1 - KU
2 - BU
3 - OSU

He is kind of a specialist for stadiums etc. He ranks all of them.

Curious that he's grading each of them mainly on aesthetics. I would think there are other criteria that are just as important if not more so, especially home court advantage.

I also find myself disagreeing with him somewhat. OSU's arena is not that much better than the rest of the league, for example. I also noticed his photos of TCU's arena are older because I didn't see their hideous floor. If you are grading them in aesthetics, there's must be near the bottom simply because the court is what people see the most and theirs is ugly! To my knowledge, only Oregon's is worse.

historian said:

---

Curious that he's grading each of them mainly on aesthetics. I would think there are other criteria that are just as important if not more so, especially home court advantage.

I also find myself disagreeing with him somewhat. OSU's arena is not that much better than the rest of the league, for example. I also noticed his photos of TCU's arena are older because I didn't see their hideous floor. If you are grading them in aesthetics, there's must be near the bottom simply because the court is what people see the most and theirs is ugly! To my knowledge, only Oregon's is worse.

---

It does blind the eyes