bear2be2 said:For reference, we averaged ...Desperado718 said:
Geez people Steele years were tons worse, tons
To say now and Steele years compare means you are to young to have experienced Steele, or mmm, trying to come up with something
Dumb as a rockAs bad as this year's team was, we were almost a touchdown better per game than Steele's best offense and only allowed more points per game than Steele's 2001 defense.
- 230.1 yards and 12.5 points per game in 1999
- 221.8 yards and 12.6 points per game in 2000
- 310.5 yards and 18.6 points per game in 2001
- 334.9 yards and 16.8 points per game in 2002
Sure, but when you control for FCS wins only Steels's first season was worse in the stat that matters the most.
The team isn't Steele bad, but the record is. Guy Morris was a lot better than Steele but only made it to 5 wins because of the hole Steele dug. What I fear is that Aranda is working on another hole.