2025-26 Postmortem & Looking Ahead

48,256 Views | 359 Replies | Last: 3 mo ago by boognish_bear
Mitch Henessey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, ***** This season sucked. I won't spend too much time on analysis of this past season's Baylor basketball iteration, because so much digital ink has already been spilled on these boards trying to dissect what went wrong. My 3 point synopsis:

1) We had a Rob Wright-sized hole on this roster. Even with all this team's flaws, we are still probably a tournament team if we had a true PG. Wright screwed us, and I will never think of him positively as a result, unless he does something crazy like cure cancer. Granted, even with Wright, we're probably a 7-10 seed, so this year's team was a notable step down from our standard.

2) No two ways about it. Two of our biggest transfer portal gets, by NIL $$ expended, were massive busts. I don't know what happened to Michael Rataj between the World University Games this past summer, where he was reportedly one of the best players in the tournament, and the regular season, but he was at times unplayable. JJ White wasn't good, and was already mostly out of the rotation by the time his season-ending injury occurred. This has been a concerning trend the last couple of years.

If you're going to spend big money on experienced players in the transfer portal, they have to be hits. To borrow baseball parlance, we have had one home run (Norchad Omier), two doubles (Dan Skillings and Obi Agbim), and three strikeouts (Rataj, White, and Jeremy Roach). You simply cannot have that and expect to be a contender, in the Big 12 or the national level. Some of our lower-level portal adds have been great (Isaac Williams, Cameron Carr, and Caden Powell, to name a few), but if you're tying up most of your NIL dollars on complete whiffs, no amount of great scouting on lesser-name players can overcome that.

I have come to agree with what IowaBear has said in multiple threads. It's probably time to move on from our basketball GM, Jason Smith. I liked the interview Smith gave prior to the season on the direction the program wanted to go, but the guys he prioritized to fit the vision were just bad choices. Plus, some terrible luck/shadiness with Wright keeping us from being in on Elliott Cadeau (thanks Rob and his dad!).

3) I'm hopeful that losing every minute played from last year's squad caused a hard reset on the roster building philosophy employed by the program. There was an interesting reddit post this morning showing where all 16 teams left in the tournament's starting 5's began their college careers (https://www.reddit.com/r/CollegeBasketball/s/AmB1TQKsOn).

The takeaway is that there are a few approaches to building a roster. You can either recruit out of high school at an extremely high level (Duke, Arkansas, Houston and UConn, to a lesser extent), you can crush your portal adds (Michigan, Texas, St. John's), or you can build through roster continuity (Michigan State, Purdue, Iowa State, Illinois, and then Alabama, Houston, and Arizona, although they supplemented their rosters with high level recruits). Iowa is an outlier because they brought in a new coach who brought most of his previous roster with him.

We probably have to slot into the roster continuity bucket, given that we don't recruit at Arkansas or Duke level, we can't compete with Michigan's or Texas's NIL budget, and even when we try to, we spend it on the wrong guys half the time. I think this roster was a step in that direction, but it'll take another 2 years to find out if the reset took.

Who We're Losing:

Here are the guys we lose. I'll add another post to this thread to discuss who is coming back and likely roster needs.

For Sure Gone:

Obi Agbim - 10.7 ppg, 2.6 reb, 3.2 ast
Dan Skillings - 9.6 ppg, 5.9 reb, 2.1 ast
Michael Rataj - 7.6 ppg, 4.8 reb, 1.8 ast
Caden Powell - 6.9 ppg, 6.3 reb, 1.4 ast

These guys are out of eligibility. They can't come back, even if there was mutual desire between Baylor and the player.

Almost Definitely Gone:

Cameron Carr - 19.2 ppg, 5.5 reb, 2.7 ast
JJ White - 1.5 ppg, 0.8 reb, 0.0 ast

Carr is going to be a first rounder, and his game fits what the NBA is looking for. He joins a growing list of guys we've developed more quickly than anticipated (Jeremy Sochan, Yves Missi, and now Carr). I will be completely stunned if White is back next year, even if he wins his appeal for a medical hardship year. I would expect him to return to the mid-major level next year, if at all.

On The Fence:

Tounde Yessoufou - 17.8 ppg, 5.8 reb, 1.6 ast
Mayo Soyoye - Redshirt

On the one hand, Tounde was assumed to be a one-and-done before the season. On the other, this year's draft class is loaded, and Tounde could be a lottery pick with another year of development. I'd expect him to declare and remain in the draft if he gets a 1st round guarantee from a team. The interesting aspect will be if he simultaneously declares and enters the portal. Soyoye has good size (6'10", 234), but I wonder if his path is blocked by James Nnaji, who is more highly regarded and more physically mature. I would not be surprised by Soyoye returning or leaving.

Based on the classifications above, we're guaranteed to lose 42.1% of our scoring, likely to lose 67.2%, and could possibly lose 88.7%. For rebounding, that shakes out to 53.3% gone, 70.4% likely gone, and 86.1% possibly gone. For assists, 53.8%, 70.9%, and 81.0%.

Regardless, we have a lot of production to replace this upcoming season. What remains to be seen is how much, and how much of it comes from outside the current program.
Mitch Henessey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Next Year's Roster:

Rosters in CBB are fluid, so this is based on assumptions I'm making as of today.

PG: Isaac Williams (JR) 6'1", 192
Wing: Elijah Williams (FR) 6'6", 200, #31 player nationally
Andre Igodula II (RsFR) 6'7" 170
Forward: Maikcol Perez (RsFR) 6'8" 215
Big: Juslin Bodo Bodo (RsJR) 6'11" 231
James Nnaji (SO) 7'0" 255

We have some good size on next year's roster. If Tounde and Soyoye return, this gets even more fun, as you'd add a 6'5" wing and a 6'10" forward to the mix. We know what we have in Isaac Williams, and the expectation is that he'll make another leap, based on his improvement this year and his work ethic. I don't know what to expect from Elijah Williams, but I do think he'll be a smart player who fits the culture well, given that his dad is longtime NBA coach Monty Williams. If he is equipped to be a scorer, there's room for him to do that next year. If Igudola is anything like his dad, he should be a plus defensively, but he really needs to get stronger in the off-season. I don't think he'll be much more than a rotational player next year, and will be pleasantly surprised by anything we get offensively.

Perez would have likely cracked the rotation this year, if not for his injury. I expect him to be a rotation piece next year. Bodo Bodo needs to stay the hell away from ATVs this off-season. I'm excited to see what he can do, as he was the best defender on what turned out to be a salty High Point squad. I expect that he will be the starting big and that we'll see an improved Nnaji backing him up, once he's had a full year of conditioning and learning the system.

What We'll Need to Add:

Scoring. More specifically, shooting. Right now, even if Tounde comes back, this team isn't scaring anyone from behind the arc. Adding at least one high-level shooter is a must, and we probably need two.

We need another ball handler. The little I've read suggests that we'll target a high-level PG aggressively and that Isaac Williams will either start with or back up that player.

I'd also love to see us add a junkyard dog, high energy player in the post. Think of someone in the Quincy Acy/Mark Vital/Johnathan Tchamwa Tchatchoua mold. Ironically, if Skillings had another year of eligibility, he would be a great fit.

If we add players that can fit those roles, I think we would have a solid 9-man rotation with the potential to be a mid-level Big 12 squad. Which would mean making the tournament and being a piece or two away from making some real noise the following season.
BUBradley
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Really glad you made this thread as its time to look forward to next season.

I am already seeing posts of players entering the transfer portal so just have to share who we would want as more and more players enter. We might even have some of the players on our current roster enter the portal.

Would really like to get 1-2 players that are on the top of the board of the transfer portal but we are going to need the $$ to buy them and its never been more competitive.
Mitch Henessey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The transfer portal opens on April 7th, two days after the national championship game. So far, there are 129 players who have either entered, or declared their intention to enter the portal. Of those 129, 2 players have committed to a new school.

The prize player in the portal at the moment is rising SR F, Kwame Evans Jr., who averaged 13.3 ppg and 7.4 reb for an underachieving Oregon team. He's listed at 6'10" 220. I don't believe we'll be in the mix for him, however.
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I was under the impression Agbim was possibly eligible for another year? That said, I'd only want him back if he was going to play his natural position
Mitch Henessey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

I was under the impression Agbim was possibly eligible for another year? That said, I'd only want him back if he was going to play his natural position
I'm not sure, as he was a JUCO guy, and their eligibility has been up in the air. I assume he's going to have to appeal to get the extra year.

Regardless, I agree with your second point. He was much better, and our team subsequently was, once he played the 2. If we get another PG, we wouldn't have to worry about him playing out of position.
El Oso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The season isn't over yet. There's at least one game left and as many as three.
Bearsalwayswin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
i didn't think so, where'd you hear this? i think your right though it would be good to move him from pg if he did come back.
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
One of the more knowledgeable posters on here mentioned it. Unfortunately I'm forgetting which poster. Something about a JUCO ruling that would end up giving him another season
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Illustrating the point Mitch said he saw being made on Reddit about different approaches to roster construction by top teams

bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

One of the more knowledgeable posters on here mentioned it. Unfortunately I'm forgetting which poster. Something about a JUCO ruling that would end up giving him another season

I don't know that Agbim would have much hope of getting that JUCO year back given that he played two full years of Division II ball before his two in DI at Wyoming at Baylor. But I've been baffled on a number of occasions by who the NCAA has granted extra years to and who they haven't.

I honestly don't have much clue what goes into those decisions anymore.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good posts and discussion Mitch. I hope we bring back every player that we can, though I'm assuming Cameron Carr is gone. As much as I'd love to have him back, he'd probably be dumb to stay.

I want a good nucleus to build around when we go shopping in the portal this year. We desperately need some continuity so we can rebuild some sort of sustainable program culture and standard.

We need to get back to having leaders who have been in the program for multiple years who can pass the torch to the next group when they leave. They don't need to be here four or five years. But a good group of five or so players who are here for at least two would do wonders.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

Illustrating the point Mitch said he saw being made on Reddit about different approaches to roster construction by top teams



I've been arguing with people here about this for years now. It's still possible to keep players in your program -- not all of them, but enough to build a nucleus and maintain a culture/standard.

We've got to get back to that if we want to be relevant again on a national stage.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hard pass for me on any grad transfers. Get guys with multiple years of eligibility
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

Hard pass for me on any grad transfers. Get guys with multiple years of eligibility


Yeah.... and his stats in the Ivy League are not necessarily eye popping. But... on the other hand it seems like we are always in need of big men once the season gets going.
Mitch Henessey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The staff obviously knows better than we do what we need and how guys are developing, but looking at the guys we think should return, I think we're pretty ok on bigs (assuming Bodo Bodo is cleared to return).
bear_kessner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think the staff would choose Soyoye over Nnaji 100%.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear_kessner said:

I think the staff would choose Soyoye over Nnaji 100%.
With the number of scholarships available today, I don't know why you'd have to choose one over the other. I can't imagine either would cost much in NIL. Bring both back and let them compete for the backup post spot behind Bodo Bodo.
Adriacus Peratuun
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It would be great to look at Baylor's bench and see players 9-13 that look like D-1 basketball players and not like Accounting or Industrial Art majors.

bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Adriacus Peratuun said:

It would be great to look at Baylor's bench and see players 9-13 that look like D-1 basketball players and not like Accounting or Industrial Art majors.


In the NIL era, I don't think most programs use all 13 of their scholarships on real players/prospects. But you have to have more than the seven or eight that we've had in recent years.

I like the shift we made last year to adding more program type freshmen. That's a good way to use the end of your bench IMO because it at least gives you a chance to develop some rotation players. But you've got to keep those guys in your program and develop them into viable pieces.
Adriacus Peratuun
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

Adriacus Peratuun said:

It would be great to look at Baylor's bench and see players 9-13 that look like D-1 basketball players and not like Accounting or Industrial Art majors.


In the NIL era, I don't think most programs use all 13 of their scholarships on real players/prospects. But you have to have more than the seven or eight that we've had in recent years.

I like the shift we made last year to adding more program type freshmen. That's a good way to use the end of your bench IMO because it at least gives you a chance to develop some rotation players. But you've got to keep those guys in your program and develop them into viable pieces.


The House settlement bumped the MBB scholarship
Limit to 15.

Rotational options of 11ish and a couple of deep bench development players is a reasonable goal.

bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Adriacus Peratuun said:

bear2be2 said:

Adriacus Peratuun said:

It would be great to look at Baylor's bench and see players 9-13 that look like D-1 basketball players and not like Accounting or Industrial Art majors.


In the NIL era, I don't think most programs use all 13 of their scholarships on real players/prospects. But you have to have more than the seven or eight that we've had in recent years.

I like the shift we made last year to adding more program type freshmen. That's a good way to use the end of your bench IMO because it at least gives you a chance to develop some rotation players. But you've got to keep those guys in your program and develop them into viable pieces.


The House settlement bumped the MBB scholarship
Limit to 15.

Rotational options of 11ish and a couple of deep bench development players is a reasonable goal.


They could bump it up to 25 and it wouldn't matter. No one has used 13 since NIL became a thing. It's just too expensive for most programs to fill an entire roster, and your projects are as likely as not to be poached through the portal once they develop, so many don't even go after them at all.

But I think Drew is onto something in filing those last few spots with project freshmen who don't cost much in NIL. I like that strategy. In addition to the low cost, those guys tend to be more appreciative of the opportunities given to them, potentially building some program loyalty. It will just take time to pay off because those guys likely need two years at minimum to develop.

But I agree with your general sentiment. We need at least nine real rotation players every year, and ideally that number will be closer to 10 or 11 before injuries.
Adriacus Peratuun
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

Adriacus Peratuun said:

bear2be2 said:

Adriacus Peratuun said:

It would be great to look at Baylor's bench and see players 9-13 that look like D-1 basketball players and not like Accounting or Industrial Art majors.



In the NIL era, I don't think most programs use all 13 of their scholarships on real players/prospects. But you have to have more than the seven or eight that we've had in recent years.

I like the shift we made last year to adding more program type freshmen. That's a good way to use the end of your bench IMO because it at least gives you a chance to develop some rotation players. But you've got to keep those guys in your program and develop them into viable pieces.


The House settlement bumped the MBB scholarship
Limit to 15.

Rotational options of 11ish and a couple of deep bench development players is a reasonable goal.



They could bump it up to 25 and it wouldn't matter. No one has used 13 since NIL became a thing.

But I think Drew is onto something in filing those last few spots with project freshmen who don't cost much in NIL. It's just too expensive for most programs to fill an entire roster, and your projects are as likely as more to be poached through the portal, so many don't even go after them at all.

I like the strategy of filing your remaining scholarships with freshmen projects, though. Those guys didn't cost much in NIL and and they tend to be more appreciative of the opportunities given to them, potentially building some program loyalty. It will just take time to pay off because those guys likely need two years at minimum to develop.

But I agree with your general sentiment. We need at least nine real rotation players every year, and ideally that number will be closer to 10 or 11 before injuries.

Look at the UH, KU, AU and ISU rosters. 13-14 scholarship players deep is not impractical.
The best programs in the B12 are prepared for injuries.
Big12Fan2024
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Excellent post as usual, Mitch. I'm really interested in how Iguodola and Soyoye have grown.

A conscious decision was made to bring them both in with the intent to redshirt, which basically then ensured we would have a roster of only 10 potential rotation players, 2 redshirts and 3 walk-on level players. I was concerned at the time because every school (not just Baylor; but certainly Baylor for the past 5 years) typically has approximately 2 injuries during the course of a season, some which become season ending and some which result in various game absences. If a staff (not singling Baylor out; I'm talking about any staff) is not accounting for potential injuries then something is amiss.

Well, unfortunately for us, our injuries started even before the first ball was tipped in November as we lost Perez for the year with the ACL tear and Bodo Bodo was a mystery because there was no timeline on his injury other than TBD. Suddenly we were down to 8 players with no room for error. A few weeks into the season, we have another injury (JJ White) and he goes from "game time decision" in early December to never playing another game.

We're now down to only 7 players and there's no pulling of redshirts from Iguodola or Soyoye. The staff obviously started pursuing other alternatives in December and found Nnaji to get us to 8. So, I can only assume the staff felt like neither was at a point skill wise to impact this season's results significantly. I'm not calling the staff's decision out as wrong, just pointing out that both were likely too green which was to be expected in the first place since we were redshirting them.

For us to return to roster building this way, it will be imperative to hit on guys like these two to be, at minimum, rotation players who can contribute when called upon. I'm not expecting either to be world beaters in Year 2 (year 1 in playing terms) as I aways assumed it would take a couple of years for them to start being productive. What would really s uck, however, is if we used 2 positions to redshirt for development and either lost them to the portal or they were complete busts. IMHO, guys like these (along with Isaac Williams, although I can see him as a starter not just a rotational piece) are guys who we need to be a foundational base of rotational core players who then can allow us to supplement with some strong portal transfers.

That's is why I'm anxious to find out the progress those two in particular have made. Of course, I'm also anxious to see Perez. I'm always cautious of superlatives being thrown around when he's never played a game in college and quite frankly very few have seen him actually play, but I'm excited to see whether he becomes a solid starting piece or, at worst, a pivotal rotation player. And I'm also curious if Nnaji develops now that he'll have an entire offseason to work on conditioning, hopefully be at 100% physically, and adjust to college ball.
Ewalker80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This season was wrecked by one thing-byu's tortious interference with our RW contract. I have no idea why Baylor hasn't sued them yet. With all the other lawsuits now there's no pr reason not to do so.
GoodOleBaylorLine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PG: Isaac Williams (JR) 6'1", 192
Wing: Elijah Williams (FR) 6'6", 200, #31 player nationally
Andre Igodula II (RsFR) 6'7" 170
Forward: Maikcol Perez (RsFR) 6'8" 215
Big: Juslin Bodo Bodo (RsJR) 6'11" 231
James Nnaji (SO) 7'0" 255

So basically an untested roster (including portal adds) other than Williams, who we had to throw the kitchen sink at. Same as this season but locked up the PG this time (hopefully).

Tounde is gone. He should stay, but Drew has proven he cannot keep guys like him around. Someone closer to the program can tell me, but I am not even sure he tries.

bear_kessner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Soyoye
GoodOleBaylorLine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ok. Also untested.

I know we are going to add to what was posted, but the only player with real BU playing experience is Williams right?
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GoodOleBaylorLine said:

Ok. Also untested.

I know we are going to add to what was posted, but the only player with real BU playing experience is Williams right?

Though not with Baylor, Bodo Bodo has a ton of real playing experience (71 starts for two really good High Point teams), so I think we can expect him to be a reliable rotation player at the very least.

So we're starting with two starting caliber players IMO. Perez could be a third, but we won't know until we actually get to see him play.

I would imagine we're going to hit the portal pretty hard this offseason as we always do. The key is getting solid progress from the untested guys to add the depth that we've sorely lacked in recent years.
GoodOleBaylorLine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not sure Bodo Bodo and reliable go together. Reliable teammates don't go jacking around on an ATV over the break. This would be a violation of any real player contract, as opposed to whatever mickey mouse nonsense we seem to be using.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GoodOleBaylorLine said:

Not sure Bodo Bodo and reliable go together. Reliable teammates don't go jacking around on an ATV over the break. This would be a violation of any real player contract, as opposed to whatever mickey mouse nonsense we seem to be using.

Accidents happen. Outside of a crime being committed, I'm not going to make any single incident a referendum on any player's character or commitment level.

By Scott Drew's own account, Juslin Bodo Bodo is an "unbelievable teammate."
GoodOleBaylorLine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am also an unbelievable teammate and have contributed exactly as much as Bodo. Where is my NIL?
BUBradley
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GoodOleBaylorLine said:

I am also an unbelievable teammate and have contributed exactly as much as Bodo. Where is my NIL?

bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GoodOleBaylorLine said:

I am also an unbelievable teammate and have contributed exactly as much as Bodo. Where is my NIL?

Bodo Bodo has the exact same amount of eligibility remaining as he did the day we signed him. Why don't we wait and see what kind of contribution he can make to Baylor basketball before ****ting all over him?

Frankly, his injury could have been a blessing in disguise. I'd rather have him playing for two good Baylor teams than wasting a year on the bad one we just watched.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.