Love?

10,712 Views | 87 Replies | Last: 25 days ago by TWD 1974
EvilTroyAndAbed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The main point is that no one on this board knows anything, so to be disappointed in a player when you don't actually know anything is a choice.

I'm frustrated, but since there is no verified info, I choose to think the best of everyone's intentions.
davesburgerbarn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EvilTroyAndAbed said:

The main point is that no one on this board knows anything, so to be disappointed in a player when you don't actually know anything is a choice.

I'm frustrated, but since there is no verified info, I choose to think the best of everyone's intentions.


If I didn't have great sources, I wouldn't say anything. I have extremely credible people telling me stuff. This isn't my outside opinion. In fact, a lot of stuff I have refrained from saying out of respect to my sources.
http://www.onlyinyourstate.com/texas/mouthwatering-burgers-tx/

Save 20% when you mention SicEm365
EvilTroyAndAbed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So a guy who has hardly played in a season and a half is choosing not to play because that will endear him to NBA teams? Gotcha.
Big12Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stefano DiMera said:

Matt Mosley...who is an insider you can trust...tweeted last weekend that Feb 8th ...UCF...was the target date for Love's return..


I wouldn't be surprised if we will have a full lineup on Saturday for the first time since NYE. The cavalry is coming.
Quinton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Don't know why Roach was ever included in those posts. Not a great look to go somewhere after the game or whatever but dude has never missed time in his career and was coming off concussions.

That was weak of the dude to include him. Especially when the "insiders" are so soft in general when covering the program and their issues. Love, I still don't understand the situation but I get it. But different situations and should have never been paired
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quinton said:

Don't know why Roach was ever included in those posts. Not a great look to go somewhere after the game or whatever but dude has never missed time in his career and was coming off concussions.

That was weak of the dude to include him. Especially when the "insiders" are so soft in general when covering the program and their issues. Love, I still don't understand the situation but I get it. But different situations and should have never been paired
Agreed. It was really irresponsible to call him out that way IMO. Two weeks isn't an unreasonable amount of time to miss after your second concussion in a short period of time. I don't care what the circumstances are for or around those absences. That was pretty ****ty.
BUCANDOIT82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I disagree, Roach was the only Baylor Student at Scruffy Murphy's Saturday and that was worth noting.
Quinton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

Quinton said:

Don't know why Roach was ever included in those posts. Not a great look to go somewhere after the game or whatever but dude has never missed time in his career and was coming off concussions.

That was weak of the dude to include him. Especially when the "insiders" are so soft in general when covering the program and their issues. Love, I still don't understand the situation but I get it. But different situations and should have never been paired
Agreed. It was really irresponsible to call him out that way IMO. Two weeks isn't an unreasonable amount of time to miss after your second concussion in a short period of time. I don't care what the circumstances are for or around those absences. That was pretty ****ty.


I don't know why but it started to bother me as I saw him on the court. I had no doubt he would play again and it had nothing to do with Love's situation. Soft s***.

Look I know Roach really hasn't been any good and is getting paid.. but dude got concussed twice and was basically Ko'd on the floor very recently. Don't put that guy in that drama. Weak
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quinton said:

bear2be2 said:

Quinton said:

Don't know why Roach was ever included in those posts. Not a great look to go somewhere after the game or whatever but dude has never missed time in his career and was coming off concussions.

That was weak of the dude to include him. Especially when the "insiders" are so soft in general when covering the program and their issues. Love, I still don't understand the situation but I get it. But different situations and should have never been paired
Agreed. It was really irresponsible to call him out that way IMO. Two weeks isn't an unreasonable amount of time to miss after your second concussion in a short period of time. I don't care what the circumstances are for or around those absences. That was pretty ****ty.


I don't know why but it started to bother me as I saw him on the court. I had no doubt he would play again and it had nothing to do with Love's situation. Soft s***.

Look I know Roach really hasn't been any good and is getting paid.. but dude got concussed twice and was basically Ko'd on the floor very recently. Don't put that guy in that drama. Weak
I'm with you. I don't even particularly like Roach's game very much. But publicly questioning his character after suffering two concussions because he missed exactly one more game than you think he should have is nonsense.

His situation and Love's aren't in any way similar or related.
Quinton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BUCANDOIT82 said:

I disagree, Roach was the only Baylor Student at Scruffy Murphy's Saturday and that was worth noting.


There have been a lot for those close to the program to call out and not a word. Then to go off for that (Roach specifically) it was weak.

Love again have at it. I'm not going to pretend I understand what is going on in that one. I'm not talking about that part
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hodges post referenced both love and roach. It's not like he singled out Roach. He simply questioned Roach choosing to sit after being cleared and proceeding to hit up the bars after the game. It's a bad look even if unintentional. And Drew's comment was a clear call out to at minimum Love
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

Hodges post referenced both love and roach. It's not like he singled out Roach. He simply questioned Roach choosing to sit after being cleared and proceeding to hit up the bars after the game. It's a bad look even if unintentional. And Drew's comment was a clear call out to at minimum Love
The point is those two shouldn't have been paired, especially given that Roach was back on the court in a reasonable amount of time for a guy with multiple brain injuries in a short span.

If you want to call out Love, fine. But a guy with two concussions should get more than one game of grace before publicly calling his character into question.
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Must have missed the part where Hodge questioned Jeremy Roachs character.
Quinton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

Hodges post referenced both love and roach. It's not like he singled out Roach. He simply questioned Roach choosing to sit after being cleared and proceeding to hit up the bars after the game. It's a bad look even if unintentional. And Drew's comment was a clear call out to at minimum Love


I get that but these dudes have had plenty they could have mentioned over the last few years about the program and nothing. A college dude shouldn't have a beer at a bar when not playing.. I get it. But that's small potatoes. I have to be realistic.

Including him was simply trying to spread frustration when he very clearly was pissed at Love. The rest was just noise.

If you want to call dude out take a breath and call him out. Don't soften it by including a guy with zero history of not playing for extended periods and has nothing to do with the heart of the issue.
BUCANDOIT82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quinton said:

BUCANDOIT82 said:

I disagree, Roach was the only Baylor Student at Scruffy Murphy's Saturday and that was worth noting.


There have been a lot for those close to the program to call out and not a word. Then to go off for that (Roach specifically) it was weak.

Love again have at it. I'm not going to pretend I understand what is going on in that one. I'm not talking about that part
Come on Quinton, sarcasm!
Quinton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BUCANDOIT82 said:

Quinton said:

BUCANDOIT82 said:

I disagree, Roach was the only Baylor Student at Scruffy Murphy's Saturday and that was worth noting.


There have been a lot for those close to the program to call out and not a word. Then to go off for that (Roach specifically) it was weak.

Love again have at it. I'm not going to pretend I understand what is going on in that one. I'm not talking about that part
Come on Quinton, sarcasm!


82, I've got you now, my fault. I'm 100 with you. Well said. They got me pretty annoyed at this one for some reason it's affecting my comprehension
Booboo Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BUCANDOIT82 said:

I disagree, Roach was the only Baylor Student at Scruffy Murphy's Saturday and that was worth noting.
Only Baylor student at Scruff's on a Saturday night? What sort of spiritual revival is happening in Waco right now?

TWD 1974
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BUCANDOIT82 said:

I disagree, Roach was the only Baylor Student at Scruffy Murphy's Saturday and that was worth noting.
Is that the same establishment wherein a certain assistant football coach took uncertain relief at the bar?
“No eye has seen, no ear has heard, and no mind has imagined what God has prepared for those who love Him.” 1 Corinthians 2:9
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.