Really doesn't get any less ambiguous than that.

Pretty much as expected.

riflebear said:

---

Funny how the cameraman pans in for a closeup for a Democrat talking but every time a Republican talks they pan out so you can't see who it is.

---

Thought the exact same thing. WTH!?

HuMcK said:

---

Pretty much as expected.

---

How do you undermine something that is probably illegal and biased? The presence of bias undermines itself, notwithstanding the "outside my purview" of how and why you were even engaged as a special prosecutor.

HuMcK said:

---

Really doesn't get any less ambiguous than that.

---

Except Mueller said the exact opposite many times before today. Good luck w/ that.

If you haven't watched, this pretty much sums up today.

riflebear said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Really doesn't get any less ambiguous than that.

---

Except Mueller said the exact opposite many times before today. Good luck w/ that.

---

Did he? Or are you still just relying on Barr's word that he did? Frankly, outside of Gateway Pundit-Land, Mueller's word carries more credibility than Barr's. Interesting that when Barr was asked to share the notes that would corroborate that, he flatly refused.

"I find this entire process un American"

Wow

ATL Bear said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Pretty much as expected.

---

How do you undermine something that is probably illegal and biased? The presence of bias undermines itself, notwithstanding the "outside my purview" of how and why you were even engaged as a special prosecutor.

---

I never understood all the noise about "bias", as if that is some valid legal basis for attacking an investigation. Newsflash, it ain't, and investigators usually don't like the people they uncover criminal evidence about.

Jack and DP said:

---

"I find this entire process un American"

Wow

---

That was big - who said that? I'm watching online and Hillary's cameraman won't show any Republican.

Twitter post of the day

HuMcK said:

---

This seems noteworthy.

---

The DOJ exonerated him.

You forgot about that didn't you!

You're on day 915 of "We've got him this time, we promise". SAD.

HuMcK said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Pretty much as expected.

---

How do you undermine something that is probably illegal and biased? The presence of bias undermines itself, notwithstanding the "outside my purview" of how and why you were even engaged as a special prosecutor.

---

I never understood all the noise about "bias", as if that is some valid legal basis for attacking an investigation. Newsflash, it ain't, and investigators usually don't like the people they uncover criminal evidence about.

---

Well when the 'investigation' was started based on a setup from 'biased' sources and then they hire those same 'biased' sources to investigate the 'fake investigation' it's not really hard to understand.

Doc Holliday said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

This seems noteworthy.

---

The DOJ exonerated him.

You forgot about that didn't you!

---

Barr certainly shielded him from prosecution, but that's along way off from an exoneration. I can't get over how shameless y'all are about misrepresenting facially plain facts. Mueller's Report specifically said it did not exonerate him, and now we have Mueller himself saying the Office of the Presidency is the only thing shielding Trump from criminal charges, while y'all morons plug your ears and pretend you didn't hear that.

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

This seems noteworthy.

---

The DOJ exonerated him.

You forgot about that didn't you!

---

Barr certainly shielded him from prosecution, but that's along way off from an exoneration. I can't get over how shameless y'all are about misrepresenting facially plain facts. Mueller's Report specifically said it did not exonerate him, and now we have Mueller himself saying the Office of the Presidency is the only thing shielding Trump from criminal charges, while y'all morons plug your ears and pretend you didn't hear that.

---

Innocent until PROVEN guilty.

The burden is on Mueller. He did not deliver.

You do not exonerate. You charge. That's it.
Game over bud. Get over it.

Chris Wallace says this has been a disaster for the Dems & Mueller.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/chris-wallace-robert-mueller-hearing-disaster-for-democrats

Doc Holliday said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

This seems noteworthy.

---

The DOJ exonerated him.

You forgot about that didn't you!

---

Barr certainly shielded him from prosecution, but that's along way off from an exoneration. I can't get over how shameless y'all are about misrepresenting facially plain facts. Mueller's Report specifically said it did not exonerate him, and now we have Mueller himself saying the Office of the Presidency is the only thing shielding Trump from criminal charges, while y'all morons plug your ears and pretend you didn't hear that.

---

Innocent until PROVEN guilty.

The burden is on Mueller. He did not deliver.

You do not exonerate. You charge. That's it.
Game over bud. Get over it.

---

That is literally the opposite of the shameless lie you posted just 1 comment ago, when you said DoJ exonerated Trump. I'm tired of entertaining your faux-stupidity act, you know damn good and well (especially now that he said it on camera) that the only reason Mueller didn't charge Trump is DoJ policy.

So Humck, Manafort's "Russian contact" was actually a State Department asset and the Mueller Report makes no mention of this and Mueller claims he did not know this? How could he not?

Perjury trap #2.

HuMcK said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Pretty much as expected.

---

How do you undermine something that is probably illegal and biased? The presence of bias undermines itself, notwithstanding the "outside my purview" of how and why you were even engaged as a special prosecutor.

---

I never understood all the noise about "bias", as if that is some valid legal basis for attacking an investigation. Newsflash, it ain't, and investigators usually don't like the people they uncover criminal evidence about.

---

It isn't about like or dislike of an investigation subject. It's whether your actions intentionally steered toward guilt or innocence due to your biased actions or sentiments, and there are laws against that. That is the fundamental problem with a special prosecutor. It is a witch hunt for wrong doing under a broad guise of authority and scope. Please kill the special prosecutors. We have plenty of DOJ and other investigative arms to deal with criminal situations.

A small footnote in the report says these 'news' reports aren't based on facts, just used as a reference to Trump's responses. So here we have misleading/fakenews reports from the most liberal Trump hating sites being used to push Obstruction conspiracy theories when they know no one will read the foot note. Shady

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

This seems noteworthy.

---

The DOJ exonerated him.

You forgot about that didn't you!

---

Barr certainly shielded him from prosecution, but that's along way off from an exoneration. I can't get over how shameless y'all are about misrepresenting facially plain facts. Mueller's Report specifically said it did not exonerate him, and now we have Mueller himself saying the Office of the Presidency is the only thing shielding Trump from criminal charges, while y'all morons plug your ears and pretend you didn't hear that.

---

Innocent until PROVEN guilty.

The burden is on Mueller. He did not deliver.

You do not exonerate. You charge. That's it.
Game over bud. Get over it.

---

That is literally the opposite of the shameless lie you posted just 1 comment ago, when you said DoJ exonerated Trump. I'm tired of entertaining your faux-stupidity act, you know damn good and well (especially now that he said it on camera) that the only reason Mueller didn't charge Trump is DoJ policy.

---

Not in the legal sense.

They tried to charge on obstruction but they stretched the law so much that it didn't comply.

Are you even aware of Weissmann getting in trouble for this exact same thing? SAME STATUTE!

And talking about being dishonest...you stay far away from the predicates and what led to the SC creation. Why is that?

The most shocking thing in all of this today is him saying he wasn't familiar w/ Fusion GPS who literally fabricated this entire story to kick off Trump/Russia and Mueller has never heard of it? Insanity

Mueller just said his deputy, who was the personal attorney for the Hillary Clinton aide who smashed her Blackberries, was in charge of "day-to-day oversight" of Mueller's investigation.

Blasey F'ing Ford did a better job than Mueller today.

Doc Holliday said:

---

So Humck, Manafort's "Russian contact" was actually a State Department asset and the Mueller Report makes no mention of this and Mueller claims he did not know this? How could he not?

Perjury trap #2.

---

Again, play the idiot if you want, but nothing about Kilimnik feeding info to State (which is in the report, actually, part of how Mueller knew Manafort lied was because of something Kilimnik emailed to a person in the Dept. of State) precludes him from working as an agent for Oleg Deripaska (which he was). That's how spy-craft works, you play all sides for an advantage.

I almost feel sorry for Mueller, nope - not anymore. What a hack