vanilla sky and AI artificial intelligence were freaking horrible

Are sequels excluded from this discussion? If not, Beverly Hills Cop III is absolutely the worst movie in history.

Any movie with Kristen Stewart in it. I am so tired of people and the media trying to convince me that Kristen Stewart is a good actress.

Gust Avrakotos said:

---

vanilla sky and AI artificial intelligence were freaking horrible

Are sequels excluded from this discussion? If not, Beverly Hills Cop III is absolutely the worst movie in history.

Any movie with Kristen Stewart in it. I am so tired of people and the media trying to convince me that Kristen Stewart is a good actress.

---

A.I. had, like, three directors who apparently worked on it during their spare time. Individual sections of the movie are brilliant, but it has no overall flow. It also ends like 6 times. Any one of those endings would have worked better than all of them.

Battlefield Earth and Catwoman

Anything starring Nicolas Cage or Keanu Reeves and Blade Runner.

Captain Spooge said:

---

Anything starring Nicolas Cage or Keanu Reeves and Blade Runner.

---

John Wick was awesome. The Matrix was great. Speed was good. Point Break and The Replacements were entertaining. I liked 47 Ronin also.

But other than those and Raising Arizona you have a point.

Several great movies have been mentioned: No Country For Old Men, Eyes Wide Shut, The Wicker Man, Vanilla Sky, AI, Raising Arizona, and the best movie of all time...Blade Runner.

My vote for worst goes to Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri. Although it's unintentionally funny enough that I'd put it in the so-bad-it's-good category.

Captain Spooge said:

---

Anything starring Nicolas Cage or Keanu Reeves and Blade Runner.

---

Cage was great in Raising Arizona. He peaked early.

BellCountyBear said:

---

Captain Spooge said:

---

Anything starring Nicolas Cage or Keanu Reeves and Blade Runner.

---

Cage was great in Raising Arizona. He peaked early.

---

Cage had some success and was making big checks. Between spending (buying houses was the big problem I think) and poor business management he ended up like William Nelson with a huge IRS debt and no liqiudity. So he started taking any role with a payday. That started a spiral of bad scripts and poor effort then less pay each time. So he cranks up the volume and does more movies. He is now doing five or six a year. He puts out about one watchable film every two years. I liked Next and National Treasure. Kick Ass was great but he was a supporting role. It has been a decade and a half since he had a movie with teeth like Windtalkers or Gone in 60 Seconds (Fantastic remake - the original was a huge car stunt reel. Talk about a stinker).

John Cusack is teetering on the edge of the Cage path. He is more Samuel Jackson at this stage without the big performance each year. Cage and Cusack do 2-3 duds a year - barely watchable crap that $1.50-2.00 rental or streaming fee was too much. Cusack ' s Love & Mercy was a good film but not a commercial success like Hitman's Bodyguard. Jackson is smart to take supporting roles in quality films and blockbusting Avengers to not let the bombs drag him down.