Canada2017 said:
Late in life Ol Bernie has become a multi millionaire by bashing the rich .
Hypocrite ....of course . Oncoming senility...possibly .
But no communist.
Bearitto said:Canada2017 said:
Late in life Ol Bernie has become a multi millionaire by bashing the rich .
Hypocrite ....of course . Oncoming senility...possibly .
But no communist.
Communist leaders are always the ones who end up rich and powerful
Canada2017 said:Bearitto said:Canada2017 said:
Late in life Ol Bernie has become a multi millionaire by bashing the rich .
Hypocrite ....of course . Oncoming senility...possibly .
But no communist.
Communist leaders are always the ones who end up rich and powerful
Not always .
Just because Trump says Bernie is a communist doesn't make him one .
How many dachas do you own comrade? Bernie owns three because some workers are more equal than others.Canada2017 said:
Late in life Ol Bernie has become a multi millionaire by bashing the rich .
Hypocrite ....of course . Oncoming senility...possibly .
But no communist.
ABC BEAR said:How many dachas do you own comrade? Bernie owns three because some workers are more equal than others.Canada2017 said:
Late in life Ol Bernie has become a multi millionaire by bashing the rich .
Hypocrite ....of course . Oncoming senility...possibly .
But no communist.
Canada2017 said:Bearitto said:Canada2017 said:
Late in life Ol Bernie has become a multi millionaire by bashing the rich .
Hypocrite ....of course . Oncoming senility...possibly .
But no communist.
Communist leaders are always the ones who end up rich and powerful
Not always .
Just because Trump says Bernie is a communist doesn't make him one .
FIFY: Communist leaders are always the ones who end up rich and powerful, as do some capitalist leaders.Bearitto said:Communist leaders are always the ones who end up rich and powerfulCanada2017 said:
Late in life Ol Bernie has become a multi millionaire by bashing the rich .
Hypocrite ....of course . Oncoming senility...possibly .
But no communist.
57Bear said:FIFY: Communist leaders are always the ones who end up rich and powerful, as do some capitalist leaders.Bearitto said:Communist leaders are always the ones who end up rich and powerfulCanada2017 said:
Late in life Ol Bernie has become a multi millionaire by bashing the rich .
Hypocrite ....of course . Oncoming senility...possibly .
But no communist.
Bearitto said:
Bernie is a communist. Why run from it?
Poultry houses or hog confinement sheds?Canada2017 said:ABC BEAR said:How many dachas do you own comrade? Bernie owns three because some workers are more equal than others.Canada2017 said:
Late in life Ol Bernie has become a multi millionaire by bashing the rich .
Hypocrite ....of course . Oncoming senility...possibly .
But no communist.
26
I'm cool with eliminating all of those programs.tommie said:Bearitto said:
Bernie is a communist. Why run from it?
Bernie calls himself a socialist. Not communist. That distinction is important. Under Bernie's ideology, you're free to own property and become rich but the state (and the people) have a responsibility to the less fortunate.
Historically, people have argued that many programs we now accept were socialist. Each a step towards ruining America.
Just because Bernie calls himself a socialist doesn't mean he is not a communist.tommie said:Bearitto said:
Bernie is a communist. Why run from it?
Bernie calls himself a socialist. Not communist. That distinction is important. Under Bernie's ideology, you're free to own property and become rich but the state (and the people) have a responsibility to the less fortunate.
Historically, people have argued that many programs we now accept were socialist. Each a step towards ruining America.
Sorry, I don't accept those programs and yes, they are socialist.tommie said:Bearitto said:
Bernie is a communist. Why run from it?
Bernie calls himself a socialist. Not communist. That distinction is important. Under Bernie's ideology, you're free to own property and become rich but the state (and the people) have a responsibility to the less fortunate.
Historically, people have argued that many programs we now accept were socialist. Each a step towards ruining America.
HashTag said:Sorry, I don't accept those programs and yes, they are socialist.tommie said:Bearitto said:
Bernie is a communist. Why run from it?
Bernie calls himself a socialist. Not communist. That distinction is important. Under Bernie's ideology, you're free to own property and become rich but the state (and the people) have a responsibility to the less fortunate.
Historically, people have argued that many programs we now accept were socialist. Each a step towards ruining America.
tommie said:HashTag said:Sorry, I don't accept those programs and yes, they are socialist.tommie said:Bearitto said:
Bernie is a communist. Why run from it?
Bernie calls himself a socialist. Not communist. That distinction is important. Under Bernie's ideology, you're free to own property and become rich but the state (and the people) have a responsibility to the less fortunate.
Historically, people have argued that many programs we now accept were socialist. Each a step towards ruining America.
You don't accept Interstate Highways? You can avoid them. No reason to participate in the socialism.
Bearitto said:tommie said:HashTag said:Sorry, I don't accept those programs and yes, they are socialist.tommie said:Bearitto said:
Bernie is a communist. Why run from it?
Bernie calls himself a socialist. Not communist. That distinction is important. Under Bernie's ideology, you're free to own property and become rich but the state (and the people) have a responsibility to the less fortunate.
Historically, people have argued that many programs we now accept were socialist. Each a step towards ruining America.
You don't accept Interstate Highways? You can avoid them. No reason to participate in the socialism.
Government spending does not automatically equate to socialism. I'm sorry to be the one to break it to you. The Army isn't socialism either.
tommie said:Bearitto said:tommie said:HashTag said:Sorry, I don't accept those programs and yes, they are socialist.tommie said:Bearitto said:
Bernie is a communist. Why run from it?
Bernie calls himself a socialist. Not communist. That distinction is important. Under Bernie's ideology, you're free to own property and become rich but the state (and the people) have a responsibility to the less fortunate.
Historically, people have argued that many programs we now accept were socialist. Each a step towards ruining America.
You don't accept Interstate Highways? You can avoid them. No reason to participate in the socialism.
Government spending does not automatically equate to socialism. I'm sorry to be the one to break it to you. The Army isn't socialism either.
I don't call it socialism. When (and consistently) new government programs are created, they are often called socialism including the Interstate Highway System at the time.
Nice try toomie. I'd hardly consider the gov't spending money on infrastructure a social program.... get realtommie said:HashTag said:Sorry, I don't accept those programs and yes, they are socialist.tommie said:Bearitto said:
Bernie is a communist. Why run from it?
Bernie calls himself a socialist. Not communist. That distinction is important. Under Bernie's ideology, you're free to own property and become rich but the state (and the people) have a responsibility to the less fortunate.
Historically, people have argued that many programs we now accept were socialist. Each a step towards ruining America.
You don't accept Interstate Highways? You can avoid them. No reason to participate in the socialism.
Here is a link from 2006 where some guy is still arguing that Ike's plan was socialism:Bearitto said:tommie said:Bearitto said:tommie said:HashTag said:Sorry, I don't accept those programs and yes, they are socialist.tommie said:Bearitto said:
Bernie is a communist. Why run from it?
Bernie calls himself a socialist. Not communist. That distinction is important. Under Bernie's ideology, you're free to own property and become rich but the state (and the people) have a responsibility to the less fortunate.
Historically, people have argued that many programs we now accept were socialist. Each a step towards ruining America.
You don't accept Interstate Highways? You can avoid them. No reason to participate in the socialism.
Government spending does not automatically equate to socialism. I'm sorry to be the one to break it to you. The Army isn't socialism either.
I don't call it socialism. When (and consistently) new government programs are created, they are often called socialism including the Interstate Highway System at the time.
I'd love to read about that. Do you have a link?
What Brother tommie is trying to tell you is that you are already paying taxes that contribute to the greater good. You are just not paying enough and need to dig a little deeper and pay more!!!HashTag said:Nice try toomie. I'd hardly consider the gov't spending money on infrastructure a social program.... get realtommie said:HashTag said:Sorry, I don't accept those programs and yes, they are socialist.tommie said:Bearitto said:
Bernie is a communist. Why run from it?
Bernie calls himself a socialist. Not communist. That distinction is important. Under Bernie's ideology, you're free to own property and become rich but the state (and the people) have a responsibility to the less fortunate.
Historically, people have argued that many programs we now accept were socialist. Each a step towards ruining America.
You don't accept Interstate Highways? You can avoid them. No reason to participate in the socialism.
Booray said:Here is a link from 2006 where some guy is still arguing that Ike's plan was socialism:Bearitto said:tommie said:Bearitto said:tommie said:HashTag said:Sorry, I don't accept those programs and yes, they are socialist.tommie said:Bearitto said:
Bernie is a communist. Why run from it?
Bernie calls himself a socialist. Not communist. That distinction is important. Under Bernie's ideology, you're free to own property and become rich but the state (and the people) have a responsibility to the less fortunate.
Historically, people have argued that many programs we now accept were socialist. Each a step towards ruining America.
You don't accept Interstate Highways? You can avoid them. No reason to participate in the socialism.
Government spending does not automatically equate to socialism. I'm sorry to be the one to break it to you. The Army isn't socialism either.
I don't call it socialism. When (and consistently) new government programs are created, they are often called socialism including the Interstate Highway System at the time.
I'd love to read about that. Do you have a link?
https://www.ocregister.com/2006/06/29/socialist-interstate-highway-system-50-years-old-today/
Here is a pretty good history:
https://www.vox.com/2015/5/14/8605917/highways-interstate-cities-history
Makes the point that the idea of Interstate Highways could only be sold through the myth that hte gas tax fully paid for the roads; otherwise they were government giveaways.
tommie said:HashTag said:Sorry, I don't accept those programs and yes, they are socialist.tommie said:Bearitto said:
Bernie is a communist. Why run from it?
Bernie calls himself a socialist. Not communist. That distinction is important. Under Bernie's ideology, you're free to own property and become rich but the state (and the people) have a responsibility to the less fortunate.
Historically, people have argued that many programs we now accept were socialist. Each a step towards ruining America.
You don't accept Interstate Highways? You can avoid them. No reason to participate in the socialism.
Bearitto said:Booray said:Here is a link from 2006 where some guy is still arguing that Ike's plan was socialism:Bearitto said:tommie said:Bearitto said:tommie said:HashTag said:Sorry, I don't accept those programs and yes, they are socialist.tommie said:Bearitto said:
Bernie is a communist. Why run from it?
Bernie calls himself a socialist. Not communist. That distinction is important. Under Bernie's ideology, you're free to own property and become rich but the state (and the people) have a responsibility to the less fortunate.
Historically, people have argued that many programs we now accept were socialist. Each a step towards ruining America.
You don't accept Interstate Highways? You can avoid them. No reason to participate in the socialism.
Government spending does not automatically equate to socialism. I'm sorry to be the one to break it to you. The Army isn't socialism either.
I don't call it socialism. When (and consistently) new government programs are created, they are often called socialism including the Interstate Highway System at the time.
I'd love to read about that. Do you have a link?
https://www.ocregister.com/2006/06/29/socialist-interstate-highway-system-50-years-old-today/
Here is a pretty good history:
https://www.vox.com/2015/5/14/8605917/highways-interstate-cities-history
Makes the point that the idea of Interstate Highways could only be sold through the myth that hte gas tax fully paid for the roads; otherwise they were government giveaways.
The article you linked called the highway system "pork", not socialist. You should read articles you claim you have read.
I'll look forward to Tommie answering my query, as you have not.
ill get back to you.Bearitto said:Booray said:Here is a link from 2006 where some guy is still arguing that Ike's plan was socialism:Bearitto said:tommie said:Bearitto said:tommie said:HashTag said:Sorry, I don't accept those programs and yes, they are socialist.tommie said:Bearitto said:
Bernie is a communist. Why run from it?
Bernie calls himself a socialist. Not communist. That distinction is important. Under Bernie's ideology, you're free to own property and become rich but the state (and the people) have a responsibility to the less fortunate.
Historically, people have argued that many programs we now accept were socialist. Each a step towards ruining America.
You don't accept Interstate Highways? You can avoid them. No reason to participate in the socialism.
Government spending does not automatically equate to socialism. I'm sorry to be the one to break it to you. The Army isn't socialism either.
I don't call it socialism. When (and consistently) new government programs are created, they are often called socialism including the Interstate Highway System at the time.
I'd love to read about that. Do you have a link?
https://www.ocregister.com/2006/06/29/socialist-interstate-highway-system-50-years-old-today/
Here is a pretty good history:
https://www.vox.com/2015/5/14/8605917/highways-interstate-cities-history
Makes the point that the idea of Interstate Highways could only be sold through the myth that hte gas tax fully paid for the roads; otherwise they were government giveaways.
The article you linked called the highway system "pork", not socialist. You should read articles you claim you have read.
I'll look forward to Tommie answering my query, as you have not.
tommie said:ill get back to you.Bearitto said:Booray said:Here is a link from 2006 where some guy is still arguing that Ike's plan was socialism:Bearitto said:tommie said:Bearitto said:tommie said:HashTag said:Sorry, I don't accept those programs and yes, they are socialist.tommie said:Bearitto said:
Bernie is a communist. Why run from it?
Bernie calls himself a socialist. Not communist. That distinction is important. Under Bernie's ideology, you're free to own property and become rich but the state (and the people) have a responsibility to the less fortunate.
Historically, people have argued that many programs we now accept were socialist. Each a step towards ruining America.
You don't accept Interstate Highways? You can avoid them. No reason to participate in the socialism.
Government spending does not automatically equate to socialism. I'm sorry to be the one to break it to you. The Army isn't socialism either.
I don't call it socialism. When (and consistently) new government programs are created, they are often called socialism including the Interstate Highway System at the time.
I'd love to read about that. Do you have a link?
https://www.ocregister.com/2006/06/29/socialist-interstate-highway-system-50-years-old-today/
Here is a pretty good history:
https://www.vox.com/2015/5/14/8605917/highways-interstate-cities-history
Makes the point that the idea of Interstate Highways could only be sold through the myth that hte gas tax fully paid for the roads; otherwise they were government giveaways.
The article you linked called the highway system "pork", not socialist. You should read articles you claim you have read.
I'll look forward to Tommie answering my query, as you have not.