Key point: in radical left discourse, "white" is not a physical characteristic. It's anyone they want to get rid of.Quote:
That question has bothered many students of revolutionary movements. Revolutions never succeed without the support of wealthy, liberal, educated society. Yet revolutionaries seldom conceal that their success entails the seizure of all wealth, the suppression of dissenting opinion, and the murder of class enemies. Lenin, after all, was by no means the only bloodthirsty Russian radical. In 1907, Ivan Pavlovnot the Nobel prizewinning scientist, but one of the brightest theoreticians of the especially violent Maximalistspublished The Purification of Mankind, which divided humanity into ethical races. In this analysis, exploiters, vaguely and broadly identified, constituted a race, "morally inferior to our animal predecessors," which must be exterminated, children and all, by the morally superior race, whose best members were the terrorists themselves. Remarkably enough, this program evoked no indignation, among other Maximalists or even among other socialists, however moderate. Another prominent Maximalist, M. A. Engel'gardt, argued for a red terror that would kill at least twelve million people. As if anticipating the Khmer Rouge, one anarchist group sought to establish equality by killing all educated people.
The only one I've seen lately defending internment camps was that guy who worked for Bernie Sanders. It is a real possibility, though, if the likes of Antifa get power.Jinx 2 said:
We won't have to commit suicide. Plenty of you boys will find endless justifications to justify internment camps like the ones the Chinese run for the Uighurs, since democracy and the rule of law no longer matter to the party of Trump.