Booray said:

---

Canada2017 said:

---

contrario said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

I'd love seeing Feds come in there with directions to clean this thing up

Wouldn't take long and the rioters would run like weaklings

Shoot em like fish in a barrel

---

"shoot em like fish in a barrel" really? I think it's fair to disagree with some of the protesters' violence, but I don't think any sane person would want the feds to start indiscriminately shooting at crowds of people like fish in a barrel. Get help floriduh...

---

Incorrect

Targeted sniping .

Enough is enough .

These are anarchists....rat people with nothing to lose .

Either face what's going on or they will continue to escalate their destruction.

---

Lets try arresting them before shooting them. Rule of law and all.

And to be clear, many of these people should be arrested.

---

chuckle ...there must be a time limit to these 'ignore' controls....cause here you are still again .

Incorrect

The Dem mayors and DA's of too many cities are not pressing charges .

These *******s are back on the streets within hours .....so they have zero fear of consequences.

This situation has escalated beyond the experience of anyone who didn't watch what happened in 1968.

It's going to require lethal force . The sooner people face it ...the fewer casualties.

Otherwise anarchy could grow exponentially throughout 5-6 of our worst **** hole cities by October.

And the response of the Dems like Pelosi have been nothing short of insane .

BaylorOkie said:

---

Poor wittle mayor fella. Both sides are turning against him, including the protesters he's trying to suck up to. What an absolutely pathetic display of leadership.

---

Really I figured you would want a statue built for him like Robert E Lee or is that only if he is standing up to the feds for slavery as the reason for asserting state's rights.

Seriously you folks will have no credibility left when this all comes to an end and ya'll then try to cry wolf about crap you make up.

And who shows up here to DEFEND the rioting, arson, and vandalism? Mr. "Libertarian" of course! LOL!!!

Canada2017 said:

---

Booray said:

---

Canada2017 said:

---

contrario said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

I'd love seeing Feds come in there with directions to clean this thing up

Wouldn't take long and the rioters would run like weaklings

Shoot em like fish in a barrel

---

"shoot em like fish in a barrel" really? I think it's fair to disagree with some of the protesters' violence, but I don't think any sane person would want the feds to start indiscriminately shooting at crowds of people like fish in a barrel. Get help floriduh...

---

Incorrect

Targeted sniping .

Enough is enough .

These are anarchists....rat people with nothing to lose .

Either face what's going on or they will continue to escalate their destruction.

---

Lets try arresting them before shooting them. Rule of law and all.

And to be clear, many of these people should be arrested.

---

chuckle ...there must be a time limit to these 'ignore' controls....cause here you are still again .

Incorrect

The Dem mayors and DA's of too many cities are not pressing charges .

These *******s are back on the streets within hours .....so they have zero fear of consequences.

This situation has escalated beyond the experience of anyone who didn't watch what happened in 1968.

It's going to require lethal force . The sooner people face it ...the fewer casualties.

Otherwise anarchy could grow exponentially throughout 5-6 of our worst **** hole cities by October.

And the response of the Dems like Pelosi have been nothing short of insane

---

My post clearly said that the right thing to do would be to arrest protesters who are breaking the law. To the extent mayors and DAs are not doing so, I condemn them.

Arresting and prosecuting is preferable to executing people for property crimes, something I would have thought to be self-evident. The fact that you think we should be killing protesters for any reason other than another life being in danger is horrific.

Booray said:

---

Canada2017 said:

---

Booray said:

---

Canada2017 said:

---

contrario said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

I'd love seeing Feds come in there with directions to clean this thing up

Wouldn't take long and the rioters would run like weaklings

Shoot em like fish in a barrel

---

"shoot em like fish in a barrel" really? I think it's fair to disagree with some of the protesters' violence, but I don't think any sane person would want the feds to start indiscriminately shooting at crowds of people like fish in a barrel. Get help floriduh...

---

Incorrect

Targeted sniping .

Enough is enough .

These are anarchists....rat people with nothing to lose .

Either face what's going on or they will continue to escalate their destruction.

---

Lets try arresting them before shooting them. Rule of law and all.

And to be clear, many of these people should be arrested.

---

chuckle ...there must be a time limit to these 'ignore' controls....cause here you are still again .

Incorrect

The Dem mayors and DA's of too many cities are not pressing charges .

These *******s are back on the streets within hours .....so they have zero fear of consequences.

This situation has escalated beyond the experience of anyone who didn't watch what happened in 1968.

It's going to require lethal force . The sooner people face it ...the fewer casualties.

Otherwise anarchy could grow exponentially throughout 5-6 of our worst **** hole cities by October.

And the response of the Dems like Pelosi have been nothing short of insane

---

My post clearly said that the right thing to do would be to arrest protesters who are breaking the law. To the extent mayors and DAs are not doing so, I condemn them.

Arresting and prosecuting is preferable to executing people for property crimes, something I would have thought to be self-evident. The fact that you think we should be killing protesters for any reason other than another life being in danger is horrific.

---

What world are you observing ?

Murders are up in many cites .....in some cases dramatically.
It's not a coincidences and innocent people are getting slaughtered.

Police have been effectively neutered and the rat people are getting bolder and bolder .

Arrest is no longer any deterrent in many cities .

Either see what's really happening ......do something about it or even more innocent people are going to die .

Now with your track record I have zero expectation you will understand this.

So type one more of your platitudes and back on ignore you go .

The plain fact is that the Mayors and Governor of Oregon have no interest in meeting basic responsibilities, because they put politics way ahead of protecting innocent citizens from harm and property loss.

"To the extent" is a weasel phrase that sounds like you are still in denial about what is going on, and who is getting hurt.

Bottom line seems to be you are cool with anything that hurts Trump.

fubar said:

---

My eyes aren't as good as they once were, but that video doesn't seem to show a courthouse on fire. Looks like paper and boxes burning to me.

---

You are right. Just a few kiddos roasting some marshmallows and making some Smores I'm sure. LOL!!!

PartyBear said:

---

BaylorOkie said:

---

Poor wittle mayor fella. Both sides are turning against him, including the protesters he's trying to suck up to. What an absolutely pathetic display of leadership.

---

Really I figured you would want a statue built for him like Robert E Lee or is that only if he is standing up to the feds for slavery as the reason for asserting state's rights.

Seriously you folks will have no credibility left when this all comes to an end and ya'll then try to cry wolf about crap you make up.

---

Robert E Lee statue, *** are you talking about? Don't project that on me. I'm fine with removing Confederate materials and have never said otherwise.

You are intellectually lazy. Stop grouping people with extremists. Try to think critically and contribute to this site rather than just vomiting out drive-by accusations.

If Canada is representative, the "conservatives" in this country are now in favor of extra-judicial assassinations by the government for alleged property crimes.

But the liberals are the facists?

Holy cow.

Just wondering are there any right wingers out there who will step up and say we should arrest rather that shoot people we suspect of committing a property crime?

Booray said:

---

If Canada is representative, the "conservatives" in this country are no in favor of extra-judicial assassinations by the government for alleged property crimes.

But the liberals are the facists?

Holy cow.

Just wondering are there any right wingers out there who will step up and say-we should arrest rather that shoot people we suspect of committing a property crime?

---

How many rioters have actually been shot?

For now, your post is just more evasion because you can't admit the violence is all from the Left, and the federal law enforcement is simply a long-overdue and necessary response.

Booray said:

---

If Canada is representative, the "conservatives" in this country are now in favor of extra-judicial assassinations by the government for alleged property crimes.

But the liberals are the facists?

Holy cow.

Just wondering are there any right wingers out there who will step up and say we should arrest rather that shoot people we suspect of committing a property crime?

---

Drama drama drama.

Assassinations? Where?

Oldbear83 said:

---

Booray said:

---

If Canada is representative, the "conservatives" in this country are no in favor of extra-judicial assassinations by the government for alleged property crimes.

But the liberals are the facists?

Holy cow.

Just wondering are there any right wingers out there who will step up and say-we should arrest rather that shoot people we suspect of committing a property crime?

---

How many rioters have actually been shot?

For now, your post is just more evasion because you can't admit the violence is all from the Left, and the federal law enforcement is simply a long-overdue and necessary response.

---

None, thankfully.

I am not evading anything. I said that the lawbreakers should be arrested and prosecuted rather than shot without trial.

Canada expressly disagrees-saying we need to start shooting our own citizens. You and now Doc apparently agree because you can't bring yourself to say Canada is wrong.

Its a pretty simple question: should we arrest and prosecute protesters who break the law or should we just shoot them?

Booray said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Booray said:

---

If Canada is representative, the "conservatives" in this country are no in favor of extra-judicial assassinations by the government for alleged property crimes.

But the liberals are the facists?

Holy cow.

Just wondering are there any right wingers out there who will step up and say-we should arrest rather that shoot people we suspect of committing a property crime?

---

How many rioters have actually been shot?

For now, your post is just more evasion because you can't admit the violence is all from the Left, and the federal law enforcement is simply a long-overdue and necessary response.

---

None, thankfully.

I am not evading anything. I said that the lawbreakers should be arrested and prosecuted rather than shot without trial.

Canada expressly disagrees-saying we need to start shooting our own citizens. You and now Doc apparently agree because you can't bring yourself to say Canada is wrong.

Its a pretty simple question: should we arrest and prosecute protesters who break the law or should we just shoot them?

---

BS.

You implied law enforcement was shooting protesters, instead of what they are actually doing, protecting citizens and stopping violence.

Canada spoke out of emotion, just as you did. This is obvious from simply reading the thread, but you can't be honest enough to admit that, either.

The plain fact is that federal officers are doing what the Mayor and Governor should have done but refused to do, and you won't admit that their political malfeasance is wrong.

Oldbear83 said:

---

Booray said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Booray said:

---

If Canada is representative, the "conservatives" in this country are no in favor of extra-judicial assassinations by the government for alleged property crimes.

But the liberals are the facists?

Holy cow.

Just wondering are there any right wingers out there who will step up and say-we should arrest rather that shoot people we suspect of committing a property crime?

---

How many rioters have actually been shot?

For now, your post is just more evasion because you can't admit the violence is all from the Left, and the federal law enforcement is simply a long-overdue and necessary response.

---

None, thankfully.

I am not evading anything. I said that the lawbreakers should be arrested and prosecuted rather than shot without trial.

Canada expressly disagrees-saying we need to start shooting our own citizens. You and now Doc apparently agree because you can't bring yourself to say Canada is wrong.

Its a pretty simple question: should we arrest and prosecute protesters who break the law or should we just shoot them?

---

BS.

You implied law enforcement was shooting protesters, instead of what they are actually doing, protecting citizens and stopping violence.

Canada spoke out of emotion, just as you did. This is obvious from simply reading the thread, but you can't be honest enough to admit that, either.

The plain fact is that federal officers are doing what the Mayor and Governor should have done but refused to do, and you won't admit that their political malfeasance is wrong.

---

I didn't imply any such thing. Quote the words that caused you to think I did.

Canada's first post might be out of emotion but I gave him time to think about it and he stuck with it.

I said we should arrest and prosecute lawbreakers and condemned any mayor or DA who didn't do that. What more do you want?

And most of all, you are still avoiding the question: should we arrest and prosecute protesters who break the law or should we just shoot them?

The politically smart thing to do is nothing if you're the federal government.

You have a clear distinction of how you want your future:
1. Reasonable if imperfect ordered society
2. Venezuela except with privileged fascist mobs that have to hide behind their mommies because we reared a generation if physical and intellectual midgets

Booray said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Booray said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Booray said:

---

If Canada is representative, the "conservatives" in this country are no in favor of extra-judicial assassinations by the government for alleged property crimes.

But the liberals are the facists?

Holy cow.

Just wondering are there any right wingers out there who will step up and say-we should arrest rather that shoot people we suspect of committing a property crime?

---

How many rioters have actually been shot?

For now, your post is just more evasion because you can't admit the violence is all from the Left, and the federal law enforcement is simply a long-overdue and necessary response.

---

None, thankfully.

I am not evading anything. I said that the lawbreakers should be arrested and prosecuted rather than shot without trial.

Canada expressly disagrees-saying we need to start shooting our own citizens. You and now Doc apparently agree because you can't bring yourself to say Canada is wrong.

Its a pretty simple question: should we arrest and prosecute protesters who break the law or should we just shoot them?

---

BS.

You implied law enforcement was shooting protesters, instead of what they are actually doing, protecting citizens and stopping violence.

Canada spoke out of emotion, just as you did. This is obvious from simply reading the thread, but you can't be honest enough to admit that, either.

The plain fact is that federal officers are doing what the Mayor and Governor should have done but refused to do, and you won't admit that their political malfeasance is wrong.

---

I didn't imply any such thing. Quote the words that caused you to think I did.

Canada's first post might be out of emotion but I gave him time to think about it and he stuck with it.

I said we should arrest and prosecute lawbreakers and condemned any mayor or DA who didn't do that. What more do you want?

And most of all, you are still avoiding the question: should we arrest and prosecute protesters who break the law or should we just shoot them?

---

I can answer the last one - arrest them and prosecute, obviously. Anyone that advocates shooting them must not remember what country we live in. This isn't Venezuela.

The problem is, the leftist mob condemns even arrests. It destroys the narrative (however false) that the protestors are "peaceful." We all know that's a bunch of malarkey, but the leftist (and chiefly, the leftist new organizations) can't admit it. Even the Portland Mayor, when confronted my the mob, spit on and assaulted, can't admit it.

Got to maintain that bull **** narrative. There is afterall an election coming.

sort of appears the mayor has enabled a long standing riot to go on. If you had a business and these people took over your street and closed you down, thus your livelihood, maybe a very large investment, loans etc, , would you think the mayor was supporting these criminal actvities.

i keep hearing about a right to protest. That is ok as long as it does not infringe on anyone else's rights, such as using public streets, walking where you want to go safely, operating your business, home, and ability to be uninterfered with in your free exercise of your rights. For example, there rights to protest stopped at the trespass of someone else's property.

These mayors have unilaterally given all other rights away without due process to a bunch of thugs in the name of peaceful protest. That kind of protest never was a right, and still isn't.

Beartrack said:

---

sort of appears the mayor has enabled a long standing riot to go on. If you had a business and these people took over your street and closed you down, thus your livelihood, maybe a very large investment, loans etc, , would you think the mayor was supporting these criminal actvities.

i keep hearing about a right to protest. That is ok as long as it does not infringe on anyone else's rights, such as using public streets, walking where you want to go safely, operating your business, home, and ability to be uninterfered with in your free exercise of your rights. For example, there rights to protest stopped at the trespass of someone else's property.

These mayors have unilaterally given all other rights away without due process to a bunch of thugs in the name of peaceful protest. That kind of protest never was a right, and still isn't.

---

We gave up on principled, rational POVs long ago. The emotional hysterics have completely taken over every major American institution.

quash said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

The Portland Mayor was tear gassed in last nights protests/riots.

https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/portland-mayor-tear-gassed-amid-protests-over-federal-agents-11595499111

Does this mean the mayor was part of a riot in his own city?

---

---

Ummm...Trump has a problem with self awareness at times, but I'm not sure I can recall a more idiotic lack of self and situational awareness than this guy. I'm thinking he's just looking to score points with the protester/riot folks.

---

Can you go deeper on this comment? I don't see your point yet.

---

Pretty self explanatory.

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

---

And who shows up here to DEFEND the rioting, arson, and vandalism? Mr. "Libertarian" of course! LOL!!!

---

I'm going to say this again. Please try to read slowly.

If you support freedom you have to support the freedom of others to do what you personally may oppose. Supporting the freedom of others is not the same as advocating in favor of what they do with their freedom.

This is a core tenet of libertarianism.

Some of you hate the Left more than you love liberty. Sad!

quash said:

---

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

---

And who shows up here to DEFEND the rioting, arson, and vandalism? Mr. "Libertarian" of course! LOL!!!

---

I'm going to say this again. Please try to read slowly.

If you support freedom you have to support the freedom of others to do what you personally may oppose. Supporting the freedom of others is not the same as advocating in favor of what they do with their freedom.

This is a core tenet of libertarianism.

Some of you hate the Left more than you love liberty. Sad!

---

Been that way for a good minute now.

ATL Bear said:

---

quash said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

The Portland Mayor was tear gassed in last nights protests/riots.

https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/portland-mayor-tear-gassed-amid-protests-over-federal-agents-11595499111

Does this mean the mayor was part of a riot in his own city?

---

---

Ummm...Trump has a problem with self awareness at times, but I'm not sure I can recall a more idiotic lack of self and situational awareness than this guy. I'm thinking he's just looking to score points with the protester/riot folks.

---

Can you go deeper on this comment? I don't see your point yet.

---

Pretty self explanatory.

---

Mayor attends a peaceful rally, gets teargassed. And this demonstrates a lack of self-awareness how? Considering you use Trump as the benchmark this one is not even close.

quash said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

quash said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

The Portland Mayor was tear gassed in last nights protests/riots.

https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/portland-mayor-tear-gassed-amid-protests-over-federal-agents-11595499111

Does this mean the mayor was part of a riot in his own city?

---

---

Ummm...Trump has a problem with self awareness at times, but I'm not sure I can recall a more idiotic lack of self and situational awareness than this guy. I'm thinking he's just looking to score points with the protester/riot folks.

---

Can you go deeper on this comment? I don't see your point yet.

---

Pretty self explanatory.

---

Mayor attends a peaceful rally, gets teargassed. And this demonstrates a lack of self-awareness how? Considering you use Trump as the benchmark this one is not even close.

---

A peaceful rally? You have got to be kidding me. I think Ron Paul would slap the living **** out of you if he ever got the chance.

Plenty of proof in the thread that it wasn't a peaceful rally.

I don't support shooting heroin on the streets in front of my teen daughter. Let that make me whatever it makes me.

quash said:

---

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

---

And who shows up here to DEFEND the rioting, arson, and vandalism? Mr. "Libertarian" of course! LOL!!!

---

I'm going to say this again. Please try to read slowly.

If you support freedom you have to support the freedom of others to do what you personally may oppose. Supporting the freedom of others is not the same as advocating in favor of what they do with their freedom.

This is a core tenet of libertarianism.

Some of you hate the Left more than you love liberty. Sad!

---

There are a whole bunch of law abiding citizens in Portland, Seattle, and across the nation that are being denied their right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness right now. What about them? For some reason, you and your Leftist friends just want to embrace and make excuses for the anarchists. SMMFH

Jack and DP said:

---

I don't support shooting heroin on the streets in front of my teen daughter. Let that make me whatever it makes me.

---

Makes you someone that doesn't know how to party, bro.

Jack and DP said:

---

Plenty of proof in the thread that it wasn't a peaceful rally.

---

I watched it live and this tear gassing was nothing more than a publicity stunt. He made a speech just before this moment stating that he was just like the protesters, blah blah...even stating that he wasn't immune from being tear gassed. Then he inserted himself as close to the fence as possible. The feds gave at least a dozen warnings that protesters would be gassed or other if they didn't step away from the barricade. He didn't. I was surprised he didn't try to crowd surf. Lol

quash said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

quash said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

The Portland Mayor was tear gassed in last nights protests/riots.

https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/portland-mayor-tear-gassed-amid-protests-over-federal-agents-11595499111

Does this mean the mayor was part of a riot in his own city?

---

---

Ummm...Trump has a problem with self awareness at times, but I'm not sure I can recall a more idiotic lack of self and situational awareness than this guy. I'm thinking he's just looking to score points with the protester/riot folks.

---

Can you go deeper on this comment? I don't see your point yet.

---

Pretty self explanatory.

---

Mayor attends what started as a peaceful rally, but after midnight gets predictably destructive, warned to disperse and then gets teargassed. And this demonstrates a lack of self-awareness how? Considering you use Trump as the benchmark this one is not even close.

---

FIFY

Booray said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Booray said:

---

If Canada is representative, the "conservatives" in this country are no in favor of extra-judicial assassinations by the government for alleged property crimes.

But the liberals are the facists?

Holy cow.

Just wondering are there any right wingers out there who will step up and say-we should arrest rather that shoot people we suspect of committing a property crime?

---

How many rioters have actually been shot?

For now, your post is just more evasion because you can't admit the violence is all from the Left, and the federal law enforcement is simply a long-overdue and necessary response.

---

None, thankfully.

I am not evading anything. I said that the lawbreakers should be arrested and prosecuted rather than shot without trial.

Canada expressly disagrees-saying we need to start shooting our own citizens. You and now Doc apparently agree because you can't bring yourself to say Canada is wrong.

Its a pretty simple question: should we arrest and prosecute protesters who break the law or should we just shoot them?

---

Individuals attacking law enforcement officers with deadly intent should be shot, arsonists caught in the act should be shot .

National guard units should have been sent to certain areas of Chicago, St Louis and Baltimore years ago.
There is simply no excuse in allowing dozens of innocent people....the majority of which are black....to be slaughtered each week.

Why are pasty white, tattooed, blue- haired, man bun freaks so p.o.'d in the Pacific N.W.??

quash said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

quash said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

The Portland Mayor was tear gassed in last nights protests/riots.

https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/portland-mayor-tear-gassed-amid-protests-over-federal-agents-11595499111

Does this mean the mayor was part of a riot in his own city?

---

---

Ummm...Trump has a problem with self awareness at times, but I'm not sure I can recall a more idiotic lack of self and situational awareness than this guy. I'm thinking he's just looking to score points with the protester/riot folks.

---

Can you go deeper on this comment? I don't see your point yet.

---

Pretty self explanatory.

---

Mayor attends a peaceful rally, gets teargassed. And this demonstrates a lack of self-awareness how? Considering you use Trump as the benchmark this one is not even close.

---

Aside from this not being a peaceful rally, you could argue he assisted in inciting the crowd.

ilbb990912 said:

---

Why are pasty white, tattooed, blue- haired, man bun freaks so p.o.'d in the Pacific N.W.??

---

My theory is that they're pissed that the women won't shave their pits and they're too scared to say anything, so they lash out elsewhere.

Just a theory, but I haven't been able to disprove it yet.

ATL Bear said:

---

quash said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

quash said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

ATL Bear said:

---

The Portland Mayor was tear gassed in last nights protests/riots.

https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/portland-mayor-tear-gassed-amid-protests-over-federal-agents-11595499111

Does this mean the mayor was part of a riot in his own city?

---

---

Ummm...Trump has a problem with self awareness at times, but I'm not sure I can recall a more idiotic lack of self and situational awareness than this guy. I'm thinking he's just looking to score points with the protester/riot folks.

---

Can you go deeper on this comment? I don't see your point yet.

---

Pretty self explanatory.

---

Mayor attends a peaceful rally, gets teargassed. And this demonstrates a lack of self-awareness how? Considering you use Trump as the benchmark this one is not even close.

---

Aside from this not being a peaceful rally, you could argue he assisted in inciting the crowd.

---

Incite...Insight.

Tomayto...tomahto.

quash said:

---

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

---

And who shows up here to DEFEND the rioting, arson, and vandalism? Mr. "Libertarian" of course! LOL!!!

---

I'm going to say this again. Please try to read slowly.

If you support freedom you have to support the freedom of others to do what you personally may oppose. Supporting the freedom of others is not the same as advocating in favor of what they do with their freedom.

This is a core tenet of libertarianism.

Some of you hate the Left more than you love liberty. Sad!

---

I get most of that, but supporting the freedom of others to loot and riot? Nah, there's nothing libertarian about that.