MrGolfguy said:
CTbruin said:
MrGolfguy said:
CTbruin said:
And where exactly in Woodway are your foundation issues?
I have lived in six different houses in Woodway. Never a foundation issue.
Southwood, Wedgewood, Fairway, Arliss, Gaywood, Rio Vista, Forrest Ridge, Sierra, Valley Ridge, Woodland West, Knotty Oaks, Western Oaks, Briargrove, Greenbranch, Wood Valley, Oak Hollow
Like I said it's everywhere
And those are streets on the lake side of Bosque or "old." Woodway. Used to be called Westwood. I was aware of problems in those areas.
The newer sections of Woodway have fewer issues.
Woodway is Woodway. Thanks for finally admitting that i've been right all along - Woodway is known for having homes with foundation issues.
Lived here for all of my adult life and never heard anyone correlate Woodway with foundational issues. Definitely a much bigger problem on the Robinson side of 35, them sands are a shiftin' constantly and the folks I know in foundation repair basically have their mail sent there by this point.
I think the general public perception of the Woodway footprint is the area around from Whitehall Park extending to SBE, and then in the homes behind HEB stretching to First Woodway Baptist. So, the fact that there are pockets near highway 6/Bosque that have higher incidences of foundation issues on homes built in the 50s/60s, does not a "Woodway has foundation problems everywhere" make, in my opinion. I think this is probably the first time I've ever heard someone equate Woodway with endemic foundation issues.
I'm not sure why you seem to intensely combative on it, like CTBruin said you appear to have an axe to grind on the topic, which is puzzling. Having multiple incidents of "ADMIT I WAS RIGHT" seems just...juvenile I guess? It feels like I'm listening to one of my middle school kid's classmates arguing about nonsense. "NO, NO, I WAS RIGHT, ADMIT IT. AND THEN ADMIT THIS ONE TOO". Lord almighty man, pump the brakes a bit.