Adriacus Peratuun said:
Without telling me the exact amount (folks don't want to cross some lines), a friend in the upper reaches of the Baylor Admin offered that WBB currently has sufficient NIL funds to be a consistent NCAAT 2nd weekend team.
A reasonable conclusion from that comment is that WBB at least falls somewhere in the Top 20-25 of NIL funding and possibly in the Top 15.
Given that it is fairly easy to determine the current top funders: UConn, Texas, Tennessee, South Carolina, LSU, Duke, Louisville, Notre Dame, Ohio State, USC, UCLA, TCU, Vandy…..it should also be easy to figure that next tier…..Iowa, Michigan, UNC, NC State, Minnesota, Oregon, ATM, SMU, Ole Miss, Miami, etc.
How does our program compare to that group and to the end of the top funding group?
Think it is a fair assessment that the NIL situation isn't merely an "amount" issue but also a "use of funds" issue.
Didn't buy a starting PG when CNC repeatedly opines of her affinity for running a high ball screen offense.
First Portal buy last year was Pemberton who by any metric was a massive failure.
Great buy of Scott. Solid buys of Deng and Johnson. Brow was clearly a miss.
We also spent up on Fontleroy who clearly is heavily physically damaged.
After a slow start Buggs had a solid season. But although a great rebounder, she is an undersized 4 whose shooting range is 20 feet and is an average defender.
Is 1 great, 1 good, 2 solids and 3 misses a great NIL record?
CNC is not terrible. But neither is she delivering results above reasonable expectations.
The biggest worry is her failure to recruit players who fit her system.
Another big worry is a noticeable cap on player development.
The final big worry is being a team constantly reacting to game plans when playing top teams.
Can anyone name one game this season (against a top team) where our game plan dictated how the game was played?
Do we see Ines(not mentioned above)as a decent backup?I assume we will buy a starting point guard.