Jim Boeheim Apologizes for Saying ACC Opponents 'Bought' Players

1,506 Views | 27 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by bear2be2
gobears20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
gobears20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
I often wonder if some of these long time coaches will retire with all this mess. It was hard enough to recruit before .
gobears20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I mean he's not wrong… especially in reference to Miami. They bought Wong, Pack, and Omier
Stefano DiMera
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He's done..it's what pushed Jay Wright and Roy Williams and Coach K out.
EvilTroyAndAbed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Adapt or die.
ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He's not wrong but it's within the rules.
pluce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There are no rules. That's the problem. Inducing kids to sign by paying big bucks and calling it so called NIL is a joke. Thats not Name , Image or likeness. The Name,image and likeness should come after a player chooses a school and then benefit from NIL.
Chamberman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's time for Boeheim to move on. He's 78, and can't compete in the new world of college basketball. If I was a Syracuse alum, I'd be pushing for it.

As long as they keep paying him $3MM a year, he ain't leaving.
Stefano DiMera
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How that sanctimonious ***** still has a job baffles me.

Not only did he know his lead assistant was a pedophile..but that assistants wife was sleeping with players!

Forget Briles...can you imagine it that was Baylor?! There'd be nothing left of the school.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EvilTroyAndAbed said:

Adapt or die.
Adapting isn't exactly a strength of old men.

That's not meant as a jab at any of the coaches mentioned in this thread, who are all legends. It's just a general truth.

If you can't roll with the changes without complaining constantly about the new landscape, it's probably time to step aside and let someone who can take your place.

Change can be bad. Usually, it's just different. The guys who will succeed are the ones who recognize this and make the necessary adjustments to what they're doing.
JP1037
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EvilTroyAndAbed said:

Adapt or die.
True, but NIL in its current form is poison and realizing that and pushing to have it changed is not a lack of ability or willingness to adapt. Its the wisdom of realizing what lies ahead is not good.

NCAA needs to put in guard rails to keep a competitive league. Pro teams vs Amateur teams is not competition its an exhibition.

NBA and NFL at least have salary caps to keep things competitive.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JP1037 said:

EvilTroyAndAbed said:

Adapt or die.
True, but NIL in its current form is poison and realizing that and pushing to have it changed is not a lack of ability or willingness to adapt. Its the wisdom of realizing what lies ahead is not good.

NCAA needs to put in guard rails to keep a competitive league. Pro teams vs Amateur teams is not competition its an exhibition.

NBA and NFL at least have salary caps to keep things competitive.
The NCAA has no jurisdiction here. The courts have already ruled that.

If the schools and conferences want to rein this in, it's going to be on them to do it.

But their actions will show that they don't really want to do that. They benefit too much monetarily from the rules (or lack thereof) as they currently exist. And everything in big-time college athletics is about money.
JP1037
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

JP1037 said:

EvilTroyAndAbed said:

Adapt or die.
True, but NIL in its current form is poison and realizing that and pushing to have it changed is not a lack of ability or willingness to adapt. Its the wisdom of realizing what lies ahead is not good.

NCAA needs to put in guard rails to keep a competitive league. Pro teams vs Amateur teams is not competition its an exhibition.

NBA and NFL at least have salary caps to keep things competitive.
The NCAA has no jurisdiction here. The courts have already ruled that.

If the schools and conferences want to rein this in, it's going to be on them to do it.

But their actions will show that they don't really want to do that. They benefit too much monetarily from the rules (or lack thereof) as they currently exist. And everything in big-time college athletics is about money.
NCAA has no jurisdiction over individuals paying players but it does over schools paying players, which is what is happening in many cases.

That being said, I think Congress or schools should pursue equity.
gobears20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
Can you imagine Bobby Knight coaching in this mess. Do you remember he got mad way back on how Drew was recruiting?
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

I mean he's not wrong… especially in reference to Miami. They bought Wong, Pack, and Omier


It's funny. He likely benefited a ton from the old rules and paying guys and harbored ped as long as Paterno did
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
gobears20 said:

Can you imagine Bobby Knight coaching in this mess. Do you remember he got mad way back on how Drew was recruiting?


Drew sent a flyer!!!!!
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JP1037 said:

bear2be2 said:

JP1037 said:

EvilTroyAndAbed said:

Adapt or die.
True, but NIL in its current form is poison and realizing that and pushing to have it changed is not a lack of ability or willingness to adapt. Its the wisdom of realizing what lies ahead is not good.

NCAA needs to put in guard rails to keep a competitive league. Pro teams vs Amateur teams is not competition its an exhibition.

NBA and NFL at least have salary caps to keep things competitive.
The NCAA has no jurisdiction here. The courts have already ruled that.

If the schools and conferences want to rein this in, it's going to be on them to do it.

But their actions will show that they don't really want to do that. They benefit too much monetarily from the rules (or lack thereof) as they currently exist. And everything in big-time college athletics is about money.
NCAA has no jurisdiction over individuals paying players but it does over schools paying players, which is what is happening in many cases.

That being said, I think Congress or schools should pursue equity.
The schools aren't paying players. Collectives of donors are.

The courts will never side with the NCAA on this issue. They've proven it time and time again.
gobears20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
Fre3dombear said:

gobears20 said:

Can you imagine Bobby Knight coaching in this mess. Do you remember he got mad way back on how Drew was recruiting?


Drew sent a flyer!!!!!
Great memory! I couldn't remember what it was but knew it was something stupid
EvilTroyAndAbed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

I mean he's not wrong… especially in reference to Miami. They bought Wong, Pack, and Omier
He's just upset that it's out in the open. Syracuse bought plenty of players. They were just under the table ... Derrick Coleman ... ::cough cough::
Media Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
gobears20 said:


A: It's legal now, so deal with it ...
B. Case of an old pot calling an old kettle rusty -- and corroded ...
Media Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stefano DiMera said:

He's done..it's what pushed Jay Wright and Roy Williams and Coach K out.
I think Williams and K were gonna retire anyway -- NIL or not.

Wright ... probably another story. I could see NIL and him not mixing well.
Alf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stefano DiMera said:

How that sanctimonious ***** still has a job baffles me.

Not only did he know his lead assistant was a pedophile..but that assistants wife was sleeping with players!

Forget Briles...can you imagine it that was Baylor?! There'd be nothing left of the school.

I guess he's got good PR working for him because I never heard about either of those things.
RegentCoverup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stefano DiMera said:

How that sanctimonious ***** still has a job baffles me.

Not only did he know his lead assistant was a pedophile..but that assistants wife was sleeping with players!

Forget Briles...can you imagine it that was Baylor?! There'd be nothing left of the school.
The proximity of Syracuse to Bristol Connecticut MIGHT be a factor
RegentCoverup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Alf said:

Stefano DiMera said:

How that sanctimonious ***** still has a job baffles me.

Not only did he know his lead assistant was a pedophile..but that assistants wife was sleeping with players!

Forget Briles...can you imagine it that was Baylor?! There'd be nothing left of the school.

I guess he's got good PR working for him because I never heard about either of those things.

All true.
Stefano DiMera
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Google 'Bernie Fine' and 'Laurie Fine'...it was huge when it happened..but about 80% of the media and executives graduated from Syracuse.
JP1037
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

The schools aren't paying players. Collectives of donors are.

The courts will never side with the NCAA on this issue. They've proven it time and time again.

Collective donors are driven by the coach's desired players. It's the same thing as schools paying them they just don't touch the money.

Austin NovoSAD was given an offer by Oregon at the same time he was offered $ 1 million (reportedly) by Oregon Donor Group. Oregon paid NovoSAD through a third party at the urging of an Oregon employee. It had nothing to do with intended name image likeness compensation. Its pay to play. Ray Charles can see that.

It may never change and probably won't any time soon, but courts changing their minds on the law or the law changing is not an uncommon event especially when unintended consequences become unbearable which I foresee.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JP1037 said:

bear2be2 said:

The schools aren't paying players. Collectives of donors are.

The courts will never side with the NCAA on this issue. They've proven it time and time again.

Collective donors are driven by the coach's desired players. It's the same thing as schools paying them they just don't touch the money.

Austin NovoSAD was given an offer by Oregon at the same time he was offered $ 1 million (reportedly) by Oregon Donor Group. Oregon paid NovoSAD through a third party at the urging of an Oregon employee. It had nothing to do with intended name image likeness compensation. Its pay to play. Ray Charles can see that.

It may never change and probably won't any time soon, but courts changing their minds on the law or the law changing is not an uncommon event especially when unintended consequences become unbearable which I foresee.
Who's money it is matters. Universities have been raising funds for years to improve the perks they can offer prospective recruits. This really isn't that different. Donors' money is just landing directly in athletes' bank accounts now instead of being spent on exorbitant facilities upgrades and amenities.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.