Of course he deserved a vote. Stop being silly.GrowlTowel said:George Truett said:Apparently not. --Merrick Garland.GrowlTowel said:Username checks out said:Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
Repubs denied a legally elected president from getting a vote on his nomination for sc for 8 months. This was wrong. Its wrong for radicals on the dem side to threaten burning down the house.
Now Dems want to delay it 6 weeks..
It was wrong when repubs did it and wrong when dems do it.
Both sides suck and are no better than the other.
The hypocrisy on both sides is sickening. If one of my sons screwed up and when confronted said, "but my brother did it first" I would whip him twice.
So what's the answer, Republicans get to win both times?
Elections have consequences. - Obama
Republicans determined Obama got 3/5ths of a presidency.
Garland did not deserve a vote. Why? Elections have consequences.
Your people come up with these policies and then have the gall to act shocked when used against you. Pucker up buttercup.
Make Racism Wrong Again