Not a straw man. It is why I am anti abortion but in context to the woman and her moral position it is immaterial and none of my business. It like saying "You are a stupid drunk and alcoholic and killing yourself but it's your damn business. "
2. "that does not give you right to control a woman's body." """"""Do you have the right? Is it reciprocal?""
3. "It's her business, not yours." (You have repeated this one more times than I care to count).
""""""""So I have said it countless times. You have no answer and you know it."""""
Maybe someone stole your login information.

---

---

Waco, DC Bear is using the quote function properly which copies your exact words and places them in a quote.

You, on the other hand, struggle with the quote function.

---

It's hilarious how many people Waco bothers with quote function