Status:
Uncommitted
HIGH SCHOOL
Tank King
Rating: 91
?
National Avg
Rating: 90.7
?
School Preferences
School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit
Baylor
Medium
Alabama
Medium
Arizona
Medium
Florida
Medium
Houston
Medium
LSU
Medium
Michigan
Medium
Missouri
Medium
Notre Dame
Medium
Oklahoma
Medium
Penn State
Medium
TCU
Medium
Tennessee
Medium
Texas
Medium
Texas A&M
Medium
Texas Tech
Medium
Washington
Medium
+ 12 More
Staff Predictions
?
Confidence
Prediction
Name & Date
Videos
(1 Total)
12/30/1969
TANK King 23 Season Highlights
Photos
(1 Total)
×
National Average Rating
The National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a SicEm365 rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the SicEm365 Rating 100-point scale.The intent of this rating is to provide SicEm365 readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
SicEm365 Rating
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.×