historian said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Thee University said:

---

3,095 days and STILL we have grown men peeing their panties.

Candy legs.

Limp wrists.

Dishwater hands.

Manicured nails.

Self flagellation.

Concave chests.

Pencil necks.

I'll bet a couple of you carry man purses strapped around your waist.

3,095 days. Think about it.

---

What are you talking about?

---

He's still living in the past, obsessed with the whole Briles fake scandal fiasco. It often seems that Art Briles has taken permanent residency in his brain, rent free.

---

Nice try candy leg.

I'm here to remind you chief apologists who are liable to trot out revisionist history that hero worshippers started blowing out their keisters excuses starting 3,095 days ago. It's a sickness I tell you. Hanging on for 3,095 days to sadly try to defend the indefensible. I used to have fun making fun of these poindexters but it's gotten pitiful. Some of these boys have gone full ******.

I NEVER think of Art until someone goes full ****** on here and I feel it is my public duty to dry those legs, stiffen those wrists, put callouses on those soft hands, put a hang nail on those perfectly manicured nails, stop the brutal self-administered public floggings, put some meat on that little chest, bow that neck and toss the man purse.

I'm not giving up. 3,095 days = 101.7 months = 8.5 years. All gone. Massive depression. Colossal loss of self-esteem. Sadness. Traumatic emotional pain creeps in to the same old, tired posters. Empty, feeling of worthless, pessimistic, angry, fatigue and worst of all……..reduced sexual desire or lack of performance.

You can throw around childish insults all you want. I don't care. I moved onto from Briles years ago.

Yes, it would be nice to have a dynamic offense like we did 10 years ago but it would also be nice to have a great defense like we did in 2019 & 2021. If we have both consistently then we will be closer to winning championships. That's my primary concern: looking forward. History is a useful tool to understand what works and what doesn't. No need for revisionism.

Thee University said:

---

historian said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Thee University said:

---

3,095 days and STILL we have grown men peeing their panties.

Candy legs.

Limp wrists.

Dishwater hands.

Manicured nails.

Self flagellation.

Concave chests.

Pencil necks.

I'll bet a couple of you carry man purses strapped around your waist.

3,095 days. Think about it.

---

What are you talking about?

---

He's still living in the past, obsessed with the whole Briles fake scandal fiasco. It often seems that Art Briles has taken permanent residency in his brain, rent free.

---

Nice try candy leg.

I'm here to remind you chief apologists who are liable to trot out revisionist history that hero worshippers started blowing out their keisters excuses starting 3,095 days ago. It's a sickness I tell you. Hanging on for 3,095 days to sadly try to defend the indefensible. I used to have fun making fun of these poindexters but it's gotten pitiful. Some of these boys have gone full ******.

I NEVER think of Art until someone goes full ****** on here and I feel it is my public duty to dry those legs, stiffen those wrists, put callouses on those soft hands, put a hang nail on those perfectly manicured nails, stop the brutal self-administered public floggings, put some meat on that little chest, bow that neck and toss the man purse.

I'm not giving up. 3,095 days = 101.7 months = 8.5 years. All gone. Massive depression. Colossal loss of self-esteem. Sadness. Traumatic emotional pain creeps in to the same old, tired posters. Empty, feeling of worthless, pessimistic, angry, fatigue and worst of all……..reduced sexual desire or lack of performance.

---

Ok, got you. I agree with you. Thought you were on the other side.

Yogi said:

---

Not all the victims were "victims".

I hate to tell you guys this, especially here at the end of the Age of Chivalry - but women, like men, are not 100% credible. Women do lie, and they will lie about physical and sexual abuse. That's why if you want to be fair, you have to consider all the facts.

After the #metoo movement in 2018, the number of allegations of physical and sexual misconduct to my firm went up over 200% from where they were prior. Still today, women allege abuse in about 40% of high conflict divorces.

The number of protective orders followed, as in 2018, I prosecuted only 2 civil protective orders and that number was up to 11 in 2022 and 9 for 2023.

Not saying these things didn't happen, but I also don't like a trend where a woman, probably yours, is capable of ruining you financially and sending you to prison based on criminal allegations that you never committed. And, I will tell you, it is really, really easy to get a jury in McLennan County to send an innocent man to prison.

Just be careful out there, and don't judge a book by its cover.

---

Even if it is one she matters.

Waco1947 said:

---

Yogi said:

---

Not all the victims were "victims".

I hate to tell you guys this, especially here at the end of the Age of Chivalry - but women, like men, are not 100% credible. Women do lie, and they will lie about physical and sexual abuse. That's why if you want to be fair, you have to consider all the facts.

After the #metoo movement in 2018, the number of allegations of physical and sexual misconduct to my firm went up over 200% from where they were prior. Still today, women allege abuse in about 40% of high conflict divorces.

The number of protective orders followed, as in 2018, I prosecuted only 2 civil protective orders and that number was up to 11 in 2022 and 9 for 2023.

Not saying these things didn't happen, but I also don't like a trend where a woman, probably yours, is capable of ruining you financially and sending you to prison based on criminal allegations that you never committed. And, I will tell you, it is really, really easy to get a jury in McLennan County to send an innocent man to prison.

Just be careful out there, and don't judge a book by its cover.

---

Even if it is one she matters.

---

He didn't say sexual assault victims don't matter; he was talking about a different issue. I think you are projecting on to him your own feelings, since you are defending the BOR covering up rapes and trying to divert all the focus from the larger picture the BOR presided over to one program - a program that was still in their purview. And you have the gall to call their cover-up and protection of rapists from criminal prosecution "protecting victims."