drahthaar said:
Bruisers Burner Phone said:
boognish_bear said:
Fans want winning teams and competitive teams...then the enjoyment takes care of itself
I think that winning teams are a necessary, but not a sufficient, part of fan enjoyment. It is the MOST important ingredient, but not the only one. For example, CDA's first season with a Big XII championship was amazing and wonderful...and the new tailgate scene was still a horrible mistake.
No doubt the "fan experience" is multifaceted, but the foundational components are winning consistently and cost to participate in the circus. Get those "right" and folks will tolerate most of the rest, and will give leadership time to correct the remainder of issues. We've proven that losing, inept/inconsistent play and expense are poor "loss-leaders".
I agree with you completely. But I also think it is appropriate to hold AD's to account for other aspects of the fan experience even if they are winning.
I think Mack had a very pri*kly relationship with the fans, even when the programs were winning. He made some serious errors in fan engagement. Ian, for all of his many faults, took good advantage of the football success to create a great tailgating experience, and the school really leaned into sailgating in a positive way. When Mack came along, he really mucked it up - wanted it outsourced so he could get to his "real job" of managing the coaches and programs and raising money.