The three spineless wafflers (Murkowski/ Collins/ Romney) could be bigly problematic. They blow whichever way the political winds blow. At least if they vote against the pick or if they do not vote, they will be finished.BornAgain said:
Unleash that demon Schiff one more time .... Pelosi is a wind bag. Their only hope is if republicans fail to take advantage of this.
What are your thoughts on using impeachment as a political weapon to stall a Supreme Court nomination?HuMcK said:
Collins is toast as is. Romney is untouchable in Mormon Utah. Murkowski kept her seat in 2010 by winning against a party endorsed Republican as a write in, so she's not going anywhere either. The math gets even tighter sometime in late November when Mark Kelly takes Arizona's junior Senate seat from McSally.
Against it, dumb idea.Sam Lowry said:What are your thoughts on using impeachment as a political weapon to stall a Supreme Court nomination?HuMcK said:
Collins is toast as is. Romney is untouchable in Mormon Utah. Murkowski kept her seat in 2010 by winning against a party endorsed Republican as a write in, so she's not going anywhere either. The math gets even tighter sometime in late November when Mark Kelly takes Arizona's junior Senate seat from McSally.
Same question to any other Trump critic here.
That would never happen because conservatives and Republicans simply don't think or act that way. Not saying there couldn't be some (truly) peaceful demonstrations, and/or some random people that act out, but there is no counterpart or equivalency on the right/conservative side to BLM or ANTIFA or their sympathizers. Whatever one off type screwballs out there that really are "white supremacists" or KKK members, etc. constitute a miniscule number of disorganized disturbed people that by comparison pose a minimal threat at most.Thee University said:
I know it is bad for the country but I hope that if Cadaver Biden wins that the Republicans give the Democrats even more hell back as return favor time.
I'd like to see the Democrat response if the conservatives started rioting, looting and beating in those hellhole cities the Dems created. I'd pay to watch a few hundred Proud Boys get bussed into Portland and let them camp out in the streets and wreak havoc for 100 days or more.
Sam Lowry said:What are your thoughts on using impeachment as a political weapon to stall a Supreme Court nomination?HuMcK said:
Collins is toast as is. Romney is untouchable in Mormon Utah. Murkowski kept her seat in 2010 by winning against a party endorsed Republican as a write in, so she's not going anywhere either. The math gets even tighter sometime in late November when Mark Kelly takes Arizona's junior Senate seat from McSally.
Same question to any other Trump critic here.
SHOCKER!HuMcK said:Sam Lowry said:What are your thoughts on using impeachment as a political weapon to stall a Supreme Court nomination?HuMcK said:
Collins is toast as is. Romney is untouchable in Mormon Utah. Murkowski kept her seat in 2010 by winning against a party endorsed Republican as a write in, so she's not going anywhere either. The math gets even tighter sometime in late November when Mark Kelly takes Arizona's junior Senate seat from McSally.
Same question to any other Trump critic here.
Barr should have been impeached the moment the first prosecutor resigned in protest on Stone's case, doubly so after Flynn, and that's independent of this latest standoff. DeJoy also arguably has some exposure for his handling of the USPS. I actually don't think Pelosi will do that now though to tie up the Senate.
That said, I'm fine with it if she does. After listening to all the self righteous "might makes right" sentiments lately from Republicans in re RBG, I just don't have any appetite for Dems rolling over and doing nothing. The House has some might too, might be time to wield it.
This is what y'all wanted. Y'all were warned again and again that what McConnell did to Garland would escalate things, and now you have most of that same GOP Senate putting their bad faith on full display and saying "so what". Antagonism has consequences, and if y'all want to turn the court into a nakedly partisan instrument (which McConnell has made loud and clear), that has consequences to.
I won't try to speak for Huey, but this is on Mitch McConnell and any Senate Republican who was in the Senate in 2016. I'll give a partial pass to those who took a seat for the first time after 2016 ... they weren't in on the game in 2016.HashTag said:SHOCKER!HuMcK said:
Barr should have been impeached the moment the first prosecutor resigned in protest on Stone's case, doubly so after Flynn, and that's independent of this latest standoff. DeJoy also arguably has some exposure for his handling of the USPS. I actually don't think Pelosi will do that now though to tie up the Senate.
That said, I'm fine with it if she does. After listening to all the self righteous "might makes right" sentiments lately from Republicans in re RBG, I just don't have any appetite for Dems rolling over and doing nothing. The House has some might too, might be time to wield it.
This is what y'all wanted. Y'all were warned again and again that what McConnell did to Garland would escalate things, and now you have most of that same GOP Senate putting their bad faith on full display and saying "so what". Antagonism has consequences, and if y'all want to turn the court into a nakedly partisan instrument (which McConnell has made loud and clear), that has consequences to.
One of the most triggered TDSers on this board isn't happy with the Republicans (again).
Let me guess.... it's all Trump's fault (again)?
fubar said:I won't try to speak for Huey, but this is on Mitch McConnell and any Senate Republican who was in the Senate in 2016. I'll give a partial pass to those who took a seat for the first time after 2016 ... they weren't in on the game in 2016.HashTag said:SHOCKER!HuMcK said:
Barr should have been impeached the moment the first prosecutor resigned in protest on Stone's case, doubly so after Flynn, and that's independent of this latest standoff. DeJoy also arguably has some exposure for his handling of the USPS. I actually don't think Pelosi will do that now though to tie up the Senate.
That said, I'm fine with it if she does. After listening to all the self righteous "might makes right" sentiments lately from Republicans in re RBG, I just don't have any appetite for Dems rolling over and doing nothing. The House has some might too, might be time to wield it.
This is what y'all wanted. Y'all were warned again and again that what McConnell did to Garland would escalate things, and now you have most of that same GOP Senate putting their bad faith on full display and saying "so what". Antagonism has consequences, and if y'all want to turn the court into a nakedly partisan instrument (which McConnell has made loud and clear), that has consequences to.
One of the most triggered TDSers on this board isn't happy with the Republicans (again).
Let me guess.... it's all Trump's fault (again)?
By the way, why in the world are you guys worried about this? The consensus from the Trumpty Dumpts is that we're headed for a landslide.
So you want McConnell to follow what he said in 2016, but the those that demanded for a floor vote, it's okay for them to change their mind now? - okay.fubar said:I won't try to speak for Huey, but this is on Mitch McConnell and any Senate Republican who was in the Senate in 2016. I'll give a partial pass to those who took a seat for the first time after 2016 ... they weren't in on the game in 2016.HashTag said:SHOCKER!HuMcK said:
Barr should have been impeached the moment the first prosecutor resigned in protest on Stone's case, doubly so after Flynn, and that's independent of this latest standoff. DeJoy also arguably has some exposure for his handling of the USPS. I actually don't think Pelosi will do that now though to tie up the Senate.
That said, I'm fine with it if she does. After listening to all the self righteous "might makes right" sentiments lately from Republicans in re RBG, I just don't have any appetite for Dems rolling over and doing nothing. The House has some might too, might be time to wield it.
This is what y'all wanted. Y'all were warned again and again that what McConnell did to Garland would escalate things, and now you have most of that same GOP Senate putting their bad faith on full display and saying "so what". Antagonism has consequences, and if y'all want to turn the court into a nakedly partisan instrument (which McConnell has made loud and clear), that has consequences to.
One of the most triggered TDSers on this board isn't happy with the Republicans (again).
Let me guess.... it's all Trump's fault (again)?
By the way, why in the world are you guys worried about this? The consensus from the Trumpty Dumpts is that we're headed for a landslide.
Republicans would be absolute morons to not vote in a Conservative Justice. The way our country is falling, the majority will be communist/socialist leaning within a decade. They have already determine Biden is a lock, it will be absolute foolishness not to nominate, then vote in a conservative Justice, because this might be the last chance for a generation of voters.BornAgain said:
Unleash that demon Schiff one more time .... Pelosi is a wind bag. Their only hope is if republicans fail to take advantage of this.
And her colleague from California, Diane Feinstein, is.....HOLY ****....87 years old.Forest Bueller_bf said:There are simply too many democratic leaders on the verge of dementia.Doc Holliday said:
Lmao
Look at the eyes, that's were you first see it. The look of vacancy.
Not their fault, but they should be forced to step down.
Fear. That's what you got. Apparently you're not as confident in your boy as you project. Fear.riflebear said:fubar said:I won't try to speak for Huey, but this is on Mitch McConnell and any Senate Republican who was in the Senate in 2016. I'll give a partial pass to those who took a seat for the first time after 2016 ... they weren't in on the game in 2016.HashTag said:SHOCKER!HuMcK said:
Barr should have been impeached the moment the first prosecutor resigned in protest on Stone's case, doubly so after Flynn, and that's independent of this latest standoff. DeJoy also arguably has some exposure for his handling of the USPS. I actually don't think Pelosi will do that now though to tie up the Senate.
That said, I'm fine with it if she does. After listening to all the self righteous "might makes right" sentiments lately from Republicans in re RBG, I just don't have any appetite for Dems rolling over and doing nothing. The House has some might too, might be time to wield it.
This is what y'all wanted. Y'all were warned again and again that what McConnell did to Garland would escalate things, and now you have most of that same GOP Senate putting their bad faith on full display and saying "so what". Antagonism has consequences, and if y'all want to turn the court into a nakedly partisan instrument (which McConnell has made loud and clear), that has consequences to.
One of the most triggered TDSers on this board isn't happy with the Republicans (again).
Let me guess.... it's all Trump's fault (again)?
By the way, why in the world are you guys worried about this? The consensus from the Trumpty Dumpts is that we're headed for a landslide.
Because we don't want to see thousands of innocent businesses burned against and billions of $$ worth of damage.
If GOP voters get mad they might shout but they go vote to change things.
When Dems get mad they want to burn everything down and it doesn't matter what corrupt or illegal things they do to win back power.
Which party do you want to support?
You didn't address the question as to Trump. He's already been impeached and investigated. Now they're talking about impeaching him again just to stop a Supreme Court nomination. You're okay with that?HuMcK said:Sam Lowry said:What are your thoughts on using impeachment as a political weapon to stall a Supreme Court nomination?HuMcK said:
Collins is toast as is. Romney is untouchable in Mormon Utah. Murkowski kept her seat in 2010 by winning against a party endorsed Republican as a write in, so she's not going anywhere either. The math gets even tighter sometime in late November when Mark Kelly takes Arizona's junior Senate seat from McSally.
Same question to any other Trump critic here.
Barr should have been impeached the moment the first prosecutor resigned in protest on Stone's case, doubly so after Flynn, and that's independent of this latest standoff. DeJoy also arguably has some exposure for his handling of the USPS. I actually don't think Pelosi will do that now though to tie up the Senate.
That said, I'm fine with it if she does. After listening to all the self righteous "might makes right" sentiments lately from Republicans in re RBG, I just don't have any appetite for Dems rolling over and doing nothing. The House has some might too, might be time to wield it.
This is what y'all wanted. Y'all were warned again and again that what McConnell did to Garland would escalate things, and now you have most of that same GOP Senate putting their bad faith on full display and saying "so what". Antagonism has consequences, and if y'all want to turn the court into a nakedly partisan instrument (which McConnell has made loud and clear), that has consequences to.
This is deceptive.Jack and DP said:
They'll definitely try to shove it through before the election because Kelly is way ahead of McSally, and he'll take that seat immediately.HuMcK said:
Collins is toast as is. Romney is untouchable in Mormon Utah. Murkowski kept her seat in 2010 by winning against a party endorsed Republican as a write in, so she's not going anywhere either. The math gets even tighter sometime in late November when Mark Kelly takes Arizona's junior Senate seat from McSally.
If you change the rules, play by the rules you made. Calling the other side -- the one without power to do anything of substance -- hypocritical, while you're Grand Marshal of the Hypocrite Parade, is asinine. Nobody outside of the True Believers in the echo chamber buys it.HashTag said:So you want McConnell to follow what he said in 2016, but the those that demanded for a floor vote, it's okay for them to change their mind now? - okay.fubar said:I won't try to speak for Huey, but this is on Mitch McConnell and any Senate Republican who was in the Senate in 2016. I'll give a partial pass to those who took a seat for the first time after 2016 ... they weren't in on the game in 2016.HashTag said:SHOCKER!HuMcK said:
Barr should have been impeached the moment the first prosecutor resigned in protest on Stone's case, doubly so after Flynn, and that's independent of this latest standoff. DeJoy also arguably has some exposure for his handling of the USPS. I actually don't think Pelosi will do that now though to tie up the Senate.
That said, I'm fine with it if she does. After listening to all the self righteous "might makes right" sentiments lately from Republicans in re RBG, I just don't have any appetite for Dems rolling over and doing nothing. The House has some might too, might be time to wield it.
This is what y'all wanted. Y'all were warned again and again that what McConnell did to Garland would escalate things, and now you have most of that same GOP Senate putting their bad faith on full display and saying "so what". Antagonism has consequences, and if y'all want to turn the court into a nakedly partisan instrument (which McConnell has made loud and clear), that has consequences to.
One of the most triggered TDSers on this board isn't happy with the Republicans (again).
Let me guess.... it's all Trump's fault (again)?
By the way, why in the world are you guys worried about this? The consensus from the Trumpty Dumpts is that we're headed for a landslide.
I would think those dems that demanded a floor vote then would be demanding a floor vote now - hypocrites.
By the way, don't know why you think we're worried, RBG passing benefits the GOP and Trump.
Democrats will overplay what ever hand they think they have and turn off many Americans by making threats about packing the court, impeaching Trump to stall confirmation, etc.....
In 2016, over 25% of Trump voters said the Supreme Court was the most important factor in their decision to support him. Potential justice appointments was shaping up to be la less powerful argument this time around. Not anymore.
So you're concerned about looting and damage?riflebear said:fubar said:I won't try to speak for Huey, but this is on Mitch McConnell and any Senate Republican who was in the Senate in 2016. I'll give a partial pass to those who took a seat for the first time after 2016 ... they weren't in on the game in 2016.HashTag said:SHOCKER!HuMcK said:
Barr should have been impeached the moment the first prosecutor resigned in protest on Stone's case, doubly so after Flynn, and that's independent of this latest standoff. DeJoy also arguably has some exposure for his handling of the USPS. I actually don't think Pelosi will do that now though to tie up the Senate.
That said, I'm fine with it if she does. After listening to all the self righteous "might makes right" sentiments lately from Republicans in re RBG, I just don't have any appetite for Dems rolling over and doing nothing. The House has some might too, might be time to wield it.
This is what y'all wanted. Y'all were warned again and again that what McConnell did to Garland would escalate things, and now you have most of that same GOP Senate putting their bad faith on full display and saying "so what". Antagonism has consequences, and if y'all want to turn the court into a nakedly partisan instrument (which McConnell has made loud and clear), that has consequences to.
One of the most triggered TDSers on this board isn't happy with the Republicans (again).
Let me guess.... it's all Trump's fault (again)?
By the way, why in the world are you guys worried about this? The consensus from the Trumpty Dumpts is that we're headed for a landslide.
Because we don't want to see thousands of innocent businesses burned against and billions of $$ worth of damage.
If GOP voters get mad they might shout but they go vote to change things.
When Dems get mad they want to burn everything down and it doesn't matter what corrupt or illegal things they do to win back power.
Which party do you want to support?