Wangchung said:

---

Man, I remember when Baylor football was absolute garbage. We would lose most games but found little moral victories to grasp on to in order to get through such dark times. Looks like democrats are now grasping at moral victories. Good times.

---

Democrats control most of the national media , the White House, Senate and House .

They are punishing their political enemies utilizing the DOJ, FBI and selected federal judges.






It is the Republicans searching for moral victories.

Wangchung said:

---

Man, I remember when Baylor football was absolute garbage. We would lose most games but found little moral victories to grasp on to in order to get through such dark times. Looks like democrats are now grasping at moral victories. Good times.

---

So Liz just lost to UNLV on the last play of the game, er, primary?

Canada2017 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Man, I remember when Baylor football was absolute garbage. We would lose most games but found little moral victories to grasp on to in order to get through such dark times. Looks like democrats are now grasping at moral victories. Good times.

---

Democrats control most of the national media , the White House, Senate and House .

They are punishing their political enemies utilizing the DOJ, FBI and selected federal judges.






It is the Republicans searching for moral victories.

---

I'm hoping Frodo throws the ring into Mt. Doom soon.

Canada2017 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Man, I remember when Baylor football was absolute garbage. We would lose most games but found little moral victories to grasp on to in order to get through such dark times. Looks like democrats are now grasping at moral victories. Good times.

---

Democrats control most of the national media , the White House, Senate and House .

They are punishing their political enemies utilizing the DOJ, FBI and selected federal judges.






It is the Republicans searching for moral victories.

---

Midterms will tell the tale. Has the system been so corrupted that elections now belong to democrats or can the American people still choose their own destiny? We'll just have to hide and watch.

Wangchung said:

---

Canada2017 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Man, I remember when Baylor football was absolute garbage. We would lose most games but found little moral victories to grasp on to in order to get through such dark times. Looks like democrats are now grasping at moral victories. Good times.

---

Democrats control most of the national media , the White House, Senate and House .

They are punishing their political enemies utilizing the DOJ, FBI and selected federal judges.






It is the Republicans searching for moral victories.

---

Midterms will tell the tale. Has the system been so corrupted that elections now belong to democrats or can the American people still choose their own destiny? We'll just have to hide and watch.

---

Dems would have never pulled such a ridiculous stunt as to raid the house of an ex president and accuse him of stealing top secret documents ( knowing full well the Secret Service is with him 24/7 ) if they had any fears of the midterms .


Dems know they have all the necessary pieces in place to 'win' .

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

ScottS said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

He Hate Me said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

ABC BEAR said:

---

Johnny Bear said:

---

ABC BEAR said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

He Hate Me said:

---

I am surprised she didn't receive 81 million votes. She is more on the ball than someone who did.

---

She isn't claiming the election was stolen. She called her opponent and conceded.
No court cases. No teams of lawyers trying to steal the election. No claims of persecution.

---

she lost by 37 points even after her campaign specifically targeted Dems to vote in the GOP primary. She won the same two counties that Joe Biden did..

---

I guess they didn't have 24 hour drive thru voting, mass mail-in balloting and ballot harvesting.

If they would've just enabled those three things, she could've won in a landslide.

---

Liz would have been doing the Detroit Shuffle.....more votes than registered voters.

---

Careful. You guys are going to upset the multiple posters on this site who are convinced none of those fraudulent (and documented) activities impacted the 2020 election and that a joke like dementia Joe really did legitimately receive 81 million votes.

---

Then there's the Philly Hustlers and Atlanta Grifters who shut down vote counting for a few hours in the wee hours and kick out legally appointed poll watchers. When the ends justify the means, nothing is off limits.

---

Trump should have gone to court.

---

The fundamental problem was the gap between his bloviation and his actual legal filings.

---

A problem created by corrupt, left-wing judges with their insistence on fact-based pleadings and evidence. What more proof do you need that the system is rigged?

---

I could explain it to you, but I cannot understand it for you.

---

But you can do neither

---

Cheney donor.

---

Proudly

---

You threw good $ after bad.

---

Principle

---

I daddy taught me never to bet on a lame horse.

---

4th, I thought you'd understand a principled stand

Oldbear83 said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

ScottS said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

He Hate Me said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

ABC BEAR said:

---

Johnny Bear said:

---

ABC BEAR said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

He Hate Me said:

---

I am surprised she didn't receive 81 million votes. She is more on the ball than someone who did.

---

She isn't claiming the election was stolen. She called her opponent and conceded.
No court cases. No teams of lawyers trying to steal the election. No claims of persecution.

---

she lost by 37 points even after her campaign specifically targeted Dems to vote in the GOP primary. She won the same two counties that Joe Biden did..

---

I guess they didn't have 24 hour drive thru voting, mass mail-in balloting and ballot harvesting.

If they would've just enabled those three things, she could've won in a landslide.

---

Liz would have been doing the Detroit Shuffle.....more votes than registered voters.

---

Careful. You guys are going to upset the multiple posters on this site who are convinced none of those fraudulent (and documented) activities impacted the 2020 election and that a joke like dementia Joe really did legitimately receive 81 million votes.

---

Then there's the Philly Hustlers and Atlanta Grifters who shut down vote counting for a few hours in the wee hours and kick out legally appointed poll watchers. When the ends justify the means, nothing is off limits.

---

Trump should have gone to court.

---

The fundamental problem was the gap between his bloviation and his actual legal filings.

---

A problem created by corrupt, left-wing judges with their insistence on fact-based pleadings and evidence. What more proof do you need that the system is rigged?

---

I could explain it to you, but I cannot understand it for you.

---

But you can do neither

---

Cheney donor.

---

Proudly

---

You threw good $ after bad.

---

Principle

---

You won't get principles that way

---

I knew Old wouldn't understand a principled stand

Osodecentx said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

ScottS said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

He Hate Me said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

ABC BEAR said:

---

Johnny Bear said:

---

ABC BEAR said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

He Hate Me said:

---

I am surprised she didn't receive 81 million votes. She is more on the ball than someone who did.

---

She isn't claiming the election was stolen. She called her opponent and conceded.
No court cases. No teams of lawyers trying to steal the election. No claims of persecution.

---

she lost by 37 points even after her campaign specifically targeted Dems to vote in the GOP primary. She won the same two counties that Joe Biden did..

---

I guess they didn't have 24 hour drive thru voting, mass mail-in balloting and ballot harvesting.

If they would've just enabled those three things, she could've won in a landslide.

---

Liz would have been doing the Detroit Shuffle.....more votes than registered voters.

---

Careful. You guys are going to upset the multiple posters on this site who are convinced none of those fraudulent (and documented) activities impacted the 2020 election and that a joke like dementia Joe really did legitimately receive 81 million votes.

---

Then there's the Philly Hustlers and Atlanta Grifters who shut down vote counting for a few hours in the wee hours and kick out legally appointed poll watchers. When the ends justify the means, nothing is off limits.

---

Trump should have gone to court.

---

The fundamental problem was the gap between his bloviation and his actual legal filings.

---

A problem created by corrupt, left-wing judges with their insistence on fact-based pleadings and evidence. What more proof do you need that the system is rigged?

---

I could explain it to you, but I cannot understand it for you.

---

But you can do neither

---

Cheney donor.

---

Proudly

---

You threw good $ after bad.

---

Principle

---

I daddy taught me never to bet on a lame horse.

---

4th, I thought you'd understand a principled stand

---

I do understand a principled stand. I could either give $500 to a politician who says they're gonna make kids lives better or I can give $500 to a foster care agency who I know is going to make kids lives better.

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

ScottS said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

He Hate Me said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

ABC BEAR said:

---

Johnny Bear said:

---

ABC BEAR said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

He Hate Me said:

---

I am surprised she didn't receive 81 million votes. She is more on the ball than someone who did.

---

She isn't claiming the election was stolen. She called her opponent and conceded.
No court cases. No teams of lawyers trying to steal the election. No claims of persecution.

---

she lost by 37 points even after her campaign specifically targeted Dems to vote in the GOP primary. She won the same two counties that Joe Biden did..

---

I guess they didn't have 24 hour drive thru voting, mass mail-in balloting and ballot harvesting.

If they would've just enabled those three things, she could've won in a landslide.

---

Liz would have been doing the Detroit Shuffle.....more votes than registered voters.

---

Careful. You guys are going to upset the multiple posters on this site who are convinced none of those fraudulent (and documented) activities impacted the 2020 election and that a joke like dementia Joe really did legitimately receive 81 million votes.

---

Then there's the Philly Hustlers and Atlanta Grifters who shut down vote counting for a few hours in the wee hours and kick out legally appointed poll watchers. When the ends justify the means, nothing is off limits.

---

Trump should have gone to court.

---

The fundamental problem was the gap between his bloviation and his actual legal filings.

---

A problem created by corrupt, left-wing judges with their insistence on fact-based pleadings and evidence. What more proof do you need that the system is rigged?

---

I could explain it to you, but I cannot understand it for you.

---

But you can do neither

---

Cheney donor.

---

Proudly

---

You threw good $ after bad.

---

Principle

---

I daddy taught me never to bet on a lame horse.

---

4th, I thought you'd understand a principled stand

---

I do understand a principled stand. I could either give $500 to a politician who says they're gonna make kids lives better or I can give $500 to a foster care agency who I know is going to make kids lives better.

---

You've never backed a losing cause?

Oso: "I knew Old wouldn't understand a principled stand"

I do indeed understand and practice principles, Oso. After all, I observed your departure from them almost as soon as you left them.

Oldbear83 said:

---

Oso: "I knew Old wouldn't understand a principled stand"

I do indeed understand and practice principles, Oso. After all, I observed your departure from them almost as soon as you left them.

---

"Nope, just correcting false assumptions by the Fascista here"

Osodecentx said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

ScottS said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

He Hate Me said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

ABC BEAR said:

---

Johnny Bear said:

---

ABC BEAR said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

He Hate Me said:

---

I am surprised she didn't receive 81 million votes. She is more on the ball than someone who did.

---

She isn't claiming the election was stolen. She called her opponent and conceded.
No court cases. No teams of lawyers trying to steal the election. No claims of persecution.

---

she lost by 37 points even after her campaign specifically targeted Dems to vote in the GOP primary. She won the same two counties that Joe Biden did..

---

I guess they didn't have 24 hour drive thru voting, mass mail-in balloting and ballot harvesting.

If they would've just enabled those three things, she could've won in a landslide.

---

Liz would have been doing the Detroit Shuffle.....more votes than registered voters.

---

Careful. You guys are going to upset the multiple posters on this site who are convinced none of those fraudulent (and documented) activities impacted the 2020 election and that a joke like dementia Joe really did legitimately receive 81 million votes.

---

Then there's the Philly Hustlers and Atlanta Grifters who shut down vote counting for a few hours in the wee hours and kick out legally appointed poll watchers. When the ends justify the means, nothing is off limits.

---

Trump should have gone to court.

---

The fundamental problem was the gap between his bloviation and his actual legal filings.

---

A problem created by corrupt, left-wing judges with their insistence on fact-based pleadings and evidence. What more proof do you need that the system is rigged?

---

I could explain it to you, but I cannot understand it for you.

---

But you can do neither

---

Cheney donor.

---

Proudly

---

You threw good $ after bad.

---

Principle

---

I daddy taught me never to bet on a lame horse.

---

4th, I thought you'd understand a principled stand

---

I do understand a principled stand. I could either give $500 to a politician who says they're gonna make kids lives better or I can give $500 to a foster care agency who I know is going to make kids lives better.

---

You've never backed a losing cause?

---

sure, i was a Baylor fan in the 2000's

Osodecentx said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Oso: "I knew Old wouldn't understand a principled stand"

I do indeed understand and practice principles, Oso. After all, I observed your departure from them almost as soon as you left them.

---

"Nope, just correcting false assumptions by the Fascista here"

---

Indeed, given your posts over the last few months I am certain you do hear that a lot, Oso.

Osodecentx said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

He Hate Me said:

---

I am surprised she didn't receive 81 million votes. She is more on the ball than someone who did.

---

She isn't claiming the election was stolen. She called her opponent and conceded.
No court cases. No teams of lawyers trying to steal the election. No claims of persecution.

---

Losing by almost 40 points will do that.

Stacy Abrams still hasn't conceded.

---

Good point. I won't vote for Stacy

---

So if it bothers you so much about Trump, it should bother you as much about Abrams or even Clinton for that matter.

FYI, Mrs. Clinton still doesn't think she lost.

At least these folks had fairly close election and I can understand they were upset.

Cheney, got donkey stomped by 40 points. She gets no bonus points for conceding.

Quote:

---

Liz Cheney is already raising money for her next effort


Ben Werschkul
Washington Correspondent
Thu, August 18, 2022 at 2:14 PM


While Liz Cheney lost among Wyoming voters, one contest where she emerged victorious was the money race against her Trump-endorsed opponent.

According to the most recent filings, Cheney raised over $15 million for her campaign versus $4.4 million for Harriet Hageman. The bigger bankroll didn't help her much on Tuesday, however, with Hageman decisively winning by nearly 40 percentage points.

But Cheney responded to her widely-expected defeat with a quick pivot. She launched a new political group for herself aimed at a possible run for president and, flush with cash, the new group's website was up and accepting donations by Wednesday morning.

---

And here is what it is all about.

Another boring, no talent, bad disposition, bad personality, nepotistic politician enriching themselves in a never ending cycle of collecting money from gullible dupes.

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

ScottS said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

He Hate Me said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

ABC BEAR said:

---

Johnny Bear said:

---

ABC BEAR said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

He Hate Me said:

---

I am surprised she didn't receive 81 million votes. She is more on the ball than someone who did.

---

She isn't claiming the election was stolen. She called her opponent and conceded.
No court cases. No teams of lawyers trying to steal the election. No claims of persecution.

---

she lost by 37 points even after her campaign specifically targeted Dems to vote in the GOP primary. She won the same two counties that Joe Biden did..

---

I guess they didn't have 24 hour drive thru voting, mass mail-in balloting and ballot harvesting.

If they would've just enabled those three things, she could've won in a landslide.

---

Liz would have been doing the Detroit Shuffle.....more votes than registered voters.

---

Careful. You guys are going to upset the multiple posters on this site who are convinced none of those fraudulent (and documented) activities impacted the 2020 election and that a joke like dementia Joe really did legitimately receive 81 million votes.

---

Then there's the Philly Hustlers and Atlanta Grifters who shut down vote counting for a few hours in the wee hours and kick out legally appointed poll watchers. When the ends justify the means, nothing is off limits.

---

Trump should have gone to court.

---

The fundamental problem was the gap between his bloviation and his actual legal filings.

---

A problem created by corrupt, left-wing judges with their insistence on fact-based pleadings and evidence. What more proof do you need that the system is rigged?

---

I could explain it to you, but I cannot understand it for you.

---

But you can do neither

---

Cheney donor.

---

Proudly

---

You threw good $ after bad.

---

Principle

---

I daddy taught me never to bet on a lame horse.

---

4th, I thought you'd understand a principled stand

---

I do understand a principled stand. I could either give $500 to a politician who says they're gonna make kids lives better or I can give $500 to a foster care agency who I know is going to make kids lives better.

---

You've never backed a losing cause?

---

sure, i was a Baylor fan in the 2000's

---

You should have been here in the 70s

Osodecentx said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

ScottS said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

He Hate Me said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

ABC BEAR said:

---

Johnny Bear said:

---

ABC BEAR said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

He Hate Me said:

---

I am surprised she didn't receive 81 million votes. She is more on the ball than someone who did.

---

She isn't claiming the election was stolen. She called her opponent and conceded.
No court cases. No teams of lawyers trying to steal the election. No claims of persecution.

---

she lost by 37 points even after her campaign specifically targeted Dems to vote in the GOP primary. She won the same two counties that Joe Biden did..

---

I guess they didn't have 24 hour drive thru voting, mass mail-in balloting and ballot harvesting.

If they would've just enabled those three things, she could've won in a landslide.

---

Liz would have been doing the Detroit Shuffle.....more votes than registered voters.

---

Careful. You guys are going to upset the multiple posters on this site who are convinced none of those fraudulent (and documented) activities impacted the 2020 election and that a joke like dementia Joe really did legitimately receive 81 million votes.

---

Then there's the Philly Hustlers and Atlanta Grifters who shut down vote counting for a few hours in the wee hours and kick out legally appointed poll watchers. When the ends justify the means, nothing is off limits.

---

Trump should have gone to court.

---

The fundamental problem was the gap between his bloviation and his actual legal filings.

---

A problem created by corrupt, left-wing judges with their insistence on fact-based pleadings and evidence. What more proof do you need that the system is rigged?

---

I could explain it to you, but I cannot understand it for you.

---

But you can do neither

---

Cheney donor.

---

Proudly

---

You threw good $ after bad.

---

Principle

---

I daddy taught me never to bet on a lame horse.

---

4th, I thought you'd understand a principled stand

---

I do understand a principled stand. I could either give $500 to a politician who says they're gonna make kids lives better or I can give $500 to a foster care agency who I know is going to make kids lives better.

---

You've never backed a losing cause?

---

sure, i was a Baylor fan in the 2000's

---

You should have been here in the 70s

---

i dont think they were a losing cause then..

liz: pronouns: he / him aka: abe

D!

- tbp*

{ sipping coffee }

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

ScottS said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

He Hate Me said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

ABC BEAR said:

---

Johnny Bear said:

---

ABC BEAR said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

He Hate Me said:

---

I am surprised she didn't receive 81 million votes. She is more on the ball than someone who did.

---

She isn't claiming the election was stolen. She called her opponent and conceded.
No court cases. No teams of lawyers trying to steal the election. No claims of persecution.

---

she lost by 37 points even after her campaign specifically targeted Dems to vote in the GOP primary. She won the same two counties that Joe Biden did..

---

I guess they didn't have 24 hour drive thru voting, mass mail-in balloting and ballot harvesting.

If they would've just enabled those three things, she could've won in a landslide.

---

Liz would have been doing the Detroit Shuffle.....more votes than registered voters.

---

Careful. You guys are going to upset the multiple posters on this site who are convinced none of those fraudulent (and documented) activities impacted the 2020 election and that a joke like dementia Joe really did legitimately receive 81 million votes.

---

Then there's the Philly Hustlers and Atlanta Grifters who shut down vote counting for a few hours in the wee hours and kick out legally appointed poll watchers. When the ends justify the means, nothing is off limits.

---

Trump should have gone to court.

---

The fundamental problem was the gap between his bloviation and his actual legal filings.

---

A problem created by corrupt, left-wing judges with their insistence on fact-based pleadings and evidence. What more proof do you need that the system is rigged?

---

I could explain it to you, but I cannot understand it for you.

---

But you can do neither

---

Cheney donor.

---

Proudly

---

You threw good $ after bad.

---

Principle

---

I daddy taught me never to bet on a lame horse.

---

4th, I thought you'd understand a principled stand

---

I do understand a principled stand. I could either give $500 to a politician who says they're gonna make kids lives better or I can give $500 to a foster care agency who I know is going to make kids lives better.

---

You've never backed a losing cause?

---

sure, i was a Baylor fan in the 2000's

---

You should have been here in the 70s

---

i dont think they were a losing cause then..

---

Bill Beall?

Osodecentx said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

ScottS said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

He Hate Me said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

ABC BEAR said:

---

Johnny Bear said:

---

ABC BEAR said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

He Hate Me said:

---

I am surprised she didn't receive 81 million votes. She is more on the ball than someone who did.

---

She isn't claiming the election was stolen. She called her opponent and conceded.
No court cases. No teams of lawyers trying to steal the election. No claims of persecution.

---

she lost by 37 points even after her campaign specifically targeted Dems to vote in the GOP primary. She won the same two counties that Joe Biden did..

---

I guess they didn't have 24 hour drive thru voting, mass mail-in balloting and ballot harvesting.

If they would've just enabled those three things, she could've won in a landslide.

---

Liz would have been doing the Detroit Shuffle.....more votes than registered voters.

---

Careful. You guys are going to upset the multiple posters on this site who are convinced none of those fraudulent (and documented) activities impacted the 2020 election and that a joke like dementia Joe really did legitimately receive 81 million votes.

---

Then there's the Philly Hustlers and Atlanta Grifters who shut down vote counting for a few hours in the wee hours and kick out legally appointed poll watchers. When the ends justify the means, nothing is off limits.

---

Trump should have gone to court.

---

The fundamental problem was the gap between his bloviation and his actual legal filings.

---

A problem created by corrupt, left-wing judges with their insistence on fact-based pleadings and evidence. What more proof do you need that the system is rigged?

---

I could explain it to you, but I cannot understand it for you.

---

But you can do neither

---

Cheney donor.

---

Proudly

---

You threw good $ after bad.

---

Principle

---

I daddy taught me never to bet on a lame horse.

---

4th, I thought you'd understand a principled stand

---

I do understand a principled stand. I could either give $500 to a politician who says they're gonna make kids lives better or I can give $500 to a foster care agency who I know is going to make kids lives better.

---

You've never backed a losing cause?

---

sure, i was a Baylor fan in the 2000's

---

You should have been here in the 70s

---

i dont think they were a losing cause then..

---

Bill Beall?

---

Yeah, I blank out everything prior to GT.. lol

"Cheney lost because her constituents saw that she cared more about fighting Trump than fighting Biden...more concerned with waging a civil war within the [GOP]than the inflation that is forcing her voters to choose between...gas and food."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/08/18/what-cheney-misses-about-republicans-trump/


the faulty assumption of neverTrumperism is that they will have a future home in the GOP after Trump is gone.
Could not be more incorrect.

whiterock said:

---

the faulty assumption of neverTrumperism is that they will have a future home in the GOP after Trump is gone.
Could not be more incorrect.

---

The will still have a place within the Republican Party ( Where else they going to go ? ) ......but obviously won't carry as much influence as they do currently .

Wyoming gets one Rep. in Congress, their Rep. decided to have a national platform, instead of representing the
desires of the state.

Doesn't seem there would be any chance for her to get reelected.

Now she gets to pusue what she was using Wyoming as a platform for all along. And enrich herself even more.


Corrected

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Montana gets one Rep. in Congress, their Rep. decided to have a national platform, instead of representing the
desires of the state.

Doesn't seem there would be any chance for her to get reelected.

Now she gets to pusue what she was using Montana as a platform for all along. And enrich herself even more.

---

why is nobody asking how the nice congressional person whose net worth was 7mil when she got to congress 6 years ago now is worth, checks notes.. 45 million. Took the Pelosi stock investing course..

whiterock said:

---

the faulty assumption of neverTrumperism is that they will have a future home in the GOP after Trump is gone.
Could not be more incorrect.

---

So much for the big tent

Canada2017 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

the faulty assumption of neverTrumperism is that they will have a future home in the GOP after Trump is gone.
Could not be more incorrect.

---

The will still have a place within the Republican Party ( Where else they going to go ? ) ......but obviously won't carry as much influence as they do currently .

---

Not sure I want to be in the Republican Party. I'll just let you boys grind it into a minority party.

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

the faulty assumption of neverTrumperism is that they will have a future home in the GOP after Trump is gone.
Could not be more incorrect.

---

So much for the big tent

---

never Trumpers chose to stay home.. old white corporate and academic elitists fit in with the Dem party just fine.

The techtonic shift of minorities away from Democrat party toward independence and MAGA is alarming to some but its ok, you are always welcome in the tent if you choose

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

the faulty assumption of neverTrumperism is that they will have a future home in the GOP after Trump is gone.
Could not be more incorrect.

---

So much for the big tent

---

It's all about policy! That and crushing the heretics. Policy, and sweet, sweet vengeance against the heretics.

4th and Inches said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

the faulty assumption of neverTrumperism is that they will have a future home in the GOP after Trump is gone.
Could not be more incorrect.

---

So much for the big tent

---

never Trumpers chose to stay home.. old white corporate and academic elitists fit in with the Dem party just fine.

The techtonic shift of minorities away from Democrat party toward independence and MAGA is alarming to some but its ok, you are always welcome in the tent if you choose

---

The minority of which I speak isn't racial, it is numerical. We're welcome if we believe Trump wont 2020 election and didn't incite a riot on Jan 6. BS. He's your boy

You guys just keep following the Trump elephant in the parade trying to clean up the ****

Sam Lowry said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

the faulty assumption of neverTrumperism is that they will have a future home in the GOP after Trump is gone.
Could not be more incorrect.

---

So much for the big tent

---

It's all about policy! That and crushing the heretics. Policy, and sweet, sweet vengeance against the heretics.

---

they wouldnt be heretics if they would follow policy.. its so hard talking to these non believers!

whiterock said:

---

"Cheney lost because her constituents saw that she cared more about fighting Trump than fighting Biden...more concerned with waging a civil war within the [GOP]than the inflation that is forcing her voters to choose between...gas and food."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/08/18/what-cheney-misses-about-republicans-trump/


the faulty assumption of neverTrumperism is that they will have a future home in the GOP after Trump is gone.
Could not be more incorrect.

---

Here's the thing:

Major political parties often face schisms as members choose who they want to follow. The Kennedies held sway for a time among Democrats, then Bill Clinton took over. The Democrats are now in a struggle between the Clintons and the Squad.

The Republicans found their brand in Reagan, but Bush hijacked it back for the Establishment. One thing the Never-Trumpers miss when considering the 2016 election, is how easily Trump blew through the field to win the RNC nomination. For better or worse, Trump was the only major candidate who convinced working-class voters he was listening to them.

Trump himself has a limited time. HIs age alone limits how long he can play an important role in politics beyond 2026, 2028 at the latest. For all the hype, none of Trump's family has any real political viability. But Trump is undeniably the biggest player in the 2022 and 2024 elections, whether he runs or not.

Anyone serious about planning for the future needs to understand these basic points.

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Montana gets one Rep. in Congress, their Rep. decided to have a national platform, instead of representing the
desires of the state.

Doesn't seem there would be any chance for her to get reelected.

Now she gets to pusue what she was using Montana as a platform for all along. And enrich herself even more.

---

Montana???? LOL. And you got three approvals no less.

Forrest is a man of the people. He's deeply in tune with the needs of...whichever backwater state it was that we were talking about.

Aliceinbubbleland said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Montana gets one Rep. in Congress, their Rep. decided to have a national platform, instead of representing the
desires of the state.

Doesn't seem there would be any chance for her to get reelected.

Now she gets to pusue what she was using Montana as a platform for all along. And enrich herself even more.

---

Montana???? LOL. And you got three approvals no less.

---

Cheney lost so bad that she lost in Montana too.. wow!