2024

249,745 Views | 5223 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by Whiskey Pete
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

There are no Dem moderates because they were purged by Nancy Pelosi. The fascists are completely intolerant of anyone who disagrees with them on anything, even in their own party.
It is not just a Dem thing. There are few GOP moderates left. Both Parties moderates are the Independents.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There are a significant number of moderates in Congress. They are often called neoconservatives & other labels but they are more willing to compromise on core "conservative" values which is why they are often labeled RINO's. That's why the fascists so often get their way on major congressional votes while the GOP rarely does. There are other reasons, naturally, but this is a big part of it.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

There are a significant number of moderates in Congress. They are often called neoconservatives & other labels but they are more willing to compromise on core "conservative" values which is why they are often labeled RINO's. That's why the fascists so often get their way on major congressional votes while the GOP rarely does. There are other reasons, naturally, but this is a big part of it.
When you look at the electorate, the number of extreme GOP voters have increased, but the other percentages stay fairly consistent.

One interesting facts is the number of extreme Dems, make we wonder if their believes are closer to the mainstream Dem?

Changing demographics of US voters and Republican, Democratic coalitions, 1996-2023 | Pew Research Center
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Somewhat misleading when some of them vote 2+ times each election, when you include all the dead voters, & when 10+ million illegals are voting. That's just the new illegals Joe Biden invited into the US for that very purpose, not the millions that came earlier.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Somewhat misleading when some of them vote 2+ times each election, when you include all the dead voters, & when 10+ million illegals are voting. That's just the new illegals Joe Biden invited into the US for that very purpose, not the millions that came earlier.
Now come on. Let's keep it to court provable information. Not that I disagree, just can't change it when the courts wouldn't listen.

Have to go with what is. Not what we suspect.

Let's hope that the GOP has the rulesin place and the election watchers in place. No more Atlanta's and Detroit's. If the GOP doesn't have attorneys in place and judges ready to issue it is on them.
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oversight committee turned into the Jerry Springer show

historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Funny in a way but really more buffoonish
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Funny in a way but really more buffoonish


But not a good as this:
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's difficult to top Babylon Bee!
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

Oversight committee turned into the Jerry Springer show


This is just SO emabarrising by both of these idiots. Maggie is certifiable Cray-cray. Who in the world respects her or demeanor , must less dumb policies? Let's here is from the S360 squad.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:


Clarence Thomas is younger than George W.

And both presidential candidates are younger than Nancy Pelosi.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




But are Rumsfeld and Cheney?
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whiskey Pete said:

boognish_bear said:


And both presidential candidates are younger than Nancy Pelosi.
but neither are drunker
“Mix a little foolishness with your serious plans. It is lovely to be silly at the right moment.”

–Horace


“Insomnia sharpens your math skills because you spend all night calculating how much sleep you’ll get if you’re able to ‘fall asleep right now.’ “
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:


This is totally dependent on which party controls the senate. No way the dems confirm Paxton as AG.
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

boognish_bear said:


This is totally dependent on which party controls the senate. No way the dems confirm Paxton as AG.
Paxton is a big NO for me. Too much baggage. Extremely corrupt politician who kept his job because of fear. He would be just a new addition to The Swamp!
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"

-- Barack Obama
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

GrowlTowel said:

boognish_bear said:


This is totally dependent on which party controls the senate. No way the dems confirm Paxton as AG.
Paxton is a big NO for me. Too much baggage. Extremely corrupt politician who kept his job because of fear. He would be just a new addition to The Swamp!
I am not endorsing him, just pointing out that he would never clear a majority if the Dems are in control.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Actually, Paxton and ***** chaser would make a great team to continue the con. Paxton is bad, bad.
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

GrowlTowel said:

boognish_bear said:


This is totally dependent on which party controls the senate. No way the dems confirm Paxton as AG.
Paxton is a big NO for me. Too much baggage. Extremely corrupt politician who kept his job because of fear. He would be just a new addition to The Swamp!
I have to agree, Paxton should be a HUGE no. Might as well pick Michael Cohen for AG, if that's the case
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

GrowlTowel said:

boognish_bear said:


This is totally dependent on which party controls the senate. No way the dems confirm Paxton as AG.
Paxton is a big NO for me. Too much baggage. Extremely corrupt politician who kept his job because of fear. He would be just a new addition to The Swamp!
I am curious, who wouldn't be an addition to the Swamp?
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

Actually, Paxton and ***** chaser would make a great team to continue the con. Paxton is bad, bad.


Paxton as AG will finish off what is left of your brain.

I support it just to see the final meltdown.
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

GrowlTowel said:

boognish_bear said:


This is totally dependent on which party controls the senate. No way the dems confirm Paxton as AG.
Paxton is a big NO for me. Too much baggage. Extremely corrupt politician who kept his job because of fear. He would be just a new addition to The Swamp!
I am curious, who wouldn't be an addition to the Swamp?
Most excellent question, FLBear! Although I have not always been, I am a huge Ted Cruz fan. Would rather see him on the Supreme Court than Attorney General.
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"

-- Barack Obama
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

FLBear5630 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

GrowlTowel said:

boognish_bear said:


This is totally dependent on which party controls the senate. No way the dems confirm Paxton as AG.
Paxton is a big NO for me. Too much baggage. Extremely corrupt politician who kept his job because of fear. He would be just a new addition to The Swamp!
I am curious, who wouldn't be an addition to the Swamp?
Most excellent question, FLBear! Although I have not always been, I am a huge Ted Cruz fan. Would rather see him on the Supreme Court than Attorney General.


I agree with you. I want DeSantis as AG...


So-crates. "The only true wisdom consists in knowing that you know nothing."


Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

Oversight committee turned into the Jerry Springer show


She's not wrong about MTG. "Bleached blonde bad butch body" about sums it up. And a horse face to boot.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:


This guy is such a buffoon. Has been for years.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

Actually, Paxton and ***** chaser would make a great team to continue the con. Paxton is bad, bad.
Since you claim to be a Repub but your ire always seems to be directed at Repubs, curious as to who you will be voting for in 2024.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Jack Bauer said:


This guy is such a buffoon. Has been for years.


90 billion for Ukraine but Americans have tk wait in line to vote. Or maybe the system is being designed to discourage in person voting.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
First Page Last Page
Page 138 of 150
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.