greggor25 said:

---

Interesting from someone who used to call Rhule Little Matty. I agree probably thinks Moore needs a lifetime contract

---

As for my original point, there are circumstances in the case of Creager that none of you have any knowledge about.

Stranger said:

---

greggor25 said:

---

Interesting from someone who used to call Rhule Little Matty. I agree probably thinks Moore needs a lifetime contract

---

As for my original point, there are circumstances in the case of Creager that none of you have any knowledge about.

---

then do share vague post king

It's too early to tell just going off previous track records of pitchers getting hurt but yes I haven't been watching BU softball for a long time. (Sarcasm)

I told y'all so!! Baylor is in ncaa tournament. Baylor is headed to Texas regional. Wagner plays Texas first. Baylor faces Wisconsin first. It is double elimination so it's not like first round loss and they are done.

Made the Austin Regional
1st game vs 8 seed Wisconsin

Does the Greggor guy owe be 10K?

Last Four In: Georgia Tech, Indiana, Marshall, Michigan

First Four Out: Nevada, North Carolina, Northwestern, Wichita State

Both lists are alphabetical, not necessarily in ranked order.

— Justin McLeod (@justfactsmaam) May 10, 2026

This is just showing context of bubble on last 4 in and last 4 out.

This is Baylor Softball's 17th Regional appearance and 3rd in the last 4 years (2023, 2024, 2026)

Some of you owe some crow and an apology to me for doubting my research. I stand on business.

ScottyB_The_Baylor_King said:

---

Yeah basically just 1 win or two in general within next 6 or 7 games should be enough to make ncaa tournament in my opinion.

---

ScottyB The Soothsayer

ScottyB_The_Baylor_King said:

---

I literally asked a person from softball America, and he said this.

With 6 Q1 games left I’d say avoid going 0-6 and win at least one B12 they’re probably in a good spot unless there’s a lot of stolen mid major bids.

— Brady (@BradyVernon) April 23, 2026

---

#TruthBomb

Well I did ask the softball America writer on what Baylor needed to do after Texas state win he said avoid 0-6 in last 6 regular season games. I thought prior to the question that I asked I thought it might have been enough. The softball America writer basically said what I thought was needed.

Well after the Texas state win I asked the question to a softball America writer about what else Baylor needs to do he said avoid 0-6 in last 6 games then Baylor should be in. A few people thought I was crazy for saying that especially Iowa Bear. You can check the thread on people who doubted.

Even you said Baylor shouldn't get in after Texas tech win in Lubbock. Even a few in here still doubted me on saying beating Texas tech in Lubbock once is enough to make ncaa tournament.

Color me shocked

Give my 10k raise to whole staff. What will you guys say if we bounced in two games?

greggor25 said:

---

Give my 10k raise to whole staff. What will you guys say if we bounced in two games?

---

I think that 10k would be better spent on players personally

IowaBear said:

---

It is incredibly shocking how low the bar is to make the ncaa field apparently. 28-26 (10-14) and a boatload of awful non con losses doesn't scream ncaa tournament. Than again maybe the entire field is ass outside of about 10-12 teams

---

a lot of half-baked opinions on how exactly Bear High made the regionals. the cold hard facts are that Baylor played tenth most difficult schedule in the country.

And beat 1 good team. Who you play shouldn't matter if all you're doing is stacking L's
You'll have to excuse me for not putting much stock into your opinions. You ***** and moan about Matt Rhule while pumping sunshine up Arandas ass. That alone tells me all I need to know

IowaBear said:

---

And beat 1 good team. Who you play shouldn't matter if all you're doing is stacking L's
You'll have to excuse me for not putting much stock into your opinions. You ***** and moan about Matt Rhule while pumping sunshine up Arandas ass. That alone tells me all I need to know

---

you must have me mistaken me with someone else. I did beat up on that con-artist, Little Matty. And I think everyone in the country backs me up on that.

As go Arandas, what other people described as "cerebral" I always described as clueless. Why, in the wide wide world of sports, does Baylor wind up with these guys that nobody else wants? i blame Mack for both of those . He extended both of those losers and ran off the best chickball coach Baylor will ever have.

I don't agree with every decision at softball but Baylor has a young team going in the right direction.

That means nothing considering a 28-26 Baylor made a regional.
They beat 1 good team. Texas Tech. That's it. One fluke win against Tech is the seasons highlight. I'll eat crow if they actually do something in the regional

Delmar 2.0 said:

---

IowaBear said:

---

And beat 1 good team.....

---

They beat 6 teams that made a Regional.

---

Yet a certain person still owes me crow sandwiches……. Say it on here now and apologize for doubting me and my research especially when I asked a person from softball America on what Baylor needed to do to make ncaa tournament after beating Texas State on the road. I even post the RPI stuff. Accept the L that person was wrong about 1-5 in last 6 games not enough making ncaa tournament. There was not a lot of bid stealers in general which helped. Same goes for Missouri losing to Auburn early which made Missouri have a losing record. Then Auburn lost to Florida in the conference tournament which gave them a losing record despite the good RPI.

The person that I'm referring to should know exactly who the person is. I'm not going to say that Baylor is going to get out of regionals but it's a lot better than no ncaa tournament.


Here a clue below on the post yet the person hasn't said anything on here and saying I was right and they were wrong.

https://sicem365.com/forums/6/topics/158470/replies/4536875

Are you really that insecure? I've seen you be wrong on here plenty! Congrats you got 1 right. Want a cookie? Why are you bragging about 1-5 as if it's some great accomplishment. It wasn't, this team didn't swerve a bid. And that'll likely show itself starting Friday.

IowaBear said:

---

....I'll eat crow if they actually do something in the regional

---

Other than winning the Regional (which ain't happening) what exactly does "do something" mean?

2 Likely Possibilities:
1. Lose to Wisconsin in game 1....then face Wagner in the '2 & Que' game that you hope they should win...then a likely rematch with Wisconsin for the prize of getting to lose to the horns. So 2-2 (L, W, W, L) or 1-2 (L, W, L)
2. Beat Wisconsin in game 1....get smoked by the horns next, then a likely rematch with Wisconsin...a probable loss because they're not beating them twice. So 1-2 (W, L, L)

Anything better than 1-2. Beating Wagner means nothing to me personally. Baylor's not winning the regional. But beating Wisconsin would be something of note imo

It happens to mean a lot to the people who count.

The only people who count are the players & coaches. I know you want to sound important. But you aren't either. So it meaning a lot to you is irrelevant.

It will be a miracle they beat Wisconsin. 2 and done but hey we made it. Just like if we get six wins in football next year we should shut down downtown and have a parade.

Mediocrity is universally celebrated at Baylor. Just look at this thread. You'd think we won the Workd Series the way some are celebrating. It's like I said earlier. It's pretty clear the standard for getting into the field of 64 is incredibly low. I'll eat crow if Baylor beats Wisconsin.