I know he's really good and the pundits keep talking about him as a 1 & done but he could use more development.
These guys get bad intel from self-serving sources in a lot of cases.Johnny Bear said:
That's generally been true about just about all the one and dones we've ever had - and yet with rare exceptions they've all still left.
Not nearly as life-changing as a second NBA contract would be. And a second-round pick almost never gets a second contract.Crawfoso1973 said:
It is easy to judge those guys as dumb but $500,000 2nd round money is life-changing for some of these kids. Take Kendall Brown for example, his rookie year he fractured his tibia which resulted in him having surgery and being out for the season. He made a half million on that rookie deal. If he would have returned for Baylor he would have likely suffered the same injury and then would have been out for the year and not drafted after year 2. Then he would have been in his 3rd year in college when his upside would have been perceived as lower, plus coming off of that injury he might have lost a step. You can't blame Kendall Brown for getting what money he could, when he could. In hindsight he made the absolute correct decision.
A kid that leaves college, goes to the NBA, gets 40+ hours a week of coaching, training, conditioning, nutrition etc will grow up and mature much quicker than one additional season of college hoops.DanaDane said:
Our fans see a starting center who displays glimpses of magical talent from time to time but struggles with situational awareness, lack of experience and not a significant amount of production. Our fans are looking at what he does NOW.
NBA scouts see an 18 year old who has only been playing organized ball for 2 years so it will be easy to guide him in a direction you want to develop, displays hand-eye-coordination you don't typically see with a kid that big, possesses facets of a game that oozes potential, and they are projecting where he will be in the FUTURE.
NBA GMs don't always draft on what stats you produce NOW. Missi will be drafted on where they think he'll be in a few years.
Given his age, Missi is in a unique situation where he and his advisors will have to decide whether it would be better for him to mature in a more comfortable living and travel situation with college ball for 1 more year vs. the rigors of being that young, traveling frequently and being an adult while trying to develop while also recognizing the significant amount of money that comes with going pro. It will be an interesting decision.
The truth is NBA GMs don't really care whether Missi develops or not. He's a lottery ticket, like most draft picks. If he works, great. If he doesn't, he'll be drafted over and replaced within two or three years.DanaDane said:
Our fans see a starting center who displays glimpses of magical talent from time to time but struggles with situational awareness, lack of experience and not a significant amount of production. Our fans are looking at what he does NOW.
NBA scouts see an 18 year old who has only been playing organized ball for 2 years so it will be easy to guide him in a direction you want to develop, displays hand-eye-coordination you don't typically see with a kid that big, possesses facets of a game that oozes potential, and they are projecting where he will be in the FUTURE.
NBA GMs don't always draft on what stats you produce NOW. Missi will be drafted on where they think he'll be in a few years.
Given his age, Missi is in a unique situation where he and his advisors will have to decide whether it would be better for him to mature in a more comfortable living and travel situation with college ball for 1 more year vs. the rigors of being that young, traveling frequently and being an adult while trying to develop while also recognizing the significant amount of money that comes with going pro. It will be an interesting decision.
Except that the NBA isn't about development. And its developmental league is a joke.LIB,MR BEARS said:A kid that leaves college, goes to the NBA, gets 40+ hours a week of coaching, training, conditioning, nutrition etc will grow up and mature much quicker than one additional season of college hoops.DanaDane said:
Our fans see a starting center who displays glimpses of magical talent from time to time but struggles with situational awareness, lack of experience and not a significant amount of production. Our fans are looking at what he does NOW.
NBA scouts see an 18 year old who has only been playing organized ball for 2 years so it will be easy to guide him in a direction you want to develop, displays hand-eye-coordination you don't typically see with a kid that big, possesses facets of a game that oozes potential, and they are projecting where he will be in the FUTURE.
NBA GMs don't always draft on what stats you produce NOW. Missi will be drafted on where they think he'll be in a few years.
Given his age, Missi is in a unique situation where he and his advisors will have to decide whether it would be better for him to mature in a more comfortable living and travel situation with college ball for 1 more year vs. the rigors of being that young, traveling frequently and being an adult while trying to develop while also recognizing the significant amount of money that comes with going pro. It will be an interesting decision.
If offered 1st round money, take it.
I hope for his sake and ours we are.DanaDane said:
Oh, I'd definitely take it. But I don't think those are the conversations that have taken place with Missi and his situation. From my understanding, Missi is highly enjoying being a kid. Some of you may be surprised in April.
That's exactly why I won't be completely surprised. I don't think this one is as sure fire "he's going" as situations like Kendal's, Keyonte's and Ja'Kobe's, which were all basically decided before they stepped foot on campus.bear2be2 said:
And at his age, the risk of losing ground by staying is minimal.
I hope you're right. I want him back at Baylor next year for purely selfish reasons. And, just as I can be selfish, I'm not gonna hold it against a kid for being "selfish" regarding an amount of money that can be life-changing.DanaDane said:
Oh, I'd definitely take it. But I don't think those are the conversations that have taken place with Missi and his situation. From my understanding, Missi is highly enjoying being a kid. Some of you may be surprised in April.
BigGameBaylorBear said:
Sicem should write an article about this topic. I don't know how many roster spots we have but we need to start talking about who should leave and stay
To my knowledge, Walter, Ray J, and JTT are leaving; Grimes left so that's 4 open spots next year
Missi and Bridges may leave.
We have 4 guys coming in next year?
I think Lohner should transfer or retire
Ideally, we need to hold on to Bridges, Love, and Missi IMO
Missi is the only ?mark and I'd like to see Lohner stay.BigGameBaylorBear said:
Sicem should write an article about this topic. I don't know how many roster spots we have but we need to start talking about who should leave and stay
To my knowledge, Walter, Ray J, and JTT are leaving; Grimes left so that's 4 open spots next year
Missi and Bridges may leave.
We have 4 guys coming in next year?
I think Lohner should transfer or retire
Ideally, we need to hold on to Bridges, Love, and Missi IMO
This is is his fifth season. He played two at Boise State and two at Toledo. He's done after this year.IowaBear said:
I think Dennis has another year. Now whether he would want to use it I have no idea
historian said:
I know he's really good and the pundits keep talking about him as a 1 & done but he could use more development.
Guitarbiscuit said:historian said:
I know he's really good and the pundits keep talking about him as a 1 & done but he could use more development.
Based on past history, the answer is a resounding NO. And these one and done players are a reason we will stay at .500 level in Big 12 play if we're lucky.