Sensitive Question: Did the Lady Bears ever have a documentary made?

6,675 Views | 41 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by historian
LadyChickBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It has really been bugging me because I have had season tickets since 2001 and I don't remember it. And, I am wondering if they haven't, why? Seems to me 3 National Championships might make a fascinating one??

Please don't pounce...just curious...did I miss something?
Bear2019
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LadyChickBear said:

It has really been bugging me because I have had season tickets since 2001 and I don't remember it. And, I am wondering if they haven't, why? Seems to me 3 National Championships might make a fascinating one??

Please don't pounce...just curious...did I miss something?
No, you didn't miss anything. But I'm not sure you understand how it works around here. You see, the Men's Championship gets the documentary. The Women's Championships (plural) get a commemorative bottle of Dr. Pepper. That said, thanks for supporting the Lady Bears.
Edmond Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?

This is not a men vs women thing.

This is a difference in stories.
Lynnp550
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Baloney
keysjaws
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If not from an outside sports network.how about Baylor F&DM taking on the project. It would be ABOUT TIME!
Edmond Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lynnp550 said:

Baloney


If you think the women's story is a better story to tell, there is nothing stopping you from raising money, hiring a documentary crew, and getting your documentary distributed.

Other people feel like the men's story is a bigger rags to riches story, has more audience hooks, fits the 'hero's journey' storyline better, and has a bigger pre-built audience.

We are getting something pretty amazing. I cannot imagine why we finds things to complain about with it.




IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not to play devils advocate and please correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't the woman's program pretty awful prior to Kim's arrival? Not picking a side as both programs have had massive turnarounds
Edmond Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

Not to play devils advocate and please correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't the woman's program pretty awful prior to Kim's arrival? Not picking a side as both programs have had massive turnarounds


It was pretty awful. So, are/were a lot of programs. And, what Kim did with our program was amazing.

But, no other program went what our men's program went through.
Brian Ethridge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Edmond Bear said:

Lynnp550 said:

Baloney


If you think the women's story is a better story to tell, there is nothing stopping you from raising money, hiring a documentary crew, and getting your documentary distributed.

Other people feel like the men's story is a bigger rags to riches story, has more audience hooks, fits the 'hero's journey' storyline better, and has a bigger pre-built audience.

We are getting something pretty amazing. I cannot imagine why we finds things to complain about with it.







Getting to hear what the previous players, current players, etc. went through and to achieve the greatest championship in school history is moving.

I doubt this will be our last one, but until it goes to market, we don't know if we'll drop mid-six figures on one with less universal appeal.
Adriacus Peratuun
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LadyChickBear said:

It has really been bugging me because I have had season tickets since 2001 and I don't remember it. And, I am wondering if they haven't, why? Seems to me 3 National Championships might make a fascinating one??

Please don't pounce...just curious...did I miss something?
Economics.

1. With every passing day it becomes less expensive to create professional quality content.

2. Comparing the size of likely purchasers might be relatively similar but comparing the size of casual purchasers would be massively different. People financing content want to make a buck.

Cheaper to make & bigger purchasing audience = why MBB NC got a documentary and WBB NCs did not.

Brian Ethridge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Adriacus Peratuun said:

LadyChickBear said:

It has really been bugging me because I have had season tickets since 2001 and I don't remember it. And, I am wondering if they haven't, why? Seems to me 3 National Championships might make a fascinating one??

Please don't pounce...just curious...did I miss something?
Economics.

1. With every passing day it becomes less expensive to create professional quality content.

2. Comparing the size of likely purchasers might be relatively similar but comparing the size of casual purchasers would be massively different. People financing content want to make a buck.

Cheaper to make & bigger purchasing audience = why MBB NC got a documentary and WBB NCs did not.




I wouldn't say cheaper as this started at 10-20k and now it's grown considerably, but less expensive compared to major studios.
Lynnp550
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It doesn't appear that anyone is questioning "Why the men and not the women;" it's more "Why not both?"

The men's program rose from the ashes of a terrible scandal to win a National Championship. The women hardly had what one could call a program when Kim Mulkey showed up. The next year they won the Big 12 title; a scant 5 years later they were National Champions, with a couple of repeats every 7 years, and ended with our coach in the HOF. I cannot even begin to imagine the amazing stories along that road.

When Central Texas' own L. C. McKamie (School Superintendent in Abbott then Gatesville, great friend and mentor of Willie Nelson btw) initiated the first women's high school basketball team in our state, did he even dare to dream of such glory? That history should preface any documentary about WBB in Texas..but I digress.

So the snarky comment about how I should elicit contributions for a Lady Bears documentary begs the question: Who paid for the men's? Because just maybe I will take you up on your suggestion, snarky tho' it was.
RBW 67
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The women's story would have best been told after the 2005 Championship. The biggest story is always the first championship. Also, that was when the Women's Championship gave hope to a University on the down and outs in sports. The football program was a laughing stock and many were saying Baylor should give up participating in big time sports. The the Men's Basketball program became a disgrace with the scandal heard around the country. The women's program was a shining light with a coach who was a winner at all levels and did not tolerate the type of atmosphere that had become pervasive in the men's program. If we could make this type of turn around in the women's program doing it the right way, maybe it could be done in other sports as well. That is a great story, but the time has passed to present it in a documentary. Maybe it could have been a legacy documentary for Kim had she stayed to the end. It could still make a great movie.
Edmond Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lynnp550 said:

It doesn't appear that anyone is questioning "Why the men and not the women;" it's more "Why not both?"

The men's program rose from the ashes of a terrible scandal to win a National Championship. The women hardly had what one could call a program when Kim Mulkey showed up. The next year they won the Big 12 title; a scant 5 years later they were National Champions, with a couple of repeats every 7 years, and ended with our coach in the HOF. I cannot even begin to imagine the amazing stories along that road.

When Central Texas' own L. C. McKamie (School Superintendent in Abbott then Gatesville, great friend and mentor of Willie Nelson btw) initiated the first women's high school basketball team in our state, did he even dare to dream of such glory? That history should preface any documentary about WBB in Texas..but I digress.

So the snarky comment about how I should elicit contributions for a Lady Bears documentary begs the question: Who paid for the men's? Because just maybe I will take you up on your suggestion, snarky tho' it was.


Fundraising on the boards paid for most of the men's documentary. That's where the suggestion for you to fundraise came from. You could do the same thing that other people have already done.

Edmond Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?

And, Lynn, you might consider that a direct challenge of 'baloney' invited a snarky response.
Adriacus Peratuun
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Brian Ethridge said:

Adriacus Peratuun said:

LadyChickBear said:

It has really been bugging me because I have had season tickets since 2001 and I don't remember it. And, I am wondering if they haven't, why? Seems to me 3 National Championships might make a fascinating one??

Please don't pounce...just curious...did I miss something?
Economics.

1. With every passing day it becomes less expensive to create professional quality content.

2. Comparing the size of likely purchasers might be relatively similar but comparing the size of casual purchasers would be massively different. People financing content want to make a buck.

Cheaper to make & bigger purchasing audience = why MBB NC got a documentary and WBB NCs did not.




I wouldn't say cheaper as this started at 10-20k and now it's grown considerably, but less expensive compared to major studios.
The use of the phrase "cheaper to make" refers to the [adjusted for inflation] production costs today [independent or major outlet] compared to historical costs. One of the reasons that Tier 3 college sports is economically worthwhile is the extremely low production costs. 30 years ago, 20 years ago, 10 years ago.......not economically viable.

I wonder what Ken Burns could accomplish if he was starting his career today.
LadyChickBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I do believe it is impossible to ask a question without a pounce. And, it still bugs me. And, I don't think it is my job to raise the money. It is what it is. And lest anyone think I am not busting with pride with what Drew and our boys did, you are wrong. I just think it is a pity that our girls don't get the same treatment. They sacrifice and work just as hard. Before anyone says it, I know parity in the NCAAM is not the same as it is in the NCAAW, but that parity is growing as is the WNBA despite the lack of support the men receive. The revelation this season of the NCAAW tournament treatment by the NCAA is evidence that we are not there, yet. I just feel a campus with the Women's BB heritage of Baylor could find some interest in doing the same for them.

Sadly, and yet, realistically, money still runs the world.

Happy 4th and God Bless
Brian Ethridge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Edmond Bear said:

Lynnp550 said:

It doesn't appear that anyone is questioning "Why the men and not the women;" it's more "Why not both?"

The men's program rose from the ashes of a terrible scandal to win a National Championship. The women hardly had what one could call a program when Kim Mulkey showed up. The next year they won the Big 12 title; a scant 5 years later they were National Champions, with a couple of repeats every 7 years, and ended with our coach in the HOF. I cannot even begin to imagine the amazing stories along that road.

When Central Texas' own L. C. McKamie (School Superintendent in Abbott then Gatesville, great friend and mentor of Willie Nelson btw) initiated the first women's high school basketball team in our state, did he even dare to dream of such glory? That history should preface any documentary about WBB in Texas..but I digress.

So the snarky comment about how I should elicit contributions for a Lady Bears documentary begs the question: Who paid for the men's? Because just maybe I will take you up on your suggestion, snarky tho' it was.


Fundraising on the boards paid for most of the men's documentary. That's where the suggestion for you to fundraise came from. You could do the same thing that other people have already done.




Paid for about 30%, so far and we greatly appreciate it. The costs continue to climb as we've added 100+ hours of interviews. It went from a 1.5 hour program to 2 parts and maybe more. The story is that deep and interesting.

WBB could be done, but we have three others in front of it with more human interest and history, IMO. I'm not going to give those away, but just as we've done with Baylor Icons (Teaff, Trull/Elkins, more coming) we're not ignoring the past or any program.

Also, Lynn, I didn't respond with any snark, but was attributed it in your response.
Ashley Hodge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lynnp550 said:

It doesn't appear that anyone is questioning "Why the men and not the women;" it's more "Why not both?"

The men's program rose from the ashes of a terrible scandal to win a National Championship. The women hardly had what one could call a program when Kim Mulkey showed up. The next year they won the Big 12 title; a scant 5 years later they were National Champions, with a couple of repeats every 7 years, and ended with our coach in the HOF. I cannot even begin to imagine the amazing stories along that road.

When Central Texas' own L. C. McKamie (School Superintendent in Abbott then Gatesville, great friend and mentor of Willie Nelson btw) initiated the first women's high school basketball team in our state, did he even dare to dream of such glory? That history should preface any documentary about WBB in Texas..but I digress.

So the snarky comment about how I should elicit contributions for a Lady Bears documentary begs the question: Who paid for the men's? Because just maybe I will take you up on your suggestion, snarky tho' it was.
Chris Scott, the director of this documentary, has mentioned doing a documentary on Mulkey and even Art Briles during this process. We will have to see how this one goes.

The Briles documentary would probably have the biggest audience given the interest in college football. 17 million tuned in to Baylor vs Gonzaga's championship game versus 3.5 million for Baylor vs Notre Dame in 2019. So some of it is potential audience as to priority.

We think all Baylor fans, college basketball fans and those who identify with Scott Drew's Christian faith (that's really the big audience) are the big viewership groups here but like Edmond Bear said also the intensity of the scandal in 2003 and then 18 years later the pinnacle is a great feel good story.

Mulkey's story would be interesting also, but perhaps less appeal now that she's gone. Sicem365 is only now in a position to even consider projects like this and the MBB documentary was all about timing, the right partnership (Chris Charles Scott) and the story all matching up.

Jim Turner talked about Mulkey quite a bit when interviewed for this MBB documentary, so she will have a role in this story.
Stefano DiMera
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They werent that bad..Sonja Hogg had them competitive..didnt she almost win a WNIT championship?
Brian Ethridge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stefano DiMera said:

They werent that bad..Sonja Hogg had them competitive..didnt she almost win a WNIT championship?


Yep. Her last year was bad, she brought them to the WNIT from Bowersland.
FWBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Demand and desire. If either existed, there'd be a documentary for the women's team (same goes for other men's sports outside of football).

Most of us cheer and get excited when the women's team wins because it's Baylor. Otherwise, very few care at all about women's basketball. That's a universal truth, not just at Baylor. The WNBA would fold absent the subsidies that keep it alive.

On the other hand, men's basketball carries with it both the fandom of Baylor AND the fandom of the game and it's significance in both respects is objectively much greater. It has nothing to do with "misogyny" and everything to do with indisputable differences in the men's and women's games (irrespective of guy and lady parts).
“When they are wrong, what makes them wrong is that they lead to violations of the duties I have described in earlier chapters.”
– Jason Brennan
baylorbear33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Brian Ethridge said:

Stefano DiMera said:

They werent that bad..Sonja Hogg had them competitive..didnt she almost win a WNIT championship?


Yep. Her last year was bad, she brought them to the WNIT from Bowersland.


Give credit where credit is due - Hogg's assistant coaches had them semi-competitive. She had a history of riding coattails and taking credit. Does the name Leon Barmore ring any bells? She was unkind, mean-spirited, and incapable. I personally witnessed a game where BU had a 6 point lead over SMU, 12 seconds left on the clock, and lost due to her inept coaching. Bowers may not have been a great coach, but at least she gave a crap about her players. Quite honestly, neither Bowers or Hogg should be mentioned in the same sentence with Mulkey. There is simply no comparison.
Brian Ethridge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
baylorbear33 said:

Brian Ethridge said:

Stefano DiMera said:

They werent that bad..Sonja Hogg had them competitive..didnt she almost win a WNIT championship?


Yep. Her last year was bad, she brought them to the WNIT from Bowersland.


Give credit where credit is due - Hogg's assistant coaches had them semi-competitive. She had a history of riding coattails and taking credit. Does the name Leon Barmore ring any bells? She was unkind, mean-spirited, and incapable. I personally witnessed a game where BU had a 6 point lead over SMU, 12 seconds left on the clock, and lost due to her inept coaching. Bowers may not have been a great coach, but at least she gave a crap about her players. Quite honestly, neither Bowers or Hogg should be mentioned in the same sentence with Mulkey. There is simply no comparison.


LT and Angela were great.

Considering Hogg helped find Mulkey, they will be forever linked.
baylorbear33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Brian Ethridge said:

baylorbear33 said:

Brian Ethridge said:

Stefano DiMera said:

They werent that bad..Sonja Hogg had them competitive..didnt she almost win a WNIT championship?


Yep. Her last year was bad, she brought them to the WNIT from Bowersland.


Give credit where credit is due - Hogg's assistant coaches had them semi-competitive. She had a history of riding coattails and taking credit. Does the name Leon Barmore ring any bells? She was unkind, mean-spirited, and incapable. I personally witnessed a game where BU had a 6 point lead over SMU, 12 seconds left on the clock, and lost due to her inept coaching. Bowers may not have been a great coach, but at least she gave a crap about her players. Quite honestly, neither Bowers or Hogg should be mentioned in the same sentence with Mulkey. There is simply no comparison.


LT and Angela were great.

Considering Hogg helped find Mulkey, they will be forever linked.


You're right Brian. They were both terrific. I will never understand why LT didn't get the head coaching job instead of them bringing in Hogg. Both he and Angela were saints to put up with what they did and suffer in silence for the good of the team.
Brian Ethridge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
baylorbear33 said:

Brian Ethridge said:

baylorbear33 said:

Brian Ethridge said:

Stefano DiMera said:

They werent that bad..Sonja Hogg had them competitive..didnt she almost win a WNIT championship?


Yep. Her last year was bad, she brought them to the WNIT from Bowersland.


Give credit where credit is due - Hogg's assistant coaches had them semi-competitive. She had a history of riding coattails and taking credit. Does the name Leon Barmore ring any bells? She was unkind, mean-spirited, and incapable. I personally witnessed a game where BU had a 6 point lead over SMU, 12 seconds left on the clock, and lost due to her inept coaching. Bowers may not have been a great coach, but at least she gave a crap about her players. Quite honestly, neither Bowers or Hogg should be mentioned in the same sentence with Mulkey. There is simply no comparison.


LT and Angela were great.

Considering Hogg helped find Mulkey, they will be forever linked.


You're right Brian. They were both terrific. I will never understand why LT didn't get the head coaching job instead of them bringing in Hogg. Both he and Angela were saints to put up with what they did and suffer in silence for the good of the team.


Yeah, I was around a bit and am still friends with LT's sons. LT would have been a great coach for the program. He was a great recruiter and respected.

I haven't seen Angela in close to 20 years and lost touch.
Task Force 2015
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When Baylor WBB won the national championship in 2005 it wasn't the first school in Texas to win it all in over 50 years(like the men).Tech WBB won a natty in the 90s and Texas in the 80s.Also,Scott Drew asked for a movie in part because Texas Western got one.;I am not aware that Kim has ever asked for a movie.And as pointed out,the media loves a story involving a scandal.Now,having said that,would I favor a documentary about the Lady Bears?Yes.
Lynnp550
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WNBA: fastest-growing sport.
Sellout crowd for Sparks vs Aces.
So, I kind of respectfully beg to differ, adding a disclaimer that I realize we're not there yet.
Proud 1992 Alum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I could see your point if this was a Baylor produced documentary but it's not. It is being funded by people who love Scott Drew and Baylor men's basketball. There is nothing wrong with people having a preference for a particular sport. If Baylor women's basketball fans want a documentary, they can fund and produce one. I would contribute to it.
Ashley Hodge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
anyone watch Women of Troy? I haven't yet but meaning to. Wonder how well it did financially.

MBB documentaries is a more crowded market so maybe I'm short-changing how well a doc on baylor wbb would do.

If Nicki wins a natty this year, we will absolutely do one.
Lynnp550
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good to know.

If Nicki won the NC this year? Now THERE'S a story.
Brian Ethridge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ashley Hodge said:

anyone watch Women of Troy? I haven't yet but meaning to. Wonder how well it did financially.

MBB documentaries is a more crowded market so maybe I'm short-changing how well a doc on baylor wbb would do.

If Nicki wins a natty this year, we will absolutely do one.


In.
TxRainMkr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Back to the Dr Pepper bottles....I'd still like one for the men.
Brian Ethridge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TxRainMkr said:

Back to the Dr Pepper bottles....I'd still like one for the men.


Same
baylor1984
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The womens doc would at least have a villain so you have that going for you.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.