Please list them.whiterock said:I count five for which there is video evidence.Sam Lowry said:No people accused of minor offenses are being held without bail.whiterock said:people who did less are in jail. Why is that?Sam Lowry said:His name is Ray Epps. It's been known since January. He was interviewed privately by both the FBI and the Jan. 6 committee. Without any evidence to the contrary, one would presume that his case was handled like hundreds of others. Instead you ask us to believe for no particular reason that he was an agent provocateur. That's an appeal to ignorance.whiterock said:LOL..."presumably....." Could that be an appeal to ignorance seasoned with a sprinkle of "ought is." You haven't heard it happened, therefore it didn't happen (to infer it certainly should not have happened.)Sam Lowry said:Yes, and presumably they investigated your guy at some point while he was on a list of unidentified suspects and before they decided he wasn't worth pursuing. Just like they did with who knows how many others. All of that adds up to exactly zero evidence that he worked for the FBI. It was a rumor that took off on social media because you and others needed it to be true.whiterock said:The FBI visited (separately, simultaneously) the offices to a husband/wife pair here in Waco who attended the Trump Rally on the mall, started walking toward Congress, but age & neuropathy soon got the better of them. So they took a selfie with the Capitol building off in the distance and headed for the Metro, thence motel & car and left the DC area that day.Sam Lowry said:There were a lot of people there. The government isn't obligated to prosecute all of them just to prove they're not FBI agents. This guy apparently never entered the building and was trying to de-escalate confrontation with the police. They'd have to prosecute him solely based on his speech, which is always tricky.4th and Inches said:he clearly on video did bad things.. why no charges? This isnt a conspiracy theory, it is fact. He is on video on jan 5th and jan 6th promoting storming the capital yet no charges..Sam Lowry said:And here come the conspiracy theories...whiterock said:What is his name and what has he been charged with and when was he arrested?Sam Lowry said:
The committee investigated your "infiltrator" and determined that he didn't work for the FBI
Come on Sam, this is a slam dunk win for the Jan 6 prosecution based on the evidence
FBI showed them a copy of that selfie the took and asked them what they were doing in the Capitol that day.
They are investigating every single person who left a digital signal in WDC that day.
Just so you know, putting "cover memos" in files of intelligence sources to obscure the operation is SOP. I have personally written them, to make anyone who might see that file think the operation ended unsuccessfully, when in fact the operation succeeded wildly and went on to generate highly valuable intelligence under a completely new codename (and other stuff to obscure trails....)
Yes, all of that is still subject to congressional oversight.
Zero chance that oversight happens in open hearings.
Zero.
More likely, this guy was put on ice. No clandestine source or agent provocateur who caught so much spotlight has much of a future, particularly in the internet age.
He manifestly had as much insurrectionist intent (or intent to interfere with govt process, or destruction of govt property, or trespassing, etc.....) as anyone prosecuted thus far. Those O/Ks on a golf cart who missed the whole thing didn't do as much. I mean, not even a disorderly conduct charge for trying to ignite an insurrection that you insist did, in fact, happen? Such sober-handedness is very uncharacteristic of you on this subject.
So, again, why don't we know his name?
People have been convicted of offenses including Parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a Capitol building, Assaulting, resisting, or impeding law enforcement officers, Obstruction of an official proceeding, Civil disorder, Entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds, Entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds with a deadly or dangerous weapon, Conspiracy, Seditious conspiracy, Obstruction of law enforcement during civil disorder, Assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees using a dangerous weapon, Disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds; Engaging in physical violence in a restricted building or grounds; Disorderly conduct in a Capitol building; Impeding passage through the Capitol grounds or buildings, Act of physical violence in the Capitol grounds or buildings, Theft of government property, Destruction of government property, Conspiracy to disrupt an official proceeding, Posession of an unregistered firearm, Carrying a pistol without a license, Climbing on US Capitol Grounds, Threats in interstate communications, Obstruction of Congress, Felony obstruction of Congress, and Illegally demonstrating inside the US Capitol.
Epps does not appear to have committed any of these crimes.
Proud Boys leader admits plan to storm Capitol, will testify against others
59,898 Views |
752 Replies |
Last: 3 yr ago by Osodecentx
Don't bother Whiterock. Sam always expects other people to do things, but never keeps his own worthless promises.Sam Lowry said:Please list them.whiterock said:I count five for which there is video evidence.Sam Lowry said:No people accused of minor offenses are being held without bail.whiterock said:people who did less are in jail. Why is that?Sam Lowry said:His name is Ray Epps. It's been known since January. He was interviewed privately by both the FBI and the Jan. 6 committee. Without any evidence to the contrary, one would presume that his case was handled like hundreds of others. Instead you ask us to believe for no particular reason that he was an agent provocateur. That's an appeal to ignorance.whiterock said:LOL..."presumably....." Could that be an appeal to ignorance seasoned with a sprinkle of "ought is." You haven't heard it happened, therefore it didn't happen (to infer it certainly should not have happened.)Sam Lowry said:Yes, and presumably they investigated your guy at some point while he was on a list of unidentified suspects and before they decided he wasn't worth pursuing. Just like they did with who knows how many others. All of that adds up to exactly zero evidence that he worked for the FBI. It was a rumor that took off on social media because you and others needed it to be true.whiterock said:The FBI visited (separately, simultaneously) the offices to a husband/wife pair here in Waco who attended the Trump Rally on the mall, started walking toward Congress, but age & neuropathy soon got the better of them. So they took a selfie with the Capitol building off in the distance and headed for the Metro, thence motel & car and left the DC area that day.Sam Lowry said:There were a lot of people there. The government isn't obligated to prosecute all of them just to prove they're not FBI agents. This guy apparently never entered the building and was trying to de-escalate confrontation with the police. They'd have to prosecute him solely based on his speech, which is always tricky.4th and Inches said:he clearly on video did bad things.. why no charges? This isnt a conspiracy theory, it is fact. He is on video on jan 5th and jan 6th promoting storming the capital yet no charges..Sam Lowry said:And here come the conspiracy theories...whiterock said:What is his name and what has he been charged with and when was he arrested?Sam Lowry said:
The committee investigated your "infiltrator" and determined that he didn't work for the FBI
Come on Sam, this is a slam dunk win for the Jan 6 prosecution based on the evidence
FBI showed them a copy of that selfie the took and asked them what they were doing in the Capitol that day.
They are investigating every single person who left a digital signal in WDC that day.
Just so you know, putting "cover memos" in files of intelligence sources to obscure the operation is SOP. I have personally written them, to make anyone who might see that file think the operation ended unsuccessfully, when in fact the operation succeeded wildly and went on to generate highly valuable intelligence under a completely new codename (and other stuff to obscure trails....)
Yes, all of that is still subject to congressional oversight.
Zero chance that oversight happens in open hearings.
Zero.
More likely, this guy was put on ice. No clandestine source or agent provocateur who caught so much spotlight has much of a future, particularly in the internet age.
He manifestly had as much insurrectionist intent (or intent to interfere with govt process, or destruction of govt property, or trespassing, etc.....) as anyone prosecuted thus far. Those O/Ks on a golf cart who missed the whole thing didn't do as much. I mean, not even a disorderly conduct charge for trying to ignite an insurrection that you insist did, in fact, happen? Such sober-handedness is very uncharacteristic of you on this subject.
So, again, why don't we know his name?
People have been convicted of offenses including Parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a Capitol building, Assaulting, resisting, or impeding law enforcement officers, Obstruction of an official proceeding, Civil disorder, Entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds, Entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds with a deadly or dangerous weapon, Conspiracy, Seditious conspiracy, Obstruction of law enforcement during civil disorder, Assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees using a dangerous weapon, Disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds; Engaging in physical violence in a restricted building or grounds; Disorderly conduct in a Capitol building; Impeding passage through the Capitol grounds or buildings, Act of physical violence in the Capitol grounds or buildings, Theft of government property, Destruction of government property, Conspiracy to disrupt an official proceeding, Posession of an unregistered firearm, Carrying a pistol without a license, Climbing on US Capitol Grounds, Threats in interstate communications, Obstruction of Congress, Felony obstruction of Congress, and Illegally demonstrating inside the US Capitol.
Epps does not appear to have committed any of these crimes.
Sam is becoming this board's Biden.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Seems like a loose version of the plan was for the Capitol breach to force Pence to leave and halt proceedings, that's what the Proud Boys were there for, then Grassley would step in as President Pro Tempore of the Senate (https://iowacapitaldispatch.com/2021/01/05/grassley-suggests-he-may-preside-over-senate-debate-on-electoral-college-votes/) and throw the relevant electors out and transfer the issue to House state delegations to decide. If that sounds familiar, it's because Oldbear83 and others were advocating for exactly that (but with Pence, who ultimately proved unwilling, instead of Grassley). Pence caught wind and refused to leave the building.
The chief-of-staff, Marc Short, warned the lead agent that Trump was going to turn on the vice president and they may have a security risk because of it, an extraordinary situation https://t.co/Dzuc5GfuDV
— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) June 3, 2022
Giebels, the agent who Short warned, was the one whisking Pence to safety as rioters chanting "Hang Mike Pence!" stormed the Capitol. Pence refused to get into a waiting car because, aides have said, it would give the rioters a victory https://t.co/Dzuc5GfuDV
— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) June 3, 2022
You're a weird guy.Oldbear83 said:Don't bother Whiterock. Sam always expects other people to do things, but never keeps his own worthless promises.Sam Lowry said:Please list them.whiterock said:I count five for which there is video evidence.Sam Lowry said:No people accused of minor offenses are being held without bail.whiterock said:people who did less are in jail. Why is that?Sam Lowry said:His name is Ray Epps. It's been known since January. He was interviewed privately by both the FBI and the Jan. 6 committee. Without any evidence to the contrary, one would presume that his case was handled like hundreds of others. Instead you ask us to believe for no particular reason that he was an agent provocateur. That's an appeal to ignorance.whiterock said:LOL..."presumably....." Could that be an appeal to ignorance seasoned with a sprinkle of "ought is." You haven't heard it happened, therefore it didn't happen (to infer it certainly should not have happened.)Sam Lowry said:Yes, and presumably they investigated your guy at some point while he was on a list of unidentified suspects and before they decided he wasn't worth pursuing. Just like they did with who knows how many others. All of that adds up to exactly zero evidence that he worked for the FBI. It was a rumor that took off on social media because you and others needed it to be true.whiterock said:The FBI visited (separately, simultaneously) the offices to a husband/wife pair here in Waco who attended the Trump Rally on the mall, started walking toward Congress, but age & neuropathy soon got the better of them. So they took a selfie with the Capitol building off in the distance and headed for the Metro, thence motel & car and left the DC area that day.Sam Lowry said:There were a lot of people there. The government isn't obligated to prosecute all of them just to prove they're not FBI agents. This guy apparently never entered the building and was trying to de-escalate confrontation with the police. They'd have to prosecute him solely based on his speech, which is always tricky.4th and Inches said:he clearly on video did bad things.. why no charges? This isnt a conspiracy theory, it is fact. He is on video on jan 5th and jan 6th promoting storming the capital yet no charges..Sam Lowry said:And here come the conspiracy theories...whiterock said:What is his name and what has he been charged with and when was he arrested?Sam Lowry said:
The committee investigated your "infiltrator" and determined that he didn't work for the FBI
Come on Sam, this is a slam dunk win for the Jan 6 prosecution based on the evidence
FBI showed them a copy of that selfie the took and asked them what they were doing in the Capitol that day.
They are investigating every single person who left a digital signal in WDC that day.
Just so you know, putting "cover memos" in files of intelligence sources to obscure the operation is SOP. I have personally written them, to make anyone who might see that file think the operation ended unsuccessfully, when in fact the operation succeeded wildly and went on to generate highly valuable intelligence under a completely new codename (and other stuff to obscure trails....)
Yes, all of that is still subject to congressional oversight.
Zero chance that oversight happens in open hearings.
Zero.
More likely, this guy was put on ice. No clandestine source or agent provocateur who caught so much spotlight has much of a future, particularly in the internet age.
He manifestly had as much insurrectionist intent (or intent to interfere with govt process, or destruction of govt property, or trespassing, etc.....) as anyone prosecuted thus far. Those O/Ks on a golf cart who missed the whole thing didn't do as much. I mean, not even a disorderly conduct charge for trying to ignite an insurrection that you insist did, in fact, happen? Such sober-handedness is very uncharacteristic of you on this subject.
So, again, why don't we know his name?
People have been convicted of offenses including Parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a Capitol building, Assaulting, resisting, or impeding law enforcement officers, Obstruction of an official proceeding, Civil disorder, Entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds, Entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds with a deadly or dangerous weapon, Conspiracy, Seditious conspiracy, Obstruction of law enforcement during civil disorder, Assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees using a dangerous weapon, Disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds; Engaging in physical violence in a restricted building or grounds; Disorderly conduct in a Capitol building; Impeding passage through the Capitol grounds or buildings, Act of physical violence in the Capitol grounds or buildings, Theft of government property, Destruction of government property, Conspiracy to disrupt an official proceeding, Posession of an unregistered firearm, Carrying a pistol without a license, Climbing on US Capitol Grounds, Threats in interstate communications, Obstruction of Congress, Felony obstruction of Congress, and Illegally demonstrating inside the US Capitol.
Epps does not appear to have committed any of these crimes.
Sam is becoming this board's Biden.
You lied about your promise, Sam. We made an agreement, I kept my word but you chose to ignore your promise.
It may be 'weird' to you that such conduct is significant.
It may be 'weird' to you that such conduct is significant.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
What a load of BS. Show me even one post where I advocated for Pence to be removed or the Electoral Vote to be rejected.
You won't because I never said anything like that, and you damn well know it.
There's some major league lying going on in this thread, and it's despicable.
You won't because I never said anything like that, and you damn well know it.
There's some major league lying going on in this thread, and it's despicable.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
You're lying as usual. I answered your question two or three times.Oldbear83 said:
You lied about your promise, Sam. We made an agreement, I kept my word but you chose to ignore your promise.
It may be 'weird' to you that such conduct is significant.
It is. You should stop it.Oldbear83 said:
What a load of BS. Show me even one post where I advocated for Pence to be removed or the Electoral Vote to be rejected.
You won't because I never said anything like that, and you damn well know it.
There's some major league lying going on in this thread, and it's despicable.
https://sicem365.com/forums/7/topics/76030/1
The hell you did. All you did was repeat the same bigoted claims and lies about how 'objective' you think you are.Sam Lowry said:You're lying as usual. I answered your question two or three times.Oldbear83 said:
You lied about your promise, Sam. We made an agreement, I kept my word but you chose to ignore your promise.
It may be 'weird' to you that such conduct is significant.
You spent more time on how to praise yourself than you ever did considering what I was saying.
Over the past several months, in fact, that's been your M.O.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Hmmm
NEW - CISA issues detailed advisory on vulnerabilities affecting certain versions of Dominion Voting Systems’ software.
— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) June 3, 2022
Full report: https://t.co/bFSwXf7EiM
based on 2016 info.. remember it was totally safe and secure in 2020.. back to unsecure and potential for hacking in 2022 when Dems are looking at a severe butt whippin..Doc Holliday said:
HmmmNEW - CISA issues detailed advisory on vulnerabilities affecting certain versions of Dominion Voting Systems’ software.
— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) June 3, 2022
Full report: https://t.co/bFSwXf7EiM
Political theater for the sheeple
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”
Jon Stewart
Jon Stewart
Prediction: Carlson won't air the hearings, and his ratings will be massive. https://t.co/fIMywVo9Au
— Tom Bevan (@TomBevanRCP) June 6, 2022
BREAKING: Justice Department announces a new indictment charging Enrique Tarrio, chairman of the extremist far-right group the Proud Boys, and four other members with seditious conspiracy. https://t.co/uW3z4x1atR.
— ABC News (@ABC) June 6, 2022
"You know we made this happen"..."I know"
Jan. 6:
— Ryan J. Reilly (@ryanjreilly) June 6, 2022
Person 1: "Brother. You know we made this happen... I'm so proud of my country today."
Tarrio: "I know."
Person 1: "Dude. Did we just influence history?
Tarrio: "Let's first see how this plays out." https://t.co/lXm8yfOWRd
thank goodness! We need to round up all the white Supremists like this oneHuMcK said:BREAKING: Justice Department announces a new indictment charging Enrique Tarrio, chairman of the extremist far-right group the Proud Boys, and four other members with seditious conspiracy. https://t.co/uW3z4x1atR.
— ABC News (@ABC) June 6, 2022
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”
Jon Stewart
Jon Stewart
The Jan. 6th Committee is reportedly turning to professional help on framing the hearings this week in true blockbuster fashion. That follows media appearance of members like Adam Schiff promising viewers a "great deal they haven't seen" if they tune in. https://t.co/Xc6E20QCkF
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) June 6, 2022
“James Goldston — former president of ABC News, and a master documentary storyteller who ran "Good Morning America" and "Nightline" — has joined the committee as an unannounced adviser, Axios has learned.”https://t.co/hGIHgJPZUm
— Quinn Owen (@quinn_owen) June 6, 2022
they hired a professional story teller to tell stories..Cobretti said:The Jan. 6th Committee is reportedly turning to professional help on framing the hearings this week in true blockbuster fashion. That follows media appearance of members like Adam Schiff promising viewers a "great deal they haven't seen" if they tune in. https://t.co/Xc6E20QCkF
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) June 6, 2022“James Goldston — former president of ABC News, and a master documentary storyteller who ran "Good Morning America" and "Nightline" — has joined the committee as an unannounced adviser, Axios has learned.”https://t.co/hGIHgJPZUm
— Quinn Owen (@quinn_owen) June 6, 2022
Nobody is watching.. too busy looking for formula and cheap gas.
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”
Jon Stewart
Jon Stewart
Fox News won't air the January 6 hearings because they prefer their sedition made fresh on-site.
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) June 7, 2022
How dare conservative plebs from flyover country visit the Imperial city.whiterock said:The FBI visited (separately, simultaneously) the offices to a husband/wife pair here in Waco who attended the Trump Rally on the mall, started walking toward Congress, but age & neuropathy soon got the better of them. So they took a selfie with the Capitol building off in the distance and headed for the Metro, thence motel & car and left the DC area that day.Sam Lowry said:There were a lot of people there. The government isn't obligated to prosecute all of them just to prove they're not FBI agents. This guy apparently never entered the building and was trying to de-escalate confrontation with the police. They'd have to prosecute him solely based on his speech, which is always tricky.4th and Inches said:he clearly on video did bad things.. why no charges? This isnt a conspiracy theory, it is fact. He is on video on jan 5th and jan 6th promoting storming the capital yet no charges..Sam Lowry said:And here come the conspiracy theories...whiterock said:What is his name and what has he been charged with and when was he arrested?Sam Lowry said:
The committee investigated your "infiltrator" and determined that he didn't work for the FBI
Come on Sam, this is a slam dunk win for the Jan 6 prosecution based on the evidence
FBI showed them a copy of that selfie the took and asked them what they were doing in the Capitol that day.
They are investigating every single person who left a digital signal in WDC that day.
Them setting foot in the Liberal utopia was sacrilegious.
Anything to distract from $6 gas.Cobretti said:The Jan. 6th Committee is reportedly turning to professional help on framing the hearings this week in true blockbuster fashion. That follows media appearance of members like Adam Schiff promising viewers a "great deal they haven't seen" if they tune in. https://t.co/Xc6E20QCkF
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) June 6, 2022“James Goldston — former president of ABC News, and a master documentary storyteller who ran "Good Morning America" and "Nightline" — has joined the committee as an unannounced adviser, Axios has learned.”https://t.co/hGIHgJPZUm
— Quinn Owen (@quinn_owen) June 6, 2022
i mean this with respect, STFUCobretti said:Fox News won't air the January 6 hearings because they prefer their sedition made fresh on-site.
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) June 7, 2022
Actually, I dont
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”
Jon Stewart
Jon Stewart
Classic propaganda. Attempt to distract with theatrics and hysterics.
what do you expect in the modern era of "feelings" over policy politics..Harrison Bergeron said:
Classic propaganda. Attempt to distract with theatrics and hysterics.
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”
Jon Stewart
Jon Stewart
Harrison Bergeron said:
Classic propaganda. Attempt to distract with theatrics and hysterics.
There will be a caravan emergency throughout the #January6th hearings. That's how propaganda works. https://t.co/eCBux9Rhxq
— Ruth Ben-Ghiat (@ruthbenghiat) June 7, 2022
Harrison Bergeron said:
Classic propaganda. Attempt to distract with theatrics and hysterics.
What else could still be out there? https://t.co/fp5TgZ8gnu
— Sean Hannity (@seanhannity) June 7, 2022
Lots of anxiety in the MAGA ranks today. Stay focused and secure that perimeter, boys.
WE NEED MORE GOLF CARTS AND STASHES OF ARMS!!!!!Sam Lowry said:
Lots of anxiety in the MAGA ranks today. Stay focused and secure that perimeter, boys.
Deep State Sam chatting again with the voices in his head, I observe ...Sam Lowry said:
Lots of anxiety in the MAGA ranks today. Stay focused and secure that perimeter, boys.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
It needs to be on prime time TV because?
Much of that is driven by the highest inflation in 40 years, soaring gasoline prices and Biden’s slumping approval ratings https://t.co/kWrJxQMdKz pic.twitter.com/O0n1xh7q2z
— Bloomberg Politics (@bpolitics) June 6, 2022
“Literally no one is talking to me about Jan. 6,” Reschenthaler says.
— Bloomberg Politics (@bpolitics) June 6, 2022
Read more from @MikeDorning and @HouseInSession: https://t.co/kWrJxQMdKz
this is why nobody cares about Jan 6th right nowCobretti said:Much of that is driven by the highest inflation in 40 years, soaring gasoline prices and Biden’s slumping approval ratings https://t.co/kWrJxQMdKz pic.twitter.com/O0n1xh7q2z
— Bloomberg Politics (@bpolitics) June 6, 2022“Literally no one is talking to me about Jan. 6,” Reschenthaler says.
— Bloomberg Politics (@bpolitics) June 6, 2022
Read more from @MikeDorning and @HouseInSession: https://t.co/kWrJxQMdKz
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”
Jon Stewart
Jon Stewart
he's desperate to spin indictments of Proud Boys leaders as proof of a MAGA inspired insurrection.Oldbear83 said:Deep State Sam chatting again with the voices in his head, I observe ...Sam Lowry said:
Lots of anxiety in the MAGA ranks today. Stay focused and secure that perimeter, boys.
Jan. 2021: "Where are the indictments?"whiterock said:he's desperate to spin indictments of Proud Boys leaders as proof of a MAGA inspired insurrection.Oldbear83 said:Deep State Sam chatting again with the voices in his head, I observe ...Sam Lowry said:
Lots of anxiety in the MAGA ranks today. Stay focused and secure that perimeter, boys.
Feb. 2021: "Where are the indictments?"
Mar. 2021: "Where are the indictments?"
Apr. 2021: "Where are the indictments?"
May. 2021: "Where are the indictments?"
Jun. 2021: "Where are the indictments?"
Jul. 2021: "Where are the indictments?"
Aug. 2021: "Where are the indictments?"
Sep. 2021: "Where are the indictments?"
Oct. 2021: "Where are the indictments?"
Nov. 2021: "Where are the indictments?"
Dec. 2021: "Where are the indictments?"
Jan. 2022: "Where are the indictments?"
Feb. 2022: "Where are the indictments?"
Mar. 2022: "Where are the indictments?"
Apr. 2022: "Where are the indictments?"
May. 2022: "Where are the indictments?"
Jun. 2022: "INDICTMENTS MEAN NOTHING!"
HuMcK said:Harrison Bergeron said:
Classic propaganda. Attempt to distract with theatrics and hysterics.What else could still be out there? https://t.co/fp5TgZ8gnu
— Sean Hannity (@seanhannity) June 7, 2022
Man with weapon detained near Brett Kavanaugh's home. He allegedly told police he wanted to kill the Supreme Court justice. https://t.co/lvfpCjMF5p
— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) June 8, 2022
His ultimate wish is to prevent Trump from being able to run so we can continue electing establishment a holes who fleece us and cause economic hardship.whiterock said:he's desperate to spin indictments of Proud Boys leaders as proof of a MAGA inspired insurrection.Oldbear83 said:Deep State Sam chatting again with the voices in his head, I observe ...Sam Lowry said:
Lots of anxiety in the MAGA ranks today. Stay focused and secure that perimeter, boys.
No more populism, only those with money and DC approved clout can participate in our democracy.