Hotsauce said:
Wow, wasn't expecting a full retraction! Things may start to get juicy if the DA still believes otherwise.
Beard team claims there is a video of the incident. Apparently, it has not been provided to the Police. If it is exculpatory to him, can't understand why it is withheld. While prosecutors may be reluctant to proceed without the support of the alleged victim, there is physical evidence of an assault. Not sure if self-defense argument will stand up to evidence of a choke hold or bite marks.
“No eye has seen, no ear has heard, and no mind has imagined what God has prepared for those who love Him.” 1 Corinthians 2:9