There's still time!

2,105 Views | 26 Replies | Last: 3 days ago by bear2be2
Space Cutter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
UTSA HC Jeff Traylor is still available. He's got strong Texas high school coaches ties, he's a winner and his teams plays with ALOT of heart. His offense is fast and high scoring. He's already better than the coach we got now.

There's time to make the move.
Bearsalwayswin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
utsa ain't up to scratch anymore lol
Aberzombie1892
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He may have missed his window of opportunity to jump to a P4 unless he can bring the magic back.
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Traylor > Aranda… by a lot
Bearsalwayswin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
but i wouldn't take him over our options next year.
CaliBear00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Space Cutter said:

UTSA HC Jeff Traylor is still available. He's got strong Texas high school coaches ties, he's a winner and his teams plays with ALOT of heart. His offense is fast and high scoring. He's already better than the coach we got now.

There's time to make the move.


Traylor was a thing two years ago. His stock has crashed now. Oh, and getting into it with Army of all teams and throwing an adult temper tantrum after a loss was a really bad look. Picking a fight with guys who are trained to kill? Bold strategy, Cotton!
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We have no idea who are options are going to be. Good chance they keep Aranda after another sub .500 season
Bearsalwayswin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
0 chance of that, ADDM has good ideas, one will be firing dave.
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you say so
BBWCBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bearsalwayswin said:

0 chance of that, ADDM has good ideas, one will be firing dave.


If '26 season generates a 6/6 or 7/5 year I'm not so sure. Linda will make that call. Betting the "AD" is on a leash. Just watched a YT interview with David Smoak with Dayton McLane. Presently not sure the money would be there. Yoda may run to the end of his contract.
drahthaar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BBWCBear said:

Bearsalwayswin said:

0 chance of that, ADDM has good ideas, one will be firing dave.


If '26 season generates a 6/6 or 7/5 year I'm not so sure. Linda will make that call. Betting the "AD" is on a leash. Just watched a YT interview with David Smoak with Dayton McLane. Presently not sure the money would be there. Yoda may run to the end of his contract.

If he goes to 6 or 7 W's, BU will take the position that they're on the upswing and find multiple excuses for the poor play, energy-malaise and loss of fan support, the first being Mack Rhoades. Weak sauce all way around.
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bro anyone, but nice guy Dave
boykin_spaniel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No move being made. Portal is on the doorstep. Slow start to next year and the AD will make a move. We'd have a new coach if Rhoades hadn't done what he did but instead we got a new AD. Linda will not be hiring the next football coach… I do not understand people who keep saying this. The new AD will decide what happens with football, she even said that in her dumb little letter.
Baylorbears111
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bearsalwayswin said:

0 chance of that, ADDM has good ideas, one will be firing dave.


He hasn't done it yet and his delay will cost another year only for us to wind up with a replacement that we could've gotten this year. He is a mindless lackey for the Livingstone admin and has zero agency to affect change.
Baylorbears111
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boykin_spaniel said:

No move being made. Portal is on the doorstep. Slow start to next year and the AD will make a move. We'd have a new coach if Rhoades hadn't done what he did but instead we got a new AD. Linda will not be hiring the next football coach… I do not understand people who keep saying this. The new AD will decide what happens with football, she even said that in her dumb little letter.


Either the AD has the authority to hire a new coach or he doesn't and that power lies with the president. Livingstone stuck her neck out and said that we need AD to make these decisions and now we hav wine and he hasn't done anything. Utah will have a new coach before we will.
Aberzombie1892
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Baylorbears111 said:

boykin_spaniel said:

No move being made. Portal is on the doorstep. Slow start to next year and the AD will make a move. We'd have a new coach if Rhoades hadn't done what he did but instead we got a new AD. Linda will not be hiring the next football coach… I do not understand people who keep saying this. The new AD will decide what happens with football, she even said that in her dumb little letter.


Either the AD has the authority to hire a new coach or he doesn't and that power lies with the president. Livingstone stuck her neck out and said that we need AD to make these decisions and now we hav wine and he hasn't done anything. Utah will have a new coach before we will.


To be fair, Utah already had hired and made known that it had a head coaching in waiting already on staff, so it doesn't really make sense to compare their situation to Baylor's or really anyone else who isn't in a similar position.
Dia del DougO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ain't gonna happen. Maybe next year.
"The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what you share with someone else when you're uncool."
boykin_spaniel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Utah had a head coach in waiting, there was no search. No AD we hired was walking in here and conducting a coaching search in record time. Other schools that made quick hires had AD's in place.
Baylorbears111
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boykin_spaniel said:

Utah had a head coach in waiting, there was no search. No AD we hired was walking in here and conducting a coaching search in record time. Other schools that made quick hires had AD's in place.


Dickey could've brought Danielson. Mosley could've brought Morris. You can do these hires simultaneously, there isn't anything special about Baylor's situation except our willingness to delay and accept results that no other program would.
Bruisers Burner Phone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boykin_spaniel said:

Utah had a head coach in waiting, there was no search. No AD we hired was walking in here and conducting a coaching search in record time. Other schools that made quick hires had AD's in place.

Other's weren't surprised by a sudden collapse of the head of our athletic dept. I'm not saying we've done well since then, but it was a bit out-of-the-blue.
boykin_spaniel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Those guys still might have wanted to conduct a search even if the current coach at their school was a leading candidate. AD would also have to raise the money to buyout current coach and staff and then hire a new coach and staff. What happens if we offered Morris but OSU had more money for an assistant pool and went there anyway? Now an AD is walking into a school he doesn't know, without time to schmooze boosters, and a limited roster of coaches to pursue with not much of a timetable to vet them.

No idea what line of work you're in but if another company in your industry offered you the CEO job but day 1 you had to fire the current CFO and hire a new one, and oh by the way if the day 1 CFO hire goes poorly you're on the hot seat. Personally I'd say no to that job and position myself for a better opening where I could get a proper team in place.

I'm as unhappy as anyone at the W/L record of our football team but no quality AD was going to come in and fire Aranda and hire a new football coach before the portal opened.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Baylorbears111 said:

boykin_spaniel said:

Utah had a head coach in waiting, there was no search. No AD we hired was walking in here and conducting a coaching search in record time. Other schools that made quick hires had AD's in place.


Dickey could've brought Danielson. Mosley could've brought Morris. You can do these hires simultaneously, there isn't anything special about Baylor's situation except our willingness to delay and accept results that no other program would.

Mosley/Morris would have been the obvious choice. I'm not sold on Danielson as a coach just yet.
JBear14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
drahthaar said:

BBWCBear said:

Bearsalwayswin said:

0 chance of that, ADDM has good ideas, one will be firing dave.


If '26 season generates a 6/6 or 7/5 year I'm not so sure. Linda will make that call. Betting the "AD" is on a leash. Just watched a YT interview with David Smoak with Dayton McLane. Presently not sure the money would be there. Yoda may run to the end of his contract.

If he goes to 6 or 7 W's, BU will take the position that they're on the upswing and find multiple excuses for the poor play, energy-malaise and loss of fan support, the first being Mack Rhoades. Weak sauce all way around.


A 6 or even 7-win year is not good enough to save Aranda's job, IMO. It means he's stuck in mediocrity. Some years, he'll get you 8. Most years, he'll be borderline or have losing seasons. 2025 was proof that Aranda was not it. Only Mack going rogue kept Aranda from getting the boot this year. 8 wins is his floor next year, or he's out.
BBWCBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JBear14 said:

drahthaar said:

BBWCBear said:

Bearsalwayswin said:

0 chance of that, ADDM has good ideas, one will be firing dave.


If '26 season generates a 6/6 or 7/5 year I'm not so sure. Linda will make that call. Betting the "AD" is on a leash. Just watched a YT interview with David Smoak with Dayton McLane. Presently not sure the money would be there. Yoda may run to the end of his contract.

If he goes to 6 or 7 W's, BU will take the position that they're on the upswing and find multiple excuses for the poor play, energy-malaise and loss of fan support, the first being Mack Rhoades. Weak sauce all way around.


A 6 or even 7-win year is not good enough to save Aranda's job, IMO. It means he's stuck in mediocrity. Some years, he'll get you 8. Most years, he'll be borderline or have losing seasons. 2025 was proof that Aranda was not it. Only Mack going rogue kept Aranda from getting the boot this year. 8 wins is his floor next year, or he's out.


Suggest you watch interview of David Smoak with Drayton McLane.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

Traylor > Aranda… by a lot

100 percent.

At UTSA, Traylor is at every possible disadvantage in the NIL era.

He's begging his boosters for $4-5 million per year, which tells you that they have no money whatsoever to spend on their roster.

And he's still never had a losing season as a college head football coach.

Traylor would be a massive upgrade over what we currently have. He had that program rolling before NIL and infinite player movement threw a giant wrench in what he was building. Give him the resources Aranda has squandered at Baylor, and he'd win at a much higher level than what Dave has.
dycbaylor02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

IowaBear said:

Traylor > Aranda… by a lot

100 percent.

At UTSA, Traylor is at every possible disadvantage in the NIL era.

He's begging his boosters for $4-5 million per year, which tells you that they have no money whatsoever to spend on their roster.

And he's still never had a losing season as a college head football coach.

Traylor would be a massive upgrade over what we currently have. He had that program rolling before NIL and infinite player movement threw a giant wrench in what he was building. Give him the resources Aranda has squandered at Baylor, and he'd win at a much higher level than what Dave has.

If he did come to Baylor and basically lifted and shifted his entire starting squad to Baylor how would his guys do in the big 12? Or would it be a complete rebuild?
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dycbaylor02 said:

bear2be2 said:

IowaBear said:

Traylor > Aranda… by a lot

100 percent.

At UTSA, Traylor is at every possible disadvantage in the NIL era.

He's begging his boosters for $4-5 million per year, which tells you that they have no money whatsoever to spend on their roster.

And he's still never had a losing season as a college head football coach.

Traylor would be a massive upgrade over what we currently have. He had that program rolling before NIL and infinite player movement threw a giant wrench in what he was building. Give him the resources Aranda has squandered at Baylor, and he'd win at a much higher level than what Dave has.

If he did come to Baylor and basically lifted and shifted his entire starting squad to Baylor how would his guys do in the big 12? Or would it be a complete rebuild?

It's likely going to be a complete rebuild regardless of who we hire next. That's modern college football.

UTSA has a few guys who could play at our level. But those guys are leaving in the transfer portal every year because UTSA can't pay them.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.