2024

640,882 Views | 10581 Replies | Last: 17 min ago by nein51
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Sam Lowry said:

Oldbear83 said:

Give me a break, Sam. Not one of the charges against Trump would have even been brought, except the Democrats coordinated a series of suits and accusations intended to hurt his image and cost him money/energy/time.

Your pathetic defense of such tactics reveals a nasty lack of character, Sam. And yet malignant haters like you actually helped the voters to understand that Trump represented anyone who got in the way of the Machine.

A lot of people voted for Trump despite his ego and hyperbole, precisely because they learned the Left really is evil, and their supporters are everything they accuse MAGA people of being.


So, back to the question of imprisoning "leftist" prosecutors and judges. I assume you think that's evil and malignant too?
Sure, unless they've committed cognizable crimes. I just think it's odd you all the sudden have a problem with it. You didn't seem to have much righteous indignation when it was Republicans being prosecuted.

But now it's a bridge too far for Sam Lowry. LOL.
It's odd that you all of a sudden don't. So now that we're done with the obligatory ad hominems, here's the difference. Trump is a president-elect using the threat of executive power to obstruct a prosecution to which he himself is a party. Are you not even a little bit troubled by that?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Sam Lowry said:

Oldbear83 said:

Give me a break, Sam. Not one of the charges against Trump would have even been brought, except the Democrats coordinated a series of suits and accusations intended to hurt his image and cost him money/energy/time.

Your pathetic defense of such tactics reveals a nasty lack of character, Sam. And yet malignant haters like you actually helped the voters to understand that Trump represented anyone who got in the way of the Machine.

A lot of people voted for Trump despite his ego and hyperbole, precisely because they learned the Left really is evil, and their supporters are everything they accuse MAGA people of being.


So, back to the question of imprisoning "leftist" prosecutors and judges. I assume you think that's evil and malignant too?


Right now Sam, you ought to pay more attention to your own evil and malignant behavior than throwing out another batch of malicious accusations.
I understand why you don't want to answer.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Mothra said:

Sam Lowry said:

Oldbear83 said:

Give me a break, Sam. Not one of the charges against Trump would have even been brought, except the Democrats coordinated a series of suits and accusations intended to hurt his image and cost him money/energy/time.

Your pathetic defense of such tactics reveals a nasty lack of character, Sam. And yet malignant haters like you actually helped the voters to understand that Trump represented anyone who got in the way of the Machine.

A lot of people voted for Trump despite his ego and hyperbole, precisely because they learned the Left really is evil, and their supporters are everything they accuse MAGA people of being.


So, back to the question of imprisoning "leftist" prosecutors and judges. I assume you think that's evil and malignant too?
Sure, unless they've committed cognizable crimes. I just think it's odd you all the sudden have a problem with it. You didn't seem to have much righteous indignation when it was Republicans being prosecuted.

But now it's a bridge too far for Sam Lowry. LOL.
It's odd that you all of a sudden don't. So now that we're done with the obligatory ad hominems, here's the difference. Trump is a president-elect using the threat of executive power to obstruct a prosecution to which he himself is a party. Are you not even a little bit troubled by that?
I am not terribly concerned about hypothetical lawfare by Trump on various Democrat operatives. If he engages in the same kind of conduct that has been employed against him the last 4 years once he takes office, then we can talk.

Until then, your concerns with hypothetical lawfare by Trump and your lack of concerns about actual lawfare by the Dems the last 4 years is duly noted, but no surprise. You always have been one of the biggest hypocrites on this board.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mothra said:

Sam Lowry said:

Oldbear83 said:

Give me a break, Sam. Not one of the charges against Trump would have even been brought, except the Democrats coordinated a series of suits and accusations intended to hurt his image and cost him money/energy/time.

Your pathetic defense of such tactics reveals a nasty lack of character, Sam. And yet malignant haters like you actually helped the voters to understand that Trump represented anyone who got in the way of the Machine.

A lot of people voted for Trump despite his ego and hyperbole, precisely because they learned the Left really is evil, and their supporters are everything they accuse MAGA people of being.


So, back to the question of imprisoning "leftist" prosecutors and judges. I assume you think that's evil and malignant too?
Sure, unless they've committed cognizable crimes. I just think it's odd you all the sudden have a problem with it. You didn't seem to have much righteous indignation when it was Republicans being prosecuted.

But now it's a bridge too far for Sam Lowry. LOL.
It's odd that you all of a sudden don't. So now that we're done with the obligatory ad hominems, here's the difference. Trump is a president-elect using the threat of executive power to obstruct a prosecution to which he himself is a party. Are you not even a little bit troubled by that?
I am not terribly concerned about hypothetical lawfare by Trump on various Democrat operatives. If he engages in the same kind of conduct that has been employed against him the last 4 years once he takes office, then we can talk.

Until then, your concerns with hypothetical lawfare by Trump and your lack of concerns about actual lawfare by the Dems the last 4 years is duly noted, but no surprise. You always have been one of the biggest hypocrites on this board.
And as tiresome as it is to keep doing so, I will set the record straight once again. To see a president or former president prosecuted is always concerning. The Mar-a-Lago case set a terrible precedent, as I said at the time. The problem is that the DOJ would have set at least an equally bad precedent by not acting. Trump didn't give them a choice. You can't really make that argument here. There are no national security interests at stake. This is Trump threatening a prosecutor solely for his own benefit.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Too bad it's an edit and not real.

That none of those morons tried to cut him off 90 times should have been a dead giveaway
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mothra said:

Sam Lowry said:

Oldbear83 said:

Give me a break, Sam. Not one of the charges against Trump would have even been brought, except the Democrats coordinated a series of suits and accusations intended to hurt his image and cost him money/energy/time.

Your pathetic defense of such tactics reveals a nasty lack of character, Sam. And yet malignant haters like you actually helped the voters to understand that Trump represented anyone who got in the way of the Machine.

A lot of people voted for Trump despite his ego and hyperbole, precisely because they learned the Left really is evil, and their supporters are everything they accuse MAGA people of being.


So, back to the question of imprisoning "leftist" prosecutors and judges. I assume you think that's evil and malignant too?
Sure, unless they've committed cognizable crimes. I just think it's odd you all the sudden have a problem with it. You didn't seem to have much righteous indignation when it was Republicans being prosecuted.

But now it's a bridge too far for Sam Lowry. LOL.
It's odd that you all of a sudden don't. So now that we're done with the obligatory ad hominems, here's the difference. Trump is a president-elect using the threat of executive power to obstruct a prosecution to which he himself is a party. Are you not even a little bit troubled by that?


Until then, your concerns with hypothetical lawfare by Trump and your lack of concerns about actual lawfare by the Dems the last 4 years is duly noted, but no surprise. You always have been one of the biggest hypocrites on this board.


Both of you are attorneys .
Both are intelligent individuals.
Both are good reads.

However whereas you post to inform……Sam enjoys provoking a response.

Suspect Sam has a lot of fun in the process.



Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?




Quote:

The Harris campaign and its affiliated committees dropped more than $654 million on advertising from July 22 to Election Day, whereas Trump spent $378 million, or 57% less, in the same category, according to data from AdImpact.

Payroll and the taxes that accompanied it accounted for $56.6 million of the Harris campaign's spending. In comparison, the Trump campaign reported spending $9 million on payroll employing hundreds fewer staff members.

One vendor, Village Marketing Agency, received over $3.9 million and reportedly worked to recruit thousands of social media influencers to boost Harris online. Others that scored lucrative consulting gigs from the campaign included the likes of Precision Strategies, a Democratic-aligned marketing agency; Ethos Organizing, founded by former Ohio Democratic Party director Malik Hubbard; and the Biden-allied SKDK communications firm.
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacques Strap said:




"You voted for deportations"

She makes voting to uphold the law sound bad.

Not to mention of course takes for granted that the Democratic platform was to violate the law and let law breakers stay in the USA

PS

She is a massive fat turd of a person.
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ignore the headline but watch the video

Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

Too bad it's an edit and not real.

That none of those morons tried to cut him off 90 times should have been a dead giveaway

It's still funny!
nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

nein51 said:

Too bad it's an edit and not real.

That none of those morons tried to cut him off 90 times should have been a dead giveaway

It's still funny!

Would be a lot funnier if people would actually speak up in that way
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Every county in Oklahoma and West Virginia voted for Trump




historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Leftists repeatedly demonstrate that thru cannot be trusted with government authority and should be denied power whenever possible:

historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Poetic justice?!!!

historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Joe's revenge was forcing Kamala on them



historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Oldbear83 said:

Sam Lowry said:

Oldbear83 said:

Give me a break, Sam. Not one of the charges against Trump would have even been brought, except the Democrats coordinated a series of suits and accusations intended to hurt his image and cost him money/energy/time.

Your pathetic defense of such tactics reveals a nasty lack of character, Sam. And yet malignant haters like you actually helped the voters to understand that Trump represented anyone who got in the way of the Machine.

A lot of people voted for Trump despite his ego and hyperbole, precisely because they learned the Left really is evil, and their supporters are everything they accuse MAGA people of being.


So, back to the question of imprisoning "leftist" prosecutors and judges. I assume you think that's evil and malignant too?


Right now Sam, you ought to pay more attention to your own evil and malignant behavior than throwing out another batch of malicious accusations.
I can't stand losing to someone who would return us to accountable government.
Corrected for accuracy
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Sam Lowry said:

Oldbear83 said:

Sam Lowry said:

Oldbear83 said:

Give me a break, Sam. Not one of the charges against Trump would have even been brought, except the Democrats coordinated a series of suits and accusations intended to hurt his image and cost him money/energy/time.

Your pathetic defense of such tactics reveals a nasty lack of character, Sam. And yet malignant haters like you actually helped the voters to understand that Trump represented anyone who got in the way of the Machine.

A lot of people voted for Trump despite his ego and hyperbole, precisely because they learned the Left really is evil, and their supporters are everything they accuse MAGA people of being.


So, back to the question of imprisoning "leftist" prosecutors and judges. I assume you think that's evil and malignant too?


Right now Sam, you ought to pay more attention to your own evil and malignant behavior than throwing out another batch of malicious accusations.
I can't stand losing to someone who would return us to accountable government.
Corrected for accuracy
Meh.
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacques Strap said:




They all astroturf. Just like all the unqualified DEI promotions of special people most y'all work around every day. It has consequences. It's being corrected.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
First Page Last Page
Page 292 of 303
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.