Great time to go to it. But why was Cincinnati so befuddled by it. Ironically, we had the best help defense we've had all year.
Cincinnati doesn't shoot well from the outside and they couldn't get inside against the zone. They were forced to take jump shots and they couldn't knock them down until Skillings hit a couple of big ones late.BUCANDOIT82 said:
Great time to go to it. But why was Cincinnati so befuddled by it. Ironically, we had the best help defense we've had all year.
vanillabryce said:
I loved the move to zone. Going forward teams will have to prepare for that. And I thought we really played well, and rebounded well out of it.
Yep. A well-run zone is always better than a poorly run man. And there's nothing more manly or pure about the latter.contrario said:
It's isn't an admission of weakness, it's a smart strategy when properly implemented. I trust our national championship winning coach.
Stefano DiMera said:
Undefeated in the Bill Gates Girlfriend Arena.
contrario said:
It's isn't an admission of weakness, it's a smart strategy when properly implemented. I trust our national championship winning coach.
Bakersdozen said:
Can't win championships playing zone. It is an admission of weakness to depend on it. Better teams than Cincy would have murdered our zone but…we won and that's all that matters.
Stefano DiMera said:
Undefeated in the Bill Gates Girlfriend Arena.
But that was only because Tang was still on staff....right?historian said:
According to some. There are also some he think Scott Drew cannot coach. They have been pretty silent since April 5, 2021.
Welcome to Baylor basketball over the past 8 or 10 years.dstaylor57 said:
Defense looked much better, offense not so much. Too much globetrotter weave. Not enough inside outside.
historian said:
The fact that Drew went back and forth must have made a huge difference. That's great coaching.
Crawfoso1973 said:Welcome to Baylor basketball over the past 8 or 10 years.dstaylor57 said:
Defense looked much better, offense not so much. Too much globetrotter weave. Not enough inside outside.
Three of our five best seasons and three of our four deepest tournament runs in modern program history came running zone almost exclusively.Porteroso said:Bakersdozen said:
Can't win championships playing zone. It is an admission of weakness to depend on it. Better teams than Cincy would have murdered our zone but…we won and that's all that matters.
In spurts it is really good. Obviously you can't reliably win playing even 30% zone, but at the end when emotions are high, bodies are tired, it can be super confusing to see for a few plays. Because most teams generally play it, no matter how you prepare, it is such a different look all the sudden. And if it is working, don't change until they figure it out.
I don't think Nunn's blow-by issue yesterday was anything that can't be fixed. He was just anticipating too much and got caught flat-footed on pick-and-roll situations where the penetrating guard went opposite of the screen.Hotsauce said:
There was some hope with Nunn after the BYU game, but now we know that he's completely unplayable in man-to-man. Zone is probably a necessity moving forward in conference play.
bear2be2 said:Three of our five best seasons and three of our four deepest tournament runs in modern program history came running zone almost exclusively.Porteroso said:Bakersdozen said:
Can't win championships playing zone. It is an admission of weakness to depend on it. Better teams than Cincy would have murdered our zone but…we won and that's all that matters.
In spurts it is really good. Obviously you can't reliably win playing even 30% zone, but at the end when emotions are high, bodies are tired, it can be super confusing to see for a few plays. Because most teams generally play it, no matter how you prepare, it is such a different look all the sudden. And if it is working, don't change until they figure it out.
And under Drew, our zone teams graded significantly higher than all but a few of our man teams have in defensive efficiency.
I'll support Scott Drew and whatever defense he wants to run. And I tend to think our best bet is probably a mix of man and zone. But history has shown Drew to be a much better teacher of zone defense than man. And I would welcome a full-time switch back to the zone if it meant climbing from 70s and 100s in defensive efficiency back into the 30s.
Agreed but mainly I think it's because he tries to play guys way up too close and gets blown by. He could get away with defending lesser players that close but not at this level. Walter was doing this earlier in the season but appears to have corrected it. Holding out hope that Nunn can get this corrected as we move forward.Quinton said:
It's happened too often now. His stance and footwork are poor. Base way too thin too often. Moving at the back a lot. It would take a lot of fundamental work to get it corrected unfortunately.
Previous clips his defense looked okay so I agree the guessing in coverage is making it much worse. Has been blown by nearly as much as the guards from last year. Still a "better" defender than those but barely. Doesn't make a whole lot of sense since he's a capable athlete but instinct and fundamentals on defense just isn't close