Baylor Football

Baylor Finalizing Deal to Hire Joe Klanderman as Next DC | Report

Baylor plans to hire Kansas State defensive coordinator Joe Klanderman as its next defensive coordinator.
December 11, 2025
17k Views
52 Comments
Story Poster
Photo by Kevin Jairaj-USA TODAY Sports

Baylor plans to hire Kansas State defensive coordinator Joe Klanderman as its next defensive coordinator; ESPN’s Pete Thamel first broke the news.

Klanderman will try to retool a Baylor defense that was toward the bottom of the Big 12 in every category, allowing 32.6 points per game, 197.2 rushing yards per game, 194.9 passing yards per game and an opponent third-down conversion rate of 41%. Baylor was dead last in the conference in fumbles recovered (2) and sacks (12).

Over the last four seasons, Klanderman’s defenses at Kansas State have ranked 41st (2025), 24th (2024), 24th (2023) and 19th (2022), according to ESPN’s F+ metric; the Wildcats won the Big 12 title in 2022.

Klanderman spent the last six seasons as Kansas State’s defensive coordinator under recently retired head coach Chris Klieman. Before that, Klanderman spent one season as Kansas State’s safeties coach (2019).

Prior to his time in Manhattan, Klanderman spent five seasons as the defensive backs coach at FCS powerhouse North Dakota State, also under Klieman, where he won four national titles.

Klanderman started his coaching career at Minnesota State after spending five seasons with the Mavericks as a defensive lineman from 1997 to 2001.

Although Klanderman will technically be replacing former defensive coordinator Matthew Powledge, who took the DC job at North Texas earlier this week, it was head coach Dave Aranda who called plays for the Bears’ defense each of the past two seasons.

Aranda is now expected to hand off the play-calling duties to Klanderman as Baylor looks to revamp that side of the ball.

52 Comments
Discussion from...

Baylor Finalizing Deal to Hire Joe Klanderman as Next DC | Report

8,221 Views | 52 Replies | Last: 9 hrs ago by Guitarbiscuit
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big12Fan2024 said:

Background suggests a good hire particularly given our circumstances.


This is where I am at on it. I just feel like because of the context of our current situation there were many obstacles to getting in a qualified person. This guy sounds much better than when I was expecting us to end up with.
Bandito
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is a good pickup considering the current state of the football program, Dave being a lame duck coach, and said coach throwing every coordinator he's ever had under the bus.
Ewalker80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dia del DougO said:

BellCountyBear said:

The big question will be whether Aranda will stay the **** out of the way and let him coach how he wants. Even cussing.

Really his only hope for staying on past next season.

Let somebody else control defense.
Let somebody else control offense.
Let somebody else make in-game decisions.

The last one is the hang-up.

(2) is already happening. (1) will 100% happen next year. if he doesn't do (3) he can't call himself the head coach. Dave makes basically all in-game decisions (e.g., going on 4th down, going for 2) based on analytics anyway, and that's not really the problem. When your defense sucks every in-game decision is the wrong one.
PartyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ewalker80 said:

Dia del DougO said:

BellCountyBear said:

The big question will be whether Aranda will stay the **** out of the way and let him coach how he wants. Even cussing.

Really his only hope for staying on past next season.

Let somebody else control defense.
Let somebody else control offense.
Let somebody else make in-game decisions.

The last one is the hang-up.

(2) is already happening. (1) will 100% happen next year. if he doesn't do (3) he can't call himself the head coach. Dave makes basically all in-game decisions (e.g., going on 4th down, going for 2) based on analytics anyway, and that's not really the problem. When your defense sucks every in-game decision is the wrong one.


Y'all are being ridiculous. By this standard no HC is a HC unless they are also one of their own coordinators, which generally is a bad idea and hence why that isn't customary. He will make in game decisions. Some he will make in collaboration with the staff, hence why HCs have a staff.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Does this mean he's going to follow his coach to Baylor? Does he have some friends he can bring?

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Certainly beats what we have been seeing here the last four years.

I'm not sure what our offense is going to bring next year with several new parts coming on board next year... but if it can continue the success it has had we don't really need a lights out defense. Just a solid one.

Bearknuckle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PartyBear said:

Ewalker80 said:

Dia del DougO said:

BellCountyBear said:

The big question will be whether Aranda will stay the **** out of the way and let him coach how he wants. Even cussing.

Really his only hope for staying on past next season.

Let somebody else control defense.
Let somebody else control offense.
Let somebody else make in-game decisions.

The last one is the hang-up.

(2) is already happening. (1) will 100% happen next year. if he doesn't do (3) he can't call himself the head coach. Dave makes basically all in-game decisions (e.g., going on 4th down, going for 2) based on analytics anyway, and that's not really the problem. When your defense sucks every in-game decision is the wrong one.


Y'all are being ridiculous. By this standard no HC is a HC unless they are also one of their own coordinators, which generally is a bad idea and hence why that isn't customary. He will make in game decisions. Some he will make in collaboration with the staff, hence why HCs have a staff.

Whoever kept insisting on 4th down chances instead of letting our all-world punter flip the field, whether Dave or Jake or Mack lol, needs a come to Jesus talk.

I really hope we don't let Palmer get away - he's a legit game changing weapon on Special Teams.
pathological optimist
Cove Dawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Run away and don't look back Klanderman, as long as Aranda is in town you are in a no win situation.
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cove Dawg said:

Run away and don't look back Klanderman, as long as Aranda is in town you are in a no win situation.

Aranda is the assistant coach reaper
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dia del DougO said:

blackie said:

dycbaylor02 said:

Just absolutely sucks we're in a lame duck session. Such a waste of time.

When are you guys going to understand that it is only a lame duck season if there has been a term limit set. That has not been the case. Nothing in the official statements has indicated there is. The chance that CDA is still here in 2027 is not zero. I think we need to understand and be prepared for that. They want Aranda to work. I don't have a dog in the hunt one way or another with CDA. I just want to win and have a program worthy of respect.. If that is without DA great....if it is with DA great.

This is the way I see it. I don't think DM is here to fire an existing coach that hasn't yet had a season under his watch. After kickoff 2026 it's his call, unless he gets vetoed (which could be a possibility).

Baylor really wants Aranda to work. He has this chance to convince the majority he's worth keeping past 2026.

This is his third such chance. Good luck convincing people who have already concluded you're not good enough.

The home attendance last season shows you the confidence Baylor fans have in Dave. And the attendance next season will be even worse.
GruntTuff
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's possible that the money saved when the top freshman recruits bolted can be used in the portal in a way that benefits the 2026 season more than if the money had been spent on the freshmen.

The new DC has had to work with 3-star type players at KSU, I would imagine (for the most part). He might be the kind of coach who can identify talent better than a coach who has coached at a high profile school.

Yes, going forward there needs to be a balance between freshmen and transfers, but for 2026 I'd rather spend my money on transfers.
Smashmouth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This whole Aranda deal reminds me of the guy we have all worked with. He sucked at his job after being promoted so they gave him the same title with less responsibility but he still sucked.
BluesBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
My money is on Joe being the Head Coach in waiting. I have a co-worker whose dad worked with him at North Dakota State - says he is about as real as it gets. Tough competitor.

Also said that Joe wouldn't take a role for just a year. As an another poster stated " With Baylor, when they have an engine issue, they go and replace the windshield wipers"….i believe we will start operate like a Tulsa - don't need a Head Coach because the DC and OC are getting it down.

I suspect if Baylor is able to turn around the program despite Dave - that is we do keep him, it will be at a major reduction in salary.
Dia del DougO
How long do you want to ignore this user?

I just wonder, under the circumstances, who were the real forces behind the hire. Who reached out to who, and how many had to agree before making the selection. Normally the head coach probably gets the guy he wants. But we've been through that before. Often, it is a guy they have worked with before. Don't see any connection there.

I would love to believe Baylor is bringing in a guy they think has head coach potential, and can be closely followed and vetted over the next year. I'd like to think their interest in Mo Linguist was that as well, but they may not have had been able to pay him enough to get him out of Bama. But that's just because that's what I would try to do, get upside coaches on board that may end up in larger roles. Don't know how realistic that might be.

It is a bit of an unusual situation.
"The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what you share with someone else when you're uncool."
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dia del DougO said:


I just wonder, under the circumstances, who were the real forces behind the hire. Who reached out to who, and how many had to agree before making the selection. Normally the head coach probably gets the guy he wants. But we've been through that before. Often, it is a guy they have worked with before. Don't see any connection there.

I would love to believe Baylor is bringing in a guy they think has head coach potential, and can be closely followed and vetted over the next year. I'd like to think their interest in Mo Linguist was that as well, but they may not have had been able to pay him enough to get him out of Bama. But that's just because that's what I would try to do, get upside coaches on board that may end up in larger roles. Don't know how realistic that might be.

It is a bit of an unusual situation.

Klieman has always seemed to have a pretty good relationship with Aranda. I wouldn't be surprised if that played a role.
Booboo Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Klanderman started his coaching career at Minnesota State after spending five seasons as a defensive lineman from 1997 to 2001.

So does this mean Klanderman played under the great Coach Hayden Fox??

Impressive!

Guitarbiscuit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Booboo Bear said:

Quote:

Klanderman started his coaching career at Minnesota State after spending five seasons as a defensive lineman from 1997 to 2001.

So does this mean Klanderman played under the great Coach Hayden Fox??

Impressive!




Luther Van Dam was a real ball buster, so I'm hoping he brings some of that mentality down to Waco.
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.