LJ Cryer Commits

10,771 Views | 48 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by TWD 1974
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Not much of a surprise here.
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And for the record -- he's going to a school that returns its 2nd team all conference junior (will be senior but still has COVID year) starting point guard.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, he is from Katy. He should have plenty of friends & family for every home game & plenty of other games in the state.

Hard to see another Baylor person at a Big 12 school. How many others are there, besides Tang & McCasland at Tech?
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Stefano DiMera
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kelvin Sampson abandoning his defensive principles in his old age?
gobears20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
This is just confusing
Best of luck to him but i think he would have been better off outside the conference at a Gonzaga type team
cougar king
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I can't wait to smoke Baylor.
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good luck, you aren't in the AAC anymore. You were talking mad crap before that F4 beat down as well
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
gobears20 said:

This is just confusing
Best of luck to him but i think he would have been better off outside the conference at a Gonzaga type team
It's definitely an odd fit. LJ Cryer doesn't seem like a Kelvin Simpson type of guard to me.
Bakersdozen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Great shooter. Average or worse at every other aspect of his game. Next point guard for Houston? I don't think so. He will help Houston but he will not find satisfaction there.
Quinton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

gobears20 said:

This is just confusing
Best of luck to him but i think he would have been better off outside the conference at a Gonzaga type team
It's definitely an odd fit. LJ Cryer doesn't seem like a Kelvin Simpson type of guard to me.


It's one of the worst possible fits you could find. Doesn't fit the system at all. But was expected.

Sampson sees the writing on the wall. You can't trot out the all D ( save this past year) banging style and win consistently at the high D1 level. They'll have to score bc the backcourt will be small and really poor defensively save Shead.
Quinton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DanaDane said:

And for the record -- he's going to a school that returns its 2nd team all conference junior (will be senior but still has COVID year) starting point guard.


This is why you have to basically ignore the rationale given publicly. They actually have a pg which we didn't this year.

They also try a grinding style of defense while Cryer was one of our worst defenders of the last decade. Also brought in another tweener scorer so won't be enough shots to make everyone happy. It's a very poor fit but makes sense for proximity, Nil, program vibe (although either Sampson goes lighter on a few of these guys or they adjust).
Stefano DiMera
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You don't want that smoke.
Pdxbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Love it when cougar high folks follow our sites.
Crawfoso1973
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Has to be quite the $$ incentive, because as you all have pointed out, terrible basketball fit.
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In another thread a poster got hammered on for saying LJs move to the portal was NiL motivated…. Said poster looks pretty smart now. This was purely NIl driven. Houston is a God awful fit!
parch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

In another thread a poster got hammered on for saying LJs move to the portal was NiL motivated…. Said poster looks pretty smart now. This was purely NIl driven. Houston is a God awful fit!
Which would bring up a rather uncomfortable series of questions about what our players are earning on NIL, if Houston is outbidding us on our own players. It's not like Cryer was a bench guy or wouldn't get starting minutes next year, so the only explanation I can give is similar to yours.

Must kind of suck to be a coach in this era when dealing with this mess. You have zero control over how much NIL money your players get, yet you now have to use those figures not just to initially recruit high school kids, but to perpetually recruit your own players.
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bingo, I was one of the few against NiL when this all started as this was exactly why! It was always going to end up turning into a bidding war…loyalty to programs is a dying commodity.
parch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
As time wears on, college sports will increasingly resemble pro sports in all aspects until the two are nearly indistinguishable.

As pay-to-play and NIL become more ingrained, and I'm thinking a few years down the road here, you're going to eventually see players sign contracts with colleges stipulating length of service. Players will have to negotiate 1, 2, 3 4-year deals that guarantee rights access, NIL payment plans, etc. The transfer portal will be limited to players out of contract. Agency services will professionally extend to repping college athletes. There will be a CBA. It's already legal precedent that college students can unionize, so either the NCAA will have to bargain or a new org will sprout up that will and supplant it.

At some point these schools individually are going to act on the unbalanced leverage issue, because you can't have a league (in either revenue sport) where anyone can go anywhere at any time for any reason and their payment is just a giant hazy roulette wheel for the coaches.
Johnny Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Where would Cryer fit in if it's any place that takes pride in its defense and isn't just about trying to outscore the opponent?
Stefano DiMera
How long do you want to ignore this user?
From his initial list. Maybe KState.. Illinois...LSU..or Arkansas.
Married A Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Possibly a big factor is a big time name might be able to get a nice bit more NIL in front of your hometown crowd?
Quinton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
None of these guys are driving numbers. They are just getting paid to come. Don't think it matters where they are from as they still won't drive any real revenue. But I'm sure Nil is a raise and playing back home is a benefit.. almost guaranteed the two most important factors.

Would be shocked if he plays any significant pg time against real competition and if he does the team will struggle.
ABC BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cougar king said:

I can't wait to smoke Baylor.
A few things have changed since we were last conference mates: i.e., the 7-11 at Ivy Square is gone now.
whitetrash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ABC BEAR said:

cougar king said:

I can't wait to smoke Baylor.
A few things have changed since we were last conference mates: i.e., the 7-11 at Ivy Square is gone now.
They built a new one directly across the street from Tiny Arena. So Coog Fans will have somewhere to congregate and get a bite to eat before the game.
gobears20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
JP1037
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

Bingo, I was one of the few against NiL when this all started as this was exactly why! It was always going to end up turning into a bidding war…loyalty to programs is a dying commodity.
I think the majority see NIL as the end of college sports as we know them. Stacking the deck and buying wins is not a fulfilling win. Plus it's not NIL anymore. It's paying players to win.

I pray this will be reigned in at some point.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JP1037 said:

IowaBear said:

Bingo, I was one of the few against NiL when this all started as this was exactly why! It was always going to end up turning into a bidding war…loyalty to programs is a dying commodity.
I think the majority see NIL as the end of college sports as we know them. Stacking the deck and buying wins is not a fulfilling win. Plus it's not NIL anymore. It's paying players to win.

I pray this will be reigned in at some point.
It's just not collegiate sports anymore. It's pro sports, and low quality pro sports at that.

I can't see my interest in college football and basketball doing anything but waning over the coming decades. There's just not a whole lot of reason to invest the time or energy into it that I have.

To me, what made college sports really fun was the shared experience you had with those representing your school. That no longer exists in an environment where players choose their schools based exclusively on incentive packages and one in every five players (and climbing) transfers every year.
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Take up fishing, it soothes the soul
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

Take up fishing, it soothes the soul
I love fishing. Unfortunately, the little fishing hole I used to take the kids to every weekend dried up last summer. I have to find a new place this summer.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And just to be clear, I don't have a problem with players being compensated or a fair chunk of the insane money in these sports trickling down to the athletes who play them. But at the end of the day, college sports (like all others) are an entertainment product. And if I no longer find the product entertaining, I'll just move on to something else.

It's a shame because there was likely a sensible solution to be struck in the pay-for-play discussion a decade or two ago, but that ship has sailed. Because of stubborn inaction by the "stewards" of these sports, high major college athletics will never again look like the version that hooked most of us years and years ago. It will, at best, be some *******ized facsimile that will become more and more difficult for some of us to enjoy.
ABC BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whitetrash said:

ABC BEAR said:

cougar king said:

I can't wait to smoke Baylor.
A few things have changed since we were last conference mates: i.e., the 7-11 at Ivy Square is gone now.
They built a new one directly across the street from Tiny Arena. So Coog Fans will have somewhere to congregate and get a bite to eat before the game.
We get stuck with another 7-11 while Hillsboro gets a Buc-ee's. Any chance we might get a Puff-a-Lump outlet store to make everyone jealous of us for a change?
Bakersdozen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I doubt there is a P5 coach in America that wouldn't have taken Cryer. In today's game, shooting is the most important thing. However, I think most would have regretted taking him if they expected him to be anything other than one of the best shooting guards in the nation.
gobears20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
ursamajor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

And just to be clear, I don't have a problem with players being compensated or a fair chunk of the insane money in these sports trickling down to the athletes who play them. But at the end of the day, college sports (like all others) are an entertainment product. And if I no longer find the product entertaining, I'll just move on to something else.

It's a shame because there was likely a sensible solution to be struck in the pay-for-play discussion a decade or two ago, but that ship has sailed. Because of stubborn inaction by the "stewards" of these sports, high major college athletics will never again look like the version that hooked most of us years and years ago. It will, at best, be some *******ized facsimile that will become more and more difficult for some of us to enjoy.
I'm with you. And the bolded part is (one of) the part(s) that gets me. It's not like the giant sums ESPN/Fox are paying out are trickling down to the athletes: the current setup has alumni donors paying more money to give to players. Most alumni simply can't/won't, giving the ultra-enthusiastic megadonors outsized influence. I can't think of anything that goes more directly against the idea of amateur, collegiate competition than that.

It starts to feel like the ship of Theseus: take away local rivalries, introduce the transfer portal, dump in TV money, throw in pay-for-play and it starts to take an Aggie-like devotion to believe the sport bears any resemblance to its former self.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.