Redbrickbear said:
whiterock said:
Cobretti said:
boognish_bear said:
One of my Palestinian friends in Khartoum told me back in 1994 that "everybody" (Arabs) knew that American policy in the Middle East would not change until muslims outnumbered Jews, which would eventually happen.
And here we are.....
So one group of insular ethno-centric semites ran our foreign policy and now another one is…great just great
Some one might ask why these foreign ethnic groups have so much control of our foreign policy and when is the USA going to look out for its own citizens
you are half-correct. The Arab part.
The Jewish part is mostly ahistorical. Zionism as policy started with the Balfour Declaration, the first three words of which are "His Majesty's Government." It accelerated throughout Post-WWII Europe as a remedy to forestall future horrors. To to portray the modern Israeli state as evidence of Jewish highjacking of Western foreign policy establishments is crackpot theory.
Selecting powerful minorities as allies abroad is wise. They can be the most reliable of allies, out of dire need. The Democrat predilection with Iran is wildly misguided in timing, but totally rational in theory - making an ally of a Shiite state surrounded by Sunni states would be ideal, if only the Iranians could get past the great Satan BS.
Our alliance with Israel his highly beneficial to us.