Drag shows at Libraries
3,083 Views |
56 Replies |
Last: 1 yr ago by BusyTarpDuster2017
Wonder what Lizzie Borden would think?
The passion for grooming kids is terrifying.
Why doesn't this mafia just do it in churches to really try to piss off those groups of people and point out their bigotry being against child grooming?
Democrats. A scourge
Democrats. A scourge
If draq queens are so inspirational, why aren't they giving Ted Talks, speaking to CEOs, giving pregame speeches to sports teams?
Whyis it JUST targeted at kids.....hmmm.
Whyis it JUST targeted at kids.....hmmm.
great point .Jack Bauer said:
If draq queens are so inspirational, why aren't they giving Ted Talks, speaking to CEOs, giving pregame speeches to sports teams?
Whyis it JUST targeted at kids.....hmmm.
Why is this world would a man dressed as and acting like they are a woman want to read to kids in a library in the first place?
Why would a real parents WANT this to go on?
Having their own entertainment with other like minded ADULTS isn't something I would go see, but it's a free country and they are consenting adults, so they can do what they wish, it is their right.
Getting little kids involved is anywhere from flat wrong, to perverted.
Why would a real parents WANT this to go on?
Having their own entertainment with other like minded ADULTS isn't something I would go see, but it's a free country and they are consenting adults, so they can do what they wish, it is their right.
Getting little kids involved is anywhere from flat wrong, to perverted.
And if these people care so much about kids why not read to them in their normal clothes? Why must it be in your grooming gear? If a Two Minnies dancer has a child, does she have to pick up the child in her Two Minnies outfit, or can she wear sweats?
No one can answer why grooming kids is so important to the fieghs?!?
No one can answer why grooming kids is so important to the fieghs?!?
Drag is inherently and explicitly sexual, which is my main issue with kids being involved. But the parents of these kids get the blame.
And the drag queens.Porteroso said:
Drag is inherently and explicitly sexual, which is my main issue with kids being involved. But the parents of these kids get the blame.
OsoCoreyell said:And the drag queens.Porteroso said:
Drag is inherently and explicitly sexual, which is my main issue with kids being involved. But the parents of these kids get the blame.
I don't know about that. Being ridiculous is sort of the whole point. I guess maybe any adult should know better but obviously not.
The obsession with butt pirate rapists is Uber creepy - Waco47 is trying to build a pedophile hall of fame.
This drag queen's response is spot on.
HOW IN THE WORLD do you not blame the drag queens?? If you think it's bad enough that parents should be blamed for allowing their children to be exposed to it, then HOW do you NOT blame the ones who are willfully initiating the exposure?? That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. I swear, you have some of THE stupidest takes on this forum.Porteroso said:OsoCoreyell said:And the drag queens.Porteroso said:
Drag is inherently and explicitly sexual, which is my main issue with kids being involved. But the parents of these kids get the blame.
I don't know about that. Being ridiculous is sort of the whole point. I guess maybe any adult should know better but obviously not.
Ya, its obvious that the goal of the drag queens is to normalize this stuff and groom the kids so they want to get f'd at a young age. The parents are just morons who are sacrifcing the innocence of their children to the rainbow people.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:HOW IN THE WORLD do you not blame the drag queens?? If you think it's bad enough that parents should be blamed for allowing their children to be exposed to it, then HOW do you NOT blame the ones who are willfully initiating the exposure?? That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. I swear, you have some of THE stupidest takes on this forum.Porteroso said:OsoCoreyell said:And the drag queens.Porteroso said:
Drag is inherently and explicitly sexual, which is my main issue with kids being involved. But the parents of these kids get the blame.
I don't know about that. Being ridiculous is sort of the whole point. I guess maybe any adult should know better but obviously not.
I've been trying to figure out the mentality of parents who take their kids to drag readings, drag shows and the such. I don't have an obvious explanation but think it may be related to a form of virtue signaling. In this case it would be virtue signaling by proxy.
Everyone look...there are no bigots in our family!
Everyone look...there are no bigots in our family!
Yes, it is a liberal badge-of-honor to say "we're so enlightened that we accept everyone and any behavior!" They are especially keen to show that they don't care about matters sexual as those are evidence of the hated victorian mindset. This drives them to undertake silly, performative behavior to show their piety. They know this is destructive, but they don't know how to get off of their philosophical train.
We've all seen the same types in church - They practice a very public piety and tend towards more and more extreme behaviors.
We've all seen the same types in church - They practice a very public piety and tend towards more and more extreme behaviors.
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:HOW IN THE WORLD do you not blame the drag queens?? If you think it's bad enough that parents should be blamed for allowing their children to be exposed to it, then HOW do you NOT blame the ones who are willfully initiating the exposure?? That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. I swear, you have some of THE stupidest takes on this forum.Porteroso said:OsoCoreyell said:And the drag queens.Porteroso said:
Drag is inherently and explicitly sexual, which is my main issue with kids being involved. But the parents of these kids get the blame.
I don't know about that. Being ridiculous is sort of the whole point. I guess maybe any adult should know better but obviously not.
You can't blame sexual deviants for all the world's problems, as happy as it would make you. What a great scapegoat for you right-wing zealots. I see why the zealots in the middle east love beheading gays so much.
So, here's your reasoning:Porteroso said:BusyTarpDuster2017 said:HOW IN THE WORLD do you not blame the drag queens?? If you think it's bad enough that parents should be blamed for allowing their children to be exposed to it, then HOW do you NOT blame the ones who are willfully initiating the exposure?? That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. I swear, you have some of THE stupidest takes on this forum.Porteroso said:OsoCoreyell said:And the drag queens.Porteroso said:
Drag is inherently and explicitly sexual, which is my main issue with kids being involved. But the parents of these kids get the blame.
I don't know about that. Being ridiculous is sort of the whole point. I guess maybe any adult should know better but obviously not.
You can't blame sexual deviants for all the world's problems, as happy as it would make you. What a great scapegoat for you right-wing zealots. I see why the zealots in the middle east love beheading gays so much.
- the overtly sexualized display of drag queens makes them inappropriate for children;
- therefore, parents who expose their children to it are to be blamed;
- however, the drag queens who are directly targeting children for exposure should NOT be blamed, because...
..."you can't blame them for all the world's problems" ????
Like you said, the absolute stupidity on this forum...
No one is blaming anyone for the world's problems ... just asking children not be exposed to porn at school or public events.Porteroso said:BusyTarpDuster2017 said:HOW IN THE WORLD do you not blame the drag queens?? If you think it's bad enough that parents should be blamed for allowing their children to be exposed to it, then HOW do you NOT blame the ones who are willfully initiating the exposure?? That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. I swear, you have some of THE stupidest takes on this forum.Porteroso said:OsoCoreyell said:And the drag queens.Porteroso said:
Drag is inherently and explicitly sexual, which is my main issue with kids being involved. But the parents of these kids get the blame.
I don't know about that. Being ridiculous is sort of the whole point. I guess maybe any adult should know better but obviously not.
You can't blame sexual deviants for all the world's problems, as happy as it would make you. What a great scapegoat for you right-wing zealots. I see why the zealots in the middle east love beheading gays so much.
Honestly, I know we use this word a lot, but it is hard to see it as anything other than grooming. There has always been a tendency by those engaged in sexual immorality to try and normalize their deviancy, and what better way than to make little converts by normalizing and saying such behavior is "ok" to children?Forest Bueller_bf said:
Why is this world would a man dressed as and acting like they are a woman want to read to kids in a library in the first place?
Why would a real parents WANT this to go on?
Having their own entertainment with other like minded ADULTS isn't something I would go see, but it's a free country and they are consenting adults, so they can do what they wish, it is their right.
Getting little kids involved is anywhere from flat wrong, to perverted.
Satan is at work here.
Bingo. You nailed it.BearFan33 said:
I've been trying to figure out the mentality of parents who take their kids to drag readings, drag shows and the such. I don't have an obvious explanation but think it may be related to a form of virtue signaling. In this case it would be virtue signaling by proxy.
Everyone look...there are no bigots in our family!
Classic straw man fallacy. Nobody said or even suggested drag queens are responsible for the world problems. You're smart enough to know that's an absurd position.Porteroso said:BusyTarpDuster2017 said:HOW IN THE WORLD do you not blame the drag queens?? If you think it's bad enough that parents should be blamed for allowing their children to be exposed to it, then HOW do you NOT blame the ones who are willfully initiating the exposure?? That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. I swear, you have some of THE stupidest takes on this forum.Porteroso said:OsoCoreyell said:And the drag queens.Porteroso said:
Drag is inherently and explicitly sexual, which is my main issue with kids being involved. But the parents of these kids get the blame.
I don't know about that. Being ridiculous is sort of the whole point. I guess maybe any adult should know better but obviously not.
You can't blame sexual deviants for all the world's problems, as happy as it would make you. What a great scapegoat for you right-wing zealots. I see why the zealots in the middle east love beheading gays so much.
What they said is yes, they can be blamed - at least in party (along with the parents) - for displaying that sexual deviancy to children.
While we can agree that stupid, virtue signaling parents bear the majority of the blame, it would be equally absurd to try and absolve the sexual deviant from responsibility for their willingness to display their deviant conduct in front of children.
Stay out of our bedrooms! We'll bring it to you.
That is because grooming is the absolute correct word. The goal 100% is to normalize sexual deviancy by indoctrinating kids very early. There literally is no other reason to want kids subject to porn other than to normalize and internalize it so the deviants feel normal. They are obsessed with forcing their deviancy on others' children.Mothra said:Honestly, I know we use this word a lot, but it is hard to see it as anything other than grooming. There has always been a tendency by those engaged in sexual immorality to try and normalize their deviancy, and what better way than to make little converts by normalizing and saying such behavior is "ok" to children?Forest Bueller_bf said:
Why is this world would a man dressed as and acting like they are a woman want to read to kids in a library in the first place?
Why would a real parents WANT this to go on?
Having their own entertainment with other like minded ADULTS isn't something I would go see, but it's a free country and they are consenting adults, so they can do what they wish, it is their right.
Getting little kids involved is anywhere from flat wrong, to perverted.
Satan is at work here.
I miss the days when drag queen meant this:
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:So, here's your reasoning:Porteroso said:BusyTarpDuster2017 said:HOW IN THE WORLD do you not blame the drag queens?? If you think it's bad enough that parents should be blamed for allowing their children to be exposed to it, then HOW do you NOT blame the ones who are willfully initiating the exposure?? That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. I swear, you have some of THE stupidest takes on this forum.Porteroso said:OsoCoreyell said:And the drag queens.Porteroso said:
Drag is inherently and explicitly sexual, which is my main issue with kids being involved. But the parents of these kids get the blame.
I don't know about that. Being ridiculous is sort of the whole point. I guess maybe any adult should know better but obviously not.
You can't blame sexual deviants for all the world's problems, as happy as it would make you. What a great scapegoat for you right-wing zealots. I see why the zealots in the middle east love beheading gays so much.
- the overtly sexualized display of drag queens makes them inappropriate for children;
- therefore, parents who expose their children to it are to be blamed;
- however, the drag queens who are directly targeting children for exposure should NOT be blamed, because...
..."you can't blame them for all the world's problems" ????
Like you said, the absolute stupidity on this forum...
Ultimately I hold parents responsible for the events they take their kids to, because I think adults should be free to read stories at libraries. Is personal responsibility not a part of your beliefs?
There have been quite a few intellectually dishonest posters here over the years, and you might be their chairman of the board.Porteroso said:BusyTarpDuster2017 said:So, here's your reasoning:Porteroso said:BusyTarpDuster2017 said:HOW IN THE WORLD do you not blame the drag queens?? If you think it's bad enough that parents should be blamed for allowing their children to be exposed to it, then HOW do you NOT blame the ones who are willfully initiating the exposure?? That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. I swear, you have some of THE stupidest takes on this forum.Porteroso said:OsoCoreyell said:And the drag queens.Porteroso said:
Drag is inherently and explicitly sexual, which is my main issue with kids being involved. But the parents of these kids get the blame.
I don't know about that. Being ridiculous is sort of the whole point. I guess maybe any adult should know better but obviously not.
You can't blame sexual deviants for all the world's problems, as happy as it would make you. What a great scapegoat for you right-wing zealots. I see why the zealots in the middle east love beheading gays so much.
- the overtly sexualized display of drag queens makes them inappropriate for children;
- therefore, parents who expose their children to it are to be blamed;
- however, the drag queens who are directly targeting children for exposure should NOT be blamed, because...
..."you can't blame them for all the world's problems" ????
Like you said, the absolute stupidity on this forum...
Ultimately I hold parents responsible for the events they take their kids to, because I think adults should be free to read stories at libraries. Is personal responsibility not a part of your beliefs?
She/he gets it.Jack Bauer said:
This drag queen's response is spot on.
Yep. Perfectly so.J.R. said:She/he gets it.Jack Bauer said:
This drag queen's response is spot on.
What is dishonest about my argument? I can walk you through the logic behind it if you want me to. Otherwise, show me the dishonesty or just go ahead and shut up, troll.Malbec said:There have been quite a few intellectually dishonest posters here over the years, and you might be their chairman of the board.Porteroso said:Ultimately I hold parents responsible for the events they take their kids to, because I think adults should be free to read stories at libraries. Is personal responsibility not a part of your beliefs?BusyTarpDuster2017 said:So, here's your reasoning:Porteroso said:You can't blame sexual deviants for all the world's problems, as happy as it would make you. What a great scapegoat for you right-wing zealots. I see why the zealots in the middle east love beheading gays so much.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:HOW IN THE WORLD do you not blame the drag queens?? If you think it's bad enough that parents should be blamed for allowing their children to be exposed to it, then HOW do you NOT blame the ones who are willfully initiating the exposure?? That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. I swear, you have some of THE stupidest takes on this forum.Porteroso said:I don't know about that. Being ridiculous is sort of the whole point. I guess maybe any adult should know better but obviously not.OsoCoreyell said:And the drag queens.Porteroso said:
Drag is inherently and explicitly sexual, which is my main issue with kids being involved. But the parents of these kids get the blame.
- the overtly sexualized display of drag queens makes them inappropriate for children;
- therefore, parents who expose their children to it are to be blamed;
- however, the drag queens who are directly targeting children for exposure should NOT be blamed, because...
..."you can't blame them for all the world's problems" ????
Like you said, the absolute stupidity on this forum...
The dishonest part, in my opinion, is when you attempted to frame the discussion as "adults should be free to read stories at libraries".Porteroso said:What is dishonest about my argument? I can walk you through the logic behind it if you want me to. Otherwise, show me the dishonesty or just go ahead and shut up, troll.Malbec said:There have been quite a few intellectually dishonest posters here over the years, and you might be their chairman of the board.Porteroso said:Ultimately I hold parents responsible for the events they take their kids to, because I think adults should be free to read stories at libraries. Is personal responsibility not a part of your beliefs?BusyTarpDuster2017 said:So, here's your reasoning:Porteroso said:You can't blame sexual deviants for all the world's problems, as happy as it would make you. What a great scapegoat for you right-wing zealots. I see why the zealots in the middle east love beheading gays so much.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:HOW IN THE WORLD do you not blame the drag queens?? If you think it's bad enough that parents should be blamed for allowing their children to be exposed to it, then HOW do you NOT blame the ones who are willfully initiating the exposure?? That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. I swear, you have some of THE stupidest takes on this forum.Porteroso said:I don't know about that. Being ridiculous is sort of the whole point. I guess maybe any adult should know better but obviously not.OsoCoreyell said:And the drag queens.Porteroso said:
Drag is inherently and explicitly sexual, which is my main issue with kids being involved. But the parents of these kids get the blame.
- the overtly sexualized display of drag queens makes them inappropriate for children;
- therefore, parents who expose their children to it are to be blamed;
- however, the drag queens who are directly targeting children for exposure should NOT be blamed, because...
..."you can't blame them for all the world's problems" ????
Like you said, the absolute stupidity on this forum...
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?
Consistent with everyone with a brain.Jack Bauer said:
This drag queen's response is spot on.
I actually am afraid for the future ... not because of this particular issue but just how easily people can be led into stupidity.
At the end of the day this topic has been a fruitful one. The basic problems that democrats cannot get around is that there is no reasonable explanation for why a grown man would feel the need to perform as the opposite sex for children. There is also no reasonable explanation for a parent desiring to expose their kids to adult entertainment. These two facts will always destroy any argument made and so upon realizing this our leftist friends are forced to introspect on exactly WHY they would argue for taking kids to trans shows at all. This leads to the epiphany that they truly are choosing their opinions based on political aspirations of power by democrats and not based on facts. If only to be there when they come to this realization...
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?
It's completely honest, and the root issue, so let's explore it. To me there are 3 parties present. The person in drag, the library sponsoring/allowing this story reading, and the parents taking their children to these story readings.Wangchung said:The dishonest part, in my opinion, is when you attempted to frame the discussion as "adults should be free to read stories at libraries".Porteroso said:What is dishonest about my argument? I can walk you through the logic behind it if you want me to. Otherwise, show me the dishonesty or just go ahead and shut up, troll.Malbec said:There have been quite a few intellectually dishonest posters here over the years, and you might be their chairman of the board.Porteroso said:Ultimately I hold parents responsible for the events they take their kids to, because I think adults should be free to read stories at libraries. Is personal responsibility not a part of your beliefs?BusyTarpDuster2017 said:So, here's your reasoning:Porteroso said:You can't blame sexual deviants for all the world's problems, as happy as it would make you. What a great scapegoat for you right-wing zealots. I see why the zealots in the middle east love beheading gays so much.BusyTarpDuster2017 said:HOW IN THE WORLD do you not blame the drag queens?? If you think it's bad enough that parents should be blamed for allowing their children to be exposed to it, then HOW do you NOT blame the ones who are willfully initiating the exposure?? That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. I swear, you have some of THE stupidest takes on this forum.Porteroso said:I don't know about that. Being ridiculous is sort of the whole point. I guess maybe any adult should know better but obviously not.OsoCoreyell said:And the drag queens.Porteroso said:
Drag is inherently and explicitly sexual, which is my main issue with kids being involved. But the parents of these kids get the blame.
- the overtly sexualized display of drag queens makes them inappropriate for children;
- therefore, parents who expose their children to it are to be blamed;
- however, the drag queens who are directly targeting children for exposure should NOT be blamed, because...
..."you can't blame them for all the world's problems" ????
Like you said, the absolute stupidity on this forum...
Assuming it's really just story reading, and not also a drag sermon being presented, what it boils down to is a biological male in traditionally women's clothes/makeup. Most conservatives take issue with this from the getgo, but what is society to do? Should we outlaw males wearing female clothing? To me it's a non-starter, because of my core American value- err on the side of too much freedom, rather than too much government control. So while I think it's weird, and totally don't get it, I also think it's fine for a biological male to wear traditionally female clothing. Period. They can read stories, they can do a drag show, they can walk around the mall, they can go to libraries.
The library I partially take issue with, however in the end if I can't fault the dude in drag, I can't logically fault the library. I do think the library could exercise a little more judgement or discernment. Is there a need to have provocative story readers? They couldn't find story readers that didn't make scandalous national headlines? But ultimately the library did use their own judgement, and decided they wanted this attention.
Now, the parents. Look, kids are going to hear curse words at football games, they are going to see pornographic material on shady websites or their televisions, they are going to be exposed to outright hatred and bigotry at school, and yes they might run into a dude in drag at the library.
No matter your willpower or good intentions, you cannot convince the adults of the world to never curse at football games, not film porn, teach their own kids hatred and bigotry to take to the classroom, or prevent men wearing whatever clothes they want. You can blame all those people for whatever you want, but it's a losing battle to even begin to fight adults doing adult things.
What you can do, is make sure you are rearing your child to discern the true nature of these things, and prevent your child from being excessively exposed to any one of them too young. The last being the operative phrase. It might mean not taking a 5 year old to an NFL game, putting a ridiculous filter on your internet at home, teaching your kids way too early about having to respect all humans regardless of what they look or seem like, or not taking your kid to hear a story from a man in woman's clothes, because that is a box of worms you can't seal back up. I'm all for these things, because ultimately the buck stops right there, at the parent.
Parents are responsible for their kids, totally. I only see 1 problem, and it's young kids being taken to something they are not able to discern and filter for themselves.
In answer, yes, the issue really is kids hearing stories from dudes in drag, at libraries.