Officially the smallest Bball arena in the Big12

8,168 Views | 72 Replies | Last: 10 mo ago by whitetrash
MrGolfguy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BYU 19,000
KU 16,300
Tech 15,000
ISU 14,400
WVU 14,000
OSU 13,600
KSU 12,500
Cincy 12,000
OU 11,500
UCF 10,000
Texas 10,000
Tcu 8,500
UH 7,100
Baylor 7,000
MrGolfguy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Future teams:

Utah 15,000
Arizona 14,700
Ariz St 14,200
Colorado 11,000
RightRevBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MrGolfguy said:

BYU 19,000
KU 16,300
Tech 15,000
ISU 14,400
WVU 14,000
OSU 13,600
KSU 12,500
Cincy 12,000
OU 11,500
UCF 10,000
Texas 10,000
Tcu 8,500
UH 7,100
Baylor 7,000


We are barely the third largest in the Big 12. While I think 8k might have been better, but I am far from an expert.

If you compare it to enrollment, ours is much larger than most schools.

Houston has double our enrollment, but they have only 100 more seats.

UT's enrollment is over 2.5 times our enrollment, and their arena sits 10k.

UCF has an enrollment of 68k with a 10k arena.

The only outliers are TCU and KSU which both have smaller enrollments.
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Amazing that UT built a stadium smaller than the FC and has almost 70,000 students.

Well amazing if you listen to most who post on this board
BluesBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why are we still complaining about something we've known the day the fieldhouse designs were issued. Valid complaints about the bathroom facilities and concession stands but let's move on from the "size"....

I can't wait to experience a game where I don't feel like I'm sitting on cement blocks in a giant bubble.
chorne68
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I only care about winning.
Johnny Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am one that thought we should've built an 8K capacity arena given among other things our average attendance (or at least our average tickets sold) the last few years, but I will say per the steep incline of the seating design it at least appears to be a considerably larger arena on TV. If we can routinely fill it or at least regularly have near capacity crowds or better that create a more consistently effective home court advantage, I'm onboard.
vanillabryce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anyone see how empty GIA was yesterday on a Saturday v a top 20 team?

It doesn't bother me at all if we have a small field house.
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
may be the smallest, but we're the tallest!

- kkm

{ ippingsay offeecay }

pro ecclesia, pro javelina
Cove Dawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MrGolfguy said:

BYU 19,000
KU 16,300
Tech 15,000
ISU 14,400
WVU 14,000
OSU 13,600
KSU 12,500
Cincy 12,000
OU 11,500
UCF 10,000
Texas 10,000
Tcu 8,500
UH 7,100
Baylor 7,000


A damn shame!
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
foster pavilion - bring your oxygen!!!

- KKM

go bears!!!

beat the mormons!!!!

woooooooooo!!!!
pro ecclesia, pro javelina
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who cares how many seats it has? It's one of the loudest arenas in the Big12 and will be extremely tough to play in. I Duke is 9,300, Gonzaga is 6,000, Villanova is 6,500.

Success in basketball isn't determined how big your arena is.

Not to mention we didn't fill up Ferrell unless it was a blockbuster matchup
Robert Wilson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Seem like maybe the newer ones are smaller? UT is the largest school and has the 11th largest arena. Actually UCF right there with them.
MrGolfguy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear said:

Who cares how many seats it has? It's one of the loudest arenas in the Big12...
How do you know this as a fact? Have you been to the other Big12 arenas and measured & compared decibel levels to FP?
Isn't it true that they all likely are "loud"?
Isn't it true that 16,000 people (or 14,000? or 12,000? or 10,000?) can potentially make more noise than 7,000?
PartyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Moody Center is brand new and based on the size of UT it is the equivalent of Baylor having a 4K seat arena. If going smaller wasn't the trend as to where things are going I'm sure Texas would not have spent 375 million to do this.
Quinton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear said:



Success in basketball isn't determined how big your arena is.

Not to mention we didn't fill up Ferrell unless it was a blockbuster matchup


Agree on the success part. But disagree with logic on the second part. No teams really fill up for small time games. It's not unique and is true across the country.

Bu drew way more than Tcu or Houston (9.4k avg last year) at the time of their remodels but Bu downsized more than both. Probably a bit too small but the venue is nice. Most wanted in the low to mid 8s.

Point is Bu basketball quantitatively draws more than several programs on the list. Now they can't. I agree with the future being sized down. Just think the made it a little too small.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear said:

Who cares how many seats it has? It's one of the loudest arenas in the Big12 and will be extremely tough to play in. I Duke is 9,300, Gonzaga is 6,000, Villanova is 6,500.

Success in basketball isn't determined how big your arena is.

Not to mention we didn't fill up Ferrell unless it was a blockbuster matchup
Agreed. Baylor fans spend way too much time worrying about things that don't matter at all. And it almost always stems from insecurity and being made fun of at work or online by fans of other schools.

Who cares? In the Foster Pavilion, Baylor now has one of the nicest basketball venues in the country, much less the Big 12. The seating capacity literally doesn't matter. It won't impact the atmosphere, as this 7,000-seat venue will be far louder than our previous 10,000-seat one. And in most cases, it will accommodate most if not all fans that want to attend a particular game.
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MrGolfguy said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:

Who cares how many seats it has? It's one of the loudest arenas in the Big12...
How do you know this as a fact? Have you been to the other Big12 arenas and measured & compared decibel levels to FP?
Isn't it true that they all likely are "loud"?
Isn't it true that 16,000 people (or 14,000? or 12,000? or 10,000?) can potentially make more noise than 7,000?


Well obviously but it comes down to how the arenas are designed, an arena like foster will be louder than the ferrell due to the way the sound waves are bouncing around the arena. More with less. Not to mention our seats are closer to the court

Autzen Stadium is one of the loudest in college football due to its design despite having a capacity of 54,000 people
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quinton said:

BigGameBaylorBear said:



Success in basketball isn't determined how big your arena is.

Not to mention we didn't fill up Ferrell unless it was a blockbuster matchup


Agree on the success part. But disagree with logic on the second part. No teams really fill up for small time games. It's not unique and is true across the country.

Bu drew way more than Tcu or Houston (9.4k avg last year) at the time of their remodels but Bu downsized more than both. Probably a bit too small but the venue is nice. Most wanted in the low to mid 8s.

Point is Bu basketball quantitatively draws more than several programs on the list. Now they can't. I agree with the future being sized down. Just think the made it a little too small.


5500 fans for a week night game at Foster will be a better home field advantage than 5500 fans at Ferrell.
MrGolfguy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:


The seating capacity literally doesn't matter. It won't impact the atmosphere, as this 7,000-seat venue will be far louder than our previous 10,000-seat one.
How do you know this as a fact? 9,000 to 10,000 people make far more noise than 7,000. Fact.
The FC was damn loud; I went to the 1st game there & the last, and hundreds in between. It was it's loudest when 9,000 or 10,000 fans were in there, but also plenty loud when 'only' 7,000 to 8,000 were there. Loud is loud. FP will be plenty loud but saying FC was something less is simply not true.
Quinton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sure, but that has little to do with what I said. I'm not a supporter of the FC.

I could say 8500 in a home game in a new arena v Ku is better than 7500 in a new arena.. and is more important than the 6k at a no name game on ESPN+. That's why it's an argument but the capacity is what it is now. Just win at this point
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MrGolfguy said:

bear2be2 said:


The seating capacity literally doesn't matter. It won't impact the atmosphere, as this 7,000-seat venue will be far louder than our previous 10,000-seat one.
How do you know this as a fact? 9,000 to 10,000 people make far more noise than 7,000. Fact.
The FC was damn loud; I went to the 1st game there & the last, and hundreds in between. It was it's loudest when 9,000 or 10,000 fans were in there, but also plenty loud when 'only' 7,000 to 8,000 were there. Loud is loud. FP will be plenty loud but saying FC was something less is simply not true.
The Ferrell Center wasn't loud. It took 9,000 or 10,000 fans to make it loud because it was a noise-suppressing cave. And we only drew those kinds of crowds a handful of times a season.

The Foster Pavilion was designed to maximize noise. A capacity crowd there will be much louder than the Ferrell Center ever was. And the smaller seating capacity will get us that atmosphere way more often than we got it at the Ferrell Center.
blackie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When we had crowds in the FC greater than 7,500, how many of those were actually Baylor fans versus Texas, TCU, Tech, OU, KU etc. fans? And how many of those got their tickets fairly close to game day? Point being do we really think in the FC Baylor had more than 75% of those in attendance with the possible exception of some outliers? I don't. I like the size. The difference now is that you need to get any available tickets much further in advance if it is a game with a more interesting opponent. The goal should be that outside of whatever allotment we have to set aside for conference opponents because of conference rules, the rest of the seats should be filled with Baylor butts.

But, whether you like the size or not, it is what we have and it ain't gonna change. IMO, they made the right choice.
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cove Dawg said:

MrGolfguy said:

BYU 19,000
KU 16,300
Tech 15,000
ISU 14,400
WVU 14,000
OSU 13,600
KSU 12,500
Cincy 12,000
OU 11,500
UCF 10,000
Texas 10,000
Tcu 8,500
UH 7,100
Baylor 7,000


A damn shame!


Now do wins per year
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
blackie said:

When we had crowds in the FC greater than 7,500, how many of those were actually Baylor fans versus Texas, TCU, Tech, OU, KU etc. fans? And how many of those got their tickets fairly close to game day? Point being do we really think in the FC Baylor had more than 75% of those in attendance with the possible exception of some outliers? I don't. I like the size. The difference now is that you need to get any available tickets much further in advance if it is a game with a more interesting opponent. The goal should be that outside of whatever allotment we have to set aside for conference opponents because of conference rules, the rest of the seats should be filled with Baylor butts.

But, whether you like the size or not, it is what we have and it ain't gonna change. IMO, they made the right choice.
I'm with you. Sports viewership and attendance is trending downward across the board. Practicality won out over vanity in this case. We could have built an 8,000-seat arena, and it would have been fine. But if the goal is to consistently have a good, Baylor-friendly atmosphere, 7,000-7,500 is a good number. It eliminates the dozen-plus games we had every season at the Ferrell Center with a half-empty arena and maintains a great homecourt advantage for marquee matchups.
MrGolfguy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:



The Ferrell Center wasn't loud.

A capacity crowd there will be much louder than the Ferrell Center ever was.
The first statement simply isn't true. FC was plenty loud. I'd suggest having your hearing checked.
The second statement is a guess on your part that you have no idea of, you're just pulling something out of your ass; likely untrue b/c 9K-10K is louder than 7K. It's an unarguable fact.
EasyE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What happened tonit being 7500? Did someone break some seats or get out a tarp?
MrGolfguy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They say it has room for 500 SRO which would make 7500. As it is 7,000 fixed seats.
RightRevBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fre3dombear said:

Cove Dawg said:

MrGolfguy said:

BYU 19,000
KU 16,300
Tech 15,000
ISU 14,400
WVU 14,000
OSU 13,600
KSU 12,500
Cincy 12,000
OU 11,500
UCF 10,000
Texas 10,000
Tcu 8,500
UH 7,100
Baylor 7,000


A damn shame!


Now do wins per year


So do you think we could outdraw UT if we had a better record. I mean if that was the case McLane Stadium should have been built with the seating capacity of Kyle Field, because our record was much better than ATM's.
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RightRevBear said:

Fre3dombear said:

Cove Dawg said:

MrGolfguy said:

BYU 19,000
KU 16,300
Tech 15,000
ISU 14,400
WVU 14,000
OSU 13,600
KSU 12,500
Cincy 12,000
OU 11,500
UCF 10,000
Texas 10,000
Tcu 8,500
UH 7,100
Baylor 7,000


A damn shame!


Now do wins per year


So do you think we could outdraw UT if we had a better record. I mean if that was the case McLane Stadium should have been built with the seating capacity of Kyle Field, because our record was much better than ATM's.


Not sure where that logic non sequitur comes from but point being we draw way less than texas and win way more

Correlation / causality and ****
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MrGolfguy said:

bear2be2 said:



The Ferrell Center wasn't loud.

A capacity crowd there will be much louder than the Ferrell Center ever was.
The first statement simply isn't true. FC was plenty loud. I'd suggest having your hearing checked.
The second statement is a guess on your part that you have no idea of, you're just pulling something out of your ass; likely untrue b/c 9K-10K is louder than 7K. It's an unarguable fact.
10,000 screaming into a void isn't as loud as 7,000 voices bouncing off each other.

Your argument seems to be that stadium/arena design doesn't impact noise levels, which is absurd on its face.

The Ferrell Center was a cavernous dome that swallowed noise. The Foster Pavilion is the opposite. If you want to continue to argue that the Ferrell Center was the optimal basketball environment, you can do so by yourself.
OverseasBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
According to the TCU athletic website, Ed & Rae Schollmaier Arena is the home for TCU men's and women's basketball as well as volleyball with a seating capacity of 6,800. Not sure of the source for 8,500.
RightRevBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fre3dombear said:

RightRevBear said:

Fre3dombear said:

Cove Dawg said:

MrGolfguy said:

BYU 19,000
KU 16,300
Tech 15,000
ISU 14,400
WVU 14,000
OSU 13,600
KSU 12,500
Cincy 12,000
OU 11,500
UCF 10,000
Texas 10,000
Tcu 8,500
UH 7,100
Baylor 7,000


A damn shame!


Now do wins per year


So do you think we could outdraw UT if we had a better record. I mean if that was the case McLane Stadium should have been built with the seating capacity of Kyle Field, because our record was much better than ATM's.


Not sure where that logic non sequitur comes from but point being we draw way less than texas and win way more

Correlation / causality and ****


I might have misunderstood your point when you said to do it by wins. I was thinking that you thought that if you win you will attract larger crowds. This is true to a point. Attendance is usually better when a team is winning compared to when they are losing. My point though was that attendance is primarily based on fanbase size, not wins. My point about the stadium was that if wins are the determining factor, then we should have a huge stadium. We were winning a lot then.

I was using reducto ad absurdum to show the fallacy. From your follow-up post I think I misunderstood what you were saying.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
vanillabryce said:

Anyone see how empty GIA was yesterday on a Saturday v a top 20 team?

It doesn't bother me at all if we have a small field house.

OSU fans didn't show up in large numbers because they expected to lose. I'm glad we didn't disappoint.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear said:

Who cares how many seats it has? It's one of the loudest arenas in the Big12 and will be extremely tough to play in. I Duke is 9,300, Gonzaga is 6,000, Villanova is 6,500.

Success in basketball isn't determined how big your arena is.

Not to mention we didn't fill up Ferrell unless it was a blockbuster matchup

I wish it had more seats so I could afford to go to a MBB game! Right now that's unlikely.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Last Page
Page 1 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.