Baylor line against Cincinnati

1,735 Views | 14 Replies | Last: 8 mo ago by Stefano DiMera
gobears20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
Baylor -5.5
O/u 140.5
PartyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cincinnati beat Kansas by 20. Wild outcome.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PartyBear said:

Cincinnati beat Kansas by 20. Wild outcome.
Kansas was without Dickinson and McCulllar and finished the game without Adams.

Good win for Cincy, but KU was way shorthanded.
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No disrespect but I'm not sure there's a B12 team who wouldn't have beaten KU last night. They're crap without KM. And god awful without both KM and Dickinson
PartyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think Cincinnati's HC is a good young HC though as well.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PartyBear said:

I think Cincinnati's HC is a good young HC though as well.
I still think Cincinnati is a pretty good team. They, Kansas State and UCF are all potential tournament teams in the ACC, Big Ten or the PAC-12.
TWD 1974
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

No disrespect but I'm not sure there's a B12 team who wouldn't have beaten KU last night. They're crap without KM. And god awful without both KM and Dickinson
With all the missed open 3s and turnovers, you could have told me it was a frat team in the Jayhawks unis.
BUatbirth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KU is thin anyway…and without their top two, forget it. It's tournament time, and we can't keep spotting any team the first half and expect to be dancing long.
Quinton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PartyBear said:

Cincinnati beat Kansas by 20. Wild outcome.


That was a mid major team out there last night
Crawfoso1973
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cincy is a pretty bad offensive team but not sure which Baylor team will show up. Historically we tend to sleepwalk in the big 12 tourney, and this year might be no different because we really have very little to play for. On the other hand, for Cincy this game is for all the marbles.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Crawfoso1973 said:

Cincy is a pretty bad offensive team but not sure which Baylor team will show up. Historically we tend to sleepwalk in the big 12 tourney, and this year might be no different because we really have very little to play for. On the other hand, for Cincy this game is for all the marbles.
Cincinnati is up into the low-70s now for offensive efficiency. They're bad on offense in the same way we are on defense. On a universal scale -- judged against all 300-plus Division I teams -- they're more average than bad. But they're bad for a good team.

Fortunately, we've been better on offense than they have defense, so we have a bunch of close wins where they have close losses. But these are two tight-margin teams because of the extreme gap between their efficiency levels on the opposite ends of the court.

Unless we can just run away from a gassed Cincinnati squad (my hope), I would expect this one to be pretty close as well.
dstaylor57
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cincy should have some dead legs in the second half, they are good on defense though.
JustWinBears
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dstaylor57 said:

Cincy should have some dead legs in the second half, they are good on defense though.


The problem will be is if Baylor has sleeping legs in the first.
Gobearsone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Way too late start for this old man that works very early tomorrow. Just win Bears.
Stefano DiMera
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No Langston Love tonight.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.