What should schools do to stop shootings

41,170 Views | 550 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by Jack Bauer
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

I thought i had already said yes. I am a law abiding citizen. I would try to pass them out to the younger males in my family but if I couldnt then yes i would certainly surrender them.


If you pass your weapons to others….how is that faithfully obeying the intent of the such a law ?
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is a reporter with the Washington Post...

drahthaar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The twit makes a misleading and dishonest lead in on Cruz' comments. He is against unlocked doors and for a single controlled-entry door which is secured via technology and human guards.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cms186 said:

4th and Inches said:


When he tries to make out that Norway has a bigger Mass shooting problem then the US when Norways "Mass Shooting" problem is literally just one event (The Utoya Island shootings, literally the only mass shooting Norway has had since the 2nd World War) you can probably assume that guy is talking out of his arse
So crime rate per capita is not a valid statistic?
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

This is a reporter with the Washington Post...


Morons, some days I want to root for the astroid
cms186
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm the English Guy
cms186
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

cms186 said:

4th and Inches said:


When he tries to make out that Norway has a bigger Mass shooting problem then the US when Norways "Mass Shooting" problem is literally just one event (The Utoya Island shootings, literally the only mass shooting Norway has had since the 2nd World War) you can probably assume that guy is talking out of his arse
So crime rate per capita is not a valid statistic?
sometimes, sure, sometimes, when you try to make out that a country with a population 60 times smaller than your own country and has had 1 Mass Shooting in nearly 70 years has a worse problem with Mass Shootings than a Country that has had 213 this year alone, then you clearly are not talking sense
I'm the English Guy
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cms186 said:


"Modern Journalism exists for two reasons. To make money off selling advertisement space and to advance a certain type of political discourse…almost always of a liberal and progressive style."

"Journalists have internalized the Marxist idea that media should not reflect the world but shape it, and you get a vast relativized competitive media-sphere where power and force are the only things that matter."
cms186
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

cms186 said:


"Modern Journalism exists for two reasons. To make money off selling advertisement space and to advance a certain type of political discourse…almost always of a liberal and progressive style."

"Journalists have internalized the Marxist idea that media should not reflect the world but shape it, and you get a vast relativized competitive media-sphere where power and force are the only things that matter."
yep, deflect away that one of your state politicians thinks the answer to this tragedy is convicting a corpse and not bothered about preventing Kids getting murdered, I would too
I'm the English Guy
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Mother of Texas gunman says son was 'not a monster,' could be 'aggressive'

ABC News
The mother of the 18-year-old gunman accused of killing 21 at an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas, this week told ABC News in an interview that her son was "not a monster," but that he could "be aggressive."

"I had an uneasy feeling sometimes, like 'what are you up to?" Adriana Reyes told ABC News' Chief National Correspondent Matt Gutman in an interview at her home. "He can be aggressive... If he really got mad."

Reyes' son, accused shooter Salvador Ramos, allegedly purchased two assault rifles in the days after he turned 18 and used them to carry out the second-deadliest school shooting in U.S. history -- all within a span of eight days, authorities said.

Twenty-one people, including 19 third- and fourth-grade children, were killed in the attack, law enforcement officials said. Two teachers were killed, as well. Another 17 people were wounded, including three law enforcement officers. Ramos' grandmother, who police say was the accused gunman's first victim, is hospitalized in stable condition.


"We all have a rage, that some people have it more than others," Reyes said.

Reyes expressed sympathy for the children who were killed and the parents who lost them multiple times during the interview, but said she was not aware that her son had been buying the weapons.

People become emotional at the City of Uvalde Town Square during a prayer vigil in the wake of a mass shoo...
Jordan Vonderhaar/Getty Images
"Those kids… I have no words," Reyes said through tears. "I don't know what to say about those poor kids."

Some classmates told ABC News that Ramos was known for fighting and threatening fellow students. They said he exhibited increasingly disturbing behavior over the past two years, threatening at least one classmate and stalking others, and that he claimed to have cut scars into his face.

Ramos is accused of shooting his grandmother at their home in Uvalde before driving his grandparents' car to Robb Elementary School and opening fire.

"Anyone who shoots his grandmother in the face has to have evil in his heart," Texas Gov. Greg Abbott said during a press conference Wednesday. "But it is far more evil for someone to gun down little kids."
cms186
How long do you want to ignore this user?






I'm the English Guy
Limited IQ Redneck in PU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Canada2017 said:

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

I thought i had already said yes. I am a law abiding citizen. I would try to pass them out to the younger males in my family but if I couldnt then yes i would certainly surrender them.


If you pass your weapons to others….how is that faithfully obeying the intent of the such a law ?
If the law becomes effective tonight I will follow the law.

If I think a law will be made and its beig debated I will give my guns away. My lawyer son will not accept a gun. My son in law probably will. I am not sure about my oldest son. Of course my grandsons are too young to have them.

I am sorry I have not explained well enough. If they make a law I will follow it. I will be passing my guns along when my mother dies because I will have no place to keep them when her house is sold. Except for my great grandfathers service pistol its not a big deal.to me.
I have found theres only two ways to go:
Living fast or dying slow.
I dont want to live forever.
But I will live while I'm here.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cms186 said:

Redbrickbear said:

cms186 said:


"Modern Journalism exists for two reasons. To make money off selling advertisement space and to advance a certain type of political discourse…almost always of a liberal and progressive style."

"Journalists have internalized the Marxist idea that media should not reflect the world but shape it, and you get a vast relativized competitive media-sphere where power and force are the only things that matter."
yep, deflect away that one of your state politicians thinks the answer to this tragedy is convicting a corpse and not bothered about preventing Kids getting murdered, I would too
No one is deflecting.

What you are doing is called creating a straw man to attack easier.

What the reporters are doing, and have been doing for a very long time, is pretending to be neutral fact finders protected by the 1st amendment while actually being party hacks and progressive activists.
cms186
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

cms186 said:

Redbrickbear said:

cms186 said:


"Modern Journalism exists for two reasons. To make money off selling advertisement space and to advance a certain type of political discourse…almost always of a liberal and progressive style."

"Journalists have internalized the Marxist idea that media should not reflect the world but shape it, and you get a vast relativized competitive media-sphere where power and force are the only things that matter."
yep, deflect away that one of your state politicians thinks the answer to this tragedy is convicting a corpse and not bothered about preventing Kids getting murdered, I would too
No one is deflecting.

What you are doing is called creating a straw man to attack easier.

What the reporters are doing, and have been doing for a very long time, is pretending to be neutral fact finders protected by the 1st amendment while actually being party hacks and progressive activists.
I havent created anything, this shooting actually happened, the shooter died, as they commonly do, either killed by the Police or by committing suicide. This State politician said those words, i didnt create them out of thin air and the Journalist (who i know nothing about) responded as to why those words were absolutely ridiculous, both in general and in the particular instance, but yeah, its me and the Journalist who are in the wrong here
I'm the English Guy
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
drahthaar said:

The twit makes a misleading and dishonest lead in on Cruz' comments. He is against unlocked doors and for a single controlled-entry door which is secured via technology and human guards.

This woman is 66 years old and has never seen an "Emergency Exit" door in her life??? Yeah, right.

If I go to my kid's school, I don't just walk in wherever I want. There is one main entrance, I have to buzz in with my info. The door between the receptionist and the school also is locked unless staff let you in. it's not that complicated.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



Mother of Texas gunman says son was 'not a monster,' could be 'aggressive'

ABC News
The mother of the 18-year-old gunman accused of killing 21 at an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas, this week told ABC News in an interview that her son was "not a monster," but that he could "be aggressive."

"I had an uneasy feeling sometimes, like 'what are you up to?" Adriana Reyes told ABC News' Chief National Correspondent Matt Gutman in an interview at her home. "He can be aggressive... If he really got mad."

Reyes' son, accused shooter Salvador Ramos, allegedly purchased two assault rifles in the days after he turned 18 and used them to carry out the second-deadliest school shooting in U.S. history -- all within a span of eight days, authorities said.

Twenty-one people, including 19 third- and fourth-grade children, were killed in the attack, law enforcement officials said. Two teachers were killed, as well. Another 17 people were wounded, including three law enforcement officers. Ramos' grandmother, who police say was the accused gunman's first victim, is hospitalized in stable condition.


"We all have a rage, that some people have it more than others," Reyes said.

Reyes expressed sympathy for the children who were killed and the parents who lost them multiple times during the interview, but said she was not aware that her son had been buying the weapons.

People become emotional at the City of Uvalde Town Square during a prayer vigil in the wake of a mass shoo...
Jordan Vonderhaar/Getty Images
"Those kids… I have no words," Reyes said through tears. "I don't know what to say about those poor kids."

Some classmates told ABC News that Ramos was known for fighting and threatening fellow students. They said he exhibited increasingly disturbing behavior over the past two years, threatening at least one classmate and stalking others, and that he claimed to have cut scars into his face.

Ramos is accused of shooting his grandmother at their home in Uvalde before driving his grandparents' car to Robb Elementary School and opening fire.

"Anyone who shoots his grandmother in the face has to have evil in his heart," Texas Gov. Greg Abbott said during a press conference Wednesday. "But it is far more evil for someone to gun down little kids."
mom in denial about her childs mental health and her poor parenting
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Heartbreaking class picture emerges of Texas elementary school group | Daily Mail Online
Quote:

One fourth grader who survived the mass shooting recalled the harrowing moment the gunman stormed into his classroom and told the children 'it's time to die'.

'He came in and he crouched a little bit and he said, he said: 'It's time to die,'' the unnamed Robb Elementary School student told KENS 5 on Wednesday.

'When I heard the shooting through the door, I told my friend to hide under something so he won't find us,' the boy said. 'I was hiding hard. And I was telling my friend to not talk because he is going to hear us.'


The little boy and four others hid under a cloth-covered table while Ramos opened fire into the
classroom, killing 19 students and two teachers. Seventeen others were injured.

Authorities say it is unclear why the teen targeted the school. He had no criminal history or known mental illnesses, but was described by friends, family and co-workers as a loner and high school dropout, who was bullied and aggressive.

He had got in a fight with his grandmother about who would pay the phone bill before he went on his killing spree, law enforcement officials disclosed to CBS News. However, they note that information is preliminary and are not sure if the fight was the trigger for the massacre.


The fourth grader claims Ramos stormed into their classroom after shooting at another door in the school.

'He shot the next person's door. We have a door in the middle. He opened it,' the boy said, adding that Ramos then told the students they would die.

He and four others took cover under a table, which some experts argue shielded them from Ramos' view and saved their lives.

'When the cops came, the cop said: 'Yell if you need help!' And one of the persons in my class said 'help.' The guy overheard and he came in and shot her,' the boy said.

'The cop barged into that classroom. The guy shot at the cop. And the cops started shooting.'
The boy said they remained hidden until the gunfire ceased.

'I just opened the curtain. And I just put my hand out,' he said. 'I got out with my friend. I knew it was police. I saw the armor and the shield.'

He also alleged his teachers, Irma Garcia, 46, and Eva Mireles, 44, sacrificed themselves to protect their students.

'They were nice teachers,' he said. 'They went in front of my classmates to help. To save them.'
The little boy also issued a warning to other American families, saying: 'I would like to say to every kid and parent to be safe.'

Aliceinbubbleland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When I was in elementary school we had a Principal who was feared with his paddle.

When I was in elementary school we had the Pledge and Prayer before lessons began.

When I was in elementary school we had PTA assistants on playgrounds.

By the time I reached high school there were attacks acros the nation on all of the above.

Movies and TV were entirely different. Leave it to Beaver for example. But Gunsmoke was tops.

Today the word **** is used more in movies and TV than God.

Across town blacks were not allowed to participate in the "good" schools.

Those of us who thought everything was hunkie in our world had no idea what life was like on the otherside.

Then came 1954 and desegregation ripped apart the fabric of lots of places.

We had violence and MLK and a decade or two later Vietnam and deadly rioting.

The country evolved but we didn't. A foundation was torn apart as people were confused when others did not share their political views.

When comparing other nations lack of gun violence to the USA I have to wonder how their children are structured.
Astros in Home Stretch Geaux Texans
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.B.Katz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cms186 said:








Remember the cowardly security officer at Parkland who failed to confront the shooter?

The Uvalde swat team stood outside the building with a shooter inside wringing their hands for so long parents were ready to storm the building themselves:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/05/26/texas-school-shooting-uvalde-victims-live-updates/
J.B.Katz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Heather Cox Richardson's analysis.

Remember, this week CPAC met in Hungary, where Victor Orban has effectively ended democracy. The 'great America" Trump supporters want to bring back, was an America where infrastructure investments and basic safety nets like Social Security meant a large middle class.

All day, I have been coming back to this: How have we arrived at a place where 90% of Americans want to protect our children from gun violence, and yet those who are supposed to represent us in government are unable, or unwilling, to do so?


This is a central problem not just for the issue of gun control, but for our democracy itself.

It seems that during the Cold War, American leaders came to treat democracy and capitalism as if they were interchangeable. So long as the United States embraced capitalism, by which they meant an economic system in which individuals, rather than the state, owned the means of production, liberal democracy would automatically follow.

That theory seemed justified by the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991. The crumbling of that communist system convinced democratic nations that they had won, they had defeated communism, their system of government would dominate the future. Famously, in 1992, political philosopher Francis ***uyama wrote that humanity had reached "the universalization of Western liberal democracy as the final form of human government." In the 1990s, America's leaders believed that the spread of capitalism would turn the world democratic as it delivered to them global dominance, but they talked a lot less about democracy than they did about so-called free markets.

In fact, the apparent success of capitalism actually undercut democracy in the U.S. The end of the Cold War was a gift to those determined to destroy the popular liberal state that had regulated business, provided a basic social safety net, and invested in infrastructure since the New Deal. They turned their animosity from the Soviet Union to the majority at home, those they claimed were bringing communism to America. "For 40 years conservatives fought a two-front battle against statism, against the Soviet empire abroad and the American left at home," right-wing operative Grover Norquist said in 1994. "Now the Soviet Union is gone and conservatives can redeploy. And this time, the other team doesn't have nuclear weapons."

Republicans cracked down on Democrats trying to preserve the active government that had been in place since the 1930s. Aided by talk radio hosts, they increasingly demonized their domestic political opponents. In the 1990 midterm elections, a political action committee associated with House Republican whip Newt Gingrich gave to Republican candidates a document called "Language: A Key Mechanism of Control." It urged candidates to label Democrats with words like "decay," "failure," "crisis," "pathetic," "liberal," "radical," "corrupt," and "taxes," while defining Republicans with words like "opportunity," "moral," "courage," "flag," "children," "common sense," "hard work," and "freedom." Gingrich later told the New York Times his goal was "reshaping the entire nation through the news media."

Their focus on capitalism undermined American democracy. They objected when the Democrats in 1993 made it easier to register to vote by passing the so-called Motor-Voter Act, permitting voters to register at certain state offices. The next year, losing Republican candidates argued that Democrats had won their elections with "voter fraud." In 1996, House and Senate Republicans each launched yearlong investigations into what they insisted were problematic elections, one in Louisiana and one in California. Ultimately, they turned up nothing, but keeping the cases in front of the media for a year helped to convince Americans that voter fraud was a serious issue and that Democrats were winning elections thanks to illegal, usually immigrant, voters.

In 2010 the Supreme Court green-lit the flood of corporate money into our political system with the Citizens' United decision; in 2013 it gutted the provision of the 1965 Voting Rights Act requiring the Department of Justice to sign off on changes to election laws in some states, prompting a slew of discriminatory voter ID laws. In 2010, REDMAP (Redistricting Majority Project) enabled Republicans to take over state legislatures and gerrymander the states dramatically in their own favor.

At the same time, the rise of a market-based economy in the former Soviet republics made it clear that capitalism and democracy were not interchangeable. An oligarchy rose from the ashes of the USSR, and U.S. leaders embraced the leaders of that new system as allies. That allyship has gone so far that this week, the Conservative Political Action Conference held a conference in Hungary, where leader Viktor Orbn, who was a keynote speaker at the event, has openly rejected democracy. At the conference, he called for the right in the U.S. to join forces with those like him; yesterday, he declared martial law in his country.

At home, where our focus on free markets has stacked our political system in favor of the Republicans, the vast majority of Americans want reasonable gun laws, reproductive rights, action on climate change, equality before the law, infrastructure funding, and so on, and their representatives are unable to get those things.
Capitalism, it seems, is also trumping democracy at home.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I know the police response is starting to get dragged on social media....but I think we have to pause a minute. We obviously don't have all the facts yet.

I definitely have questions about why the shooter was not initially confronted with force when he first walked into the building and was apparently seen by the school resource officer.

But once he was in and barricaded himself in the classroom behind a locked door I think the police/border patrol agents were in a very tough spot. Some are already questioning why the police were outside blocking parents and not in the building engaging the shooter.

Well...we already know border patrol agents were inside working on the situation. Some police have to remain outside and maintain order. No matter how brave some of those parents were....letting parents storm into the building was not going to make the situation better.

Assuming the shooter had barricaded himself in the room and the border patrol agents did not have a visual into the room they couldn't just barge in or start firing indiscriminately through the door not knowing if there were still students or staff alive in the room. It sounds weird that they had to wait for a key to the room, but I could see a scenario where that made sense.

I'm sure in the weeks ahead we will start to have a clearer picture and a timeline of events to where we can see where some breakdowns may have occurred.
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

cms186 said:

4th and Inches said:


When he tries to make out that Norway has a bigger Mass shooting problem then the US when Norways "Mass Shooting" problem is literally just one event (The Utoya Island shootings, literally the only mass shooting Norway has had since the 2nd World War) you can probably assume that guy is talking out of his arse
So crime rate per capita is not a valid statistic?
Not to liberals. You need feelings, not statistics.
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.B.Katz said:

Heather Cox Richardson's analysis.

Remember, this week CPAC met in Hungary, where Victor Orban has effectively ended democracy. The 'great America" Trump supporters want to bring back, was an America where infrastructure investments and basic safety nets like Social Security meant a large middle class.

All day, I have been coming back to this: How have we arrived at a place where 90% of Americans want to protect our children from gun violence, and yet those who are supposed to represent us in government are unable, or unwilling, to do so?


This is a central problem not just for the issue of gun control, but for our democracy itself.

It seems that during the Cold War, American leaders came to treat democracy and capitalism as if they were interchangeable. So long as the United States embraced capitalism, by which they meant an economic system in which individuals, rather than the state, owned the means of production, liberal democracy would automatically follow.

That theory seemed justified by the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991. The crumbling of that communist system convinced democratic nations that they had won, they had defeated communism, their system of government would dominate the future. Famously, in 1992, political philosopher Francis ***uyama wrote that humanity had reached "the universalization of Western liberal democracy as the final form of human government." In the 1990s, America's leaders believed that the spread of capitalism would turn the world democratic as it delivered to them global dominance, but they talked a lot less about democracy than they did about so-called free markets.

In fact, the apparent success of capitalism actually undercut democracy in the U.S. The end of the Cold War was a gift to those determined to destroy the popular liberal state that had regulated business, provided a basic social safety net, and invested in infrastructure since the New Deal. They turned their animosity from the Soviet Union to the majority at home, those they claimed were bringing communism to America. "For 40 years conservatives fought a two-front battle against statism, against the Soviet empire abroad and the American left at home," right-wing operative Grover Norquist said in 1994. "Now the Soviet Union is gone and conservatives can redeploy. And this time, the other team doesn't have nuclear weapons."

Republicans cracked down on Democrats trying to preserve the active government that had been in place since the 1930s. Aided by talk radio hosts, they increasingly demonized their domestic political opponents. In the 1990 midterm elections, a political action committee associated with House Republican whip Newt Gingrich gave to Republican candidates a document called "Language: A Key Mechanism of Control." It urged candidates to label Democrats with words like "decay," "failure," "crisis," "pathetic," "liberal," "radical," "corrupt," and "taxes," while defining Republicans with words like "opportunity," "moral," "courage," "flag," "children," "common sense," "hard work," and "freedom." Gingrich later told the New York Times his goal was "reshaping the entire nation through the news media."

Their focus on capitalism undermined American democracy. They objected when the Democrats in 1993 made it easier to register to vote by passing the so-called Motor-Voter Act, permitting voters to register at certain state offices. The next year, losing Republican candidates argued that Democrats had won their elections with "voter fraud." In 1996, House and Senate Republicans each launched yearlong investigations into what they insisted were problematic elections, one in Louisiana and one in California. Ultimately, they turned up nothing, but keeping the cases in front of the media for a year helped to convince Americans that voter fraud was a serious issue and that Democrats were winning elections thanks to illegal, usually immigrant, voters.

In 2010 the Supreme Court green-lit the flood of corporate money into our political system with the Citizens' United decision; in 2013 it gutted the provision of the 1965 Voting Rights Act requiring the Department of Justice to sign off on changes to election laws in some states, prompting a slew of discriminatory voter ID laws. In 2010, REDMAP (Redistricting Majority Project) enabled Republicans to take over state legislatures and gerrymander the states dramatically in their own favor.

At the same time, the rise of a market-based economy in the former Soviet republics made it clear that capitalism and democracy were not interchangeable. An oligarchy rose from the ashes of the USSR, and U.S. leaders embraced the leaders of that new system as allies. That allyship has gone so far that this week, the Conservative Political Action Conference held a conference in Hungary, where leader Viktor Orbn, who was a keynote speaker at the event, has openly rejected democracy. At the conference, he called for the right in the U.S. to join forces with those like him; yesterday, he declared martial law in his country.

At home, where our focus on free markets has stacked our political system in favor of the Republicans, the vast majority of Americans want reasonable gun laws, reproductive rights, action on climate change, equality before the law, infrastructure funding, and so on, and their representatives are unable to get those things.
Capitalism, it seems, is also trumping democracy at home.
Good.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.B.Katz said:

Heather Cox Richardson's analysis.

Remember, this week CPAC met in Hungary, where Victor Orban has effectively ended democracy.
If you are going to come out and lie like that no one should read anything else you write in a post.

https://www.spiked-online.com/2020/04/21/hungary-is-not-a-dictatorship/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/hungary-is-no-dictatorship/2020/06/12/5a2c87e6-a9b1-11ea-a43b-be9f6494a87d_story.html

There are more opposition papers now than when Orban was elected.

And a party winning large majorities in free and fair national elections to the national parliament is not the end of democracy...unless you think democracy means liberals must always win and conservatives must lose.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:


He did not come off polished saying it that way....

But Herschel is right that social media is toxic.

Modern Internet culture among young kids and teens is a big part of the mental health problem in this country.

Increased levels of anxiety, depression, and self cutting among young girls.

Increased levels of anxiety, depression, and anti-social violent behavior among young males.

Just looks at the stats...levels have exploded since the iPhone (constant internet connection) when mainstream around 2010.
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cms186 said:


Sounds like the Justice process in this instance was expedited.
cms186
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm the English Guy
cms186
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:

cms186 said:


Sounds like the Justice process in this instance was expedited.
except hes not talking about the Justice process, why should 21 people have to die to root out one psycho?
I'm the English Guy
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

I know the police response is starting to get dragged on social media....but I think we have to pause a minute. We obviously don't have all the facts yet.

I definitely have questions about why the shooter was not initially confronted with force when he first walked into the building and was apparently seen by the school resource officer.

But once he was in and barricaded himself in the classroom behind a locked door I think the police/border patrol agents were in a very tough spot. Some are already questioning why the police were outside blocking parents and not in the building engaging the shooter.

Well...we already know border patrol agents were inside working on the situation. Some police have to remain outside and maintain order. No matter how brave some of those parents were....letting parents storm into the building was not going to make the situation better.

Assuming the shooter had barricaded himself in the room and the border patrol agents did not have a visual into the room they couldn't just barge in or start firing indiscriminately through the door not knowing if there were still students or staff alive in the room. It sounds weird that they had to wait for a key to the room, but I could see a scenario where that made sense.

I'm sure in the weeks ahead we will start to have a clearer picture and a timeline of events to where we can see where some breakdowns may have occurred.
There will definitely be mistakes that occurred, especially what happened in the initial interaction. But one factor of holding back parents was to reduce the likelihood of additional victims. Whether they over resourced that instead of engaging the shooter will come out. I'm certain more could have been done though.
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cms186 said:

ATL Bear said:

cms186 said:


Sounds like the Justice process in this instance was expedited.
except hes not talking about the Justice process, why should 21 people have to die to root out one psycho?
How would you have rooted him out before the attack?
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cms186 said:

ATL Bear said:

cms186 said:


Sounds like the Justice process in this instance was expedited.
except hes not talking about the Justice process, why should 21 people have to die to root out one psycho?
Until pre-crime is invented, we're stuck with prosecuting criminals that commit crimes or killing them during apprehension.

To "root out" a psycho like this guy requires a lot more trimming off of rights, not gun rights, to be effective.
cms186
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:

cms186 said:

ATL Bear said:

cms186 said:


Sounds like the Justice process in this instance was expedited.
except hes not talking about the Justice process, why should 21 people have to die to root out one psycho?
Until pre-crime is invented, we're stuck with prosecuting criminals that commit crimes or killing them during apprehension.

To "root out" a psycho like this guy requires a lot more trimming off of rights, not gun rights, to be effective.
Theres plenty of things you can do, obviously we dont know everything about this particular case right now and im sure more things will be come apparent, but not even touching on Gun rights, theres a lot more that can be done with Mental Health care (something your Governor acknowledged, despite having cut 200 million dollars from Mental Health Care budgets in the state)

We can help these people (when possible, it wont always be possible, im sure) before they end up feeling that a School Shooting is the best way to resolve their problems
I'm the English Guy
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

Canada2017 said:

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

I thought i had already said yes. I am a law abiding citizen. I would try to pass them out to the younger males in my family but if I couldnt then yes i would certainly surrender them.


If you pass your weapons to others….how is that faithfully obeying the intent of the such a law ?
If the law becomes effective tonight I will follow the law.

If I think a law will be made and its beig debated I will give my guns away. My lawyer son will not accept a gun. My son in law probably will. I am not sure about my oldest son. Of course my grandsons are too young to have them.

I am sorry I have not explained well enough. If they make a law I will follow it. I will be passing my guns along when my mother dies because I will have no place to keep them when her house is sold. Except for my great grandfathers service pistol its not a big deal.to me.


Am willing to surrender my LWRC as I can understand the hysteria surrounding AR's .

But that all. The rest of my pistols , rifles and shotguns will stay with me . As I have seen first hand what tough gun laws have created in Mexico .
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.