terrific story for women and team, my nickel says they all go.
These are ladies being invited not football players. I doubt they will get fast food.The only reason the football team got fast food was that the White House staff was off. No one was available to prepare anything.Jack Bauer said:
Fast food at the White House, it better be Whataburger.
It was her political beliefs that led to the stupid, obnoxious, and dangerous behavior--and her childish way of letting her radical politics influence her this way. Regardless of anyone's politics, there is no reason one cannot be civil.Timbear said:
Willtalk, the stupid woman was removed for disturbing the peace and threatening the safety of other passengers, not her political beliefs.
How true! Any tourist in Washington can take the tour. I did that when I was in Middle School and was unimpressed because it was very limited (I was a kid!). But they will meet with the president for a photo-op. That is unique. Then again, their accomplishments this season were special and unique. They have earned it.Quote:
Glad they are going. I would love to get to go to the White House, no matter who the president is. What an amazing opportunity that few get.
Jack Bauer said:
Fast food at the White House, it better be Whataburger.


Funny you should mention that! I was thinking along the same lines...WIBear said:
Does anyone know if the team will spend a few days in the D.C. area? There are a number of things to see in our nation's capitol. It could be a meaningful educational experience.
If not, hopefully it at least gets some coverage in the media - although given the way most of the MSM treats anything that possibly portrays Trump in a favorable light, it won't surprise me if it gets largely ignored or buried.historian said:
Does anyone know if the White House visit will be broadcast anywhere live?
Not bringing "politics" into it - just stating a fact.WIBear said:
Can we keep politics out of this? This is about our Lady Bears outstanding season.
Baring a historic incident, I don't think any White house visit is usually ever covered live.historian said:
Does anyone know if the White House visit will be broadcast anywhere live?
I would agree that they were just responding to "historics" question about media coverage. An opinion on how extensive the coverage would be was added along with their rationale as to why it might be limited.Johnny Bear said:Not bringing "politics" into it - just stating a fact.WIBear said:
Can we keep politics out of this? This is about our Lady Bears outstanding season.
Do you count twitter as live?willtalk said:Baring a historic incident, I don't think any White house visit is usually ever covered live.historian said:
Does anyone know if the White House visit will be broadcast anywhere live?
you are gonna need to rent a house for a month to get thru DC as a history buff. Spent a week and only scratched the surfacehistorian said:Funny you should mention that! I was thinking along the same lines...WIBear said:
Does anyone know if the team will spend a few days in the D.C. area? There are a number of things to see in our nation's capitol. It could be a meaningful educational experience.
I hope they take time to visit the Smithsonian and a must see is the National Archives to view the original Declaration of Independence and U.S. Constitution. Plus there are so many other museums, galleries, etc. I have a nice bucket list of places I want to visit if I ever get the chance to return.
I know. At the beginning of the century had a few opportunities to visit Europe and discovered the same issue in Berlin, Paris, Prague, London, and other cities: a week is barely enough for an introduction. To really experience all that these historic places have to offer would take much longer. Washington, D.C. is not nearly as old but still has many fine museums and so much history in or near the city. You could easily spend an entire week just in the Smithsonian and not do it all!Gruvin said:you are gonna need to rent a house for a month to get thru DC as a history buff. Spent a week and only scratched the surfacehistorian said:Funny you should mention that! I was thinking along the same lines...WIBear said:
Does anyone know if the team will spend a few days in the D.C. area? There are a number of things to see in our nation's capitol. It could be a meaningful educational experience.
I hope they take time to visit the Smithsonian and a must see is the National Archives to view the original Declaration of Independence and U.S. Constitution. Plus there are so many other museums, galleries, etc. I have a nice bucket list of places I want to visit if I ever get the chance to return.
I don't know but that may be true for MBB as well. Yes, I am a historian and no, that does not mean my brain is an encyclopedia of all historical information on every single topic!slimecap said:
I believe Kim Mulkey is the only NCAA Division I WBB National Champion head coach
that has met with every President at the White House for a Victory Celebration
during her entire career as a head coach.
Baylor Head Coach
2000-present
2005 George Bush
2012 Barack Obama
2019 Donald Trump
i know! we only got thru the national air & space and museum of natural history... planning a longer trip, wife really wants to go back.historian said:I know. At the beginning of the century had a few opportunities to visit Europe and discovered the same issue in Berlin, Paris, Prague, London, and other cities: a week is barely enough for an introduction. To really experience all that these historic places have to offer would take much longer. Washington, D.C. is not nearly as old but still has many fine museums and so much history in or near the city. You could easily spend an entire week just in the Smithsonian and not do it all!Gruvin said:you are gonna need to rent a house for a month to get thru DC as a history buff. Spent a week and only scratched the surfacehistorian said:Funny you should mention that! I was thinking along the same lines...WIBear said:
Does anyone know if the team will spend a few days in the D.C. area? There are a number of things to see in our nation's capitol. It could be a meaningful educational experience.
I hope they take time to visit the Smithsonian and a must see is the National Archives to view the original Declaration of Independence and U.S. Constitution. Plus there are so many other museums, galleries, etc. I have a nice bucket list of places I want to visit if I ever get the chance to return.
If you do, don't miss the National Archives. It's there on the mall near the Smithsonian and it does not take long to see the main exhibits: Declaration of Independence from 1776 & U.S. Constitution from 1787. The other stuff is interesting too: early treaty with Japan (mid-19th century), something from Lincoln assassination, etc. My memory fades and it's possible they may have switched some things out.Gruvin said:i know! we only got thru the national air & space and museum of natural history... planning a longer trip, wife really wants to go back.historian said:
I know. At the beginning of the century had a few opportunities to visit Europe and discovered the same issue in Berlin, Paris, Prague, London, and other cities: a week is barely enough for an introduction. To really experience all that these historic places have to offer would take much longer. Washington, D.C. is not nearly as old but still has many fine museums and so much history in or near the city. You could easily spend an entire week just in the Smithsonian and not do it all!
lolWIBear said:
Wow. If they are able to see all of these places, Baylor should award them 3 semester hour credits in American Studies.
JIVATY said:Too many members of the press (especially WH press corps) are just laughable. It's almost Pavlovian. In the 1990s someone would say "Clinton" and they almost seemed to be drooling, then it was "Obama" and now it's both. If someone says "Trump" the reaction resembles vomit or diarrhea, metaphorically speaking. They are so predictable it is sometimes funny.bowdedg said:
Those words sound familiar....JIVATY said:Too many members of the press (especially WH press corps) are just laughable. It's almost Pavlovian. In the 1990s someone would say "Clinton" and they almost seemed to be drooling, then it was "Obama" and now it's both. If someone says "Trump" the reaction resembles vomit or diarrhea, metaphorically speaking. They are so predictable it is sometimes funny.bowdedg said:
... since I posted them somewhere in these threads a few days ago.historian said:Those words sound familiar....JIVATY said:
Too many members of the press (especially WH press corps) are just laughable. It's almost Pavlovian. In the 1990s someone would say "Clinton" and they almost seemed to be drooling, then it was "Obama" and now it's both. If someone says "Trump" the reaction resembles vomit or diarrhea, metaphorically speaking. They are so predictable it is sometimes funny.